SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 15
AssetLabs
The following document is authored by Steve O’Halloran – the co-founder of AssetMetrix (now owned by
Microsoft Corporation).


Re-distribution rights have been allowed via a legal arrangement between Mr. O’Halloran and AssetMetrix.



AssetMetrix – now owned by Microsoft Corporation - remains the holder of Copyright of the following
document. Other AssetMetrix ‘Research Labs’ documents can be found at www.AssetLabs.com




AssetMetrix™ Research Labs: Corporate Acceptance of Windows® XP Service Pack 2                  Page 1 of 15

Published March 29 , 2005.
                  th

Copyright 2000-2005 AssetMetrix, Inc.   Redistribution prohibited without written permission.
Corporate Acceptance
of Windows® XP Service Pack 2
Executive Summary:
         On April 12th, 2005 Windows XP ‘Service Pack 2’ will be automatically delivered to Windows XP
         users who are using Microsoft’s Windows Update or Automatic Update tool. Service Pack 2 is a
         significant modification to previous editions of Windows XP and may require a download of up to
         266Mb per PC.

         On August 16th, 2004 Microsoft offered a ‘blocking mechanism’ within the update tool to allow
         organizations and/or end-users to delay the installation of Windows XP Service Pack 2 for a
         period of 240 days (i.e. April 12th, 2005) to allow for testing and validation of Windows XP Service
         Pack 2 within their corporate infrastructure.

         As of April 12th, 2005 any Windows XP PC with the update tool enabled will automatically initiate
         the upgrade to Service Pack 2.

         CONCLUSION: Companies with Windows XP currently deployed should quickly make a
         decision to accept Service Pack 2 - or not - and put measures in place (both policy and
         technology) to ensure that the decision is enforced.

         Companies should inventory their PCs to determine the location and quantity of all
         Windows XP PCs in order to determine the effort to enforce their decision.

         In general, AssetMetrix Research Labs recommends the deployment of Service Pack 2
         amongst Windows XP PCs, and recommends proper testing and verification before April
         12th, 2005.


Statistical Synopsis
         AssetMetrix Research Labs conducted an analysis of over 130,000 Windows XP PCs from 251
         corporations ranging in size from 20 to 9,000 employees. On average, Windows XP Service
         Pack 2 is deployed on less than 25% of all Windows XP PCs.

         Smaller companies are more likely to have more PCs using Windows XP, and to have
         accepted Windows XP Service Pack 2.




AssetMetrix™ Research Labs: Corporate Acceptance of Windows® XP Service Pack 2                  Page 2 of 15

Published March 29 , 2005.
                  th

Copyright 2000-2005 AssetMetrix, Inc.   Redistribution prohibited without written permission.
Larger companies are less apt to accept Windows XP Service Pack 2 into their Windows
              XP sub-population compared to smaller companies, regardless of the number of
              Windows XP found within the company.




Index

ACRONYM TABLE
..........................................................................................................................................................................4
Dataset Parameters..........................................................................................................................................4
Data Analysis:..................................................................................................................................................5

    Overall Windows XP popularity...............................................................................................................5
    Popularity of Windows XP SP2.................................................................................................................6
Commentary ....................................................................................................................................................8
Understanding the benefits and risks associated with Windows XP Service Pack 2....................................8
Factors leading to Windows XP SP2 ‘avoidance’ .........................................................................................9
Support gap between Windows XP SP1 vs. Longhorn.................................................................................10
Recommendations.........................................................................................................................................11
Addendum 1:
Microsoft’s Lifecycle Supported Service Packs
(edited)
........................................................................................................................................................................12
Addendum 2:
Resources for Managing Windows XP Service Pack 2................................................................................13
Data Privacy..................................................................................................................................................14
About AssetMetrix.........................................................................................................................................15
About AssetMetrix Research Labs................................................................................................................15
About the Author...........................................................................................................................................15




AssetMetrix™ Research Labs: Corporate Acceptance of Windows® XP Service Pack 2                                                                         Page 3 of 15

Published March 29 , 2005. th

Copyright 2000-2005 AssetMetrix, Inc.                    Redistribution prohibited without written permission.
ACRONYM TABLE

ACRONY        DEFINITION
M
PC            Personal Computer
Win XP        Windows XP Operating System
SP1 (SP2)     Service Pack 1 (or 2)
SME           Small to Medium Enterprise (up to 500 PCs)
OEM           Original Equipment Manufacturer
SMS           Systems Management Server
AD            Active Directory




Dataset Parameters

         AssetMetrix Research Labs conducted a statistical analysis of the 136,120 PCs using various
         versions of Microsoft Windows from 251 corporations - ranging in size from 20 to 9,000
         employees - where a PC inventory was obtained between January 05th and March 10th, 2005.

         These 251 corporations -predominantly from the US and Canada - represent a variety of market
         sectors including:


              •    Financial
              •    Communications
              •    Government
              •    Healthcare
              •    Services
              •    Transportation
              •    Utilities



         96% (240 of 250) of the companies had at least one instance of Windows XP, with the average of
         27% of PCs using Windows XP within a company.




AssetMetrix™ Research Labs: Corporate Acceptance of Windows® XP Service Pack 2                  Page 4 of 15

Published March 29 , 2005.
                  th

Copyright 2000-2005 AssetMetrix, Inc.   Redistribution prohibited without written permission.
Data Analysis:
Overall Windows XP popularity

From the entire dataset of 136,120 PCs, Windows XP was found on over one third (37.6%) of the PCs.
Overall, the average popularity of
Windows XP was 47.6%, with a standard                      Windows Popularity vs. Company Size
deviation of +/- 35% (indicating a great
                                                                     XP pop        Log. (XP pop)
variation   between    near    complete
acceptance     and    near     complete     100%
avoidance).                                  90%
                                                                             80%




                                                    XP (all ed) Popularity
It must be noted that the acceptance of                                      70%
Windows XP is on a significant rise;                                         60%
previous   analysis  from AssetMetrix                                        50%
Research Labs suggested that Windows                                         40%
XP had a popularity of 7% in Q403,                                           30%
compared to about 38% in Q105.                                               20%
                                                                             10%
                                                                             0%
                                                                                   0   1000                           2000   3000      4000   5000       6000   7000    8000   9000   10000
                                                                                                                                      Company Size
                                                                                                                                Popularity of Windows XP vs. Company Size

Overall. the Windows XP popularity                                                                                    80%
compared to company size decreases slightly as the
company size increases. SMEs had an average Windows                                                                   70%


XP popularity of over 50%, where companies larger than                                                                60%
                                                                                              Windows XP popularity


1000 PCs had Windows XP popularity at 38%.                                                                            50%

                                                                                                                      40%

                                                                                                                      30%

                                                                                                                      20%

                                                                                                                      10%

                  Range                 % Windows XP                                                                  0%
                  (PCs)                                                                                                       20-100           100-500           500-1000        > 1000

                       20-100                      51.6%                                                                                             Company Range

                     100-500                       50.3%
                    500-1000                       47.2%
                        >1000                     Conclusion: The popularity of Windows XP
                                                   38.4%
                                                  has risen significantly during 2004, with
greater densities in smaller sized organizations (SME).




AssetMetrix™ Research Labs: Corporate Acceptance of Windows® XP Service Pack 2                                                                                         Page 5 of 15

Published March 29 , 2005.
                  th

Copyright 2000-2005 AssetMetrix, Inc.    Redistribution prohibited without written permission.
Popularity of Windows XP SP2
                                                                                                                 Popularity of Win XP SP2 vs Company Size
The popularity of Windows XP SP2 is
calculated by comparing the number of                                                                                                              XPSP2 pop                             Log. (XPSP2 pop)

Windows XP SP2 vs. all editions of Windows                                 100%
XP (original, SP1 & SP2) in order to                                       90%
determine how Windows XP populations are                                   80%
accepting SP2.




                                                       XP SP2 Popularity
                                                                           70%
                                                                           60%
                                                                           50%

Windows XP SP2 was found on 12,330 of the                                  40%

50,665 Windows XP PCs, representing an                                     30%

overall   24%     popularity. The average                                  20%

company popularity was 27%, with a                                         10%

variation of +/- 28.9 %.                                                    0%
                                                                                  0   1000   2000                                          3000              4000                5000             6000               7000                 8000             9000              10000
                                                                                                                                                                    Company Size
As seen on the X-Y scatter plot, the
popularity of Windows XP SP2 tends to decrease slightly as company size increases, but the highest
acceptance of Windows XP SP2 is typically seen in SMEs.


                                                                                                                                                                    Relative Windows XP SP2 popularity

                Range             % Windows XP XSP2                                                                                  80%
                (PCs)




                                                                                              % of Win XP SP2 in ALL XP population
                                                                                                                                     70%
                     20-100                            30.4%                                                                         60%
                   100-500                             22.6%                                                                         50%
                  500-1000                             24.0%                                                                         40%
                      >1000                            26.0%                                                                         30%
                                                       In
                                                                                                                                     20%
general, the average corporate Windows XP SP2 popularity
                                                                                                                                     10%
(within a Windows XP population) ranged from 23% to 30%.
                                                                                                                                     0%
                                                                                                                                                        20-100                            100-500                                500-1000                           > 1000
                                                                                                                                                                                                    Campany Range




SP2: Accept or Embargo?

By reviewing the number of SP2 within each company’s                                                                                                                                             SP2 Acceptance

Windows XP population, one can identify whether SP2 is                                                                               60

being accepted (where SP2 popularity is within 85%-100%)                                                                             50
or being embargoed (where SP2 popularity is within
                                                                                                                                     40
                                                                                               # of companies




0%-15%).
                                                                                                                                     30


These values act as an indicator to evaluate the degree of                                                                           20


acceptance of SP2. Values ranging from 16% to 84% may                                                                                10

reflect a lack of decision or policy to approach SP2.                                                                                0
                                                                                                                                           0-5

                                                                                                                                                 6-10

                                                                                                                                                         11-15

                                                                                                                                                                 16-20

                                                                                                                                                                         21-25

                                                                                                                                                                                 26-30

                                                                                                                                                                                         31-35

                                                                                                                                                                                                 36-40

                                                                                                                                                                                                         41-45

                                                                                                                                                                                                                 46-50

                                                                                                                                                                                                                         51-55

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  56-60

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          61-65

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  66-70

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          71-75

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  76-80

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          81-85

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  86-90

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          91-95

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  96-100
44 companies -having less than 10 installs of Windows XP -                     % of SP2 Acceptance

were excluded from this analysis. 84 of the 207 companies
(40.7%- in RED) are tending to exclude Windows XP SP2 within their Windows XP sub-population,
whereas 16 companies (7.7%- in BLUE) are tending to accept Windows XP SP2.


Conclusion: SMEs have a greater tendency to fully deploy Windows XP SP2 within their
Windows XP sub-population, but the average deployment of SP2 stays within 26% to 30%,
regardless of the company size. To date, more companies are tending to ‘hold back’ on SP 2
than accept it as a standard.




AssetMetrix™ Research Labs: Corporate Acceptance of Windows® XP Service Pack 2                                                                                                                                                                    Page 6 of 15

Published March 29 , 2005.
                  th

Copyright 2000-2005 AssetMetrix, Inc.   Redistribution prohibited without written permission.
User Settings to accept or embargo SP2
                                                                                                      AU Settings vs WinXP-SP2 populatiry


Microsoft’s Automatic Update service allows end-                                    100%

users of Windows2000 and Windows XP to receive                                      90%

updates and/or notifications of various ‘updates’.                                  80%

                                                                                    70%




                                                            'negative' AU options
By default, this Automatic Update (AU)                                              60%

automatically downloads and installs updates are                                    50%
they are offered from Microsoft. End-users can                                      40%
modify the behavior of the AU from complete ‘off’,                                  30%
‘notify only’, to ‘automatic download.’                                             20%

                                                                                    10%
‘Off’, ‘disabled’ and ‘notify only’ settings were
                                                                                     0%
classified as ‘negative’ AU settings as they allow                                         0%   10%   20%   30%   40%     50%    60%     70%   80%   90%   100%
the end-user to avoid or ignore update alerts.                                                                    WinXP-SP2 popularity



The percentage of ‘negative AU settings were compared against the popularity of SP2 within each
company’s XP sub-population of PCs. The trend line and data clustering in the upper left indicates a loose
correlation between a low popularity of SP2 and high use of ‘negative’ settings.

This correlation may be weakened by the fact that AU settings may be overwritten by network functions
(or group policies), and thus may not properly represent the actual settings used. Typically, the larger
companies are more likely to have invested in technologies to deploy group policies compared to smaller
companies.




AssetMetrix™ Research Labs: Corporate Acceptance of Windows® XP Service Pack 2                                                                 Page 7 of 15

Published March 29 , 2005.
                  th

Copyright 2000-2005 AssetMetrix, Inc.   Redistribution prohibited without written permission.
Commentary


Understanding the benefits and risks associated with Windows
XP Service Pack 2

Benefits:

Overall, Windows XP-SP2 is a significant ‘re-write’ of the Dec-2001 edition of Windows XP; some consider
Windows XP SP2 to be a new operating system rather than simply an update. The focus of the SP2 is that
of increased corporate and end-user security, minimizing the success of malicious attacks that could
compromise the PC’s security. SP2 also includes the following improvements:

    •    Windows       Security   Center,    for   managing      the    PC’s    security    settings   in   one   place

    •    Improved Firewall, offering a ‘permission interface’ to block or accept external connection
         requests.

    •    Improved Security for Microsoft Internet Explorer (download monitoring, pop-up blocking, etc.)



Details of SP2 features and benefits can be found one the Microsoft Website: (http://www.microsoft.com/
windowsxp/sp2/default.mspx).


Risks:

Due to the introduction of re-structured code and/or the Microsoft Firewall applications, there are several
applications that may encounter a ‘lack of functionality’ or have an ‘issue’ with Windows XP-SP2.

The risks for each company is based upon the business dependency for the applications in question, and
the ability to address the ‘functionality’ issue with an upgrade or replacement applications.


Microsoft list of apps that have an issue with SP2 Firewall: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?
kbid=842242

Microsoft list of apps with 'loss of functionality' after SP2 is deployed:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=884130&product=windowsxpsp2

AssetMetrix Research Lab's Analysis of XP SP2 impact vs. company size (444Kb, PDF)




AssetMetrix™ Research Labs: Corporate Acceptance of Windows® XP Service Pack 2                              Page 8 of 15

Published March 29 , 2005.
                  th

Copyright 2000-2005 AssetMetrix, Inc.   Redistribution prohibited without written permission.
Factors leading to Windows XP SP2 ‘avoidance’

End-user avoidance
Previous to October 2004, Microsoft’s policy was to reply to a recent security issue by releasing a new
update immediately through the AU services. This response tactic – though well-intended – appeared to
cause issues for corporations attempting to test these updates against their business infrastructure.

In October 2004, Microsoft modified its update release policy such that updates were released once a
month, giving customers an opportunity to plan for testing. Nonetheless, end-users who control their AU
services have the opportunity to ‘avoid’ updates that may appear to hinder their use of their PC or
otherwise interfere with their activities.


Group Policy Mechanisms
The ‘initial’ release of SP2 (August 2004) via the AU services created an unexpected management scenario
for corporations who had yet to deploy Microsoft’s Update Services (a free application for Microsoft
customers -with licensed Windows Server CALs - to allow corporations to control which updates are
deployed).

The August 2004 release of SP2 also caused the necessity for corporations to review a list of applications
that lose functionality on SP2, ranging from word processing to anti-virus software (see addendum 2).

This ‘functionality’ loss at the end-user level has inspired many corporations to deploy Microsoft Update
Services as a method to supersede the end-user’s AU settings and create a ‘SP2 halting mechanism’ until
the ‘loss of functionality’ issues have been addressed and remedied.

Rather than resolving the issues of ‘functionality loss’, companies may intend to use Update Services to
attempt to ‘embargo’ SP2 within the current XP sub-population due to the fact that an corporate-wide
software audit to analyze ‘compatibility loss’ hasn’t yet been initiated.




AssetMetrix™ Research Labs: Corporate Acceptance of Windows® XP Service Pack 2                  Page 9 of 15

Published March 29 , 2005.
                  th

Copyright 2000-2005 AssetMetrix, Inc.   Redistribution prohibited without written permission.
Support gap between Windows XP SP1 vs. Longhorn

Typically, Microsoft supports the most recent Service Pack until the Mainstream support of the product
(i.e. Windows XP) has terminated. For previous Service Packs, support is continued for a period of one
year from the introduction of the next Service Pack.

Microsoft’s current policy (as of March, 2005) is that Windows XP SP1 will be supported until Sept 17th,
2006 (two years instead of one) and that SP2 will be supported via the conditions stated above. As per
Microsoft’s policy of supporting Business software for five years, Mainstream Support for Windows XP
terminates on Dec 31st, 2006.




               P o te n tia l X P L ife c y c le S u p p o r t T im e - T a b le
                                                                                                                                                                                        L o n g h o rn Q 1 -0 7 ?



                                                                                                                  W in d o w s X P S P 2 M a in s tr e a m S u p p o rt e n d s 1 2 m th s a fte r S P 3 o r 2 4 m th s a fte r L o n g h o r n

                                                 W in d o w s X P S P 1 M a i n s t r e a m S u p p o r t e n d s S e p 1 7 , 2 0 0 6                                       G AP

                 W in d o w s X P M a in s tr e a m S u p p o r t                                                                                                                         E x t S u p p o r t u n til Q 1 -0 9 ?




2001         2002                       2003                               2004                              2005                            2006                              2007                               2008                            2009


With the next edition of Windows (codename ‘Longhorn’) not anticipated until late 2006 (see Microsoft’s
press release: http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2004/Aug04/08-27Target2006PR.asp), there is
a potential ‘support gap’ for those who deploy only SP1 in anticipation of ‘leapfrogging’ over Windows XP
SP2 to ‘Longhorn’.

It is assumed that Microsoft extended Windows XP SP1 support from 1 year to 2 years to accommodate a
seamless support offering for customers not willing to update to Windows XP SP2. Unless Microsoft
extends support for Windows XP SP1 further into the first half of 2007 (and Microsoft has extended OS
support in the past for Windows 98), customers might face a support gap in Q406 should Microsoft release
Longhorn at the tail end of 2006 (as it did for Windows XP in 2001).

Customers who deploy Windows XP SP2 will most likely not face this issue of a support gap.




AssetMetrix™ Research Labs: Corporate Acceptance of Windows® XP Service Pack 2                                                                                                                                                 Page 10 of 15

Published March 29 , 2005.
                  th

Copyright 2000-2005 AssetMetrix, Inc.                               Redistribution prohibited without written permission.
Recommendations
    1.) Identify the magnitude of Windows XP and Windows XP SP2 in your corporation via a PC
          inventory.
              a. Do not guess at the potential magnitude of work required; identify the number of XP-
                  based PCs that will require SP2. Furthermore, identify XP-based PCs that are ‘internet
                  facing’.


    2.) Verify that technology and business dependencies are not impacted by the use of Windows XP
          SP2. Alternatively, assess your impact via a PC with Windows XP SP2 already installed, such as
          a recently purchased PC with an OEM edition of Windows XP Professional.



              a.    Identify all PCs with software identified as having ‘functionality loss’ (AssetMetrix
                    subscribers should use XP Compatibility report under the Windows XP menu).

              b.    Apply application upgrades where functionality loss is suggested, or replace product if
                    required (remove if product is not required for business operations, i.e. games, etc.)


    3.)   Determine if the Windows Update tool should be controlled by the user or by IT Management.
             a. If the user controls the Update Tool behavior, set out a clear governance policy (and
                 support mechanisms).
             b. If IT Management wishes to control the Update Tool behavior, ensure that all PCs
                 outside the influence of Group Policy Management tools (such as SMS and AD) are taken
                 into account (AssetMetrix subscribers use the Update Policy Manager function for PCs
                 outside the control of SMS or AD).



    4.)      Should you decide to deploy Windows XP SP2 within your Windows XP population, updates
    should be rolled out gradually – and before April 12th, 2005 – in order to reduce stress on support
    services or reduce productivity ‘brown-outs’ if end-users upgrade simultaneously (i.e. 9am on April
    12th, 2005).




AssetMetrix™ Research Labs: Corporate Acceptance of Windows® XP Service Pack 2                  Page 11 of 15

Published March 29 , 2005.
                   th

Copyright 2000-2005 AssetMetrix, Inc.   Redistribution prohibited without written permission.
Addendum 1:
     Microsoft’s Lifecycle Supported Service Packs
     (edited)

              This list is a portion of Microsoft’s Support table for Service Packs related to Windows XP,
              obtained from http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifesupsps (as of March, 2005).
              Review Microsoft’s website for a complete and updated list.



                                                                         General
                                                                                      Service Pack
Product Name                                                             Availability
                                                                                      Support Retired
                                                                         Date
Microsoft Windows XP Embedded Service Pack 2                              30-Jan-2002   Not Applicable
Windows XP Home Edition Service Pack 1                                     30-Aug-2002         17-Sep-2006
                                                                                              Not Applicable
Windows XP Home Edition Service Pack 2                                     17-Sep-2004

Windows XP Media Center Edition 2002 Service Pack 1                        30-Aug-2003         17-Sep-2006
                                                                                              Not Applicable
Windows XP Media Center Edition 2002 Service Pack 2                        17-Sep-2004

Windows XP Media Center Edition 2004 Service Pack 1                        30-Aug-2003         17-Sep-2006
                                                                                              Not Applicable
Windows XP Media Center Edition 2004 Service Pack 2                        17-Sep-2004

Windows XP Professional Service Pack 1                                    30-Aug-2002         17-Sep-2006
                                                                                             Not Applicable
Windows XP Professional Service Pack 2                                    17-Sep-2004

Windows XP Tablet PC Edition Service Pack 1                                30-Aug-2003         17-Sep-2006
                                                                                              Not Applicable
Windows XP Tablet PC Edition Service Pack 2                                17-Sep-2004

Microsoft Windows XP Embedded Service Pack 2                               30-Jan-2002        Not Applicable
Windows XP Home Edition Service Pack 1                                     30-Aug-2002         17-Sep-2006
                                                                                              Not Applicable
Windows XP Home Edition Service Pack 2                                     17-Sep-2004

Windows XP Media Center Edition 2002 Service Pack 1                        30-Aug-2003         17-Sep-2006
                                                                                              Not Applicable
Windows XP Media Center Edition 2002 Service Pack 2                        17-Sep-2004




     AssetMetrix™ Research Labs: Corporate Acceptance of Windows® XP Service Pack 2                            Page 12 of 15

     Published March 29 , 2005.
                       th

     Copyright 2000-2005 AssetMetrix, Inc.   Redistribution prohibited without written permission.
Addendum 2:
Resources for Managing Windows XP Service Pack 2


Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 2 Deployment Page


Using SUS to deploy a delayed roll-out or Windows XP SP2
(SUS is a free download for customers using Microsoft’s Windows Server 2003 or Windows 200 Server,
and can be downloaded from Microsoft’s Download Center)


Using SMS to deploy Windows XP SP2
(Requires Microsoft’s System Management Server 2 or 2003)


Using Group Policy to deploy Windows XP SP2
(Requires Microsoft’s Active Directory with Software Installation & Maintenance features enabled)


Using AssetMetrix to help you deploy or delay Windows XP SP2



Microsoft’s list of app that have an issue with the SP2 Firewall


Microsoft’s list of app with ‘loss of functionality’ after SP2 is deployed


AssetMetrix Research Lab’s Q304 analysis of ‘application issues’ with Windows XP SP2
(PDF, 444Kb)




AssetMetrix™ Research Labs: Corporate Acceptance of Windows® XP Service Pack 2                  Page 13 of 15

Published March 29 , 2005.
                  th

Copyright 2000-2005 AssetMetrix, Inc.   Redistribution prohibited without written permission.
Disclaimer

The information contained in this document represents the current view of AssetMetrix, Inc.
(“AssetMetrix”) on the issues discussed as of the date of publication. Because AssetMetrix must respond to
changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of AssetMetrix
and AssetMetrix cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information presented. This document is for
informational purposes only. ASSETMETRIX MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, IN THIS
DOCUMENT. THIS DOCUMENT SHOULD NOT BE VIEWED AS LEGAL ADVICE.

AssetMetrix may have patents or pending patent applications, trademarks, copyrights, or other intellectual
property rights covering subject matter in this document. The furnishing of this document does not give
you any license to these patents, trademarks, copyrights, or other intellectual property rights.

AssetMetrix does not make any representation or warranty regarding specifications in this document or
any product or item developed based on these specifications. AssetMetrix disclaims all express and
implied warranties, including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a
particular purpose, and freedom from infringement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing,
AssetMetrix does not make any warranty of any kind that any item developed based on these
specifications, or any portion of a specification, will not infringe any copyright, patent, trade secret, or
other intellectual property right of any person or entity in any country. It is your responsibility to seek
licenses for such intellectual property rights where appropriate. AssetMetrix shall not be liable for any
damages arising out of or in connection with the use of these specifications, including liability for lost
profit, business interruption, or any other damages whatsoever.

AssetMetrix, AssetMetrix Research Labs and AssetLabs are either registered trademarks or trademarks of
AssetMetrix, Inc.

Windows is a registered trademark of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and other countries.
Other product and company names herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners. Usage
and/or reference of other product and/company names should not necessarily be construed as an
endorsement by AssetMetrix.

© 2000-2005 AssetMetrix Inc. All rights reserved.




Data Privacy
         Corporate participants in this survey are protected by AssetMetrix’s strict privacy and
         confidentiality policy. Data used by AssetMetrix Research Labs was blindly aggregated to prevent
         any identification of a company and/or any end-user identifiers.




AssetMetrix™ Research Labs: Corporate Acceptance of Windows® XP Service Pack 2                   Page 14 of 15

Published March 29 , 2005.
                  th

Copyright 2000-2005 AssetMetrix, Inc.   Redistribution prohibited without written permission.
About AssetMetrix

         Founded in 2000 and headquartered in Ottawa, Canada, AssetMetrix is the industry’s premiere
         on-demand ‘AssetIntelligence’ service. AssetMetrix gives CIOs the power to analyze their
         corporate environment, quantify their business and technology risks, and verify the effectiveness
         of their management tools and policies.

         AssetMetrix offers corporate policy and security threat analysis, identifies viruses and improper
         anti-virus application configurations, and forecasts PC replacement budgets and platform
         migration service/component costs. With more than 160 reports, AssetMetrix is the most
         comprehensive IT asset analysis solution available today. Visit www.assetmetrix.com.




About AssetMetrix Research Labs
         AssetMetrix Research Labs is the research division of AssetMetrix, and is responsible for the
         algorithms used within the many asset analysis reports found within AssetMetrix (i.e. Windows
         Migration analysis, PC Population Replacement Forecasting, License Calculators, etc.)

         AssetMetrix Research Labs focuses on assisting AssetMetrix clientele (and channel partners) with
         strategic IT Asset Management advice and solutions, and also with monitoring industry events
         and trends on behalf of AssetMetrix to help partners and clients keep abreast of the most
         pressing IT Asset Management issues.




About the Author
         Steve O’Halloran is the Managing Director of AssetMetrix Research Labs, and the CKO/Co-
         Founder of AssetMetrix, Inc. Mr. O’Halloran is an SIIA Certified Software Manager (CSM), and
         has been in the ITAM marketplace since 1993, and has previously worked with asset
         management companies such as Compucom, Provance Technologies and Peregrine Systems.


         Commentary on this document is welcome.

                             Phone:     613-599-1825
                               Fax:     613-599-9613
                              Email:    ResearchLabs@AssetMetrix.com




AssetMetrix™ Research Labs: Corporate Acceptance of Windows® XP Service Pack 2                  Page 15 of 15

Published March 29 , 2005.
                  th

Copyright 2000-2005 AssetMetrix, Inc.   Redistribution prohibited without written permission.

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

[Era] cost reduction guide - issue 1 - property and premises costs
[Era]   cost reduction guide - issue 1 - property and premises costs[Era]   cost reduction guide - issue 1 - property and premises costs
[Era] cost reduction guide - issue 1 - property and premises costsManuel A. Velazquez
 
[Era] cost reduction guide - issue 6 IT
[Era]   cost reduction guide - issue 6 IT[Era]   cost reduction guide - issue 6 IT
[Era] cost reduction guide - issue 6 ITManuel A. Velazquez
 
WMA: Growing Your Membership Using Technology
WMA: Growing Your Membership Using TechnologyWMA: Growing Your Membership Using Technology
WMA: Growing Your Membership Using TechnologyDebra Drummond
 
Bringing the Discipline of Direct Cost Management to G&A Costs
Bringing the Discipline of Direct Cost Management to G&A CostsBringing the Discipline of Direct Cost Management to G&A Costs
Bringing the Discipline of Direct Cost Management to G&A CostsManuel A. Velazquez
 
[Era] cost reduction guide - issue 4 professional services
[Era]   cost reduction guide - issue 4 professional services[Era]   cost reduction guide - issue 4 professional services
[Era] cost reduction guide - issue 4 professional servicesManuel A. Velazquez
 
Package1
Package1Package1
Package1HeBu4
 

Viewers also liked (8)

[Era] cost reduction guide - issue 1 - property and premises costs
[Era]   cost reduction guide - issue 1 - property and premises costs[Era]   cost reduction guide - issue 1 - property and premises costs
[Era] cost reduction guide - issue 1 - property and premises costs
 
[Era] cost reduction guide - issue 6 IT
[Era]   cost reduction guide - issue 6 IT[Era]   cost reduction guide - issue 6 IT
[Era] cost reduction guide - issue 6 IT
 
WMA: Growing Your Membership Using Technology
WMA: Growing Your Membership Using TechnologyWMA: Growing Your Membership Using Technology
WMA: Growing Your Membership Using Technology
 
Managing Uncertainty
Managing UncertaintyManaging Uncertainty
Managing Uncertainty
 
Bringing the Discipline of Direct Cost Management to G&A Costs
Bringing the Discipline of Direct Cost Management to G&A CostsBringing the Discipline of Direct Cost Management to G&A Costs
Bringing the Discipline of Direct Cost Management to G&A Costs
 
[Era] cost reduction guide - issue 4 professional services
[Era]   cost reduction guide - issue 4 professional services[Era]   cost reduction guide - issue 4 professional services
[Era] cost reduction guide - issue 4 professional services
 
Veterans Day 2009
Veterans  Day 2009Veterans  Day 2009
Veterans Day 2009
 
Package1
Package1Package1
Package1
 

Similar to Asset Metrix Corporate Acceptance Of Windows Xp Sp2 Asset Labs Edition

CIS13: Dealing with Our App-Centric Future
CIS13: Dealing with Our App-Centric FutureCIS13: Dealing with Our App-Centric Future
CIS13: Dealing with Our App-Centric FutureCloudIDSummit
 
81819, 957 PMPrintPage 1 of 43httpscontent.ashford.e.docx
81819, 957 PMPrintPage 1 of 43httpscontent.ashford.e.docx81819, 957 PMPrintPage 1 of 43httpscontent.ashford.e.docx
81819, 957 PMPrintPage 1 of 43httpscontent.ashford.e.docxblondellchancy
 
Merge Presentation August 2009
Merge Presentation August 2009Merge Presentation August 2009
Merge Presentation August 2009mvangompel
 
EMEA WIN Media Kit2009
EMEA WIN Media Kit2009EMEA WIN Media Kit2009
EMEA WIN Media Kit2009WindowsITPRO
 
Welcome to Love Cloud Manchester | 21st February 2018
Welcome to Love Cloud Manchester | 21st February 2018Welcome to Love Cloud Manchester | 21st February 2018
Welcome to Love Cloud Manchester | 21st February 2018Vuzion
 
BigData @ comScore
BigData @ comScoreBigData @ comScore
BigData @ comScoreeaiti
 
Utilizing Aster nCluster to support processing in excess of 100 Billion rows ...
Utilizing Aster nCluster to support processing in excess of 100 Billion rows ...Utilizing Aster nCluster to support processing in excess of 100 Billion rows ...
Utilizing Aster nCluster to support processing in excess of 100 Billion rows ...Teradata Aster
 
Driving workforce enablement through it innovation - Windows & Devices
Driving workforce enablement through it innovation - Windows & DevicesDriving workforce enablement through it innovation - Windows & Devices
Driving workforce enablement through it innovation - Windows & DevicesMicrosoft UK
 
Comparing Operating Systems for Interfacing
Comparing Operating Systems for InterfacingComparing Operating Systems for Interfacing
Comparing Operating Systems for InterfacingChad Johnson
 
UCS Launch PR Results Summary FINAL
UCS Launch PR Results Summary FINALUCS Launch PR Results Summary FINAL
UCS Launch PR Results Summary FINALLee Davis
 
Welcome to Love Cloud London | 27th February 2018
Welcome to Love Cloud London | 27th February 2018Welcome to Love Cloud London | 27th February 2018
Welcome to Love Cloud London | 27th February 2018Vuzion
 
VMware: Súčasnosť a trendy v cloud computingu
VMware: Súčasnosť a trendy v cloud computinguVMware: Súčasnosť a trendy v cloud computingu
VMware: Súčasnosť a trendy v cloud computinguASBIS SK
 
Primend Pilvekonverents - Azure Infrastruktuur
Primend Pilvekonverents - Azure InfrastruktuurPrimend Pilvekonverents - Azure Infrastruktuur
Primend Pilvekonverents - Azure InfrastruktuurPrimend
 
Spiceworks Unplugged Microsoft UK 30 Nov 11
Spiceworks Unplugged Microsoft UK 30 Nov 11Spiceworks Unplugged Microsoft UK 30 Nov 11
Spiceworks Unplugged Microsoft UK 30 Nov 11Auskosh
 
Comparisons And Contrasts Of Windows Ce, Windows Xp, And...
Comparisons And Contrasts Of Windows Ce, Windows Xp, And...Comparisons And Contrasts Of Windows Ce, Windows Xp, And...
Comparisons And Contrasts Of Windows Ce, Windows Xp, And...Cecilia Lucero
 
Utilising Open Source and Communities to Drive Innovation in a Cost-Effective...
Utilising Open Source and Communities to Drive Innovation in a Cost-Effective...Utilising Open Source and Communities to Drive Innovation in a Cost-Effective...
Utilising Open Source and Communities to Drive Innovation in a Cost-Effective...Dr. Haxel Consult
 

Similar to Asset Metrix Corporate Acceptance Of Windows Xp Sp2 Asset Labs Edition (20)

CIS13: Dealing with Our App-Centric Future
CIS13: Dealing with Our App-Centric FutureCIS13: Dealing with Our App-Centric Future
CIS13: Dealing with Our App-Centric Future
 
81819, 957 PMPrintPage 1 of 43httpscontent.ashford.e.docx
81819, 957 PMPrintPage 1 of 43httpscontent.ashford.e.docx81819, 957 PMPrintPage 1 of 43httpscontent.ashford.e.docx
81819, 957 PMPrintPage 1 of 43httpscontent.ashford.e.docx
 
Merge Presentation August 2009
Merge Presentation August 2009Merge Presentation August 2009
Merge Presentation August 2009
 
EMEA WIN Media Kit2009
EMEA WIN Media Kit2009EMEA WIN Media Kit2009
EMEA WIN Media Kit2009
 
Welcome to Love Cloud Manchester | 21st February 2018
Welcome to Love Cloud Manchester | 21st February 2018Welcome to Love Cloud Manchester | 21st February 2018
Welcome to Love Cloud Manchester | 21st February 2018
 
BigData @ comScore
BigData @ comScoreBigData @ comScore
BigData @ comScore
 
comScore
comScorecomScore
comScore
 
Utilizing Aster nCluster to support processing in excess of 100 Billion rows ...
Utilizing Aster nCluster to support processing in excess of 100 Billion rows ...Utilizing Aster nCluster to support processing in excess of 100 Billion rows ...
Utilizing Aster nCluster to support processing in excess of 100 Billion rows ...
 
Driving workforce enablement through it innovation - Windows & Devices
Driving workforce enablement through it innovation - Windows & DevicesDriving workforce enablement through it innovation - Windows & Devices
Driving workforce enablement through it innovation - Windows & Devices
 
Comparing Operating Systems for Interfacing
Comparing Operating Systems for InterfacingComparing Operating Systems for Interfacing
Comparing Operating Systems for Interfacing
 
UCS Launch PR Results Summary FINAL
UCS Launch PR Results Summary FINALUCS Launch PR Results Summary FINAL
UCS Launch PR Results Summary FINAL
 
Welcome to Love Cloud London | 27th February 2018
Welcome to Love Cloud London | 27th February 2018Welcome to Love Cloud London | 27th February 2018
Welcome to Love Cloud London | 27th February 2018
 
VMware: Súčasnosť a trendy v cloud computingu
VMware: Súčasnosť a trendy v cloud computinguVMware: Súčasnosť a trendy v cloud computingu
VMware: Súčasnosť a trendy v cloud computingu
 
Primend Pilvekonverents - Azure Infrastruktuur
Primend Pilvekonverents - Azure InfrastruktuurPrimend Pilvekonverents - Azure Infrastruktuur
Primend Pilvekonverents - Azure Infrastruktuur
 
MICROSOFT CORP.
MICROSOFT CORP.MICROSOFT CORP.
MICROSOFT CORP.
 
Spiceworks Unplugged Microsoft UK 30 Nov 11
Spiceworks Unplugged Microsoft UK 30 Nov 11Spiceworks Unplugged Microsoft UK 30 Nov 11
Spiceworks Unplugged Microsoft UK 30 Nov 11
 
Tomorrow's Server Infrastructure Today
Tomorrow's Server Infrastructure TodayTomorrow's Server Infrastructure Today
Tomorrow's Server Infrastructure Today
 
Comparisons And Contrasts Of Windows Ce, Windows Xp, And...
Comparisons And Contrasts Of Windows Ce, Windows Xp, And...Comparisons And Contrasts Of Windows Ce, Windows Xp, And...
Comparisons And Contrasts Of Windows Ce, Windows Xp, And...
 
Utilising Open Source and Communities to Drive Innovation in a Cost-Effective...
Utilising Open Source and Communities to Drive Innovation in a Cost-Effective...Utilising Open Source and Communities to Drive Innovation in a Cost-Effective...
Utilising Open Source and Communities to Drive Innovation in a Cost-Effective...
 
Mon, 10.45h luethje, boy global production and work in the it industry
Mon, 10.45h luethje, boy global production and work in the it industryMon, 10.45h luethje, boy global production and work in the it industry
Mon, 10.45h luethje, boy global production and work in the it industry
 

Recently uploaded

Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL Certs
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL CertsScanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL Certs
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL CertsRizwan Syed
 
Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024
Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024
Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024Enterprise Knowledge
 
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry InnovationBeyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry InnovationSafe Software
 
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio Web
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio WebDev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio Web
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio WebUiPathCommunity
 
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR SystemsHuman Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR SystemsMark Billinghurst
 
My INSURER PTE LTD - Insurtech Innovation Award 2024
My INSURER PTE LTD - Insurtech Innovation Award 2024My INSURER PTE LTD - Insurtech Innovation Award 2024
My INSURER PTE LTD - Insurtech Innovation Award 2024The Digital Insurer
 
Artificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptx
Artificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptxArtificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptx
Artificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptxhariprasad279825
 
Commit 2024 - Secret Management made easy
Commit 2024 - Secret Management made easyCommit 2024 - Secret Management made easy
Commit 2024 - Secret Management made easyAlfredo García Lavilla
 
"Federated learning: out of reach no matter how close",Oleksandr Lapshyn
"Federated learning: out of reach no matter how close",Oleksandr Lapshyn"Federated learning: out of reach no matter how close",Oleksandr Lapshyn
"Federated learning: out of reach no matter how close",Oleksandr LapshynFwdays
 
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache MavenDevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache MavenHervé Boutemy
 
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding ClubUnleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding ClubKalema Edgar
 
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024BookNet Canada
 
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platforms
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platformsDevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platforms
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platformsSergiu Bodiu
 
Vertex AI Gemini Prompt Engineering Tips
Vertex AI Gemini Prompt Engineering TipsVertex AI Gemini Prompt Engineering Tips
Vertex AI Gemini Prompt Engineering TipsMiki Katsuragi
 
Leverage Zilliz Serverless - Up to 50X Saving for Your Vector Storage Cost
Leverage Zilliz Serverless - Up to 50X Saving for Your Vector Storage CostLeverage Zilliz Serverless - Up to 50X Saving for Your Vector Storage Cost
Leverage Zilliz Serverless - Up to 50X Saving for Your Vector Storage CostZilliz
 
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmatics
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmaticsKotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmatics
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmaticscarlostorres15106
 
Bun (KitWorks Team Study 노별마루 발표 2024.4.22)
Bun (KitWorks Team Study 노별마루 발표 2024.4.22)Bun (KitWorks Team Study 노별마루 발표 2024.4.22)
Bun (KitWorks Team Study 노별마루 발표 2024.4.22)Wonjun Hwang
 
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024Stephanie Beckett
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL Certs
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL CertsScanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL Certs
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL Certs
 
Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024
Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024
Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024
 
DMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special Edition
DMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special EditionDMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special Edition
DMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special Edition
 
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry InnovationBeyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
 
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio Web
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio WebDev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio Web
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio Web
 
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR SystemsHuman Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
 
My INSURER PTE LTD - Insurtech Innovation Award 2024
My INSURER PTE LTD - Insurtech Innovation Award 2024My INSURER PTE LTD - Insurtech Innovation Award 2024
My INSURER PTE LTD - Insurtech Innovation Award 2024
 
Artificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptx
Artificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptxArtificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptx
Artificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptx
 
Commit 2024 - Secret Management made easy
Commit 2024 - Secret Management made easyCommit 2024 - Secret Management made easy
Commit 2024 - Secret Management made easy
 
"Federated learning: out of reach no matter how close",Oleksandr Lapshyn
"Federated learning: out of reach no matter how close",Oleksandr Lapshyn"Federated learning: out of reach no matter how close",Oleksandr Lapshyn
"Federated learning: out of reach no matter how close",Oleksandr Lapshyn
 
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache MavenDevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
 
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding ClubUnleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
 
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
 
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platforms
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platformsDevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platforms
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platforms
 
Vertex AI Gemini Prompt Engineering Tips
Vertex AI Gemini Prompt Engineering TipsVertex AI Gemini Prompt Engineering Tips
Vertex AI Gemini Prompt Engineering Tips
 
E-Vehicle_Hacking_by_Parul Sharma_null_owasp.pptx
E-Vehicle_Hacking_by_Parul Sharma_null_owasp.pptxE-Vehicle_Hacking_by_Parul Sharma_null_owasp.pptx
E-Vehicle_Hacking_by_Parul Sharma_null_owasp.pptx
 
Leverage Zilliz Serverless - Up to 50X Saving for Your Vector Storage Cost
Leverage Zilliz Serverless - Up to 50X Saving for Your Vector Storage CostLeverage Zilliz Serverless - Up to 50X Saving for Your Vector Storage Cost
Leverage Zilliz Serverless - Up to 50X Saving for Your Vector Storage Cost
 
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmatics
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmaticsKotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmatics
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmatics
 
Bun (KitWorks Team Study 노별마루 발표 2024.4.22)
Bun (KitWorks Team Study 노별마루 발표 2024.4.22)Bun (KitWorks Team Study 노별마루 발표 2024.4.22)
Bun (KitWorks Team Study 노별마루 발표 2024.4.22)
 
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
 

Asset Metrix Corporate Acceptance Of Windows Xp Sp2 Asset Labs Edition

  • 1. AssetLabs The following document is authored by Steve O’Halloran – the co-founder of AssetMetrix (now owned by Microsoft Corporation). Re-distribution rights have been allowed via a legal arrangement between Mr. O’Halloran and AssetMetrix. AssetMetrix – now owned by Microsoft Corporation - remains the holder of Copyright of the following document. Other AssetMetrix ‘Research Labs’ documents can be found at www.AssetLabs.com AssetMetrix™ Research Labs: Corporate Acceptance of Windows® XP Service Pack 2 Page 1 of 15 Published March 29 , 2005. th Copyright 2000-2005 AssetMetrix, Inc. Redistribution prohibited without written permission.
  • 2. Corporate Acceptance of Windows® XP Service Pack 2 Executive Summary: On April 12th, 2005 Windows XP ‘Service Pack 2’ will be automatically delivered to Windows XP users who are using Microsoft’s Windows Update or Automatic Update tool. Service Pack 2 is a significant modification to previous editions of Windows XP and may require a download of up to 266Mb per PC. On August 16th, 2004 Microsoft offered a ‘blocking mechanism’ within the update tool to allow organizations and/or end-users to delay the installation of Windows XP Service Pack 2 for a period of 240 days (i.e. April 12th, 2005) to allow for testing and validation of Windows XP Service Pack 2 within their corporate infrastructure. As of April 12th, 2005 any Windows XP PC with the update tool enabled will automatically initiate the upgrade to Service Pack 2. CONCLUSION: Companies with Windows XP currently deployed should quickly make a decision to accept Service Pack 2 - or not - and put measures in place (both policy and technology) to ensure that the decision is enforced. Companies should inventory their PCs to determine the location and quantity of all Windows XP PCs in order to determine the effort to enforce their decision. In general, AssetMetrix Research Labs recommends the deployment of Service Pack 2 amongst Windows XP PCs, and recommends proper testing and verification before April 12th, 2005. Statistical Synopsis AssetMetrix Research Labs conducted an analysis of over 130,000 Windows XP PCs from 251 corporations ranging in size from 20 to 9,000 employees. On average, Windows XP Service Pack 2 is deployed on less than 25% of all Windows XP PCs. Smaller companies are more likely to have more PCs using Windows XP, and to have accepted Windows XP Service Pack 2. AssetMetrix™ Research Labs: Corporate Acceptance of Windows® XP Service Pack 2 Page 2 of 15 Published March 29 , 2005. th Copyright 2000-2005 AssetMetrix, Inc. Redistribution prohibited without written permission.
  • 3. Larger companies are less apt to accept Windows XP Service Pack 2 into their Windows XP sub-population compared to smaller companies, regardless of the number of Windows XP found within the company. Index ACRONYM TABLE ..........................................................................................................................................................................4 Dataset Parameters..........................................................................................................................................4 Data Analysis:..................................................................................................................................................5 Overall Windows XP popularity...............................................................................................................5 Popularity of Windows XP SP2.................................................................................................................6 Commentary ....................................................................................................................................................8 Understanding the benefits and risks associated with Windows XP Service Pack 2....................................8 Factors leading to Windows XP SP2 ‘avoidance’ .........................................................................................9 Support gap between Windows XP SP1 vs. Longhorn.................................................................................10 Recommendations.........................................................................................................................................11 Addendum 1: Microsoft’s Lifecycle Supported Service Packs (edited) ........................................................................................................................................................................12 Addendum 2: Resources for Managing Windows XP Service Pack 2................................................................................13 Data Privacy..................................................................................................................................................14 About AssetMetrix.........................................................................................................................................15 About AssetMetrix Research Labs................................................................................................................15 About the Author...........................................................................................................................................15 AssetMetrix™ Research Labs: Corporate Acceptance of Windows® XP Service Pack 2 Page 3 of 15 Published March 29 , 2005. th Copyright 2000-2005 AssetMetrix, Inc. Redistribution prohibited without written permission.
  • 4. ACRONYM TABLE ACRONY DEFINITION M PC Personal Computer Win XP Windows XP Operating System SP1 (SP2) Service Pack 1 (or 2) SME Small to Medium Enterprise (up to 500 PCs) OEM Original Equipment Manufacturer SMS Systems Management Server AD Active Directory Dataset Parameters AssetMetrix Research Labs conducted a statistical analysis of the 136,120 PCs using various versions of Microsoft Windows from 251 corporations - ranging in size from 20 to 9,000 employees - where a PC inventory was obtained between January 05th and March 10th, 2005. These 251 corporations -predominantly from the US and Canada - represent a variety of market sectors including: • Financial • Communications • Government • Healthcare • Services • Transportation • Utilities 96% (240 of 250) of the companies had at least one instance of Windows XP, with the average of 27% of PCs using Windows XP within a company. AssetMetrix™ Research Labs: Corporate Acceptance of Windows® XP Service Pack 2 Page 4 of 15 Published March 29 , 2005. th Copyright 2000-2005 AssetMetrix, Inc. Redistribution prohibited without written permission.
  • 5. Data Analysis: Overall Windows XP popularity From the entire dataset of 136,120 PCs, Windows XP was found on over one third (37.6%) of the PCs. Overall, the average popularity of Windows XP was 47.6%, with a standard Windows Popularity vs. Company Size deviation of +/- 35% (indicating a great XP pop Log. (XP pop) variation between near complete acceptance and near complete 100% avoidance). 90% 80% XP (all ed) Popularity It must be noted that the acceptance of 70% Windows XP is on a significant rise; 60% previous analysis from AssetMetrix 50% Research Labs suggested that Windows 40% XP had a popularity of 7% in Q403, 30% compared to about 38% in Q105. 20% 10% 0% 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 Company Size Popularity of Windows XP vs. Company Size Overall. the Windows XP popularity 80% compared to company size decreases slightly as the company size increases. SMEs had an average Windows 70% XP popularity of over 50%, where companies larger than 60% Windows XP popularity 1000 PCs had Windows XP popularity at 38%. 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Range % Windows XP 0% (PCs) 20-100 100-500 500-1000 > 1000 20-100 51.6% Company Range 100-500 50.3% 500-1000 47.2% >1000 Conclusion: The popularity of Windows XP 38.4% has risen significantly during 2004, with greater densities in smaller sized organizations (SME). AssetMetrix™ Research Labs: Corporate Acceptance of Windows® XP Service Pack 2 Page 5 of 15 Published March 29 , 2005. th Copyright 2000-2005 AssetMetrix, Inc. Redistribution prohibited without written permission.
  • 6. Popularity of Windows XP SP2 Popularity of Win XP SP2 vs Company Size The popularity of Windows XP SP2 is calculated by comparing the number of XPSP2 pop Log. (XPSP2 pop) Windows XP SP2 vs. all editions of Windows 100% XP (original, SP1 & SP2) in order to 90% determine how Windows XP populations are 80% accepting SP2. XP SP2 Popularity 70% 60% 50% Windows XP SP2 was found on 12,330 of the 40% 50,665 Windows XP PCs, representing an 30% overall 24% popularity. The average 20% company popularity was 27%, with a 10% variation of +/- 28.9 %. 0% 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 Company Size As seen on the X-Y scatter plot, the popularity of Windows XP SP2 tends to decrease slightly as company size increases, but the highest acceptance of Windows XP SP2 is typically seen in SMEs. Relative Windows XP SP2 popularity Range % Windows XP XSP2 80% (PCs) % of Win XP SP2 in ALL XP population 70% 20-100 30.4% 60% 100-500 22.6% 50% 500-1000 24.0% 40% >1000 26.0% 30% In 20% general, the average corporate Windows XP SP2 popularity 10% (within a Windows XP population) ranged from 23% to 30%. 0% 20-100 100-500 500-1000 > 1000 Campany Range SP2: Accept or Embargo? By reviewing the number of SP2 within each company’s SP2 Acceptance Windows XP population, one can identify whether SP2 is 60 being accepted (where SP2 popularity is within 85%-100%) 50 or being embargoed (where SP2 popularity is within 40 # of companies 0%-15%). 30 These values act as an indicator to evaluate the degree of 20 acceptance of SP2. Values ranging from 16% to 84% may 10 reflect a lack of decision or policy to approach SP2. 0 0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41-45 46-50 51-55 56-60 61-65 66-70 71-75 76-80 81-85 86-90 91-95 96-100 44 companies -having less than 10 installs of Windows XP - % of SP2 Acceptance were excluded from this analysis. 84 of the 207 companies (40.7%- in RED) are tending to exclude Windows XP SP2 within their Windows XP sub-population, whereas 16 companies (7.7%- in BLUE) are tending to accept Windows XP SP2. Conclusion: SMEs have a greater tendency to fully deploy Windows XP SP2 within their Windows XP sub-population, but the average deployment of SP2 stays within 26% to 30%, regardless of the company size. To date, more companies are tending to ‘hold back’ on SP 2 than accept it as a standard. AssetMetrix™ Research Labs: Corporate Acceptance of Windows® XP Service Pack 2 Page 6 of 15 Published March 29 , 2005. th Copyright 2000-2005 AssetMetrix, Inc. Redistribution prohibited without written permission.
  • 7. User Settings to accept or embargo SP2 AU Settings vs WinXP-SP2 populatiry Microsoft’s Automatic Update service allows end- 100% users of Windows2000 and Windows XP to receive 90% updates and/or notifications of various ‘updates’. 80% 70% 'negative' AU options By default, this Automatic Update (AU) 60% automatically downloads and installs updates are 50% they are offered from Microsoft. End-users can 40% modify the behavior of the AU from complete ‘off’, 30% ‘notify only’, to ‘automatic download.’ 20% 10% ‘Off’, ‘disabled’ and ‘notify only’ settings were 0% classified as ‘negative’ AU settings as they allow 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% the end-user to avoid or ignore update alerts. WinXP-SP2 popularity The percentage of ‘negative AU settings were compared against the popularity of SP2 within each company’s XP sub-population of PCs. The trend line and data clustering in the upper left indicates a loose correlation between a low popularity of SP2 and high use of ‘negative’ settings. This correlation may be weakened by the fact that AU settings may be overwritten by network functions (or group policies), and thus may not properly represent the actual settings used. Typically, the larger companies are more likely to have invested in technologies to deploy group policies compared to smaller companies. AssetMetrix™ Research Labs: Corporate Acceptance of Windows® XP Service Pack 2 Page 7 of 15 Published March 29 , 2005. th Copyright 2000-2005 AssetMetrix, Inc. Redistribution prohibited without written permission.
  • 8. Commentary Understanding the benefits and risks associated with Windows XP Service Pack 2 Benefits: Overall, Windows XP-SP2 is a significant ‘re-write’ of the Dec-2001 edition of Windows XP; some consider Windows XP SP2 to be a new operating system rather than simply an update. The focus of the SP2 is that of increased corporate and end-user security, minimizing the success of malicious attacks that could compromise the PC’s security. SP2 also includes the following improvements: • Windows Security Center, for managing the PC’s security settings in one place • Improved Firewall, offering a ‘permission interface’ to block or accept external connection requests. • Improved Security for Microsoft Internet Explorer (download monitoring, pop-up blocking, etc.) Details of SP2 features and benefits can be found one the Microsoft Website: (http://www.microsoft.com/ windowsxp/sp2/default.mspx). Risks: Due to the introduction of re-structured code and/or the Microsoft Firewall applications, there are several applications that may encounter a ‘lack of functionality’ or have an ‘issue’ with Windows XP-SP2. The risks for each company is based upon the business dependency for the applications in question, and the ability to address the ‘functionality’ issue with an upgrade or replacement applications. Microsoft list of apps that have an issue with SP2 Firewall: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx? kbid=842242 Microsoft list of apps with 'loss of functionality' after SP2 is deployed: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=884130&product=windowsxpsp2 AssetMetrix Research Lab's Analysis of XP SP2 impact vs. company size (444Kb, PDF) AssetMetrix™ Research Labs: Corporate Acceptance of Windows® XP Service Pack 2 Page 8 of 15 Published March 29 , 2005. th Copyright 2000-2005 AssetMetrix, Inc. Redistribution prohibited without written permission.
  • 9. Factors leading to Windows XP SP2 ‘avoidance’ End-user avoidance Previous to October 2004, Microsoft’s policy was to reply to a recent security issue by releasing a new update immediately through the AU services. This response tactic – though well-intended – appeared to cause issues for corporations attempting to test these updates against their business infrastructure. In October 2004, Microsoft modified its update release policy such that updates were released once a month, giving customers an opportunity to plan for testing. Nonetheless, end-users who control their AU services have the opportunity to ‘avoid’ updates that may appear to hinder their use of their PC or otherwise interfere with their activities. Group Policy Mechanisms The ‘initial’ release of SP2 (August 2004) via the AU services created an unexpected management scenario for corporations who had yet to deploy Microsoft’s Update Services (a free application for Microsoft customers -with licensed Windows Server CALs - to allow corporations to control which updates are deployed). The August 2004 release of SP2 also caused the necessity for corporations to review a list of applications that lose functionality on SP2, ranging from word processing to anti-virus software (see addendum 2). This ‘functionality’ loss at the end-user level has inspired many corporations to deploy Microsoft Update Services as a method to supersede the end-user’s AU settings and create a ‘SP2 halting mechanism’ until the ‘loss of functionality’ issues have been addressed and remedied. Rather than resolving the issues of ‘functionality loss’, companies may intend to use Update Services to attempt to ‘embargo’ SP2 within the current XP sub-population due to the fact that an corporate-wide software audit to analyze ‘compatibility loss’ hasn’t yet been initiated. AssetMetrix™ Research Labs: Corporate Acceptance of Windows® XP Service Pack 2 Page 9 of 15 Published March 29 , 2005. th Copyright 2000-2005 AssetMetrix, Inc. Redistribution prohibited without written permission.
  • 10. Support gap between Windows XP SP1 vs. Longhorn Typically, Microsoft supports the most recent Service Pack until the Mainstream support of the product (i.e. Windows XP) has terminated. For previous Service Packs, support is continued for a period of one year from the introduction of the next Service Pack. Microsoft’s current policy (as of March, 2005) is that Windows XP SP1 will be supported until Sept 17th, 2006 (two years instead of one) and that SP2 will be supported via the conditions stated above. As per Microsoft’s policy of supporting Business software for five years, Mainstream Support for Windows XP terminates on Dec 31st, 2006. P o te n tia l X P L ife c y c le S u p p o r t T im e - T a b le L o n g h o rn Q 1 -0 7 ? W in d o w s X P S P 2 M a in s tr e a m S u p p o rt e n d s 1 2 m th s a fte r S P 3 o r 2 4 m th s a fte r L o n g h o r n W in d o w s X P S P 1 M a i n s t r e a m S u p p o r t e n d s S e p 1 7 , 2 0 0 6 G AP W in d o w s X P M a in s tr e a m S u p p o r t E x t S u p p o r t u n til Q 1 -0 9 ? 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 With the next edition of Windows (codename ‘Longhorn’) not anticipated until late 2006 (see Microsoft’s press release: http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2004/Aug04/08-27Target2006PR.asp), there is a potential ‘support gap’ for those who deploy only SP1 in anticipation of ‘leapfrogging’ over Windows XP SP2 to ‘Longhorn’. It is assumed that Microsoft extended Windows XP SP1 support from 1 year to 2 years to accommodate a seamless support offering for customers not willing to update to Windows XP SP2. Unless Microsoft extends support for Windows XP SP1 further into the first half of 2007 (and Microsoft has extended OS support in the past for Windows 98), customers might face a support gap in Q406 should Microsoft release Longhorn at the tail end of 2006 (as it did for Windows XP in 2001). Customers who deploy Windows XP SP2 will most likely not face this issue of a support gap. AssetMetrix™ Research Labs: Corporate Acceptance of Windows® XP Service Pack 2 Page 10 of 15 Published March 29 , 2005. th Copyright 2000-2005 AssetMetrix, Inc. Redistribution prohibited without written permission.
  • 11. Recommendations 1.) Identify the magnitude of Windows XP and Windows XP SP2 in your corporation via a PC inventory. a. Do not guess at the potential magnitude of work required; identify the number of XP- based PCs that will require SP2. Furthermore, identify XP-based PCs that are ‘internet facing’. 2.) Verify that technology and business dependencies are not impacted by the use of Windows XP SP2. Alternatively, assess your impact via a PC with Windows XP SP2 already installed, such as a recently purchased PC with an OEM edition of Windows XP Professional. a. Identify all PCs with software identified as having ‘functionality loss’ (AssetMetrix subscribers should use XP Compatibility report under the Windows XP menu). b. Apply application upgrades where functionality loss is suggested, or replace product if required (remove if product is not required for business operations, i.e. games, etc.) 3.) Determine if the Windows Update tool should be controlled by the user or by IT Management. a. If the user controls the Update Tool behavior, set out a clear governance policy (and support mechanisms). b. If IT Management wishes to control the Update Tool behavior, ensure that all PCs outside the influence of Group Policy Management tools (such as SMS and AD) are taken into account (AssetMetrix subscribers use the Update Policy Manager function for PCs outside the control of SMS or AD). 4.) Should you decide to deploy Windows XP SP2 within your Windows XP population, updates should be rolled out gradually – and before April 12th, 2005 – in order to reduce stress on support services or reduce productivity ‘brown-outs’ if end-users upgrade simultaneously (i.e. 9am on April 12th, 2005). AssetMetrix™ Research Labs: Corporate Acceptance of Windows® XP Service Pack 2 Page 11 of 15 Published March 29 , 2005. th Copyright 2000-2005 AssetMetrix, Inc. Redistribution prohibited without written permission.
  • 12. Addendum 1: Microsoft’s Lifecycle Supported Service Packs (edited) This list is a portion of Microsoft’s Support table for Service Packs related to Windows XP, obtained from http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifesupsps (as of March, 2005). Review Microsoft’s website for a complete and updated list. General Service Pack Product Name Availability Support Retired Date Microsoft Windows XP Embedded Service Pack 2 30-Jan-2002 Not Applicable Windows XP Home Edition Service Pack 1 30-Aug-2002 17-Sep-2006 Not Applicable Windows XP Home Edition Service Pack 2 17-Sep-2004 Windows XP Media Center Edition 2002 Service Pack 1 30-Aug-2003 17-Sep-2006 Not Applicable Windows XP Media Center Edition 2002 Service Pack 2 17-Sep-2004 Windows XP Media Center Edition 2004 Service Pack 1 30-Aug-2003 17-Sep-2006 Not Applicable Windows XP Media Center Edition 2004 Service Pack 2 17-Sep-2004 Windows XP Professional Service Pack 1 30-Aug-2002 17-Sep-2006 Not Applicable Windows XP Professional Service Pack 2 17-Sep-2004 Windows XP Tablet PC Edition Service Pack 1 30-Aug-2003 17-Sep-2006 Not Applicable Windows XP Tablet PC Edition Service Pack 2 17-Sep-2004 Microsoft Windows XP Embedded Service Pack 2 30-Jan-2002 Not Applicable Windows XP Home Edition Service Pack 1 30-Aug-2002 17-Sep-2006 Not Applicable Windows XP Home Edition Service Pack 2 17-Sep-2004 Windows XP Media Center Edition 2002 Service Pack 1 30-Aug-2003 17-Sep-2006 Not Applicable Windows XP Media Center Edition 2002 Service Pack 2 17-Sep-2004 AssetMetrix™ Research Labs: Corporate Acceptance of Windows® XP Service Pack 2 Page 12 of 15 Published March 29 , 2005. th Copyright 2000-2005 AssetMetrix, Inc. Redistribution prohibited without written permission.
  • 13. Addendum 2: Resources for Managing Windows XP Service Pack 2 Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 2 Deployment Page Using SUS to deploy a delayed roll-out or Windows XP SP2 (SUS is a free download for customers using Microsoft’s Windows Server 2003 or Windows 200 Server, and can be downloaded from Microsoft’s Download Center) Using SMS to deploy Windows XP SP2 (Requires Microsoft’s System Management Server 2 or 2003) Using Group Policy to deploy Windows XP SP2 (Requires Microsoft’s Active Directory with Software Installation & Maintenance features enabled) Using AssetMetrix to help you deploy or delay Windows XP SP2 Microsoft’s list of app that have an issue with the SP2 Firewall Microsoft’s list of app with ‘loss of functionality’ after SP2 is deployed AssetMetrix Research Lab’s Q304 analysis of ‘application issues’ with Windows XP SP2 (PDF, 444Kb) AssetMetrix™ Research Labs: Corporate Acceptance of Windows® XP Service Pack 2 Page 13 of 15 Published March 29 , 2005. th Copyright 2000-2005 AssetMetrix, Inc. Redistribution prohibited without written permission.
  • 14. Disclaimer The information contained in this document represents the current view of AssetMetrix, Inc. (“AssetMetrix”) on the issues discussed as of the date of publication. Because AssetMetrix must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of AssetMetrix and AssetMetrix cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information presented. This document is for informational purposes only. ASSETMETRIX MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, IN THIS DOCUMENT. THIS DOCUMENT SHOULD NOT BE VIEWED AS LEGAL ADVICE. AssetMetrix may have patents or pending patent applications, trademarks, copyrights, or other intellectual property rights covering subject matter in this document. The furnishing of this document does not give you any license to these patents, trademarks, copyrights, or other intellectual property rights. AssetMetrix does not make any representation or warranty regarding specifications in this document or any product or item developed based on these specifications. AssetMetrix disclaims all express and implied warranties, including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and freedom from infringement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, AssetMetrix does not make any warranty of any kind that any item developed based on these specifications, or any portion of a specification, will not infringe any copyright, patent, trade secret, or other intellectual property right of any person or entity in any country. It is your responsibility to seek licenses for such intellectual property rights where appropriate. AssetMetrix shall not be liable for any damages arising out of or in connection with the use of these specifications, including liability for lost profit, business interruption, or any other damages whatsoever. AssetMetrix, AssetMetrix Research Labs and AssetLabs are either registered trademarks or trademarks of AssetMetrix, Inc. Windows is a registered trademark of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and other countries. Other product and company names herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners. Usage and/or reference of other product and/company names should not necessarily be construed as an endorsement by AssetMetrix. © 2000-2005 AssetMetrix Inc. All rights reserved. Data Privacy Corporate participants in this survey are protected by AssetMetrix’s strict privacy and confidentiality policy. Data used by AssetMetrix Research Labs was blindly aggregated to prevent any identification of a company and/or any end-user identifiers. AssetMetrix™ Research Labs: Corporate Acceptance of Windows® XP Service Pack 2 Page 14 of 15 Published March 29 , 2005. th Copyright 2000-2005 AssetMetrix, Inc. Redistribution prohibited without written permission.
  • 15. About AssetMetrix Founded in 2000 and headquartered in Ottawa, Canada, AssetMetrix is the industry’s premiere on-demand ‘AssetIntelligence’ service. AssetMetrix gives CIOs the power to analyze their corporate environment, quantify their business and technology risks, and verify the effectiveness of their management tools and policies. AssetMetrix offers corporate policy and security threat analysis, identifies viruses and improper anti-virus application configurations, and forecasts PC replacement budgets and platform migration service/component costs. With more than 160 reports, AssetMetrix is the most comprehensive IT asset analysis solution available today. Visit www.assetmetrix.com. About AssetMetrix Research Labs AssetMetrix Research Labs is the research division of AssetMetrix, and is responsible for the algorithms used within the many asset analysis reports found within AssetMetrix (i.e. Windows Migration analysis, PC Population Replacement Forecasting, License Calculators, etc.) AssetMetrix Research Labs focuses on assisting AssetMetrix clientele (and channel partners) with strategic IT Asset Management advice and solutions, and also with monitoring industry events and trends on behalf of AssetMetrix to help partners and clients keep abreast of the most pressing IT Asset Management issues. About the Author Steve O’Halloran is the Managing Director of AssetMetrix Research Labs, and the CKO/Co- Founder of AssetMetrix, Inc. Mr. O’Halloran is an SIIA Certified Software Manager (CSM), and has been in the ITAM marketplace since 1993, and has previously worked with asset management companies such as Compucom, Provance Technologies and Peregrine Systems. Commentary on this document is welcome. Phone: 613-599-1825 Fax: 613-599-9613 Email: ResearchLabs@AssetMetrix.com AssetMetrix™ Research Labs: Corporate Acceptance of Windows® XP Service Pack 2 Page 15 of 15 Published March 29 , 2005. th Copyright 2000-2005 AssetMetrix, Inc. Redistribution prohibited without written permission.