3. Why it does?
Ruby EG, McFall-Ngai MJ. 1992. A squid that glows in the night: development of an animal-bacterial mutualism. J. Bacteriol.
174:4865–70
4. How it does?
• Symbiotic relationship with
Vibrio fischeri
• Light organ of the squid
• Bio-luminescence
Bassler BL, Losick R (2006) Bacterially speaking. Cell 125(2):237–246.
5. Quorum sensing
• Cell-cell communication
mechanism
• Density dependent
• Produces signaling
molecules
• Alteration in gene
expression- Group
behavior
5
8. Why it is important to us?
• Understand the pathogenicity of a bacterial species
• A potential target for targeting bacteria against
traditional antibiotic
• Understand the symbiosis of bacteria with human body
• Produce “Pro-quorum sensing” molecules- Enhance the
symbiosis
9. Category-1
• “Me” - Intraspecies
Signal 1 Signal 2
“You” - Interspecies
Miller MB, Bassler BL. Quorum sensing in bacteria. Ann Rev Microbiol 2001; 55:165-99
11. Chemical language
• Intra Species-
Gram Negative
• Acyl Homoserine
Lactone
• Inter Species- The Universal
• Auto Inducer peptide- 2
• Intra Species-
Gram Positive
• Auto Inducer
Peptide -1
Miller MB, Bassler BL. Quorum sensing in bacteria. Ann Rev Microbiol 2001; 55:165-99
14. Quorum quenching- Making
bacteria deaf and dumb
• Inhibition of quorum
sensing process
• Surgical Removal of
pathogenesis
• Do not threaten bacteria
with life-or-death
situations
• Less likely to yield resistant
phenotype
Ashima K. et al. Bacterial Quorum Sensing Inhibitors: Attractive Alternatives for Control of Infectious Pathogens Showing Multiple Drug
Resistance. Recent Patents on Anti-Infective Drug Discovery, 2013, 8, 68-83
15. Low molecular
mass
Highly Specific
Non-toxic to
host
Non-interfering
to basal
bacterial
metabolism
Chemically
Stable
Requisites for a qs
quencher
Ashima K. et al. Bacterial Quorum Sensing Inhibitors: Attractive Alternatives for Control of Infectious Pathogens Showing Multiple Drug
Resistance. Recent Patents on Anti-Infective Drug Discovery, 2013, 8, 68-83
17. Synergistic Effect Of A Quorum Sensing
Blocker And Antibiotics To Control The Oral
Adhesion Of Streptococcus Mutans
Project member
Sahana V
Under supervision of
Dr. S. Adline Princy
Associate Professor,
Quorum Sensing Laboratory,
SASTRA Hub for Research and Innovation (SHRI),
SASTRA University.
17
18. • Data: Influence of time of ethanolic bark extract of M.dubia on cell growth and
microbial adhesion at the concentration of 20μg/mL
• Result: Maximum inhibition is recorded in the adherent phase(12 and 18
hours)
Specific aim 1
To understand the influence of time and varying concentration of ethanolic
bark extract of Melia dubia on cell growth and biofilm inhibition.
19. • Data: Assessment of synergistic activity of the ethanolic bark extracts
(20μg/mL) and antibiotics [gentamycin and penicillin] on biofilm inhibition
• Result: Synergistic effect is positive in the case of penicillin
Specific aim 2
To understand the influence of time and varying concentration of ethanolic
bark extract of Melia dubia on the combinatorial action with antibiotics.
20. concerns
• Assumption 1:
• Quorum-sensing systems are actively utilized during infection and
are important for virulence.
• Assumption 2:
• QS is not essential for bacterial growth, inhibition of QS should not
exert selective pressure on the bacteria to develop resistance.
• Assumption 3:
• QS is a good therapeutic target is that the species specificity of
most QS systems should reduce the issues of broad-spectrum activity
and off-target effects traditionally associated with antibiotic
treatment.
1. Smith EE, et al. 2006. Genetic adaptation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa to the airways of cystic fibrosis patients. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103:8487– 8492.
2. Schuster M et al. 2003. Identification, timing, and signal specificity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum controlled genes: a
transcriptome analysis. J. Bacteriol. 185:2066-2079
3. Chugani S, et al. 2012. Strain-dependent diversity in the Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-sensing regulon. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. U. S. A. 109:E2823–2831.
21. Success stories
• 1524 patents filed- QS Inhibitors.1
• Treatment of cholera infection was successful.2
• Enzymatic quorum quenching in treatment of plant
and pathogens.3
• Co-administering inhibitory synthetic AIPs along with
S. aureus bacteria, staphylococcal lesion formation in
the skin of mice was reduced or prevented.4
/15
1. Ashima K. et al. Bacterial Quorum Sensing Inhibitors: Attractive Alternatives for Control of Infectious Pathogens Showing Multiple
Drug Resistance. Recent Patents on Anti-Infective Drug Discovery, 2013, 8, 68-83
2. Duan F, March JC. 2010. Engineered bacterial communication prevents Vibrio cholerae virulence in an infant mouse model. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107:11260 –11264.
3. Vanjildorj E,. 2009. Enhancement of tolerance to soft rot disease in the transgenic Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp.
pekinensis) inbred line, Kenshin. Plant Cell Rep. 28:1581–1591.
4. Mayville P,et al. 1999. Structure-activity analysis of synthetic autoinducing thiolactone peptides from Staphylococcus aureus
responsible for virulence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96:1218 –1223.
22. Bonnie L. Bassler
Howard Hughes Medical Institute Investigator
Squibb Professor in Molecular Biology
Professor and Chair of Molecular Biology
Princeton University.
