High Class Call Girls Bangalore Komal 7001305949 Independent Escort Service B...
What does the Social Progress Index tell us?
1. What does the
Social Progress
Index tell us?
Candriam Investors Seminar
7 June 2018
2. “Economic growth alone is
not sufficient to advance
societies and improve the
quality of life of citizens.
True success, and growth
that is inclusive requires
achieving both economic
and social progress.”
– Social Progress Imperative
Advisory Board Chair
Michael E. Porter
6. Realizing the promise of the Sustainable Development Goals
The Social Progress Index captures outcomes related to 16 of the 17 SDGs in a
simple but rigorous framework designed for aggregation, making it an invaluable proxy
measure of SDG performance, particularly for areas where official indicators do not exist
7. The Social Progress Index is
designed to reflect a broad
consensus about what a
healthy, successful society
looks like in the 21st century.
The global index includes
data from 128 countries on
50 indicators of social and
environmental outcomes
21. Social
Progress
Index vs. GDP
per capita Brazil
France
United Kingdom Netherlands
Belgium
Spain
Italy
Denmark
United States
Central African Republic
South Africa
Senegal
22. Social
Progress
Index vs. GDP
per capita
Russia
Brazil
France
United Kingdom Netherlands
Belgium
Spain
Italy
Denmark
United States
Central African Republic
South Africa
Senegal
23. China
Social
Progress
Index vs. GDP
per capita
Russia
Brazil
France
United Kingdom Netherlands
Belgium
Spain
Italy
Denmark
United States
Central African Republic
South Africa
Senegal
24. Social
Progress
Index vs. GDP
per capita
China
Russia
Brazil
France
United Kingdom Netherlands
Belgium
Spain
Italy
Denmark
United States
Central African Republic
South Africa
India
Senegal
25. Kuwait
Social
Progress
Index vs. GDP
per capita
China
Russia
Brazil
France
United Kingdom Netherlands
Belgium
Spain
Italy
Denmark
United States
Central African Republic
South Africa
India
Senegal
26. Kuwait
Social
Progress
Index vs. GDP
per capita
India
China
Russia
Brazil
France
United Kingdom Netherlands
Belgium
Spain
Italy
Denmark
United States
Central African Republic
Senegal
South Africa
Costa Rica
28. SCORE RANK
2017Social ProgressIndex 86.43 18/128
GDPPPPpercapita $52,704 5/128
SCORE/
VALUE RANK
STRENGTH/
WEAKNESS
BasicHumanNeeds 93.42 17
NutritionandBasicMedical Care 98.96 36
Undernourishment (%of pop.; 5 signifies ≤ 5) 5.00 1
Depthoffooddefcit
(calories/undernourished person; 8 signifies ≤ 8)
8.00 1
Maternal mortalityrate(deaths/100,000 live
births)
13.75 39
Childmortalityrate(deaths/1,000 live births) 6.50 35
Deathsfrominfectiousdiseases
(deaths/100,000)
23.33 34
WaterandSanitation 98.77 27
Accesstopipedwater (%of pop.) 98.64 30
Rural accesstoimprovedwater source
(%of pop.)
98.16 44
Accesstoimprovedsanitationfacilities
(%of pop.)
99.99 10
Shelter 89.18 10
Availabilityofaf ordablehousing(%satisfied) 56.68 30
Accesstoelectricity(%of pop.) 100.00 1
Qualityofelectricitysupply(1=low; 7=high) 6.47 13
Householdair pollutionattributabledeaths
(deaths/100,000)
0.00 1
Personal Safety 86.76 21
Homiciderate(deaths/100,000) 3.90 70
Level ofviolent crime(1=low; 5=high) 1.00 1
Perceivedcriminality(1=low; 5=high) 2.00 1
Political terror (1=low; 5=high) 2.00 34
Traf cdeaths(deaths/100,000) 10.60 40
SCORE/
VALUE RANK
STRENGTH/
WEAKNESS
Foundationsof Wellbeing 84.19 29
AccesstoBasicKnowledge 97.95 30
Adult literacyrate(%of pop. aged 15+)
Primaryschool enrollment (%of children) 98.04 53
Secondaryschool enrollment (%of children) 97.56 50
Gender parityinsecondaryenrollment
(distance from parity)
0.02 32
AccesstoInformation
andCommunications
84.63 27
Mobiletelephonesubscriptions
(subscriptions/100 people)
100.00 1
Internet users(%of pop.) 74.45 27
PressFreedomIndex
(0=most free; 100=least free)
22.49 32
HealthandWellness 75.88 34
Lifeexpectancyat 60 (years) 23.61 27
Prematuredeathsfromnon-communicable
diseases(deaths/100,000)
299.40 42
Suiciderate(deaths/100,000) 12.41 82
Environmental Quality 78.31 33
Outdoor air pollutionattributabledeaths
(deaths/100,000)
18.48 13
Wastewater treatment (%of wastewater) 50.44 36
Biodiversityandhabitat
(0=no protection; 100=high protection)
79.35 73
Greenhousegasemissions
(CO2 equivalents per GDP)
392.70 60
SCORE/
VALUE RANK
STRENGTH/
WEAKNESS
Opportunity 81.68 13
Personal Rights 88.98 19
Political rights(0=no rights; 40=full rights) 36.00 32
Freedomofexpression
(0=no freedom; 16=full freedom)
16.00 1
Freedomofassembly
(0=no freedom; 1=full freedom)
0.86 14
Privatepropertyrights(0=none; 100=full) 80.00 17
Personal FreedomandChoice 79.88 19
Freedomover lifechoices(%satisfied) 75.48 65
Freedomofreligion(1=low; 4=high) 3.00 54
Earlymarriage(%of women aged 15-19) 3.00 32
Satisfeddemandfor contraception
(%of women)
85.10 13
Corruption(0=high; 100=low) 74.00 15
ToleranceandInclusion 68.30 23
Tolerancefor immigrants(0=low; 100=high) 78.78 16
Tolerancefor homosexuals(0=low; 100=high) 71.34 19
Discriminationandviolenceagainst
minorities(0=low; 10=high)
5.10 39
Religioustolerance(1=low; 4=high) 2.00 92
Communitysafetynet (0=low; 100=high) 89.58 31
AccesstoAdvancedEducation 89.55 1
Yearsoftertiaryschooling 1.86 3
Women’saverageyearsinschool 15.06 7
Inequalityintheattainment ofeducation
(0=low; 1=high)
0.05 28
Number ofgloballyrankeduniversities
(0=none; 10=most highly rank ed)
10.00 1
Percentoftertiarystudentsenrolledinglobally
rankeduniversities
(0=none; 6=highest enrollment)
4.00 15
UNITED STATES
STRENGTH/
WEAKNESS
Oveperforming and underperforming are relative to 15 countries of similar GDPper capita:
Ireland, Saudi Arabia, Switzerland, Netherlands, Austria, Sweden, Denmark, Germany,
Australia, Canada, Belgium, Iceland, Norway, Finland, United Kingdom
Overperforming by 1or more pts.
Overperforming by less than 1pt.
Performing within the expected range
Underperforming by less than 1pt.
Underperforming by 1or more pts.
No data available
Strengthsandweaknesses
29.
30. Global change in Social
Progress 2014-2017
Since 2014, the world aggregate score on the Social
Progress Index has improved by 1.66 points
2017: 64.852014: 63.19
The Social Progress Index relies on four design principles. It uses/is:
1. Exclusively social and environmental indicators: Our aim is to measure social progress directly, rather than utilize economic proxies or outcomes.
2. Outcomes not inputs: Our purpose is to measure the outcomes that matter to the lives of real people, not the inputs. For example, we want to measure a country’s health and wellness achieved, not how much effort is expended nor how much the country spends on healthcare.
3. Holistic and relevant to all countries: We strive to create a holistic measure of social progress that encompasses the many aspects of the health of societies.
4. Actionable: The Social Progress Index aims to be a practical tool that will help leaders and practitioners in government, business, and civil society to implement policies and programs that will drive faster social progress.
Our framework was designed with four key principles in mind:
It was designed to be relevant to all countries. Our definition of social progress is based on international agreements like the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights to ensure its broad applicability.
It was designed to be actionable. That is, each component of our index represents an area where stakeholders can take concrete action based on what the data shows.
It only includes social and environmental factors, which makes it possible to compare the social and economic health of a society side-by-side and delve into the relationship between the two.
It only measure outcomes, not inputs, to more accurately capture people’s lived experience.