Marie Bacher talks about the Next Generation Science Standards and it's rollout in Santa Clara Unified School District.
More details here - https://RaynorStem.eventbrite.com
6. Three Dimensions
Intertwined
• NGSS will require
contextual application
of the three
dimensions by
students
• Focus is on how and
why as well as what
7. Guiding Assumption of Framework & Standards:
Meld Content Knowledge and Scientific Practices
“Science is not just a body of
knowledge that reflects current
understanding of the world; it is also
a set of of practices
practices used to establish,
extend and refine that knowledge.
Both elements– knowledge and
essential.”
Science
practice--- are essential.”
8. The Next Generation Science Standards are
written as performance expectations
Disciplinary Core Ideas
Crosscutting Concepts
Science and Engineering
Practices
9. Scientific and Engineering Practices
1. Asking questions and defining problems.
2. Developing and using models.
3. Planning and carrying out investigations.
4. Analyzing and interpreting data.
5. Using mathematics and computational thinking.
6. Developing explanations and designing solutions.
7. Engaging in argument from evidence.
8. Obtaining, evaluating, and communicating
information.
DRAFT
Santa Clara Unified School District
11. Crosscutting Concepts
1. Patterns
2. Cause and effect: mechanism and explanation
3. Scale, proportion and quantity
4. Systems and system models
5. Energy and matter:
flows, cycles, and conservation
6. Structure and function
7. Stability and change
Santa Clara Unified School District
12. 2011 2013
2014
CA State Drafting California Science Framework
Adoption
State NGSS Rollout PD
of NGSS
Fall 2014
Next Generation
Science
Standards
Design Phase Awareness Phase
2015
IQC Reviews CA
Framework Sp. 2015
Grades 5, 8, 10 CST
Science Test Sp. 2015
Public Review of CA
Framework Summer 2015
2011
You can provide feedback
on the CA NGSS
implementation plan
until August 25th
Transition
13. 2016
California Science
Framework
the details about HOW to
teach NGSS in CA
Approved by SBE
Jan 2016
Possible New
Monitoring Assessments
CA NGSS-Aligned
Curricula Available
2017
Next Generation
Science
Standards
Implementation Phase
2018
Transition Phase
The organizations that are formally engaged as lead partners in the development of the NGSS are Achieve, NRC, AAAS, and NSTA.
The Carnegie Corporation has taken a leadership role to ensure that the development of common science standards proceeds and is of the highest quality by funding a two-step process: first, the development of this framework by the National Research Council (NRC) and, second, the development of a next generation of science standards based on the framework (Framework, p. viii).
This framework is the first part of a two-stage process to produce a next-generation set of science standards for voluntary adoption by states. The second step—the development of a set of standards based on this framework—is a state-led effort coordinated by Achieve Inc. involving multiple opportunities for input from the states’ science educators, including teachers, and the public (Framework, p. 1-2).
As our report was being completed, Achieve’s work on science standards was already under way, starting with an analysis of international science benchmarking in high-performing countries that is expected to inform the standards development process (Framework, p. 1-8).
Recommendation 3: Standards should be limited in number.
The framework focuses on a limited set of scientific and engineering practices, crosscutting concepts, and disciplinary core ideas, which were selected by using the criteria developed by the framework committee (and outlined in Chapter 2) as a filter. We also drew on previous reports, which recommended structuring K-12 standards around core ideas as a means of focusing the K-12 science curriculum [3, 4]. These reports’ recommendations emerged from analyses of existing national, state, and local standards as well as from a synthesis of current research on learning and teaching in science (Framework, p. 12-3).
Basically, a coherent set of science standards will not be sufficient to prepare citizens for the 21st century unless there is also coherence across all subject areas of the K-12 curriculum (Framework, p. 12-8).
. . . as well as on nearly two decades of efforts to define foundational knowledge and skills for K-12 science and engineering. From this work, the committee concludes that K-12 science and engineering education should focus on a limited number of disciplinary core ideas and crosscutting concepts, be designed so that students continually build on and revise their knowledge and abilities over multiple years, and support the integration of such knowledge and abilities with the practices needed to engage in scientific inquiry and engineering design (Framework, ES 1).
Over 40 states have shown interest in the standards,[10] and as of March 2014,
11 states had adopted the standards:,
California
Delaware
Illinois
Kansas
Kentucky
Maryland
Nevada
Oregon
Rhode Island
Vermont
Washington
And Washington DC
26 states have volunteered to be lead states in the development of NGSS: Arizona, Arkansas California, Delaware, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina Ohio, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vermont, Washington and West Virginia.
Lead states have agreed to seriously consider adoption of NGSS once they are complete at the end of 2012.
Lead states have created committees that are responsible for reviewing and providing feedback about drafts versions of NGSS to Achieve.
Dimension 1 [Scientific and Engineering Practices] describes (a) the major practices that scientists employ as they investigate and build models and theories about the world and (b) a key set of engineering practices that engineers use as they design and build systems. We use the term “practices” instead of a term such as “skills” to emphasize that engaging in scientific investigation requires not only skill but also knowledge that is specific to each practice (Framework, p. 2-5).
These are the big ideas that that you will see in every grade from K to 12. There are learning progressions stated in the frameworks that start with basic ideas and get more sophisticated as you move through the grade levels. Imagine a tower of blocks…each year you build on the core idea, spiraling upward. If you miss a building block you will get a toppling tower.
The crosscutting concepts have application across all domains of science. As such, they provide one way of linking across the domains in Dimension 3. These crosscutting concepts are not unique to this report. They echo many of the unifying concepts and processes in the National Science Education Standards [7], the common themes in the Benchmarks for Science Literacy [6], and the unifying concepts in the Science College Board Standards for College Success [9] (Framework, p. 2-5).
These crosscutting concepts were selected for their value across the sciences and in engineering. These concepts help provide
students with an organizational framework for connecting knowledge from the various disciplines into a coherent and scientifically based view of the world (Framework, p. 4-1).
1. Patterns. Observed patterns of forms and events guide organization and classification, and they prompt questions about relationships and the factors that influence them.
2. Cause and effect: Mechanism and explanation. Events have causes, sometimes simple, sometimes multifaceted. A major activity of science is investigating and explaining causal relationships and the mechanisms by which they are mediated. Such mechanisms can then be tested across given contexts and used to predict and explain events in newcontexts.
3. Scale, proportion, and quantity. In considering phenomena, it is critical to recognize what is relevant at different measures of size, time, and energy and to recognize how changes in scale, proportion, or quantity affect a system’s structure or performance.
(Framework, p. 4-1)
4. Systems and system models. Defining the system under study—specifying its boundaries and making explicit a model of that system—provides tools for understanding and testing ideas that are applicable throughout science and engineering.
5. Energy and matter: Flows, cycles, and conservation. Tracking fluxes of energy and matter into, out of, and within systems helps one understand the systems’ possibilities and limitations.
6. Structure and function. The way in which an object or living thing is shaped and its substructure determine many of its properties and functions.
7. Stability and change. For natural and built systems alike, conditions of stability and determinants of rates of change or evolution of the system are critical elements of study.
(Framework, p. 4-2)
Intent: Introduce the 3 phases
The awareness phase represents an introduction to the CA NGSS, the initial planning of systems implementation, and
establishment of collaborations.
The transition phase is the concentration on building foundational resources, implementing needs assessments,
establishing new professional learning opportunities, and expanding collaborations between all stakeholders.
The implementation phase expands the new professional learning support, fully aligns curriculum, instruction, and
assessments, and effectively integrates these elements across the field.
Intent: Most of the work can’t be done until the framework is done.
Awareness phase (introduce NGSS, establish collaborations, planning of systems implementation): 2013-15
Curriculum focus groups: winter 2014
California curriculum framework development: January 2014-November 2015 (pending State Board approval of the timeline)
California framework public review periods: June-July 2015 and October-November 2015 (pending State Board approval of the timeline)
California curriculum framework adoption by State Board of Education: January 2016
Instructional materials adoption: 2017-2018
Plans for transition, development of curriculum materials, assessment development, and implementation will likely take place throughout 2014-2017. We do not expect full implementation until the 2016-17 school year.