1. VISUALATTENTION: Control, Representation, and Time Course Howard E. Egeth and Steven Yantis Department of Psychology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
2. 1. Attentional control Top-down control (goal-directed) Bottom-up control (stimulus-driven) 2. Representational basis for visual selection. 3. Time course of attention.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15. STIMULUS-DRIVEN & GOAL-DIRECTED CONTROL OF ATTENTION Yantis & Jonides (1984) Abrupt Visual Onsets & Attentional Capture The target happened to be the onset letter The target was one of the no-onset letters < Reaction time
75. Egly et al (1994) Conclusion: RTs in the same-object condition were faster than in the different-object condition.
76. Kahneman et al (1992) S P 500ms 1s ? 590ms Conclusion: naming latencies were much slower for no-match trials than for the other conditions; RTs were significantly faster for the same object condition than for the different object condition . S V S
77. Tipper et al (1991) 180° target Conclusion: RT was slower when the target appeared within the previously cued object, which suggested that IOR is object-based under these conditions . Cued box Cued box