Slides form the tutorial on the ResourceSync Framework presented at Open Repositories 2013 in Charlottetown, PEI on 8 July 2013. The latest set of ResourceSync tutorial slides are available at http://www.slideshare.net/OpenArchivesInitiative/resourcesync-tutorial
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
ResourceSync Tutorial from Open Repositories 2013
1. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
ResourceSync:
A Web-Based
Resource Synchronization
Framework
ResourceSync is funded by
The Sloan Foundation & JISC
#resourcesync
1
2. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
ResourceSync Tutorial History
Simeon Warner
Cornell University
simeon.warner@cornell.edu
@zimeon
• First outing: OAI8, Geneva, Switzerland, June 2013
• Second run: Open Repositories, here and now
• Most recent version of these tutorial slides is available at:
http://www.slideshare.net/OpenArchivesInitiative/resourcesync-tutorial
Presenter
3. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Martin Klein
Los Alamos National Laboratory
<martinklein0815@gmail.com>
@mart1nkle1n
ResourceSync Tutorial Contributors
3
Simeon Warner
Cornell University
simeon.warner@cornell.edu
@zimeon
Herbert Van de Sompel
Los Alamos National Laboratory
<hvdsomp@gmail.com>
@hvdsomp
Robert Sanderson
Los Alamos National Laboratory
<azaroth24@gmail.com>
@azaroth24
Richard Jones
Cottage Labs
<richard@cottagelabs.com>
@cottagelabs
4. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
ResourceSync
Core Team
4
OAI
Herbert Van de Sompel
Martin Klein
Robert Sanderson
(Los Alamos National Laboratory)
Simeon Warner
(Cornell University)
Berhard Haslhofer
(University of Vienna)
Michael L. Nelson
(Old Dominion University)
Carl Lagoze
(University of Michigan)
NISO
Todd Carpenter
Nettie Lagace
Lyrasis
Peter Murray
5. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
ResourceSync Technical Group
5
JISC
Richard Jones
Graham Klyne
Stuart Lewis
OCLC
Jeff Young
LOCKSS
David Rosenthal
RedHat
Christian Sadilek
Ex Libris Inc.
Shlomo Sanders
Library of Congress
Kevin Ford
6. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
ResourceSync - Agenda
1. ResourceSync: Problem Perspective & Conceptual
Approach
2. Motivation & Use Cases
3. Framework Walkthrough
4. Framework (Technical) Details
5. Implementation
6. Q&A
6
7. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
ResourceSync - Agenda
1. ResourceSync: Problem Perspective & Conceptual
Approach
7
8. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Synchronize What?
• Web resources
o things with a URI that can be dereferenced
• Focus on needs of research communication and cultural heritage
organizations
o but aim for generality
8
9. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Synchronize What?
• Small websites/repositories (a few resources) to large
repositories/datasets/linked data collections (many millions of
resources)
9
sync
sync
10. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Synchronize What?
10
• Low change frequency (weeks/months) to high change
frequency (seconds)
sync
sync
sync
11. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Synchronize What?
11
• Synchronization latency and accuracy needs may vary
sync
Sync ???
12. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Why?
… because lots of projects and services are doing synchronization
but have to resort to ad-hoc, case by case, approaches!
• Project team involved with projects that need this
• Experience with OAI-PMH: widely used in repos but
o XML metadata only
o Attempts at synchronizing actual content via OAI-PMH
(complex object formats, dc:identifier) not successful.
o Web technology has moved on since 1999
• Devise a shared solution for data, metadata, linked data?
12
13. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
ResourceSync Problem
13
• Consideration:
• Source (server) A has resources that change over time: they
get created, modified, deleted
• Destination (servers) X, Y, and Z leverage (some)
resources of Source A.
• Problem:
• Destinations want to keep in step with the resource changes
at Source A: resource synchronization.
• Goal:
• Design an approach for resource synchronization aligned
with the Web Architecture that has a fair chance of adoption
by different communities.
• The approach must scale better than recurrent HTTP
HEAD/GET on resources.
14. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Source: Four Core
Synchronization Capabilities
1. Describing content – publish a list of resources available for
synchronization to enable Destinations to perform an initial load
or catch-up with a Source
2. Packaging content – bundle resources to enable bulk download
for destinations
3. Describing changes – publish a list of resource changes to
enable destinations to stay synchronized and decrease latency
4. Packaging changes – bundle resource changes for bulk
download for destinations
14
15. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Source: Synchronization Features
5. Linking to related resources – provide links from to be
synchronized resources to related resources
applicable to all core capabilities (1..4)
6. Access to historical data – provide archives of 1..4
7. Discovery of capabilities – support Destinations in discovering
all offered capabilities 1..4
15
16. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Destination: Synchronization Needs
1. Baseline synchronization – A destination must be able to
perform an initial load or catch-up with a source
- avoid out-of-band setup
2. Incremental synchronization – A destination must have some
way to keep up-to-date with changes at a source
- subject to some latency; minimal: create/update/delete
- allow to catch-up after destination has been offline
3. Audit – A destination should be able to determine whether it is
synchronized with a source
- subject to some latency
16
17. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
ResourceSync - Agenda
2. Motivation & Use Cases
17
22. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Use Case 1: arXiv Mirroring and Data Sharing
• Repository of scholarly articles in physics,
mathematics, computer science, etc.
• > 850k articles
• approx. 1.5 revisions per article on
average
• approx. 75k new articles per year
• Each article has full-text and separate
metadata record
• approx. 3.8M resources
22
23. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Use Case 1: arXiv Mirroring and Data Sharing
• 2,700 updates daily
o at 8pm EST
o Currently using homebrew mirroring
solution (running with minor
modifications since 1994!)
o occasional rsync (file system-specific,
auth issues)
23
24. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Mirroring arXiv: 1994 - 2013
• Operated since the very early days of the
Web!
1. HTTP trigger from the main site
2. HTTP pull update specific to mirror
site
3. HTTP download of the resources
4. HTTP trigger to main site when mirror
process complete
5. HTTP verification (via HEAD) by the
main site which updates the update
list specific to mirror site
6. periodic repeat as long as there are
updates in the inventory for that
mirror
• Requires trusted set of servers operating
with the same internal organization
• Does not support synchronization check
(so rsync is used periodically)
24
25. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Use Case 1: arXiv
Mirroring
• GOAL: Keep mirror sites synchronized with daily
changes
• WANT:
o high consistency
o moderate latency
o robustness to global network outages (low admin effort)
o ability to verify sync status in case of questions
25
26. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Use Case 1: arXiv
Data Sharing
• GOAL: Make resources and update information
publicly available so that any other service may
synchronize at the frequency it needs, e.g.
o Math Front at UC Davis
o EprintWeb from IOP in UK
o Data for bibliometric and scientometric analysis
• WANT:
o low admin effort (i.e. standard approach, standard tools)
o reasonable consistency, latency, efficiency
26
27. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Use Case 2: DBpedia Live Duplication
• Average of 2 updates per second
• Low latency desirable => need for a push technology
27
28. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Use Case 2: DBpedia Live Duplication
• Initial experiment with distributed infrastructure
28
29. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Use Case 2: DBpedia Live Duplication
• Daily traffic:
o 99% updates
o 0.6% deletions
o 0.03% creations
29
30. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Use Case 2: DBpedia Live Duplication
• # of content transfer
events in two 8 hour
intervals
• Max, queue size of
remote duplication
process
30
31. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
ResourceSync - Agenda
3. Framework Walkthrough
31
32. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Source Capability 1: Describing Content
In order to advertise the resources that a source wants destinations
to know about, it may describe them:
o Publish a Resource List, a list of resource URIs and possibly
associated metadata
- Destination GETs the Content Description
- Destination GETs listed resources by their URI
o Describes state of set of resources at one point in time
(snapshot)
32
35. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Source Capability 2: Packaging Content
By default, content is transferred in response to a GET issued by a
destination against a URI of a source’s resource. But a source may
support additional mechanisms:
o Publish a Resource Dump, a document that points to
packages of resource representations and necessary
metadata
- Destination GETs the package
- Destination unpacks the package
- ZIP format supported
o Packages set of resources at one point in time (snapshot)
35
39. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Source Capability 3: Describing Changes
In order to achieve lower latency and/or greater efficiency, a source
may communicate about changes to its resources:
o Publish a Change List, a list of recent change events
(created, updated, deleted resource)
- Destination acts upon change events, e.g. GETs
created/updated resources, removes deleted resources.
o Describes changes to resources that occurred in a temporal
interval with a start- and an end-date
39
44. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Source Capability 4: Packaging Changes
In order to reduce the number of requests to obtain resource
changes, a source may provide packaged bitstreams for changed
resources:
o Publish a Change Dump, a document that points to
packages of recently changed resource representations and
necessary metadata
- Destination GETs the package
- Destination unpacks the package
- ZIP format supported
o Packages resources that changed in a temporal interval with
a start- and an end-date
44
57. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
A Framework Based on Sitemaps
• Modular framework allowing selective deployment
• Sitemap is the core format throughout the framework
o Introduce extension elements and attributes:
- In ResourceSync namespace (rs:) to
accommodate synchronization needs
o Reuse Sitemap format for all capability documents:
Resource List, Resource Dump, Change List,
Change Dump, as well as for manifest in Dumps
o Utilize Sitemap index format where
needed/allowed
57
58. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Sitemap Format
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9”>
<url>
<loc>http://example.com/res1</loc>
<lastmod>2013-01-02T13:00:00Z</lastmod>
</url>
<url>
<loc>http://example.com/res2</loc>
<lastmod>2013-01-02T14:00:00Z</lastmod>
</url>
…
</urlset>
58
59. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Sitemap Index Format
<sitemapindex xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9”>
<sitemap>
<loc>http://example.com/sitemap1.xml</loc>
<lastmod>2013-01-02T13:00:00Z</lastmod>
</sitemap>
<sitemap>
<loc>http://example.com/sitemap2.xml</loc>
<lastmod>2013-01-02T14:00:00Z</lastmod>
</sitemap>
…
</sitemapindex>
59
65. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Resource List
• Describe Source’s resources that are subject to synchronization
• At one point in time (snapshot)
• Typical Destination use: Baseline Synchronization, Audit
• Each URI typically listed only once
• Might be expensive to generate
• Destinations use @from to determine freshness
• Issue GETs against URIs to obtain resources
• Very similar to current Sitemaps
65
66. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
What if I have a million resources?
• Current sitemap limit is 50k resources (or maximum document
size of 50MB)
• Break complete list of resources into 50k-resource chunks, each
on a Resource List document
• Create a Resource List Index document to group them:
o Based on <sitemapindex>
o May have up to 50k component Resource Lists
o Extends capacity to 2,500,000,000 resources within current
community practices
67. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Resource List Index <resourcelist_index.xml>
<sitemapindex xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
xmlns:rs="http://www.openarchives.org/rs/terms/">
<rs:md capability=”resourcelist"
from="2013-01-02T09:00:02Z”/>
<sitemap>
<loc>http://example.com/resourcelist1.xml</loc>
<lastmod>2013-01-02T11:00:00Z</lastmod>
<rs:md type="application/xml"/>
</sitemap>
<sitemap>
<loc>http://example.com/resourcelist2.xml</loc>
<lastmod>2013-01-02T11:00:01Z</lastmod>
<rs:md type="application/xml"/>
</sitemap>
</urlset>
67
72. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Resource Dump
• Package Source’s resourcesthat are subject to synchronization
• At one point in time (snapshot)
• Points to ZIP packages
• Mandatory, even for only one ZIP
• ZIP package contains manifest, listing contained bitstreams
• Typical Destination use: Baseline Synchronization, bulk
download
• Each URI typically listed only once
• Might be expensive to generate
• Destinations use @from to determine freshness
• GETs against individual URIs from Resource List achieves the
same result (ignoring varying freshness)
72
75. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Change List
• Describe Source’s resource changes
• Occurring during temporal interval with start- and end-date
• Typical Destination use: Incremental Synchronization, Audit
• Changes are listed in chronological order
• Multiple changes to one URI may result in multiple listing of
same URI
• Source determines duration of temporal interval
• Destinations use @from and @until to determine freshness
• Issue GETs against URIs to obtain changed resources
75
79. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Change Dump
• Package Source’s resources that have changed
• during temporal interval with start- and end-date
• Points to ZIP packages
• Mandatory, even for only one ZIP
• ZIP package contains manifest, listing contained bitstreams
• Typical Destination use: Incremental Synchronization, bulk
download of changes
• Changes in Change Dump Manifest listed in chronological order
• Same URI can be listed multiple times
• Might be expensive to generate
• Destinations use @from and @until to determine freshness
79
80. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Recall… *Index
<changelist_index.xml>
<changelist1.xml>
80
81. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Change List Index <changelist_index.xml>
<sitemapindex xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
xmlns:rs="http://www.openarchives.org/rs/terms/">
<rs:md capability=”changelist"
from="2013-01-02T09:00:00Z”
until="2013-01-03T09:00:00Z”/>
<sitemap>
<loc>http://example.com/changelist1.xml</loc>
<lastmod>2013-01-02T11:00:00Z</lastmod>
<rs:md type="application/xml"/>
</sitemap>
<sitemap>
<loc>http://example.com/changelist2.xml</loc>
<lastmod>2013-01-02T23:00:00Z</lastmod>
<rs:md type="application/xml"/>
</sitemap>
</urlset>
81
83. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Resource Metadata Summary
Element/Attribute Description Defined by
<loc> Resource URI (identity) sitemaps
<lastmod> Timestamp of last change sitemaps
<changefreq> Expected update frequency sitemaps
<rs:md> ResourceSync
change
Change type (Change List & Change
Dump Manifest only)
ResourceSync
encoding
HTTP Content-Encoding header value RFC2616
hash
One or more content digests (md5, sha-1,
sha-256)
Atom Link Ext.
length
HTTP Content-Length header value RFC4287
path
Path in ZIP package (Dump Manifests
only)
ResourceSync
type
HTTP Content-Type header value RFC4287
84. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
ResourceSync - Agenda
4. Framework (Technical) Details
3. Linking between resources
84
85. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Supported Linking Use Cases
The web is based on links between resources, many of which are
important to understand for synchronization.
1. Mirrored content with multiple download locations
2. Alternate representations of the same content
3. Patching content rather than replacing
4. Resources and their metadata
5. Prior versions of resources
6. Collection membership of resources
7. Republishing synchronized resources
All cases are handled with a <rs:ln> element referring to the remote
resource
85
86. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Notes about Linked Resources
Some important things to keep in mind about linked resources:
• They may also be subject to synchronization
• They may be updated in a very different schedule to the resource
it is linked from
• Therefore, it is recommended to convey metadata about the
linked resource too
• Links can be bi-directional – the linked resource can link back to
the linking resource
86
87. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Linking #1 - Mirror
1. Mirrored content with multiple download locations
This might occur due to:
• Content distribution networks
• Mirror sites
• Backup locations
• Load balancing
87
89. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Linking #2 – Alternate Representations
2. Alternate representations of the same content
This might occur due to:
• Server supports HTTP content negotiation
• Multiple copies of the same resource
• Format migration for preservation reasons
• Different clients wanting different formats
• Multiple languages of the content
89
92. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Linking #3 – Patching Content
3. Patching content rather than replacing
This might occur due to:
• Resources are very large and server wishes to conserve
bandwidth where possible
• Changes are frequent and small
• Changes are managed in a CMS that tracks differences
• Format exists or can be described that is machine
processable to replicate the change
92
94. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Linking #4 – Metadata about Resources
4. Resources and their metadata
This might occur due to:
• Resources have additional metadata records, which are
useful for understanding the resource
• Such as cultural heritage images, audio, video
• Collections with descriptive metadata
• Resources with technical metadata
• Administrative or Rights metadata
94
97. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Linking #5 – Prior Versions of Resources
But first…
97
98. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Memento Intermezzo
http://www.mementoweb.org/
99. URI for Original, URI for Version
URI-M - http://web.archive.org/web/20010911203610/http://www.cnn.com/
Web Archive
URI-R - http://www.cnn.com/
100. URI for Original, URI for Version
URI-M - http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=September_11_attacks&oldid=282333
CMS
URI-R - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attacks
108. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Linking #6 – Collection Membership
6. Collection membership of resources
A source might want to express this because:
• Resources are part of OAI-ORE aggregations
• Resources are part of OAI-PMH sets
• Or to indicated any other type of collections of resources
Collections are named with URIs and can then be linked to with
rel=“collection”
• Nice if the collection URI resolves to a useful description
108
110. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Linking #7 – Republishing Resources
7. Republishing synchronized resources
This might occur due to:
• Aggregator systems that harvest resources from remote sites
and then republish them at new URIs
• Examples include Blog republishing, content distribution
networks, mirrored or combined collections
• Hypothetical scenario: Lots of little museums with small
collections, and a large European/American aggregating
digital library system that wants to provide fast, combined
access to the content (with permission)
110
113. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Link Relation Summary
Relation Use in ResourceSync Defined in
rel="alternate"
Link from generic to specific
URI HTML 5
rel="canonical"
Link from specific to generic
URI RFC6596
rel="collection"
Resource is member of
collection RFC6573
rel="describedby" Has metadata
Protocol for Web Description Resources
(POWDER): Description Resources
rel="describes" Is metadata for The 'describes' Link Relation Type
rel="duplicate" Mirror or alternative copy RFC6249
rel=".../rs/terms/patch"
A patch -- efficient change
information This specification
rel="memento" Link to time-specific URI Memento Internet Draft
rel="timegate" Link to timegate Memento Internet Draft
rel="via" Provenance chain, came from RFC4287
114. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Related Resource Metadata Summary
• Attributes of the <rs:ln> element; c.f. resource metadata + pri
Element/Attribute Description Defined by
<rs:ln> ResourceSync
encoding HTTP Content-Encoding header value RFC2616
hash One or more content digests (md5, sha-1, sha-256) Atom Link Ext.
href Related resource URI (identity) RFC4287
length HTTP Content-Length header value RFC4287
modified Timestamp of last change (c.f. <lastmod>) Atom Link Ext.
path Path in ZIP package (Dump Manifests only) ResourceSync
pri Priority of link RFC6249
rel Relation - IANA registered or URI RFC4287
type HTTP Content-Type header value RFC4287
117. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Discovery of Capability Documents
Requirements:
• Need to discover capability documents, i.e. Resource List,
Resource Dump, Change List, Change Dump, Archives
• Need to know the type of capability each document
represents.
Approach:
• The Capability List provides links to these capability documents,
if the Source supports them.
• These links have appropriate relation types, e.g.
“resourcelist”, “changelist”, etc.
117
119. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
119
Requirements:
• Need to discover a Capability List
Approach:
• HTTP Link header from resources subject to synchronization,
relation type “resourcesync”
• Links from HTML document <head>, relation type “resourcesync”
• Links from Capability documents, relation type “up”
Link header on example.com/res1.pdf
Link: <example.com/dataset1/capabilitylist.xml>;rel=“resourcesync”
Discovery of Capability Lists
121. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Discovery: ResourceSync Description
Requirements:
• Support for multiple Capability Lists, one per “set of
resources”
• Need to discover these Capability Lists
• Need descriptive information about each set of resources
that a Capability List pertains to
• Useful to have descriptive information about the Source itself
Approach:
• The ResourceSync Description document meets these
requirements.
• It should be at a particular location to avoid having registries:
http://(hostname)/.well-known/resourcesync
• It can be linked to from the Capability Lists as well.
121
126. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Motivation for a Push Component in
ResourceSync
126
• Reduce synchronization latency by having the Source push out
resource change information
• To avoid continuous pull of Change Lists by Destinations
• Share information about changes to the Source’s
ResourceSync implementation, e.g. announcement of new
Resource List, new Capability List, etc.
• To avoid continuous polling of e.g. Resource Lists,
ResourceSync Description
127. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Notification Types
127
• Events pertaining to a resource
• updated | created | deleted for a resource
• 3rd party defined events
• Events pertaining to a set of resources
• updated | created | deleted for a Resource List, Resource
Dump, Change List, Change Dump, Archives
• 3rd party defined events
• Events pertaining to the overall ResourceSync implementation
• updated | created | deleted for a Capability List,
ResourceSync Description
• 3rd party defined events
128. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Possible Push Technology: XMPP PubSub
128
Other technologies: WebSockets, HTTP callback
129. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Notification Payload
129
• Payload the same irrespective of transport protocol
• Use <urlset> as encapsulating element
• One <url> element per notification
132. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Push Technology Considerations
132
• Notification channels
• Multiple channels per Source to divide up notifications, e.g.
• a channel for changes pertaining to all resources that
belong to a set of resources
• a channel for changes to capabilities for a set of
resources
• Server-side filtering preferred over client-side
• Authentication/Authorization
• To subscribe/create channels
133. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Push Technology Considerations
133
• Delayed notification
• Insurance that Destination does not miss anything
• Discovery
• Links to channels e.g. from a Capability List
• Links from channels to other channels
• Provide channel metadata (transport protocol info etc.)
136. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
ResourceSync Framework Component:
Archives
In order to allow a Source to hold on to historical data and
Destinations to catch up with events it has missed:
o Publish a
- Resource List Archive,
- Resource Dump Archive,
- Change List Archive, and/or a
- Change Dump Archive
o Documents, listing historical capability documents
136
145. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
ResourceSync - Agenda
5. Implementation
145
146. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Implementation #1:
The Metadata Harvesting Use Case
146
147. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
The Metadata Harvesting Use Case
1. Identification of metadata records within a service
1. Use of standards in metadata formats
1. Incremental updates
1. Create, Update, Delete
1. Sets
147
148. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
The Metadata Harvesting Use Case
1. Identification of metadata records within a service
2. Use of standards in metadata formats
148
ResourceSync does not specifically care about metadata records, only
resources. It is up to the server to identify which of those resources
are metadata.
We are free to annotate a resource's entry with appropriate metadata
to indicate the format.
149. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
The Metadata Harvesting Use Case
3. Incremental updates
4. Create, Update, Delete
5. Sets
149
All resources that can be obtained from a change list will be annotated
with the kind of change that happened to them.
ResourceSync allows the server to publish lists of resources and
changes and indexes of those lists all annotated with metadata.
ResourceSync publishes changes as static documents. The client is
then free to walk up and down the change lists provided by the server.
150. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
(Required) Documents for
metadata harvesting use case
150
154. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Generating Documents
1. Initialise
Creates initial Capability List and Resource List documents
[dspace]/bin/dspace dsrun org.dspace.resourcesync.ResourceSyncGenerator -i
2. Update
Creates a new Change List which covers the period since the last Change List
was created
[dspace]/bin/dspace dsrun org.dspace.resourcesync.ResourceSyncGenerator -u
3. Rebase
A combination of both Initialise and Update.
[dspace]/bin/dspace dsrun org.dspace.resourcesync.ResourceSyncGenerator -r
154
157. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
URLs
• Stable identifiers for archived items
• Stable identifiers for unarchived items
• Stable identifiers for metadata resources (in their various formats)
• Stable identifiers for previous versions
Provenance
• History of changes to an item/bitstream
• Item/bitstream deletions (vs withdraw)
• Bitstream create/update dates
• Item create/update dates
157
?
158. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Versioning
• Access of previous versions of both metadata and bitstreams
• Stable identifiers for previous versions of both metadata and
bitstreams
Metadata Resources
• Metadata in a variety of formats
• Metadata as file/bitstream
158
?
?
159. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Admin Files
• ResourceSync documents (Resource Lists, Change Lists, etc)
• ResourceSync exports - Resource Dumps, Change Dumps
• Metadata exports in a number of formats
Scheduled Tasks
• Regular generation of RS documents
Complex Objects
• Item/bitstream relationships
• Collections of content
159
160. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Dspace Module:
https://github.com/CottageLabs/DSpaceResourceSync
depends on the common java library:
https://github.com/CottageLabs/ResourceSyncJava
PHP client:
https://github.com/stuartlewis/resync-php
depends on the SWORDv2 clienbt library:
https://github.com/swordapp/swordappv2-php-library/
Get the software!
160
161. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Implementation #2:
ResourceSync at arXiv.org
161
162. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
ResourceSync @ arXiv
• Use ResourceSync for both mirroring and public data access
o efficient updates
o ability to do periodic audits
o public synchronization capability
o reduce admin burden
• Likely start with metadata + source for mirroring use case (doing
experiments now)
• Open access use cases requires processed PDF also
• Some concerns about likely use/load…
162
164. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Alternate download location
• Likely want to separate machine accesses from human accesses to
preserve response time on main server
=> Use Mirrored Content part of spec
o <loc> specifies canonical URI
- e.g. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1306.1073v1.pdf
o <rs:ln rel=“duplicate”> specifies preferred download location
- e.g. http://export.arxiv.org/pdf/1306.1073v1.pdf
164
166. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Getting a copy of arXiv
It might be as easy as:
166
(of course, you probably have to wait a while but it is nice to know ResourceSync is
stateless so one can efficiently restart)
167. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Python Library and Client
• Aim to provide library code implementing all ResourceSync
facilities for use in both source and destination implementations
o Designed for python 2.6 (RHEL6) and 2.7
o Will not work with python <= 2.5
• Client (resync) supports many destination operations, inspired
by the common Unix rsync program
• Client also supports some operations that might be useful in a
source, such as generation of static Resource Lists, or periodic
Change Lists (used in arXiv experiments)
• Explorer (resync-explorer) intended to allow easy inspection
of a source’s resource sets and capabilities
• Developed since ResourceSync v0.5, updated for v0.9
http://github.org/resync/resync
168. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
ResourceSync Source Simulator
• Python code using Tornado server
• Provides random set of resources of different sizes updated at a
particular rate
• Very useful for testing Destination code
http://github.com/resync/simulator
173. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Timeline
• June 2013
o Version 0.9 of ResourceSync framework specification released
o Soliciting broad feedback
• July 2013
o Version 0.x of Push-based methods for ResourceSync
• Fall 2013
o Specification becomes NISO standard
173
174. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
Pointers
• Specification
http://www.openarchives.org/rs/
http://www.openarchives.org/rs/0.9/resourcesync
http://www.openarchives.org/rs/0.9/archives
• List for public comment
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/resourcesync
• Client and simulator code
http://github.org/resync/resync
http://github.org/resync/simulator
174
175. ResourceSync Tutorial
July 8, 2013, Open Repositories 2013, PEI, Canada
ResourceSync:
A Web-Based
Resource Synchronization
Framework
ResourceSync is funded by
The Sloan Foundation & JISC
#resourcesync
175
Editor's Notes
LANL Memento Aggregator of IIPC; Europeana does metadata via OAI-PMH but anticipate content also; arXiv – mirroring and data sharing; Linked data @ BBC; DBpedia, journal data at LANLREST not about in 1999
XML <-> OAI-PMHlarge data begs diff question
protected mostly about existing HTTP auth methods, stats -> just inventory
Switching to a standardized resource-centric framework could
Semantic web version of wikipedia; want mirror to provide reliable basis for local services
Semantic web version of wikipedia; want mirror to provide reliable basis for local services
Semantic web version of wikipedia; want mirror to provide reliable basis for local services
Semantic web version of wikipedia; want mirror to provide reliable basis for local services
Top line – just metadata about resources, destination uses GET to get them (duh)Bottom line – packaged content => fewer round trips
Rsyncetc just reference; push vs pull -> both; many other parts
Rsyncetc just reference; push vs pull -> both; many other parts
They have in common: versions exist at different URIs. Because only the representation of a single state of a resource is available from a URI.
They have in common: versions exist at different URIs. Because only the representation of a single state of a resource is available from a URI.
Pattern exists in e.g.: WikiPedia, W3C specs, DryadNot sure whether DOI in general follows this paradigm.
Now the question is “How we do access those versions” - Can interlink them. There’s RFCs that describe how to do that.-But that URI-R is special. It is what typically is being bookmarked, put in email. Want to leverage the fact that this URI-R is always there. Use it as the entry point.
Memento addresses the problem in a resource-centric way:Resource, URI, state, representation, link, content negotiation
Test site, has subsets of arXiv and even complete source plus metadata (at present not up to date with 0.9)
No way around the difficulty of transferring 1TB initially but then a daily or weekly sync is efficient, and it still works even after some arbitrary time.
Email and phone discussions over the past few months. Knock-down drag-out two day meeting after JCDL in DC in June.
Email and phone discussions over the past few months. Knock-down drag-out two day meeting after JCDL in DC in June.