Secker Understanding the role of technology through the lens of openness
1. UNDERSTANDING
THE ROLE OF
TECHNOLOGY IN
ACADEMIC
PRACTICE THROUGH
A LENS OF
OPENNESSDR JANE SECKER, CITY, UNIVERSITY OF LONDON
INTED CONFERENCE, VALENCIA
2ND-4TH MARCH 2020
3. DEFINITION: OPEN EDUCATIONAL
PRACTICES
“teaching and research practices that
espouse openness including activities
such as open teaching, the production
and dissemination of open educational
resources, publishing in open access
journals, keeping a professional blog, and
sharing of research data in online
venues.”
~ Assumptions and Challenges of Open Scholarship
by George Veletsianos and Royce Kimmons (2012)
4. DEFINITION: COPYRIGHT
LITERACY
“acquiring and demonstrating the
appropriate knowledge, skills and
behaviours to enable the ethical creation
and use of copyright material.”
Secker and Morrison, 2016, p.211
5. WHY DOES IT MATTER?
Teaching in a networked environment
Rise of digital scholarship
Teaching excellence and reputation
Openness and equity in education
Cost and commodification of education
6. EDM122: DIGITAL
LITERACIES AND OPEN
PRACTICE AT CITY
Background and overview
• Part of MA in Academic Practice at
City (15 credits) launched in October
2018
• Informed by module: Open
Knowledge in HE at University of
Manchester (part of their PGCAP)
• Built on experience of teaching
Copyright Literacy and Open
Practice teaching at the Universidad
de la Republica Uruguay in August
2018
7. COURSE STRUCTURE
3 teaching days
• Day 1: definitions and terminology
• Day 2: The digital scholar and open
practices
• Day 3: Embedding digital literacies
and open practice
6 (open) webinars in Adobe Connect
2 assessments
• Video + 500 word reflection
• Reflective essay (2500 words) on an
aspect of digital literacy / openness
on their academic practice
11. FEEDBACK FROM THE FIRST
COHORT
Jane had made the module
interesting and relevant to my
teaching. The design of the course
enables good discussion to take
place in the group
This has the potential to be a
dry topic, but Jane’s approach
to teaching has made it my
favourite module on the
programme so far
Opportunities to hear from a
range of specialists outside City
University of London via the
Adobe Connect series.
Jane is passionate about the
topic, fun and interactive. The
board game was educational and
fun
A little more supplementary guidance
on Moodle about how to use media
space (video uploads).
Expectations around the video
assignment could have been
clearer.
12. RESEARCH OVERVIEW
Explored staff attitudes and experiences of digital literacies
and open practice and implications for their teaching
6 Semi-structured interviews undertaken in summer 2019.
Transcribed and analysed with Nvivo
Using phenomenography to understand the variation in
experiences
Interesting findings emerging on staff motivations,
challenges and role of staff development
13. KEY FINDINGS
Motivations to
be open
Understanding
terminology
Staff
confidence in
digital literacies
Attitudes
towards
students
Using
educational
technologies
Training and
support
14. DEFINITIONS AND
UNDERSTANDING (2)
Open Practice is ……
• Being inclusive
• Linked to expanding / widening access to higher
education
• Sharing your research outputs openly
• Sharing your teaching materials openly
• Distance or online learning (related to MOOCs)
• Using open source software or practicing open
science
• Fundamentally linked to digital literacies
15. MOTIVATIONS AND BARRIERS
TOWARDS OPENNESS
Motivations
• Building a community of practice / sharing good practice
• Sharing research practices, tools or instruments
• Linked to inclusivity and social justice
• Maturity and seniority in discipline
Barriers
• Concern about copyright issues – sharing is stealing?
• Concern about ethics / confidentiality
• Disciplinary practices or traditions
• No clear institutional policy or leadership
16. TRAINING AND SUPPORT
Participants said:
• Formal teaching (MA in Academic Practice) was
valuable
• Learning Technologists provided ongoing support
• Peer mentors and digital champions provided
informal support
• They peer mentored others as they became more
confident
• There wasn’t enough support and training in their
context or department
• Overall found it challenging because they were time
poor
17. CONCLUSIONS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
• Considerable variation in experience amongst academic
staff depending on
• Seniority or level of experience
• Academic discipline
• Disciplinary traditions remain strong
• Awareness of concepts such as open access can often be
influenced by senior colleagues
• There is relatively little evidence of use of open
educational resources or an understanding of the nuances
of copyright and licensing (see Cronin, 2017)
18. Dr Jane Secker Jane.Secker@city.ac.uk @jsecker #CityDLOP
ANY QUESTIONS?
20. REFERENCES
Akerlind, G.S. “Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods,”
Higher Education Research and Development, Volume 24 no. 4, 321-334, 2005.
Cronin, C. “Openness and praxis: Exploring the use of open educational practices in
higher education,” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed
Learning, Volume 18, no. 5, 2017.
Morrison, C & Secker, J. “Understanding librarians’ experiences of copyright: findings
from a phenomenographic study of UK information professionals.” Library
Management, Volume 38 no. 6/7, 2017.
Secker, J. and Morrison, C. Copyright and E-learning: a guide for practitioners. London:
Facet Publishing, 2016. Second Edition.
Secker J. Copyright and E-learning: a guide for practitioners. London: Facet Publishing,
2010.
University of Manchester. ‘Open Knowledge in Higher Education’. 2018. Retrieved from
URL: https://medium.com/open-knowledge-in-he/about
Walker, R., Jenkins, M. & Voce, J The rhetoric and reality of technology-enhanced
learning developments in UK higher education: reflections on recent UCISA research
findings (2012–2016), Interactive Learning Environments, 2017.
Weller, M. The Digital Scholar: How Technology Is Transforming Scholarly Practice.
London: Bloomsbury Academic. 2011. Retrieved from URL:
https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/book/the-digital-scholar-how-technology-is-
transforming-scholarly-practice/
White, D. S., & Le Cornu, A. “Visitors and Residents: A new typology for online
engagement,” First Monday, Volume 16, no 9, 2011.
Editor's Notes
Define and articulate open practice and copyright literacy and their relevance to academic development
Discuss the benefits and challenges of introducing open practices and copyright literacy into your institution
Explore the role that policy and strategy play in helping academic staff understand these issues, and compare this to the approach of introducing a formal accredited module.
Considering how open practices and copyright literacy might fit in their own institution and plan next steps.
Use definition from Catherine Cronin
Teaching in a networked environment brings opportunities and threats. It involves navigating new risks which include legal challenge.
Digital scholarship (Martin Weller) is here and involves developing new literacies (plug for Jane’s other session)
Institutions want to be seen to be doing excellent teaching which means sharing what they’re doing as well as marking out some kind of comparative advantage in what they do.
Openness in education provides an opportunity to make the world a fairer and better place. This is in line with established academic values.
But the cost of education creates certain tensions. Digital provides the option for reducing costs and academics can work together to do this. But the commodification of the educational experience suggests exclusivity which works against the idea of openly sharing outputs. Copyright law, which is largely driven by commercial interests does not always sit happily with academic culture.
Digital, information, media literacies – frameworks and models
Digital natives – visitors and residents
Reviewing our own digital capabilities
The Martin Weller book
Making videos
Embedding it using the Jisc tools and those from the OU
Playing the publishing trap game =
Jane to edit
The overall aim of this project is to answer the following questions:
What is the experience of staff who use educational technologies and how do their attitudes towards digital literacies and open practices impact on their teaching?
How are staff currently supported to develop a good understanding of these literacies and practices as part of these two modules which form part of the MA in Academic Practice at City, University of London and what additional support might they need?
To achieve the above aim, the project will specifically examine the following sub-questions:
How do staff define terms such as digital literacies and open practice?
What support do they need to develop their own (and their students) digital literacies and what is the role of EDM122 and the EDM116 module in supporting them?
What attitudes do they have towards the concept of ‘openness’ in their teaching?
Do they share their teaching or research materials openly and how do they make decisions about re-using others and licensing their own work?
What changes might they have made to their teaching or research practices since completing the two modules and how is this impacting on their students or beyond?