SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 10
Download to read offline
Powder Technology 195 (2009) 15–24



                                                                   Contents lists available at ScienceDirect


                                                                       Powder Technology
                                                   j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w. e l s ev i e r. c o m / l o c a t e / p ow t e c




Evaluation of the physical and mechanical properties of high drug load formulations:
Wet granulation vs. novel foam granulation
Stuart L. Cantor a,1, Sanjeev Kothari b,1, Otilia M.Y. Koo c,⁎
a
    ICON Development Solutions, 6031 University Blvd., Ellicott City, MD 21043, USA
b
    AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, 1800 Concord Pike, Wilmington, DE 19850, USA
c
    Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, 1 Squibb Drive, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA




a r t i c l e           i n f o                            a b s t r a c t

Article history:                                           The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influences of intrinsic drug mechanical properties and different
Received 9 July 2008                                       granulation binder delivery processes on the physical and mechanical properties of high drug load
Received in revised form 2 February 2009                   granulations after wet granulation. Formulations (80% w/w) of acetaminophen (APAP), metformin and
Accepted 6 May 2009
                                                           aspirin, which are brittle, viscoelastic, and ductile, respectively; were granulated by high-shear wet
Available online 12 May 2009
                                                           granulation. Two modes of binder delivery for wet granulation, either conventional or binder foam, were
                                                           investigated. Particle size, surface area and pore size of the granulations were characterized. Compacts were
Keywords:
Hiestand tableting indices                                 prepared at a solid fraction of 0.9 under tri-axial decompression and Hiestand indices (worst-case bonding
Conventional wet granulation                               index (BIw) and brittle fracture index (BFI)) of the compacts were determined. APAP formulations exhibited
Foam granulation                                           the smallest geometric mean particle sizes (dg) and showed only slight differences in dg values between the
Viscoelastic                                               two granulation processes. Binder delivery mode affected mechanical properties of the granulated model
Ductile                                                    drugs differently. Foam granulation appeared to enhance the granule plasticity for APAP while aspirin
Brittle                                                    showed a mixed deformation mechanism based on both its high BIw and high BFI values. The higher BIw
                                                           value for aspirin after foam granulation may be attributed to improved binder distribution among particles
                                                           during granulation. On the other hand, conventional wet granulation improved the plasticity of metformin as
                                                           measured by the higher BIw and lower BFI values. Therefore, conventional wet granulation process conferred
                                                           advantages in manufacturability and product quality for metformin; as compared to foam granulation which
                                                           did not enhance plasticity for metformin. Based on this study, a wet granulation process can be selected
                                                           based on knowledge of the intrinsic drug mechanical properties.
                                                                                                                                  © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.



1. Introduction                                                                                  different binder delivery processes have on the properties of the final
                                                                                                 granules.
    The understanding of both physical and mechanical properties of                                  The two granulation processes compared in this study are the
pharmaceutical granulations is critical for successful tablet formula-                           conventional wet granulation and a new foam granulation process.
tion. Costly problems such as low tablet crushing strengths, poor                                High drug loads, i.e. 80% w/w, were used in this study to minimize
friability, poor coating uniformity, and capping/lamination can                                  formulation effects and enable an accurate comparison of the
potentially be avoided through an improved understanding of the                                  differences between the mechanical properties of the three model
physico-mechanical properties of granulations. Such useful informa-                              drugs in affecting granulation properties. The foam-mediated wet
tion to quantify a granulation's degree of brittleness or plasticity can                         granulation process where the binder is delivered as foam has been
be gained by using dimensionless parameters known as the Hiestand                                gaining increasing attention in the pharmaceutical industry due to its
tableting indices. In this study, the physical and mechanical properties                         advantages over conventional wet granulation. Foam granulation
of high drug load granulations prepared via both conventional wet                                yields a more homogeneous dispersion of binder throughout the
and foam processes were evaluated. It was desired to determine both                              powder bed during granulation and can potentially reduce drying
the influences that the intrinsic drug mechanical properties and                                  time due to the lower soak-to-spread ratio of binder foam compared
                                                                                                 to a conventional spray of binder solution [1]. Moreover, delivery of
                                                                                                 the binder foam through rigid plastic tubing eliminates the need to
  ⁎ Corresponding author. Biopharmaceutics Research and Development, Bristol-Myers               optimize nozzle placement and geometry. Excipients suitable for foam
Squibb Company, 1 Squibb Drive, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA. Tel.: +1 732 227 5341;             generation include commonly used binders such as hydroxypropyl
fax: +1 732 227 3986.
    E-mail address: otilia.koo@bms.com (O.M.Y. Koo).
                                                                                                 cellulose (HPC), hypromellose (HPMC) and other cellulose ethers [1].
  1
    All of the work described here was conducted by the authors at Bristol-Myers                 Surfactants (e.g., sodium laurel sulfate, Poloxamer® 188) may also be
Squibb Company, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.                                                          used as aids to generate foam. The typical binder solution viscosity

0032-5910/$ – see front matter © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2009.05.003
16                                                  S.L. Cantor et al. / Powder Technology 195 (2009) 15–24


range for foam generation is between 5 and 100 cP [2]. HPC solution               plastic deformation occurs [4]. Plastic deformation is predominant in
has the viscosity and surface tension properties to generate high                 the decompression stage for viscoelastic materials that exhibit flow
quality foam of low density and was selected for this study.                      after release of the compression stress.
    Recently, scale-up trials of sodium naproxen immediate- and                       Brittle fracture index (BFI) is the ratio of the tensile strength of the
controlled-release formulations using foam granulation technology                 tablets without a hole and with a hole at their center. This ratio may
showed that this process prevented localized over wetting during                  indicate the ability or inability of compact to relieve stress at a crack
granulation. Furthermore, drug dissolution rate profiles were similar              tip within the compact by plastic deformation [12]. The BFI is based on
across the different batch sizes, from laboratory to pilot and                    the Griffith crack propagation theory, which states that a crack will be
manufacturing scale [3].                                                          initiated and propagated when the incremental change of elastic
    In addition to the granulation moisture level, physical properties of         energy during crack growth provides the incremental gain of surface
granulations such as surface area, particle size, particle size distribu-         energy for the new surfaces [13]. It is assumed that the origin of the
tion, and pore diameter can influence subsequent tablet strength on                crack is from a defect site where the elastic stress is concentrated. It is
compaction. It is known that porous particles are mechanically                    higher than the nominal stress, and hence the first region to reach the
weaker and readily deform to create new bonding surfaces which                    stress level needed for crack growth. Since the crack tip may continue
can lead to increased inter-particulate bonding and thus, harder                  to be a stress concentrator; the crack often continues to propagate.
tablets [4,5]. Similarly, granulations with higher surface areas are              Therefore the material fails at much lower applied stress than
expected to result in harder tablets through increased inter-particle             expected from the theoretical bond strength and/or theoretical
bonding provided that true contact distances are reached between the              shear strength. However, if a material relieves some of the stress in
deforming particles. Therefore, an adequate tensile strength, indica-             the region of concentrated stress by plastic deformation, then the
tive of good bond formation, is one criterion to determine a successful           stresses may not build to the level required for crack propagation. The
tablet formulation. However, physical measurements of granulations                Griffith theory is modified to include the absorption of energy by
are typically studied because mechanical properties are not pre-                  plastic deformation when calculating the BFI.
dictable a priori [6].                                                                Three representative model drugs with different deformation
    Some processes such as conventional wet granulation can have a                mechanisms were chosen: 1) metformin was selected as the model
significant effect on the mechanical properties of certain materials; for          viscoelastic drug in this study. Viscoelastic materials are uniquely
example, the compactability of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) is                affected by their sensitivity to both moisture [9,12] and time under
significantly reduced after granulation [7]. It was found that a loss of           load [12,14]; 2) acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin), a drug known to deform
compactability following conventional wet granulation is associated               plastically [15], and 3) acetaminophen (APAP), known to undergo
with a decrease in the particle porosity of MCC [8]. This is due to the           brittle fracture. APAP exhibits poor tableting characteristics because
strain hardening effect of the wetting and drying process that leads to           the particles of this drug are very hard, and therefore, inter-particulate
strong hydrogen bonds between the hydroxyl groups of the cellulose                bonding is very weak [16]. Furthermore, APAP has been shown to be
chains and results in an increased elastic modulus. Mechanical                    susceptible to capping following compression [16–19].
properties of pure excipients have been extensively studied since                     Interestingly, while the thermodynamically stable and commer-
they can impact a successful tablet formulation. For instance,                    cially available monoclinic polymorph of APAP (form I) requires
viscoelastic materials such as starch [9] or polyethylene oxides for              binders for tablet formation, the metastable, orthorhombic form does
controlled-release applications [10] are known to be strain-rate                  not. The reason for the significant difference in mechanical properties
sensitive; thus, when scaling-up to faster tablet machines with                   lies in the fact that the crystal structure of form I consists of puckered
decreased dwell times, a reduction in tablet tensile strength can be              hydrogen-bonded sheets which are relatively stiff and do not easily
observed because the material did not receive sufficient time under                slip over each other during compression. However, the crystal
load for good bond formation.                                                     structure of form II has parallel hydrogen-bonded sheets which give
    Hiestand tableting indices have traditionally been employed to                rise to slip planes that allow for plastic deformation and improved
study the mechanical properties of pure excipients or drugs. These                compression properties [20].
tableting indices, developed over 30 years ago, have been found to be                 Aspirin and APAP were chosen specifically because there is
sufficiently sensitive to detect lot-to-lot variations in raw materials            representative data on the Hiestand indices already reported in the
[11]. Hiestand indices provide a fundamental understanding of the                 literature for comparison purposes [11]. On the other hand, to our
behavior of materials under compression and decompression. While                  knowledge, this is the first work that Hiestand tableting indices of
typically used to characterize pure materials, this research is an                metformin are discussed. This work is also important because much
attempt to study the mechanical properties of pharmaceutical                      previous work has focused on the mechanical properties of pure
granulations prepared using two different binder delivery processes               excipients [3,21–23] or pure drugs [11,23] as well as model formula-
for wet granulation and three drugs of different intrinsic mechanical             tions without drug [24,25] but not on drug-based granulations.
properties. The indices of relevance here include the worst-case                      The objectives of this study are to 1) establish a fundamental
bonding index (BIw) and the brittle fracture index (BFI).                         understanding of the physico-mechanical properties of high drug load
    BIw is a ratio of the compact's tensile strength to its dynamic               granulations manufactured using conventional wet or foam granula-
indentation hardness and indicates the ability of intra-particulate               tion techniques and determine the influence of the binder delivery
bonds formed during the compression phase to survive during the                   technique on the granulation mechanical properties; 2) provide
decompression process. Relatively speaking, a higher BIw value                    guidance for selection of the most appropriate granulation process
indicates a more plastic material, and such materials will likely have            based on the mechanical properties of drug; and 3) determine if any
lower dynamic hardness values. Plastic deformation occurs during                  relationship exists between the physical properties (i.e., particle size,
tablet compression and decompression. As compression takes place,                 surface area) and mechanical properties of each granulation.
particles initially rearrange and repack to assume a smaller bed
volume. When no further reduction in volume is possible through                   2. Experimental
rearrangement, particles begin to deform. When their elastic limit is
exceeded, permanent deformation occurs through brittle fracture                      Acetylsalicylic acid USP was purchased from Spectrum Chemicals
and/or plastic deformation, and the particle bed is sheared. When the             (New Brunswick, NJ), metformin hydrochloride USP was obtained
shear strength is greater than the breaking strength, particle fracture           from Bristol-Myers Squibb (Evansville, IN) and acetaminophen USP
occurs. When the shear strength is less than the breaking strength,               and magnesium stearate NF were purchased from Mallincrodt Inc. (St.
S.L. Cantor et al. / Powder Technology 195 (2009) 15–24                                                 17


Table 1                                                                                 time of 12 h. The LOD of the granulations was determined using a
Formulations for conventional wet or foam granulations.                                 Mettler DSC HFT-2000M Moisture balance (Columbus, OH). Samples
Material                                  Wet process %            Foam process %       of approximately 2.0 g were dried to constant weight at 105 °C for
Drug                                      80.0                     80.0                 10 min.
Microcrystalline cellulose                17.0                     17.0
Hydroxypropyl cellulose                   3.0                      Dry 2.0              2.2. Physical characterization of granulations
                                                                   As foam 1.0
Water added during granulation            12–14                    12–14
                                                                                           Particle size of the dried granulations was determined in duplicate
                                                                                        by sieve analysis using a sonic sifter (Allen Bradley ATM Model L3P
                                                                                        Sonic Sifter®, Milwaukee, WI). Sieving was run for 5 min at an
Louis, MO). Microcrystalline cellulose NF (Avicel® PH-102, FMC,                         amplitude setting of five and a pulse setting of 5. The percentage by
Philadelphia, PA) and hydroxypropylcellulose (HPC) NF (Klucel®,                         weight retained on each sieve was determined and the geometric
Aqualon, Wilmington, DE) were also used in this study.                                  mean diameter, labeled as GMD or dg, and geometric standard
                                                                                        deviation, σg, of the particle size distributions were calculated using
2.1. Granulation batches using a high-shear mixer                                       Eqs. (2) and (3), respectively [27]:
                                                                                                    P
    Table 1 lists the conventional wet and foam granulation formula-                                    ðni T log di Þ
                                                                                        log dg =          P                                                      ð2Þ
tions used in this study. The rationale for devising simple model                                            ni
formulations consisting of only three ingredients is because a
comparison of results using the Hiestand Indices can become difficult                    where ni is the weight percent of particles in the ith interval, for all ni;
if a more complex system of materials is used [26]. The drug load was                   and di is equal to the midpoint of the diameter of the size interval in
kept constant at 80.0% w/w. Since a high drug load was used, it is                      the ith interval, for all di.
assumed that physical and mechanical properties of the drugs                                      2P                 2 31 = 2
themselves exert a significant impact on the properties of the                                       ni log dg − log di 7
                                                                                                  6       P
resultant granulations. Granulations containing each of the three                       log σ g = 4                      5                                       ð3Þ
                                                                                                             ni
drugs (metformin, aspirin, and APAP) were manufactured by either
conventional wet or foam granulation processes. Mixing and
granulation was performed in a 6-L Diosna high-shear granulator                         The spread of the data was calculated as D90 − D10, where D90 and D10
(Osnabruck, Germany) at a batch size of 1 kg. All powders were pre-                     are the diameters of the 90th and 10th percentiles of the cumulative
blended in the mixer for 2 min before granulation, with the mixer                       particle size distribution, respectively. The particle size span, Sx, which
impeller set at 200 rpm and the chopper set at 500 rpm.                                 gives a description of the width of the distribution and is independent
    During conventional wet granulation, mixer impeller and chopper                     of the median size, was calculated according to Eq. (4) [28]:
were set at 300 rpm and 1300 rpm, respectively. Water was added at a
rate between 55 and 65 g/min using a peristaltic pump and the                                  D90 − D10
                                                                                        Sx =                                                                     ð4Þ
impeller power was recorded at several fixed time intervals during                                 D50
granulation. The total amounts of water added were adjusted for each
drug, but kept constant for both conventional wet and foam                                  According to Fan et al. [28] if the span of the distribution is b2, it is
granulation processes for a drug.                                                       considered narrow; ≥2 but b3, moderate; and ≥3, considered a broad
    The foam granulation process utilized the same mixer impeller and                   distribution. All spans calculated from the granulation data were less
chopper settings as for the conventional wet granulation process. A                     than 2, indicating that the breadth of the distributions were relatively
10% w/w HPC stock solution was prepared by dissolving HPC in water                      narrow.
with gentle stirring overnight. The concentration of the HPC solution                       Optical microscopy was used to examine the particle morphology
was further adjusted before granulation so that 1% of HPC in the                        of the pure materials as well as the conventional wet granulation
formulation was added as foam and 2% HPC as dry powder in the pre-                      and foam granulation samples (Nikon SMZ 1500 digital camera using
blend. Therefore, final quantity of HPC (3%) was the same as in                          Act-1 v.1 2.63 software (Micron Optics, Cedar Knolls, NJ) at 50×
formulations used in conventional wet granulation.                                      magnification.
    HPC foam was generated utilizing the same concepts previously                           All granulations were hand sieved using a mesh cut of #30/#80
described by Keary and Shesky [1]. The compressed air and liquid flow                    (595–177 μm) to eliminate oversize and fines and only particles
rates were adjusted to achieve a ≥90% foam quality, according to Eq.                    retained on #80 were used for the following characterizations and to
(1):                                                                                    prepare compacts. Using a narrow particle size range minimized
                                                                                        particle size effects and improved comparability among the different
                     Rate of air flow − Rate of liquid flow                             drug granulations.
Foam quality =                                              T100                 ð1Þ
                                 Rate of air flow                                           The true densities of dried, sieved granulations were determined
                                                                                        by a helium pcynometer (AccuPyc 1330, Micromeritics, Norcross, GA).
   Air flow rate and liquid flow rate were 2.0 L/min and 0.1 L/min,                       The true densities used in the solid fraction calculations were the
respectively. The rate of addition of the foamed binder was kept the                    average of five determinations.
same as for water during the conventional wet granulation process,                          Surface area and average pore diameter were determined by
approximately 55–65 g/min. A high foam quality enables the foam to                      nitrogen adsorption (Gemini 2380, Micromeritics, Norcross, GA) for
behave more solid-like and retain its properties better as it flows                      powdered formulations before conventional wet granulation (i.e.
through a rigid plastic pipe from the foam generator into the high-                     before water addition) and all dried granulations, which includes
shear mixer. The foam was homogeneously dispersed into the powder                       conventional wet granulation and foam granulation batches (i.e. after
during granulation.                                                                     wet granulation). Accurately weighed samples (1.0–1.3 g) were
   The wet granules were dried in a hot-air convection oven at 60 °C                    degassed by nitrogen flow and dried at 60 °C overnight (VacPrep
for 6 h to a loss on drying (LOD) value of less than 2.0%. For                          061, Micromeritics). The amount of nitrogen adsorbed was deter-
comparison purposes using aspirin, an additional conventional wet                       mined at partial nitrogen vapor pressures (P / Po) ranging between
granulation batch was also prepared and dried for a longer drying                       0.05 and 0.98. Surface area was determined by the Gemini software
18                                                  S.L. Cantor et al. / Powder Technology 195 (2009) 15–24


using the Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller (BET) isotherm calculation for             of 0.4 times the compact width; and a vertical fracture through the
the nitrogen adsorption data in the P / Po range from 0.05 to 0.30. Pore          center of the compacts indicated that the failure occurred in tension.
size diameter was also calculated by the Gemini software using the                The platens were padded with cardboard paper to decrease the
BET analysis (4 × pore volume / surface area) for the adsorption data in          stress concentration at their edges and this minimized the shear
the P / Po range from 0.05 to 0.30 [29].                                          failure of the compact [32]. The time constant between loading to
                                                                                  fracture process was set at approximately 10 s, which is the amount
2.3. Mechanical characterization of granulations                                  of time between 1 / e, or 0.368, of the fracture force and the time
                                                                                  of the fracture force (the mathematical constant, e, has a value of
    The relative degree of brittleness or plasticity of a high drug load          2.718).
granulation can be calculated following the well established methods                  The tensile strengths of compacts without holes (σT) and of
of Hiestand [6,11,30,31]. Flawless square compacts were created using             compacts with holes (σTo) were measured. A total of at least 6
tri-axial decompression. This method is selected due to its ability to            compacts were tested for each granulation and the average was used
release elastic stresses in three dimensions following decompression.             to calculate the Hiestand tableting indices.
Three discrete tests are then subsequently performed on the compact,
(tensile strength, dynamic indentation hardness, and chordal radius)              2.3.3. Dynamic indentation hardness
and this combined information was used to calculate the Hiestand                      The dynamic indentation hardness (H) test employed a custom-
tableting indices. Conventional wet granulation formulations, both                built pendulum impact device using a steel sphere with a weight of
before and after water addition (e.g., dried), and foam granulation               0.0618 g as the indenter, which was suspended from a one-meter
batches were characterized for their mechanical properties.                       length of 15-pound fishing line. The face of the compact is covered
                                                                                  with a small strip of carbon paper before being clamped onto the
2.3.1. Preparation of square compacts by tri-axial decompression                  testing platform. The sphere is held in place by an electromagnet and
    Square compacts of approximately 3.0 g measuring 2.0 cm ×                     then released, once the sphere impacts the compact, the carbon is
2.0 cm × 0.6 cm were prepared using a custom-built tri-axial decom-               transferred to the dent and enables easier viewing. The short dwell
pression press. A split-die block was used along with a computer-                 time of the indenter acting on the compact minimized any strain-rate
controlled hydraulic system (Loomis Engineering and Manufacturing                 dependent effects. The inbound and rebound velocities in m/s of the
Company, Caldwell, NJ). Compression forces ranged from 6000 to                    sphere were measured using an optical ballistic sensor and are
30,000 lb and a 10 s dwell time at maximum compression force was                  converted into the initial height, hi, and rebound height, hr, by using
used. The compression forces employed for aspirin, metformin, and                 Eq. (7):
APAP granulations were 6000, 20000, and 30000 lb, respectively. The
edges of the die surface were sparingly lubricated with magnesium                       ðvelocityÞ2   ðvelocityÞ2
                                                                                  h=                =             :                                   ð7Þ
stearate suspended in acetone when needed. For evaluating the brittle                      2×g          19:62
fracture index, a stress concentrator was also introduced in the center
of the compacts using an upper punch equipped with a 1.1-mm                          The degree of rebound of the sphere occurs as a result of the elastic
diameter, round, spring-loaded retractable pin.                                   modulus or hardness of the material [32]. The chordal radius of the
    This tri-axial press allows for release of elastic stresses in three          indentation was determined using a Mahr Federal Perthometer
dimensions during decompression by allowing the split die to expand               Concept #3754341 (Gottingen, Germany) equipped with a dia-
and hence to produce flawless compacts suitable for tensile strength               mond-tip stylus to trace through the surface roughness of the indent
testing. While the compact dimensions were measured with a caliper                on the compact. Two measurements were taken per compact by
immediately after ejection, compacts were allowed to undergo elastic              rotating each sample by 90°. A total of 10 measurements were
recovery for a 24 h period prior to testing. The solid fraction is defined         taken for the chordal radius of each granulation and the averages
as the proportion of solid material contained in the compact and was              calculated. At least 5 compacts were tested for each granulation and
calculated according to Eqs. (5a) and (5b). The pressure of the tri-axial         the dynamic indentation hardness (H) was calculated according to
press was adjusted for each granulation to achieve a constant solid               Eq. (8):where:
fraction of 0.90 ± 0.01 or 10% porosity.
                                                                                                     
                                                                                         4mgrhr hi   3
                            compact weight                                        H=               −                                                  ð8Þ
Apparent density ρapp: =                                               ð5aÞ               πa4   hr   8
                            compact volume
                   ρapp:
Solid fraction =                                                       ð5bÞ       where:
                    ρT
                                                                                  m             mass of the indenter,
where ρT represents the average true density of the granulation                   g             gravitational constant,
determined in Section 2.2.                                                        r             radius of indenter,
                                                                                  hi            initial height of indenter,
2.3.2. Determination of tensile strength                                          hr            rebound height of indenter, and
    An Instron® Model 5567 stress–strain analyzer equipped with a                 a             chordal radius of the dent.
30 kN load cell and using a Bluehill® software (version M-K2-EN
Revision B, Norwood, MA) was used for tensile strength (σT) testing of
compacts according to Eq. (6):
                                                                                  2.3.4. Hiestand tableting indices
                               Peak Force
                                                                                      The worst-case bonding index (BIw) is calculated according to Eq.
                    2
Tensile Strength N=m =                                                  ð6Þ       (9):
                              ðlenght TwidthÞ
                                                                                           σT
   The ramp rate was set at 1.0 mm/min and the failure was                        BIw =                                                               ð9Þ
                                                                                           H
determined both by when the true strain was ≤10% and when the
compressive load threshold fell below 5 N. Testing was performed                  where σT is tensile strength and H is the dynamic indentation
under transverse compression between two platens each with a width                hardness.
S.L. Cantor et al. / Powder Technology 195 (2009) 15–24                                                            19




                                 Fig. 1. Granulation power plots for the different drugs (A) wet granulation and (B) foam granulation.



   The brittle fracture index (BFI) is the ratio of the tensile strength of           increases the surface area per gram of liquid several fold compared to
the compacts without a hole, (σT), and with a hole, (σTo), at their                   the sprayed system. Furthermore, foam has the capacity to spread
center and is given by Eq. (10):                                                      rather than to soak (i.e. a low soak-to-spread ratio), and particles that
                                                                                    are initially non-coated become surface-coated by the spreading foam.
         σT     1
BFI =         −                                                            ð10Þ
        2σ To   2

   The BFI scale ranges from zero, which represents highly ductile/
plastic materials, to one, which indicates highly brittle materials that
show a greater propensity to cap or laminate during decompression/
ejection [33].

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Granulation particle size

    For a given drug, impeller power vs. time plots were higher for
conventional wet granulation (Fig. 1A) than foam granulation
(Fig. 1B). During conventional wet granulation, water droplet size
can influence the extent of development of large granules or oversize
and binder distribution at short mixing times [34]. However, Ax et al.
[34] also noted that the distinction between spraying binder liquid
with different droplet sizes becomes less pronounced on the
granulations as process time increases. This is likely due to the fact
that competing breakage and re-agglomeration phenomena will be
occurring simultaneously during high-shear mixing. Furthermore,
conventional wet granulation typically involves areas of localized over
wetting of particles which then become agglomerated. Therefore, in
order to optimize particle size distribution and improve flow proper-
ties, conventional wet granulations usually require a milling operation
after drying. Interestingly, the foam process showed a less steep slope
from the power profile and lower power consumption compared to
conventional wet granulation particularly for metformin and aspirin.
This suggests less viscous granulation and more controlled initial
granule growth for these two drugs due to improved binder
distribution and less localized over wetting during foam granulation
as compared to conventional wet granulation. Water added via the
conventional drip method have larger droplet sizes compared to a
binder solution added as aerated foam. On the other hand, APAP
power consumption profiles for both the conventional wet granula-
tion and foam granulations were more similar; therefore, the effect of
localized over wetting was not as pronounced for conventional wet
granulation of APAP.
    Keary and Sheskey proposed the hypothesis of foam granulation
and how the foamed binder circumvents localized over wetting during
conventional wet granulation [1]. A foam is by definition, air dispersed
in a liquid continuous phase. In foams prepared using the same liquid,                Fig. 2. Optical microscopy pictures of APAP particle morphology. Pure material (P), wet
this phase inverted relationship of liquid-to-air is significant and                   granulation (W), and foam granulation (F).
20                                                           S.L. Cantor et al. / Powder Technology 195 (2009) 15–24


This is in contrast to the conventional wet granulation process where
the dry binder is dispersed in the powder bed and larger water
droplets are dripped or sprayed on top of the particles. In this case, the
spray droplets are typically of the same size range as the powders to
be granulated.
   In general, there appeared to be some level of primary particle
agglomeration in all three drug samples for both granulation
processes. However, it is unclear whether there are differences in
the spatial distribution and thickness of the binder solution around
the granules in the conventional wet as compared to foam granulation
processes. It appears from the optical microscopy pictures that the
granulation processes had the most effect on the APAP particle
morphology and physical properties (Fig. 2). While pure APAP (P) is a
cohesive, poorly flowable powder comprised of acicular needles, this
drug became appreciably less cohesive following either conventional
wet (W) or foam granulation (F) processes. Furthermore, there also
appeared to be some particle agglomeration occurring in addition to
the distribution of uneven binder for both APAP granulation samples.
While there was some primary particle agglomeration occurring only
with the smaller size fractions of aspirin in conventional wet (W) and
foam granulation (F) samples (Fig. 3), granules from the two
granulation processes appeared similar. Pure metformin (P) (Fig. 4)
showed a heterogeneous mixture of particle size and shape. Both




                                                                                           Fig. 4. Optical microscopy pictures of metformin particle morphology. Pure material (P),
                                                                                           wet granulation (W), and foam granulation (F).



                                                                                           metformin granulations showed similar particle agglomeration,
                                                                                           however, there appeared to be an appreciable reduction in the
                                                                                           amount of fines for metformin granulations relative to APAP and
                                                                                           aspirin granulations.
                                                                                               Geometric mean diameter (dg) and geometric standard deviation
                                                                                           (σg) were similar for both conventional wet and foam granulation
                                                                                           processes for a given model drug (Table 2). Among the three drugs,
                                                                                           APAP granulations processed by both conventional wet and foam
                                                                                           granulation exhibited the smallest granule size as compared to
                                                                                           metformin and aspirin (Table 2). Granule particle size distributions
                                                                                           of the model drugs are illustrated in Fig. 5A–C. Generally, the higher
                                                                                           percentage of larger granules for aspirin and metformin compared to
                                                                                           APAP can be attributed to the relatively larger particle sizes of these
                                                                                           pure materials (P) (Figs. 3 and 4). Compared with the other two drugs,
                                                                                           the APAP granulations had the greatest percentage of fines, ca. 10%
                                                                                           b74 µm (Fig. 5A) and a wider span (Table 2). It is interesting to note
                                                                                           that the foam granulation process yielded a higher proportion of
                                                                                           larger particles (≥500 µm), for the APAP and metformin samples.
                                                                                           This, together with the generally lower impeller power current vs.
                                                                                           time plots observed for the foam granulation process (Fig. 1), suggest
Fig. 3. Optical microscopy pictures of aspirin particle morphology. Pure material (P),     that other factors other than drug mechanical properties, such as drug
wet granulation (W), and foam granulation (F).                                             surface hydrophlicity/hydrophobicity and wettability can influence
S.L. Cantor et al. / Powder Technology 195 (2009) 15–24                                                     21


Table 2                                                                                    mechanical properties of these conventional wet granulations. This is
Physical characterization of granulations for three model drugs.                           discussed further in Section 3.3.
                  Geometric mean     Spread       Span       LOD    Surface Average
                  diametera and      of data      of datac,d %      area    pore           3.3. Mechanical properties of granulations
                  geometric standard (μm)c,d                        (m2/g) diameter
                  deviationb (μm)                                           (nm)
                                                                                               Mechanical properties of compacts from all granulations were
Dried granulations
                                                                                           characterized by their dynamic indentation hardness, tensile
Conventional Wet
    Metformin 421.0 (1.7)              505.6      1.20       0.9    0.17        6.7        strengths, BIw, and BFI values (Table 3). The dynamic indentation
                                       (2.5)      (0.02)                                   hardness (H) indicates the resistance of a material to permanent
     Aspirin      541.6 (1.5)          483.9      0.86       1.7    0.19        4.5        plastic deformation under a compressive load and will vary depending
                                       (0.5)      (0.05)                                   on the ductility or brittle nature of the material. The tensile strength
     APAP         147.7 (1.9)          215.4      1.61       0.8    0.29        7.8
                                       (0.7)      (0.00)
                                                                                           represents the strength of a compact after permanent plastic
Foam                                                                                       deformation has occurred and gives an indication of the extent of
   Metformin 507.9 (1.6)               503.9      0.99       1.3    0.13        7.4        intra-particulate bonding due to true contact areas formed between
                                       (1.6)      (0.01)                                   the surfaces. In evaluating the different processes for metformin, foam
     Aspirin      452.1 (2.2)          539.4      1.44       2.0    0.16        4.1
                                                                                           granulation showed a higher H, while the tensile strength was the
                                       (4.1)      (0.15)
     APAP         157.8 (2.0)          232.3      1.47       1.1    0.28       10.1
                                       (0.8)      (0.01)

Powder before wet granulation
Metformin       –                      –          –          –      0.213      10.20
Aspirin         –                      –          –          –      0.180d      8.7d
APAP            –                      –          –          –      0.304       8.99
 a
     Geometric mean diameter, (dg).
 b
     Values in parenthesis represent the geometric standard deviation, (σg).
 c
     Values in parenthesis represent the arithmetic standard deviation.
 d
     Values are the average of 2 measurements.




the granulation properties and granule growth during the 2 granula-
tion processes. It will be worthy to probe these factors and determine
if these are different during the 2 granulation process in future studies.


3.2. Surface area and pore diameter

   The surface area of a granulation is an important physical property
that can affect granule flowability as well as final tablet hardness. The
surface area results for metformin and aspirin sieved granulations
were similar, while sieved APAP granulations had a smaller mean
particle size and a larger surface area than metformin and aspirin. In
order to investigate the effects of wet granulation and the method of
granulating liquid addition on the powder formulations, surface area
and pore diameters were also measured for the dry powder
formulations before granulation (Table 2). Generally, there were
minimal changes in the surface area and pore diameter results for all
samples, and when comparing between the two granulation
processes.
   While all granulations were dried to b2.0% LOD for 6 h, to further
investigate the effect of over-drying aspirin formulation prepared by
conventional wet granulation, a batch was dried for an additional 6 h
to study the effect of additional drying time on the mechanical
properties of the granulation. The surface area and pore diameter
values for the aspirin granulation dried for 12 h (LOD 1.9%) were
0.05 m2/g and 3.2 nm, respectively. However, for the aspirin
granulation dried for 6 h (LOD 1.7%), the surface area and pore
diameter values were 0.19 m2/g and 4.5 nm, respectively. While the
pore diameter remained essentially unchanged, this additional drying
time for the aspirin conventional wet granulation sample caused a
significant reduction in the surface area. This can be attributed to the
drying process that removes the added water first from the surface
and then from the pores within the particles. As the internal water
was removed from the structure, the granules begin to densify due to
the collapsing of their pore structure. Even though there is a negligible
LOD difference between aspirin granulations dried for either 6 or 12 h,                    Fig. 5. Particle size distributions for (A) APAP, (B) aspirin, and (C) metformin,
such granule densification will likely have a major impact on the                           conventional wet granulation vs. foam granulation.
22                                                            S.L. Cantor et al. / Powder Technology 195 (2009) 15–24


Table 3                                                                                     than for either conventionally wet granulated sample, indicating
Mechanical characterization of granulations for three model drugs.                          enhanced plasticity. The chordal radius determined from the aspirin
                                 Dynamic hardness     Tensile strength    BIw     BFI       before granulation compact was slightly less than the value from the
                                 (H) N/m2 109         N/m2 × 106          10− 3             foam granulated compact. Thus, while the foam granulation process
Dried granulations                                                                          appears to enhance the plasticity of aspirin, the conventional wet
Conventional Wet                                                                            granulation process decreases its plasticity. However, the rebound
    Metformin                    0.4 (0.01)a            0.7 (0.0)         1.7     0.001
                                                                                            velocity data offers some contrasts. The highest rebound velocities
    Aspirin wet (6 h drying)     0.1 (0.0)              0.7 (0.0)         7.0     0.002
    Aspirin wet (12 h drying)    0.2 (0.0)              0.7 (0.0)         3.5     0.1       were obtained for the aspirin before wet granulation sample and the
    APAP                         0.5 (0.01)             0.7 (0.16)        1.6     0.02      lowest values observed were for the aspirin granulations dried for
Foam                                                                                        either 6 or 12 h. This data indicates that the conventionally wet
    Metformin                    0.7 (0.01)             0.7 (0.0)         1.0     0.1       granulated samples are more ductile than either the aspirin before
    Aspirin                      0.1 (0.0)              0.7 (0.0)         8.9     0.5
    APAP                         0.3 (0.0)              1.0 (0.03)        3.8     0.005
                                                                                            wet granulation or the foam granulated sample. The contrasts
                                                                                            between the chordal radius and rebound velocity results support
Powder before wet granulation                                                               the likelihood that aspirin undergoes a mixed deformation
Metformin                        –                    0.03 (0.31)         –       0.81      mechanism.
Aspirin                          0.08 (0.00)           0.4 (0.15)         4.7     0.08
                                                                                                In their study comparing microcrystalline cellulose granulated
APAP                             1.2 (0.01)            0.7 (0.0)          0.55    0.06
                                                                                            with 3% HPC, Badawy et al. [8] found that there was a significant
 a
     Values in parenthesis represent the arithmetic standard deviation.                     decrease in the surface area when comparing under-granulated with
                                                                                            over-granulated samples; 0.91 m2/g vs. 0.53 m2/g, respectively. The
                                                                                            authors reported that the difference in surface area can impact and
                                                                                            reduce the compactability of the microcrystalline cellulose to varying
                                                                                            degrees.
same for both processes. However, the higher H values resulted in a                             Similarly, lactose, an excipient with some brittle character, showed
lower bonding index, BIw for the foam granulation suggesting that this                      lowered compactability after being over-granulated with excess water
process may not be beneficial for metformin. Lower BIw indicates less                        and high-shear forces. The reason for this effect was found to be the
plastic deformation behavior and lower ability of intra-particulate                         inability of the larger, denser granules with reduced surface area to
bonds formed during the compression phase to survive during the                             significantly fracture or deform when subjected to a compressive load
decompression process.                                                                      [35,36]. It is noteworthy to also mention that the extent of brittle
    Compacts were prepared from the metformin formulations before                           characteristics and thereby the mechanical properties can vary quite
conventional wet granulation (dry powder) as well as after conven-                          significantly depending on the preparation method of the grade of
tional wet granulation (dried) in order to compare their tensile                            lactose selected [37,38]. In addition, such brittle excipients can cause a
strength values (Table 3). The average peak strengths of the before                         decrease in tablet crushing strength due to the fact that these
and after conventional wet granulation samples were 10.5 N/m2 and                           materials are characteristically harder and tend to be poor at forming
272 N/m2, respectively; which corresponds to tensile strength values                        strong inter-particulate bonds [39].
of approximately 0.026 × 106 N/m2 and 0.7 × 106 N/m2, respectively. It                          There were significant differences in dynamic hardness between
is interesting that after conventional wet granulation, the metformin                       the two granulation processes for APAP, the model drug known to
formulation displayed roughly a 27-fold increase in the tensile                             undergo brittle fracture. The results showed that the powder before
strength of the compacts. This significant increase in tensile strength                      conventional wet granulation had the highest H value of all the
with the addition of water from the conventional wet granulation                            samples tested, indicating the brittle character of APAP. However, the
process indicates that metformin has viscoelastic properties. Based on                      dynamic hardness was reduced by N50% after conventional wet
the data thus far, the conventional wet granulation process offers the                      granulation and further still after foam granulation (Table 3).
most benefit for metformin in terms of improvement in mechanical                             Furthermore, it was only for APAP that an improvement in tensile
properties.                                                                                 strength was observed when comparing after granulation samples
    A brittle material will resist permanent deformation and hence,                         from the conventional wet and foam granulation processes to before
show a smaller indentation from the sphere, with a resultant smaller                        granulation samples. Tensile strength value of 1.0 N/m2 for APAP foam
chordal radius. Also, less of the impact energy will be absorbed by a                       granulation was the highest of all the granulations. These results
brittle material and that will result in a higher rebound velocity. This is                 indicate that for a brittle drug such as APAP, the foam process is more
in contrast to a compact composed of a ductile material. Such a plastic                     appropriate to improve the mechanical properties of the drug. This
compact is relatively softer and will deform around the sphere,                             may be attributed to the higher surface area of solution in the form of
absorbing its impact energy and leaving a much larger dent, therefore                       tiny bubbles of foam that enabled a more uniform distribution of the
displaying a larger chordal radius.                                                         plastic binder to cover the drug granules, thus modifying their
    Different properties were observed for aspirin, a known ductile                         mechanical properties more effectively.
material. For the conventional wet granulation process three samples
were evaluated; before granulation (without any added water), after                         3.4. Hiestand tableting indices
granulation dried for 6 h, as well as the granules over-dried for 12 h.
The conventional wet granulation sample that was over-dried for 12 h                            The BIw and BFI values can be used to further elucidate which
behaved very differently. The extra drying time caused the granule                          granulation process is best suited to improve the intrinsic mechanical
surface area to collapse. Therefore, as the water evaporated from                           properties of the drug. These two indices have an inverse relationship;
within the pores of the particles, the particles became denser, harder                      therefore, a higher BIw and/or a lower BFI are indicative of plastic
and more brittle. This is clearly seen in the doubling of the dynamic                       deformation behavior. BIw and BFI values of the formulations are listed
hardness value (H).                                                                         in Table 3.
    Furthermore, interesting relationships were observed when                                   In comparing the conventional wet and foam granulations for
examining the chordal radius and rebound velocity data for the                              metformin, the conventional wet granulation (after) sample yielded
different aspirin granulations. While the chordal radii and rebound                         the highest BIw as well as the lowest overall BFI value of 0.001. On the
velocities were similar in both the 6 and 12 h granulations, the chordal                    other hand, the powder blend before conventional wet granulation
radius for the aspirin foam granulation was approximately 30% higher                        showed the highest overall BFI value of 0.81. The addition of water in
S.L. Cantor et al. / Powder Technology 195 (2009) 15–24                                                               23


the conventional wet granulation process dramatically improved the                 was determined. While there do not appear to be major differences in
BFI value of metformin by 800-fold and showed markedly improved                    surface area and pore size for the different granulation batches, there
plasticity as compared with the powder blend before granulation.                   were discernible differences in their mechanical properties. The foam
These results were also an improvement over the foam granulation                   process appeared to significantly enhance the plasticity of a granula-
process. This supports the data discussed previously that conventional             tion containing a brittle drug such as APAP. However, foam granula-
wet granulation is the best process for this drug (Table 3). BIw                   tion with a ductile drug like aspirin produced a material with mixed
measures the survival success of true contact areas formed at                      deformation behavior based on the high BIw and BFI values. This is in
maximum compressive stress; viscoelastic materials such as metfor-                 contrast to the conventional wet granulated aspirin that showed an
min will produce compacts with higher tensile strengths due to                     inverse relationship between high BIw and low BFI values.
enhanced intra-particulate bonding in the presence of higher                          Foam granulation did not enhance the plasticity for viscoelastic
moisture levels. BFI indicates the ability of a material to relieve stress         materials like metformin and the conventional wet granulation
by plastic deformation in accordance with the Griffith crack propaga-               process was observed to confer the greatest advantage for metformin.
tion theory. If the BFI is less than 0.2 there will typically be no capping        The increase in plasticity for foam granulated formulations may be
or lamination. However, if the BFI is N0.2 in conjunction with poor BIw            due to the improved surface coverage of HPC on the drug particles as
values, there is a greater probability of capping or lamination [4,11].            compared to the conventional wet granulation process. In conclusion,
    Among the aspirin granulations, the lowest BIw value of 0.0035                 the selection of the most appropriate granulation process (conven-
was observed for the over-dried, low surface area (0.05 m2/g)                      tional wet or foam) to improve a drug product's manufacturability can
conventional wet granulation sample, indicating relative brittle                   be guided by knowledge of the intrinsic mechanical properties of the
behavior. This effect has been previously reported for conventionally              drug.
wet granulated microcrystalline cellulose where the authors found
that dense, less porous granules would be less prone to fragmentation              Acknowledgements
or plastic deformation during compression [8]. A comparison of BIw
and BFI values before and after conventional wet granulation (6 h                      The authors would like to acknowledge BMS for providing the
drying) indicated that the aspirin formulation improved in plasticity              opportunity and summer internship funding to S. Cantor to conduct
after conventional wet granulation. Foam granulated aspirin exhibited              this work and also to the BMS foam granulation team members
the highest BIw value of 0.0089 of all the granulations. However, the              especially F. Nikfar; C. Keary and P.J. Sheskey (Dow Chemical) for their
BFI value of 0.5 observed for foam granulated aspirin was high given               technical input and assistance.
that aspirin is known to be ductile. Therefore, the deformation
behavior of the aspirin foam granulation can be considered as
                                                                                   References
anomalous or mixed, showing both plastic and brittle characteristics.
Phenacetin, a drug known to exhibit a brittle deformation behavior,                 [1] C. Keary, P.J. Sheskey, Preliminary report on the discovery of a new pharmaceutical
was reported to demonstrate very similar results to the aspirin foam                    granulation process using foamed aqueous binders, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 30
                                                                                        (2004) 831–845.
granulation with 0.0088 and 0.43 for BIw and BFI values, respectively               [2] R. Rowe, P.J. Sheskey, P.J. Weller (Eds.), Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients,
[11]. High BIw and BFI values also suggest a mixed deformation                          4th ed., Pharmaceutical Press, Grayslake, IL, 2003.
mechanism for phenacetin. However, Hiestand classified phenacetin                    [3] P. Sheskey, C. Keary, D. Clark, K. Balwinski, Scale-up trials of foam granulation
                                                                                        technology — High shear, Pharm. Technol. 31 (2007) 94–108.
as a “normal” material that compresses in a viscoelastic manner [31]                [4] M. Aulton, A.M. Dyer, K.A. Khan, The strength and compaction of millispheres,
whereas APAP, a brittle drug, would be classified as a “special case”                    Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 20 (1994) 3069–3104.
material. Special case materials exhibit extremely poor tableting                   [5] Y. Habib, L.L. Augsburger, R.F. Shangraw, Production of inert cushioning beads:
                                                                                        effect of excipients on the physicomechanical properties of freeze-dried beads
characteristics because their particles are very hard and bonding                       containing microcrystalline cellulose produced by extrusion–spheronization, Int. J.
between them is very weak. Additionally, special case particles do not                  Pharm. 233 (2002) 67–83.
deform plastically under compressive load to form bonding surfaces.                 [6] E.N. Hiestand, Mechanical properties of compacts and particles that control
                                                                                        tableting success, J. Pharm. Sci. 86 (1997) 985–990.
Instead, particles easily rearrange by sliding past each other. This
                                                                                    [7] C. Gustafsson, H. Lennholm, T. Iversen, C. Nystrom, Evaluation of surface and bulk
occurrence leads to greatly diminished inter-particulate bonding and                    characteristics of cellulose powders in relation to compaction behavior and tablet
low tensile strength of compacts [23,31].                                               properties, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 29 (2003) 1095–1107.
                                                                                    [8] S. Badawy, D.B. Gray, M.A. Hussain, A study of the effect of wet granulation on
    In comparing BIw and BFI values of APAP before and after
                                                                                        microcrystalline cellulose particle structure and performance, Pharm. Res. 23
conventional wet granulation a three-fold increase in the BIw and a                     (2006) 634–640.
three-fold decrease in the BFI value was observed after granulation.                [9] K. van der voort Maarschalk, H. Vromans, W. Groenedijk, G.K. Bolhuis, C.F. Lerk,
This suggested some beneficial effect of the conventional wet                            Effect of water on deformation and bonding of pregelatinized starch compacts, Eur.
                                                                                        J. Pharm. Biopharm. 44 (1997) 253–260.
granulation process in improving the plasticity of this brittle drug.              [10] L. Yang, G. Venkatesh, R. Fassihi, Characterization of compressibility and
However, the foam process further resulted a two-fold increase in the                   compactibility of polyethylene oxide polymers for modified release application
BIw coupled with a decrease in BFI of granulated APAP over the                          by compaction simulator, J. Pharm. Sci. 85 (1996) 1085–1090.
                                                                                   [11] E.N. Hiestand, Mechanical behavior of solids, in: J.G. Stowell (Ed.), Mechanics and
conventional wet granulation process, indicating that this is the best                  Physical Properties for Powders and Compacts, SCSI, Inc., West Lafayette, IN, 2002,
process to improve the mechanical properties of this drug. These                        pp. 21–48.
results can be attributed to the fact that the foamed binder has an                [12] J.E. Rees, K.D. Tsardaka, Some effects of moisture on the viscoelastic behavior of
                                                                                        modified starch during powder compaction, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 40 (1994)
enhanced surface area compared with water alone. Therefore, HPC,                        193–197.
being a surface-active binder with ductile characteristics, can more               [13] A.A. Griffith, The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids, Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc.
homogeneously coat the APAP granules containing this brittle drug.                      Lond A221 (1920) 163–198.
                                                                                   [14] W.T. Morehead, Viscoelastic behavior of pharmaceutical materials during
Thus, by improving the intrinsic APAP granule plasticity the mechan-
                                                                                        compaction, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 18 (1992) 659–675.
ical properties of the compacts were also improved.                                [15] S. Pedersen, H.G. Kristensen, Change in crystal density of acetylsalicylic acid during
                                                                                        compaction, S.T.P, Pharm. Sci. 4 (1994) 201–206.
                                                                                   [16] E. Joiris, P.D. Martino, C. Berneron, A.M. Guyot-Hermann, J.-C. Guyot, Compression
4. Conclusions
                                                                                        behavior of orthorhombic paracetamol, Pharm. Res. 15 (1998) 1122–1130.
                                                                                   [17] B. Obiora, E. Shotten, Effects of waxes, hydrolyzed gelatin and moisture on the
   The physico-mechanical properties of high drug load granulations                     compression characteristics of paracetamol and phenacetin, J. Pharm. Pharmacol.
manufactured using conventional wet granulation or foam granula-                        28 (1976) 629–632.
                                                                                   [18] N. Patel, N.R. Poola, A. Babar, F.M. Plakogiannis, Fluidized-bed agglomeration of
tion techniques were studied. Thus, influence of binder delivery                         acetaminophen: direct compression of tablets and physiologic availability, Drug
techniques on granulation mechanical properties of the 3 model drugs                    Dev. Ind. Pharm. 15 (1989) 1175–1198.
24                                                              S.L. Cantor et al. / Powder Technology 195 (2009) 15–24

[19] C. Imbert, P. Tchoreloff, B. Leclerc, G. Couarrazw, Indices of tableting performance     [31] E.N. Hiestand, Rationale for and the measurement of tableting indices, in: G.
     and application of percolation theory to powder compaction, Eur. J. Pharm.                    Alderborn, C. Nystrom (Eds.), Pharmaceutical Powder Compaction Technology,
     Biopharm. 44 (1997) 273–282.                                                                  Marcel Dekker, New York, 1996, pp. 219–244.
[20] T. Beyer, G.M. Day, S.L. Price, The prediction, morphology, and mechanical               [32] D. Wurster, S. Likitlersuang, Y. Chen, The influence of magnesium stearate on the
     properties of the polymorphs of paracetamol, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123 (2001)                     Hiestand tableting indices and other related mechanical properties of maltodex-
     5086–5094.                                                                                    trins, Pharm. Dev. Technol. 10 (2005) 461–466.
[21] S. Malamataris, J.E. Rees, Viscoelastic properties of some pharmaceutical powders        [33] N. Davar, R. Shah, D.G. Pope, L.L. Augsburger, A critical comparison of Hiestand's
     compared using creep compliance, extended Heckel analysis and tablet strength                 tableting indices and traditional measures of compactibility to predict tableting
     measurements, Int. J. Pharm. 92 (1993) 123–135.                                               behavior, Pharm. Res. 12 (1995) S168.
[22] K.M. Picker, The 3D model: Explaining densification and deformation mechanisms            [34] K. Ax, H. Feise, R. Sochon, M. Hounslow, A. Salman, Influence of liquid binder
     by using 3D parameter plots, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 30 (2004) 413–425.                         dispersion on agglomeration in an intensive mixer, Powder Technol. 179 (2008)
[23] M. Mullarney, B.C. Hancock, Improving the prediction of exceptionally poor                    190–194.
     tableting performance: an investigation into Hiestand's “Special Case.”, J. Pharm.       [35] S. Badawy, M.M. Menning, M.A. Gorko, D.L. Gilbert, Effect of process parameters on
     Sci. 93 (2004) 2017–2021.                                                                     compressibility of granulation manufactured in a high shear mixer, Int. J. Pharm.
[24] V. Busignies, B. Leclerc, P. Porion, P. Evesque, P. Tchoreloff, Compaction behaviour          198 (2000) 51–56.
     and new predictive approach to the compressibility of binary mixtures of                 [36] M. Wikberg, G. Alderborn, Compression characteristics of granulated materials. IV.
     pharmaceutical excipients, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 64 (2006) 66–74.                          The effect of granule porosity on the fragmentation propensity and compactibility
[25] F. Kiekens, R. Zelko, I. Antal, J.P. Remon, Evaluation of substrate–binder interaction        of some granulations, Int. J. Pharm. 69 (1991) 239–253.
     in a model granule system, Int. J. Pharm. 169 (1998) 175–182.                            [37] P. Narayan, B.C. Hancock, The relationship between the particle properties,
[26] R. Williams, J.W. McGinity, The use of tableting indices to study the compaction              mechanical behavior, and surface roughness of some pharmaceutical excipient
     properties of powders, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 14 (1988) 1823–1844.                             compacts, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 355 (2003) 24–36.
[27] P. Reist, Aerosol Science and Technology, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1993,          [38] V. Busignies, P. Tchoreloff, B. Leclerc, M. Besnard, G. Couarraze, Compaction of
     pp. 13–30.                                                                                    crystallographic forms of pharmaceutical granular lactoses. I. Compressibility, Eur.
[28] A. Fan, S. Pallerla, G. Carlson, D. Ladipo, J. Dukich, R. Capella, S. Leung, Effect of        J. Pharm. Biopharm. 58 (2004) 569–576.
     particle size distribution and flow property of powder blend on tablet weight             [39] E. Horisawa, K. Danjo, H. Sunada, Influence of granulating method on physical and
     variation, Amer. Pharm. Rev. 8 (2005) 73–78.                                                  mechanical properties, compression behavior, and compactibility of lactose and
[29] P. Webb and C. Orr, 1997, Analytical Methods in Fine Particle Technology.                     microcrystalline cellulose granules, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 26 (2000) 583–593.
     Micromeritics Instrument Corp., Norcross, GA.: pp. 80, 157.
[30] E.N. Hiestand, J.E. Wells, C.B. Peot, J.F. Ochs, Physical processes of tableting, J.
     Pharm. Sci. 66 (1977) 510–519.

More Related Content

What's hot

Pelletization - classification, advantages,uses, mechanism,equipments
Pelletization - classification, advantages,uses, mechanism,equipmentsPelletization - classification, advantages,uses, mechanism,equipments
Pelletization - classification, advantages,uses, mechanism,equipmentsRavish Yadav
 
Flow Properties of Powder: Industrial Pharmacy 1st
Flow Properties of Powder: Industrial Pharmacy 1stFlow Properties of Powder: Industrial Pharmacy 1st
Flow Properties of Powder: Industrial Pharmacy 1stRAHUL PAL
 
Various factors affecting strength of tablets by kailash vilegave
Various factors affecting strength of tablets by kailash vilegaveVarious factors affecting strength of tablets by kailash vilegave
Various factors affecting strength of tablets by kailash vilegaveKailash Vilegave
 
Tablet granulation tech
Tablet granulation techTablet granulation tech
Tablet granulation techGEORGESAHA
 
Granulation Technology (A Concise View)
Granulation Technology (A Concise  View)Granulation Technology (A Concise  View)
Granulation Technology (A Concise View)Dr. Sagar Firke
 
Presentation on dry granulation
Presentation on dry   granulationPresentation on dry   granulation
Presentation on dry granulationGirgis Attia
 
Pharmaceutical Granulation
Pharmaceutical GranulationPharmaceutical Granulation
Pharmaceutical Granulationneerajrawatnik
 
Granulation by rapid release technology
Granulation by rapid release technologyGranulation by rapid release technology
Granulation by rapid release technologyrana2511
 
Granulation process and types of granulators
Granulation process and types of granulatorsGranulation process and types of granulators
Granulation process and types of granulatorsSyed Waqas Haider
 
Large scale manufacture of suspension
Large scale manufacture of suspensionLarge scale manufacture of suspension
Large scale manufacture of suspensionMirza Salman Baig
 
Mixing Technique And Equipments
Mixing Technique And Equipments Mixing Technique And Equipments
Mixing Technique And Equipments vedanshu malviya
 
Factors affecting tablet strength
Factors affecting tablet strengthFactors affecting tablet strength
Factors affecting tablet strengthMuhammadAzamTahir4
 

What's hot (20)

Pellet technology
Pellet technologyPellet technology
Pellet technology
 
Pelletization - classification, advantages,uses, mechanism,equipments
Pelletization - classification, advantages,uses, mechanism,equipmentsPelletization - classification, advantages,uses, mechanism,equipments
Pelletization - classification, advantages,uses, mechanism,equipments
 
Flow Properties of Powder: Industrial Pharmacy 1st
Flow Properties of Powder: Industrial Pharmacy 1stFlow Properties of Powder: Industrial Pharmacy 1st
Flow Properties of Powder: Industrial Pharmacy 1st
 
SPRAY GRANULATION
SPRAY GRANULATIONSPRAY GRANULATION
SPRAY GRANULATION
 
Various factors affecting strength of tablets by kailash vilegave
Various factors affecting strength of tablets by kailash vilegaveVarious factors affecting strength of tablets by kailash vilegave
Various factors affecting strength of tablets by kailash vilegave
 
Granulation
GranulationGranulation
Granulation
 
Tablet granulation tech
Tablet granulation techTablet granulation tech
Tablet granulation tech
 
Chapter on Pellets
Chapter on PelletsChapter on Pellets
Chapter on Pellets
 
Roller compactor
Roller compactorRoller compactor
Roller compactor
 
Dry granulation
Dry granulationDry granulation
Dry granulation
 
Granulation Technology (A Concise View)
Granulation Technology (A Concise  View)Granulation Technology (A Concise  View)
Granulation Technology (A Concise View)
 
Presentation on dry granulation
Presentation on dry   granulationPresentation on dry   granulation
Presentation on dry granulation
 
Pharmaceutical Granulation
Pharmaceutical GranulationPharmaceutical Granulation
Pharmaceutical Granulation
 
Granulation by rapid release technology
Granulation by rapid release technologyGranulation by rapid release technology
Granulation by rapid release technology
 
Granulation process and types of granulators
Granulation process and types of granulatorsGranulation process and types of granulators
Granulation process and types of granulators
 
Large scale manufacture of suspension
Large scale manufacture of suspensionLarge scale manufacture of suspension
Large scale manufacture of suspension
 
Granulation Process
Granulation ProcessGranulation Process
Granulation Process
 
New granulation methods (devilal .kethavath )
New granulation methods (devilal .kethavath )New granulation methods (devilal .kethavath )
New granulation methods (devilal .kethavath )
 
Mixing Technique And Equipments
Mixing Technique And Equipments Mixing Technique And Equipments
Mixing Technique And Equipments
 
Factors affecting tablet strength
Factors affecting tablet strengthFactors affecting tablet strength
Factors affecting tablet strength
 

Similar to Wet Vs. Foam Granulation- Powder Tech

Influence of manufacturing process on physical and flow characteristic and c...
Influence of manufacturing process on  physical and flow characteristic and c...Influence of manufacturing process on  physical and flow characteristic and c...
Influence of manufacturing process on physical and flow characteristic and c...Ghazwa Shawash
 
Direct compression method..Mominul Islam
Direct compression method..Mominul IslamDirect compression method..Mominul Islam
Direct compression method..Mominul IslamMd. Mominul Islam
 
International Journal of Engineering and Science Invention (IJESI)
International Journal of Engineering and Science Invention (IJESI)International Journal of Engineering and Science Invention (IJESI)
International Journal of Engineering and Science Invention (IJESI)inventionjournals
 
Direct Compressible Filler
Direct Compressible FillerDirect Compressible Filler
Direct Compressible FillerHossen M. Faruk
 
lubricants-02-00021 (1).pdf
lubricants-02-00021 (1).pdflubricants-02-00021 (1).pdf
lubricants-02-00021 (1).pdfallison498280
 
CO–PROCESSED EXCIPIENTS FOR TABLETS.pdf
CO–PROCESSED EXCIPIENTS FOR TABLETS.pdfCO–PROCESSED EXCIPIENTS FOR TABLETS.pdf
CO–PROCESSED EXCIPIENTS FOR TABLETS.pdfYamini Shah
 
Strength technologies for tissue makers
Strength technologies for tissue makersStrength technologies for tissue makers
Strength technologies for tissue makersKemira Oyj
 
Bi-axially oriented Poly polypropylene films
Bi-axially oriented Poly polypropylene films Bi-axially oriented Poly polypropylene films
Bi-axially oriented Poly polypropylene films JayaVerma28
 
characterization of ceramic green body for specific objectives
characterization of ceramic green body for specific objectivescharacterization of ceramic green body for specific objectives
characterization of ceramic green body for specific objectivesabebewolelaw6
 
NOISE ABSORBING MATERIAL USING BIOPOLYMERS
NOISE ABSORBING MATERIAL USING BIOPOLYMERSNOISE ABSORBING MATERIAL USING BIOPOLYMERS
NOISE ABSORBING MATERIAL USING BIOPOLYMERSIRJET Journal
 
Bioprocessing and Characterization of Polyhydroxyalkanoate Blends from Cassia...
Bioprocessing and Characterization of Polyhydroxyalkanoate Blends from Cassia...Bioprocessing and Characterization of Polyhydroxyalkanoate Blends from Cassia...
Bioprocessing and Characterization of Polyhydroxyalkanoate Blends from Cassia...IRJET Journal
 
Buccal &Sublingual Drug Delivery System
Buccal &Sublingual Drug Delivery SystemBuccal &Sublingual Drug Delivery System
Buccal &Sublingual Drug Delivery SystemAshish Motivaras
 
GRANULATION AND EQUIPMENTS DETAIL BY AMIT KUMAR
GRANULATION AND EQUIPMENTS DETAIL BY AMIT KUMARGRANULATION AND EQUIPMENTS DETAIL BY AMIT KUMAR
GRANULATION AND EQUIPMENTS DETAIL BY AMIT KUMARAmitKumar829430
 

Similar to Wet Vs. Foam Granulation- Powder Tech (20)

Influence of manufacturing process on physical and flow characteristic and c...
Influence of manufacturing process on  physical and flow characteristic and c...Influence of manufacturing process on  physical and flow characteristic and c...
Influence of manufacturing process on physical and flow characteristic and c...
 
Direct compression method..Mominul Islam
Direct compression method..Mominul IslamDirect compression method..Mominul Islam
Direct compression method..Mominul Islam
 
Granulation - Compression-1.pptx
Granulation - Compression-1.pptxGranulation - Compression-1.pptx
Granulation - Compression-1.pptx
 
M0261079083
M0261079083M0261079083
M0261079083
 
International Journal of Engineering and Science Invention (IJESI)
International Journal of Engineering and Science Invention (IJESI)International Journal of Engineering and Science Invention (IJESI)
International Journal of Engineering and Science Invention (IJESI)
 
M0261079083
M0261079083M0261079083
M0261079083
 
Direct Compressible Filler
Direct Compressible FillerDirect Compressible Filler
Direct Compressible Filler
 
Foammanuscript
FoammanuscriptFoammanuscript
Foammanuscript
 
lubricants-02-00021 (1).pdf
lubricants-02-00021 (1).pdflubricants-02-00021 (1).pdf
lubricants-02-00021 (1).pdf
 
CO–PROCESSED EXCIPIENTS FOR TABLETS.pdf
CO–PROCESSED EXCIPIENTS FOR TABLETS.pdfCO–PROCESSED EXCIPIENTS FOR TABLETS.pdf
CO–PROCESSED EXCIPIENTS FOR TABLETS.pdf
 
Strength technologies for tissue makers
Strength technologies for tissue makersStrength technologies for tissue makers
Strength technologies for tissue makers
 
Bi-axially oriented Poly polypropylene films
Bi-axially oriented Poly polypropylene films Bi-axially oriented Poly polypropylene films
Bi-axially oriented Poly polypropylene films
 
Drug delivery factors
Drug delivery factorsDrug delivery factors
Drug delivery factors
 
characterization of ceramic green body for specific objectives
characterization of ceramic green body for specific objectivescharacterization of ceramic green body for specific objectives
characterization of ceramic green body for specific objectives
 
NOISE ABSORBING MATERIAL USING BIOPOLYMERS
NOISE ABSORBING MATERIAL USING BIOPOLYMERSNOISE ABSORBING MATERIAL USING BIOPOLYMERS
NOISE ABSORBING MATERIAL USING BIOPOLYMERS
 
Bioprocessing and Characterization of Polyhydroxyalkanoate Blends from Cassia...
Bioprocessing and Characterization of Polyhydroxyalkanoate Blends from Cassia...Bioprocessing and Characterization of Polyhydroxyalkanoate Blends from Cassia...
Bioprocessing and Characterization of Polyhydroxyalkanoate Blends from Cassia...
 
Buccal &Sublingual Drug Delivery System
Buccal &Sublingual Drug Delivery SystemBuccal &Sublingual Drug Delivery System
Buccal &Sublingual Drug Delivery System
 
GRANULATION AND EQUIPMENTS DETAIL BY AMIT KUMAR
GRANULATION AND EQUIPMENTS DETAIL BY AMIT KUMARGRANULATION AND EQUIPMENTS DETAIL BY AMIT KUMAR
GRANULATION AND EQUIPMENTS DETAIL BY AMIT KUMAR
 
Tablet
TabletTablet
Tablet
 
PREFORMULATION.pptx
PREFORMULATION.pptxPREFORMULATION.pptx
PREFORMULATION.pptx
 

Wet Vs. Foam Granulation- Powder Tech

  • 1. Powder Technology 195 (2009) 15–24 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Powder Technology j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w. e l s ev i e r. c o m / l o c a t e / p ow t e c Evaluation of the physical and mechanical properties of high drug load formulations: Wet granulation vs. novel foam granulation Stuart L. Cantor a,1, Sanjeev Kothari b,1, Otilia M.Y. Koo c,⁎ a ICON Development Solutions, 6031 University Blvd., Ellicott City, MD 21043, USA b AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, 1800 Concord Pike, Wilmington, DE 19850, USA c Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, 1 Squibb Drive, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influences of intrinsic drug mechanical properties and different Received 9 July 2008 granulation binder delivery processes on the physical and mechanical properties of high drug load Received in revised form 2 February 2009 granulations after wet granulation. Formulations (80% w/w) of acetaminophen (APAP), metformin and Accepted 6 May 2009 aspirin, which are brittle, viscoelastic, and ductile, respectively; were granulated by high-shear wet Available online 12 May 2009 granulation. Two modes of binder delivery for wet granulation, either conventional or binder foam, were investigated. Particle size, surface area and pore size of the granulations were characterized. Compacts were Keywords: Hiestand tableting indices prepared at a solid fraction of 0.9 under tri-axial decompression and Hiestand indices (worst-case bonding Conventional wet granulation index (BIw) and brittle fracture index (BFI)) of the compacts were determined. APAP formulations exhibited Foam granulation the smallest geometric mean particle sizes (dg) and showed only slight differences in dg values between the Viscoelastic two granulation processes. Binder delivery mode affected mechanical properties of the granulated model Ductile drugs differently. Foam granulation appeared to enhance the granule plasticity for APAP while aspirin Brittle showed a mixed deformation mechanism based on both its high BIw and high BFI values. The higher BIw value for aspirin after foam granulation may be attributed to improved binder distribution among particles during granulation. On the other hand, conventional wet granulation improved the plasticity of metformin as measured by the higher BIw and lower BFI values. Therefore, conventional wet granulation process conferred advantages in manufacturability and product quality for metformin; as compared to foam granulation which did not enhance plasticity for metformin. Based on this study, a wet granulation process can be selected based on knowledge of the intrinsic drug mechanical properties. © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction different binder delivery processes have on the properties of the final granules. The understanding of both physical and mechanical properties of The two granulation processes compared in this study are the pharmaceutical granulations is critical for successful tablet formula- conventional wet granulation and a new foam granulation process. tion. Costly problems such as low tablet crushing strengths, poor High drug loads, i.e. 80% w/w, were used in this study to minimize friability, poor coating uniformity, and capping/lamination can formulation effects and enable an accurate comparison of the potentially be avoided through an improved understanding of the differences between the mechanical properties of the three model physico-mechanical properties of granulations. Such useful informa- drugs in affecting granulation properties. The foam-mediated wet tion to quantify a granulation's degree of brittleness or plasticity can granulation process where the binder is delivered as foam has been be gained by using dimensionless parameters known as the Hiestand gaining increasing attention in the pharmaceutical industry due to its tableting indices. In this study, the physical and mechanical properties advantages over conventional wet granulation. Foam granulation of high drug load granulations prepared via both conventional wet yields a more homogeneous dispersion of binder throughout the and foam processes were evaluated. It was desired to determine both powder bed during granulation and can potentially reduce drying the influences that the intrinsic drug mechanical properties and time due to the lower soak-to-spread ratio of binder foam compared to a conventional spray of binder solution [1]. Moreover, delivery of the binder foam through rigid plastic tubing eliminates the need to ⁎ Corresponding author. Biopharmaceutics Research and Development, Bristol-Myers optimize nozzle placement and geometry. Excipients suitable for foam Squibb Company, 1 Squibb Drive, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA. Tel.: +1 732 227 5341; generation include commonly used binders such as hydroxypropyl fax: +1 732 227 3986. E-mail address: otilia.koo@bms.com (O.M.Y. Koo). cellulose (HPC), hypromellose (HPMC) and other cellulose ethers [1]. 1 All of the work described here was conducted by the authors at Bristol-Myers Surfactants (e.g., sodium laurel sulfate, Poloxamer® 188) may also be Squibb Company, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. used as aids to generate foam. The typical binder solution viscosity 0032-5910/$ – see front matter © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2009.05.003
  • 2. 16 S.L. Cantor et al. / Powder Technology 195 (2009) 15–24 range for foam generation is between 5 and 100 cP [2]. HPC solution plastic deformation occurs [4]. Plastic deformation is predominant in has the viscosity and surface tension properties to generate high the decompression stage for viscoelastic materials that exhibit flow quality foam of low density and was selected for this study. after release of the compression stress. Recently, scale-up trials of sodium naproxen immediate- and Brittle fracture index (BFI) is the ratio of the tensile strength of the controlled-release formulations using foam granulation technology tablets without a hole and with a hole at their center. This ratio may showed that this process prevented localized over wetting during indicate the ability or inability of compact to relieve stress at a crack granulation. Furthermore, drug dissolution rate profiles were similar tip within the compact by plastic deformation [12]. The BFI is based on across the different batch sizes, from laboratory to pilot and the Griffith crack propagation theory, which states that a crack will be manufacturing scale [3]. initiated and propagated when the incremental change of elastic In addition to the granulation moisture level, physical properties of energy during crack growth provides the incremental gain of surface granulations such as surface area, particle size, particle size distribu- energy for the new surfaces [13]. It is assumed that the origin of the tion, and pore diameter can influence subsequent tablet strength on crack is from a defect site where the elastic stress is concentrated. It is compaction. It is known that porous particles are mechanically higher than the nominal stress, and hence the first region to reach the weaker and readily deform to create new bonding surfaces which stress level needed for crack growth. Since the crack tip may continue can lead to increased inter-particulate bonding and thus, harder to be a stress concentrator; the crack often continues to propagate. tablets [4,5]. Similarly, granulations with higher surface areas are Therefore the material fails at much lower applied stress than expected to result in harder tablets through increased inter-particle expected from the theoretical bond strength and/or theoretical bonding provided that true contact distances are reached between the shear strength. However, if a material relieves some of the stress in deforming particles. Therefore, an adequate tensile strength, indica- the region of concentrated stress by plastic deformation, then the tive of good bond formation, is one criterion to determine a successful stresses may not build to the level required for crack propagation. The tablet formulation. However, physical measurements of granulations Griffith theory is modified to include the absorption of energy by are typically studied because mechanical properties are not pre- plastic deformation when calculating the BFI. dictable a priori [6]. Three representative model drugs with different deformation Some processes such as conventional wet granulation can have a mechanisms were chosen: 1) metformin was selected as the model significant effect on the mechanical properties of certain materials; for viscoelastic drug in this study. Viscoelastic materials are uniquely example, the compactability of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) is affected by their sensitivity to both moisture [9,12] and time under significantly reduced after granulation [7]. It was found that a loss of load [12,14]; 2) acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin), a drug known to deform compactability following conventional wet granulation is associated plastically [15], and 3) acetaminophen (APAP), known to undergo with a decrease in the particle porosity of MCC [8]. This is due to the brittle fracture. APAP exhibits poor tableting characteristics because strain hardening effect of the wetting and drying process that leads to the particles of this drug are very hard, and therefore, inter-particulate strong hydrogen bonds between the hydroxyl groups of the cellulose bonding is very weak [16]. Furthermore, APAP has been shown to be chains and results in an increased elastic modulus. Mechanical susceptible to capping following compression [16–19]. properties of pure excipients have been extensively studied since Interestingly, while the thermodynamically stable and commer- they can impact a successful tablet formulation. For instance, cially available monoclinic polymorph of APAP (form I) requires viscoelastic materials such as starch [9] or polyethylene oxides for binders for tablet formation, the metastable, orthorhombic form does controlled-release applications [10] are known to be strain-rate not. The reason for the significant difference in mechanical properties sensitive; thus, when scaling-up to faster tablet machines with lies in the fact that the crystal structure of form I consists of puckered decreased dwell times, a reduction in tablet tensile strength can be hydrogen-bonded sheets which are relatively stiff and do not easily observed because the material did not receive sufficient time under slip over each other during compression. However, the crystal load for good bond formation. structure of form II has parallel hydrogen-bonded sheets which give Hiestand tableting indices have traditionally been employed to rise to slip planes that allow for plastic deformation and improved study the mechanical properties of pure excipients or drugs. These compression properties [20]. tableting indices, developed over 30 years ago, have been found to be Aspirin and APAP were chosen specifically because there is sufficiently sensitive to detect lot-to-lot variations in raw materials representative data on the Hiestand indices already reported in the [11]. Hiestand indices provide a fundamental understanding of the literature for comparison purposes [11]. On the other hand, to our behavior of materials under compression and decompression. While knowledge, this is the first work that Hiestand tableting indices of typically used to characterize pure materials, this research is an metformin are discussed. This work is also important because much attempt to study the mechanical properties of pharmaceutical previous work has focused on the mechanical properties of pure granulations prepared using two different binder delivery processes excipients [3,21–23] or pure drugs [11,23] as well as model formula- for wet granulation and three drugs of different intrinsic mechanical tions without drug [24,25] but not on drug-based granulations. properties. The indices of relevance here include the worst-case The objectives of this study are to 1) establish a fundamental bonding index (BIw) and the brittle fracture index (BFI). understanding of the physico-mechanical properties of high drug load BIw is a ratio of the compact's tensile strength to its dynamic granulations manufactured using conventional wet or foam granula- indentation hardness and indicates the ability of intra-particulate tion techniques and determine the influence of the binder delivery bonds formed during the compression phase to survive during the technique on the granulation mechanical properties; 2) provide decompression process. Relatively speaking, a higher BIw value guidance for selection of the most appropriate granulation process indicates a more plastic material, and such materials will likely have based on the mechanical properties of drug; and 3) determine if any lower dynamic hardness values. Plastic deformation occurs during relationship exists between the physical properties (i.e., particle size, tablet compression and decompression. As compression takes place, surface area) and mechanical properties of each granulation. particles initially rearrange and repack to assume a smaller bed volume. When no further reduction in volume is possible through 2. Experimental rearrangement, particles begin to deform. When their elastic limit is exceeded, permanent deformation occurs through brittle fracture Acetylsalicylic acid USP was purchased from Spectrum Chemicals and/or plastic deformation, and the particle bed is sheared. When the (New Brunswick, NJ), metformin hydrochloride USP was obtained shear strength is greater than the breaking strength, particle fracture from Bristol-Myers Squibb (Evansville, IN) and acetaminophen USP occurs. When the shear strength is less than the breaking strength, and magnesium stearate NF were purchased from Mallincrodt Inc. (St.
  • 3. S.L. Cantor et al. / Powder Technology 195 (2009) 15–24 17 Table 1 time of 12 h. The LOD of the granulations was determined using a Formulations for conventional wet or foam granulations. Mettler DSC HFT-2000M Moisture balance (Columbus, OH). Samples Material Wet process % Foam process % of approximately 2.0 g were dried to constant weight at 105 °C for Drug 80.0 80.0 10 min. Microcrystalline cellulose 17.0 17.0 Hydroxypropyl cellulose 3.0 Dry 2.0 2.2. Physical characterization of granulations As foam 1.0 Water added during granulation 12–14 12–14 Particle size of the dried granulations was determined in duplicate by sieve analysis using a sonic sifter (Allen Bradley ATM Model L3P Sonic Sifter®, Milwaukee, WI). Sieving was run for 5 min at an Louis, MO). Microcrystalline cellulose NF (Avicel® PH-102, FMC, amplitude setting of five and a pulse setting of 5. The percentage by Philadelphia, PA) and hydroxypropylcellulose (HPC) NF (Klucel®, weight retained on each sieve was determined and the geometric Aqualon, Wilmington, DE) were also used in this study. mean diameter, labeled as GMD or dg, and geometric standard deviation, σg, of the particle size distributions were calculated using 2.1. Granulation batches using a high-shear mixer Eqs. (2) and (3), respectively [27]: P Table 1 lists the conventional wet and foam granulation formula- ðni T log di Þ log dg = P ð2Þ tions used in this study. The rationale for devising simple model ni formulations consisting of only three ingredients is because a comparison of results using the Hiestand Indices can become difficult where ni is the weight percent of particles in the ith interval, for all ni; if a more complex system of materials is used [26]. The drug load was and di is equal to the midpoint of the diameter of the size interval in kept constant at 80.0% w/w. Since a high drug load was used, it is the ith interval, for all di. assumed that physical and mechanical properties of the drugs 2P 2 31 = 2 themselves exert a significant impact on the properties of the ni log dg − log di 7 6 P resultant granulations. Granulations containing each of the three log σ g = 4 5 ð3Þ ni drugs (metformin, aspirin, and APAP) were manufactured by either conventional wet or foam granulation processes. Mixing and granulation was performed in a 6-L Diosna high-shear granulator The spread of the data was calculated as D90 − D10, where D90 and D10 (Osnabruck, Germany) at a batch size of 1 kg. All powders were pre- are the diameters of the 90th and 10th percentiles of the cumulative blended in the mixer for 2 min before granulation, with the mixer particle size distribution, respectively. The particle size span, Sx, which impeller set at 200 rpm and the chopper set at 500 rpm. gives a description of the width of the distribution and is independent During conventional wet granulation, mixer impeller and chopper of the median size, was calculated according to Eq. (4) [28]: were set at 300 rpm and 1300 rpm, respectively. Water was added at a rate between 55 and 65 g/min using a peristaltic pump and the D90 − D10 Sx = ð4Þ impeller power was recorded at several fixed time intervals during D50 granulation. The total amounts of water added were adjusted for each drug, but kept constant for both conventional wet and foam According to Fan et al. [28] if the span of the distribution is b2, it is granulation processes for a drug. considered narrow; ≥2 but b3, moderate; and ≥3, considered a broad The foam granulation process utilized the same mixer impeller and distribution. All spans calculated from the granulation data were less chopper settings as for the conventional wet granulation process. A than 2, indicating that the breadth of the distributions were relatively 10% w/w HPC stock solution was prepared by dissolving HPC in water narrow. with gentle stirring overnight. The concentration of the HPC solution Optical microscopy was used to examine the particle morphology was further adjusted before granulation so that 1% of HPC in the of the pure materials as well as the conventional wet granulation formulation was added as foam and 2% HPC as dry powder in the pre- and foam granulation samples (Nikon SMZ 1500 digital camera using blend. Therefore, final quantity of HPC (3%) was the same as in Act-1 v.1 2.63 software (Micron Optics, Cedar Knolls, NJ) at 50× formulations used in conventional wet granulation. magnification. HPC foam was generated utilizing the same concepts previously All granulations were hand sieved using a mesh cut of #30/#80 described by Keary and Shesky [1]. The compressed air and liquid flow (595–177 μm) to eliminate oversize and fines and only particles rates were adjusted to achieve a ≥90% foam quality, according to Eq. retained on #80 were used for the following characterizations and to (1): prepare compacts. Using a narrow particle size range minimized particle size effects and improved comparability among the different Rate of air flow − Rate of liquid flow drug granulations. Foam quality = T100 ð1Þ Rate of air flow The true densities of dried, sieved granulations were determined by a helium pcynometer (AccuPyc 1330, Micromeritics, Norcross, GA). Air flow rate and liquid flow rate were 2.0 L/min and 0.1 L/min, The true densities used in the solid fraction calculations were the respectively. The rate of addition of the foamed binder was kept the average of five determinations. same as for water during the conventional wet granulation process, Surface area and average pore diameter were determined by approximately 55–65 g/min. A high foam quality enables the foam to nitrogen adsorption (Gemini 2380, Micromeritics, Norcross, GA) for behave more solid-like and retain its properties better as it flows powdered formulations before conventional wet granulation (i.e. through a rigid plastic pipe from the foam generator into the high- before water addition) and all dried granulations, which includes shear mixer. The foam was homogeneously dispersed into the powder conventional wet granulation and foam granulation batches (i.e. after during granulation. wet granulation). Accurately weighed samples (1.0–1.3 g) were The wet granules were dried in a hot-air convection oven at 60 °C degassed by nitrogen flow and dried at 60 °C overnight (VacPrep for 6 h to a loss on drying (LOD) value of less than 2.0%. For 061, Micromeritics). The amount of nitrogen adsorbed was deter- comparison purposes using aspirin, an additional conventional wet mined at partial nitrogen vapor pressures (P / Po) ranging between granulation batch was also prepared and dried for a longer drying 0.05 and 0.98. Surface area was determined by the Gemini software
  • 4. 18 S.L. Cantor et al. / Powder Technology 195 (2009) 15–24 using the Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller (BET) isotherm calculation for of 0.4 times the compact width; and a vertical fracture through the the nitrogen adsorption data in the P / Po range from 0.05 to 0.30. Pore center of the compacts indicated that the failure occurred in tension. size diameter was also calculated by the Gemini software using the The platens were padded with cardboard paper to decrease the BET analysis (4 × pore volume / surface area) for the adsorption data in stress concentration at their edges and this minimized the shear the P / Po range from 0.05 to 0.30 [29]. failure of the compact [32]. The time constant between loading to fracture process was set at approximately 10 s, which is the amount 2.3. Mechanical characterization of granulations of time between 1 / e, or 0.368, of the fracture force and the time of the fracture force (the mathematical constant, e, has a value of The relative degree of brittleness or plasticity of a high drug load 2.718). granulation can be calculated following the well established methods The tensile strengths of compacts without holes (σT) and of of Hiestand [6,11,30,31]. Flawless square compacts were created using compacts with holes (σTo) were measured. A total of at least 6 tri-axial decompression. This method is selected due to its ability to compacts were tested for each granulation and the average was used release elastic stresses in three dimensions following decompression. to calculate the Hiestand tableting indices. Three discrete tests are then subsequently performed on the compact, (tensile strength, dynamic indentation hardness, and chordal radius) 2.3.3. Dynamic indentation hardness and this combined information was used to calculate the Hiestand The dynamic indentation hardness (H) test employed a custom- tableting indices. Conventional wet granulation formulations, both built pendulum impact device using a steel sphere with a weight of before and after water addition (e.g., dried), and foam granulation 0.0618 g as the indenter, which was suspended from a one-meter batches were characterized for their mechanical properties. length of 15-pound fishing line. The face of the compact is covered with a small strip of carbon paper before being clamped onto the 2.3.1. Preparation of square compacts by tri-axial decompression testing platform. The sphere is held in place by an electromagnet and Square compacts of approximately 3.0 g measuring 2.0 cm × then released, once the sphere impacts the compact, the carbon is 2.0 cm × 0.6 cm were prepared using a custom-built tri-axial decom- transferred to the dent and enables easier viewing. The short dwell pression press. A split-die block was used along with a computer- time of the indenter acting on the compact minimized any strain-rate controlled hydraulic system (Loomis Engineering and Manufacturing dependent effects. The inbound and rebound velocities in m/s of the Company, Caldwell, NJ). Compression forces ranged from 6000 to sphere were measured using an optical ballistic sensor and are 30,000 lb and a 10 s dwell time at maximum compression force was converted into the initial height, hi, and rebound height, hr, by using used. The compression forces employed for aspirin, metformin, and Eq. (7): APAP granulations were 6000, 20000, and 30000 lb, respectively. The edges of the die surface were sparingly lubricated with magnesium ðvelocityÞ2 ðvelocityÞ2 h= = : ð7Þ stearate suspended in acetone when needed. For evaluating the brittle 2×g 19:62 fracture index, a stress concentrator was also introduced in the center of the compacts using an upper punch equipped with a 1.1-mm The degree of rebound of the sphere occurs as a result of the elastic diameter, round, spring-loaded retractable pin. modulus or hardness of the material [32]. The chordal radius of the This tri-axial press allows for release of elastic stresses in three indentation was determined using a Mahr Federal Perthometer dimensions during decompression by allowing the split die to expand Concept #3754341 (Gottingen, Germany) equipped with a dia- and hence to produce flawless compacts suitable for tensile strength mond-tip stylus to trace through the surface roughness of the indent testing. While the compact dimensions were measured with a caliper on the compact. Two measurements were taken per compact by immediately after ejection, compacts were allowed to undergo elastic rotating each sample by 90°. A total of 10 measurements were recovery for a 24 h period prior to testing. The solid fraction is defined taken for the chordal radius of each granulation and the averages as the proportion of solid material contained in the compact and was calculated. At least 5 compacts were tested for each granulation and calculated according to Eqs. (5a) and (5b). The pressure of the tri-axial the dynamic indentation hardness (H) was calculated according to press was adjusted for each granulation to achieve a constant solid Eq. (8):where: fraction of 0.90 ± 0.01 or 10% porosity. 4mgrhr hi 3 compact weight H= − ð8Þ Apparent density ρapp: = ð5aÞ πa4 hr 8 compact volume ρapp: Solid fraction = ð5bÞ where: ρT m mass of the indenter, where ρT represents the average true density of the granulation g gravitational constant, determined in Section 2.2. r radius of indenter, hi initial height of indenter, 2.3.2. Determination of tensile strength hr rebound height of indenter, and An Instron® Model 5567 stress–strain analyzer equipped with a a chordal radius of the dent. 30 kN load cell and using a Bluehill® software (version M-K2-EN Revision B, Norwood, MA) was used for tensile strength (σT) testing of compacts according to Eq. (6): 2.3.4. Hiestand tableting indices Peak Force The worst-case bonding index (BIw) is calculated according to Eq. 2 Tensile Strength N=m = ð6Þ (9): ðlenght TwidthÞ σT The ramp rate was set at 1.0 mm/min and the failure was BIw = ð9Þ H determined both by when the true strain was ≤10% and when the compressive load threshold fell below 5 N. Testing was performed where σT is tensile strength and H is the dynamic indentation under transverse compression between two platens each with a width hardness.
  • 5. S.L. Cantor et al. / Powder Technology 195 (2009) 15–24 19 Fig. 1. Granulation power plots for the different drugs (A) wet granulation and (B) foam granulation. The brittle fracture index (BFI) is the ratio of the tensile strength of increases the surface area per gram of liquid several fold compared to the compacts without a hole, (σT), and with a hole, (σTo), at their the sprayed system. Furthermore, foam has the capacity to spread center and is given by Eq. (10): rather than to soak (i.e. a low soak-to-spread ratio), and particles that are initially non-coated become surface-coated by the spreading foam. σT 1 BFI = − ð10Þ 2σ To 2 The BFI scale ranges from zero, which represents highly ductile/ plastic materials, to one, which indicates highly brittle materials that show a greater propensity to cap or laminate during decompression/ ejection [33]. 3. Results and discussion 3.1. Granulation particle size For a given drug, impeller power vs. time plots were higher for conventional wet granulation (Fig. 1A) than foam granulation (Fig. 1B). During conventional wet granulation, water droplet size can influence the extent of development of large granules or oversize and binder distribution at short mixing times [34]. However, Ax et al. [34] also noted that the distinction between spraying binder liquid with different droplet sizes becomes less pronounced on the granulations as process time increases. This is likely due to the fact that competing breakage and re-agglomeration phenomena will be occurring simultaneously during high-shear mixing. Furthermore, conventional wet granulation typically involves areas of localized over wetting of particles which then become agglomerated. Therefore, in order to optimize particle size distribution and improve flow proper- ties, conventional wet granulations usually require a milling operation after drying. Interestingly, the foam process showed a less steep slope from the power profile and lower power consumption compared to conventional wet granulation particularly for metformin and aspirin. This suggests less viscous granulation and more controlled initial granule growth for these two drugs due to improved binder distribution and less localized over wetting during foam granulation as compared to conventional wet granulation. Water added via the conventional drip method have larger droplet sizes compared to a binder solution added as aerated foam. On the other hand, APAP power consumption profiles for both the conventional wet granula- tion and foam granulations were more similar; therefore, the effect of localized over wetting was not as pronounced for conventional wet granulation of APAP. Keary and Sheskey proposed the hypothesis of foam granulation and how the foamed binder circumvents localized over wetting during conventional wet granulation [1]. A foam is by definition, air dispersed in a liquid continuous phase. In foams prepared using the same liquid, Fig. 2. Optical microscopy pictures of APAP particle morphology. Pure material (P), wet this phase inverted relationship of liquid-to-air is significant and granulation (W), and foam granulation (F).
  • 6. 20 S.L. Cantor et al. / Powder Technology 195 (2009) 15–24 This is in contrast to the conventional wet granulation process where the dry binder is dispersed in the powder bed and larger water droplets are dripped or sprayed on top of the particles. In this case, the spray droplets are typically of the same size range as the powders to be granulated. In general, there appeared to be some level of primary particle agglomeration in all three drug samples for both granulation processes. However, it is unclear whether there are differences in the spatial distribution and thickness of the binder solution around the granules in the conventional wet as compared to foam granulation processes. It appears from the optical microscopy pictures that the granulation processes had the most effect on the APAP particle morphology and physical properties (Fig. 2). While pure APAP (P) is a cohesive, poorly flowable powder comprised of acicular needles, this drug became appreciably less cohesive following either conventional wet (W) or foam granulation (F) processes. Furthermore, there also appeared to be some particle agglomeration occurring in addition to the distribution of uneven binder for both APAP granulation samples. While there was some primary particle agglomeration occurring only with the smaller size fractions of aspirin in conventional wet (W) and foam granulation (F) samples (Fig. 3), granules from the two granulation processes appeared similar. Pure metformin (P) (Fig. 4) showed a heterogeneous mixture of particle size and shape. Both Fig. 4. Optical microscopy pictures of metformin particle morphology. Pure material (P), wet granulation (W), and foam granulation (F). metformin granulations showed similar particle agglomeration, however, there appeared to be an appreciable reduction in the amount of fines for metformin granulations relative to APAP and aspirin granulations. Geometric mean diameter (dg) and geometric standard deviation (σg) were similar for both conventional wet and foam granulation processes for a given model drug (Table 2). Among the three drugs, APAP granulations processed by both conventional wet and foam granulation exhibited the smallest granule size as compared to metformin and aspirin (Table 2). Granule particle size distributions of the model drugs are illustrated in Fig. 5A–C. Generally, the higher percentage of larger granules for aspirin and metformin compared to APAP can be attributed to the relatively larger particle sizes of these pure materials (P) (Figs. 3 and 4). Compared with the other two drugs, the APAP granulations had the greatest percentage of fines, ca. 10% b74 µm (Fig. 5A) and a wider span (Table 2). It is interesting to note that the foam granulation process yielded a higher proportion of larger particles (≥500 µm), for the APAP and metformin samples. This, together with the generally lower impeller power current vs. time plots observed for the foam granulation process (Fig. 1), suggest Fig. 3. Optical microscopy pictures of aspirin particle morphology. Pure material (P), that other factors other than drug mechanical properties, such as drug wet granulation (W), and foam granulation (F). surface hydrophlicity/hydrophobicity and wettability can influence
  • 7. S.L. Cantor et al. / Powder Technology 195 (2009) 15–24 21 Table 2 mechanical properties of these conventional wet granulations. This is Physical characterization of granulations for three model drugs. discussed further in Section 3.3. Geometric mean Spread Span LOD Surface Average diametera and of data of datac,d % area pore 3.3. Mechanical properties of granulations geometric standard (μm)c,d (m2/g) diameter deviationb (μm) (nm) Mechanical properties of compacts from all granulations were Dried granulations characterized by their dynamic indentation hardness, tensile Conventional Wet Metformin 421.0 (1.7) 505.6 1.20 0.9 0.17 6.7 strengths, BIw, and BFI values (Table 3). The dynamic indentation (2.5) (0.02) hardness (H) indicates the resistance of a material to permanent Aspirin 541.6 (1.5) 483.9 0.86 1.7 0.19 4.5 plastic deformation under a compressive load and will vary depending (0.5) (0.05) on the ductility or brittle nature of the material. The tensile strength APAP 147.7 (1.9) 215.4 1.61 0.8 0.29 7.8 (0.7) (0.00) represents the strength of a compact after permanent plastic Foam deformation has occurred and gives an indication of the extent of Metformin 507.9 (1.6) 503.9 0.99 1.3 0.13 7.4 intra-particulate bonding due to true contact areas formed between (1.6) (0.01) the surfaces. In evaluating the different processes for metformin, foam Aspirin 452.1 (2.2) 539.4 1.44 2.0 0.16 4.1 granulation showed a higher H, while the tensile strength was the (4.1) (0.15) APAP 157.8 (2.0) 232.3 1.47 1.1 0.28 10.1 (0.8) (0.01) Powder before wet granulation Metformin – – – – 0.213 10.20 Aspirin – – – – 0.180d 8.7d APAP – – – – 0.304 8.99 a Geometric mean diameter, (dg). b Values in parenthesis represent the geometric standard deviation, (σg). c Values in parenthesis represent the arithmetic standard deviation. d Values are the average of 2 measurements. the granulation properties and granule growth during the 2 granula- tion processes. It will be worthy to probe these factors and determine if these are different during the 2 granulation process in future studies. 3.2. Surface area and pore diameter The surface area of a granulation is an important physical property that can affect granule flowability as well as final tablet hardness. The surface area results for metformin and aspirin sieved granulations were similar, while sieved APAP granulations had a smaller mean particle size and a larger surface area than metformin and aspirin. In order to investigate the effects of wet granulation and the method of granulating liquid addition on the powder formulations, surface area and pore diameters were also measured for the dry powder formulations before granulation (Table 2). Generally, there were minimal changes in the surface area and pore diameter results for all samples, and when comparing between the two granulation processes. While all granulations were dried to b2.0% LOD for 6 h, to further investigate the effect of over-drying aspirin formulation prepared by conventional wet granulation, a batch was dried for an additional 6 h to study the effect of additional drying time on the mechanical properties of the granulation. The surface area and pore diameter values for the aspirin granulation dried for 12 h (LOD 1.9%) were 0.05 m2/g and 3.2 nm, respectively. However, for the aspirin granulation dried for 6 h (LOD 1.7%), the surface area and pore diameter values were 0.19 m2/g and 4.5 nm, respectively. While the pore diameter remained essentially unchanged, this additional drying time for the aspirin conventional wet granulation sample caused a significant reduction in the surface area. This can be attributed to the drying process that removes the added water first from the surface and then from the pores within the particles. As the internal water was removed from the structure, the granules begin to densify due to the collapsing of their pore structure. Even though there is a negligible LOD difference between aspirin granulations dried for either 6 or 12 h, Fig. 5. Particle size distributions for (A) APAP, (B) aspirin, and (C) metformin, such granule densification will likely have a major impact on the conventional wet granulation vs. foam granulation.
  • 8. 22 S.L. Cantor et al. / Powder Technology 195 (2009) 15–24 Table 3 than for either conventionally wet granulated sample, indicating Mechanical characterization of granulations for three model drugs. enhanced plasticity. The chordal radius determined from the aspirin Dynamic hardness Tensile strength BIw BFI before granulation compact was slightly less than the value from the (H) N/m2 109 N/m2 × 106 10− 3 foam granulated compact. Thus, while the foam granulation process Dried granulations appears to enhance the plasticity of aspirin, the conventional wet Conventional Wet granulation process decreases its plasticity. However, the rebound Metformin 0.4 (0.01)a 0.7 (0.0) 1.7 0.001 velocity data offers some contrasts. The highest rebound velocities Aspirin wet (6 h drying) 0.1 (0.0) 0.7 (0.0) 7.0 0.002 Aspirin wet (12 h drying) 0.2 (0.0) 0.7 (0.0) 3.5 0.1 were obtained for the aspirin before wet granulation sample and the APAP 0.5 (0.01) 0.7 (0.16) 1.6 0.02 lowest values observed were for the aspirin granulations dried for Foam either 6 or 12 h. This data indicates that the conventionally wet Metformin 0.7 (0.01) 0.7 (0.0) 1.0 0.1 granulated samples are more ductile than either the aspirin before Aspirin 0.1 (0.0) 0.7 (0.0) 8.9 0.5 APAP 0.3 (0.0) 1.0 (0.03) 3.8 0.005 wet granulation or the foam granulated sample. The contrasts between the chordal radius and rebound velocity results support Powder before wet granulation the likelihood that aspirin undergoes a mixed deformation Metformin – 0.03 (0.31) – 0.81 mechanism. Aspirin 0.08 (0.00) 0.4 (0.15) 4.7 0.08 In their study comparing microcrystalline cellulose granulated APAP 1.2 (0.01) 0.7 (0.0) 0.55 0.06 with 3% HPC, Badawy et al. [8] found that there was a significant a Values in parenthesis represent the arithmetic standard deviation. decrease in the surface area when comparing under-granulated with over-granulated samples; 0.91 m2/g vs. 0.53 m2/g, respectively. The authors reported that the difference in surface area can impact and reduce the compactability of the microcrystalline cellulose to varying degrees. same for both processes. However, the higher H values resulted in a Similarly, lactose, an excipient with some brittle character, showed lower bonding index, BIw for the foam granulation suggesting that this lowered compactability after being over-granulated with excess water process may not be beneficial for metformin. Lower BIw indicates less and high-shear forces. The reason for this effect was found to be the plastic deformation behavior and lower ability of intra-particulate inability of the larger, denser granules with reduced surface area to bonds formed during the compression phase to survive during the significantly fracture or deform when subjected to a compressive load decompression process. [35,36]. It is noteworthy to also mention that the extent of brittle Compacts were prepared from the metformin formulations before characteristics and thereby the mechanical properties can vary quite conventional wet granulation (dry powder) as well as after conven- significantly depending on the preparation method of the grade of tional wet granulation (dried) in order to compare their tensile lactose selected [37,38]. In addition, such brittle excipients can cause a strength values (Table 3). The average peak strengths of the before decrease in tablet crushing strength due to the fact that these and after conventional wet granulation samples were 10.5 N/m2 and materials are characteristically harder and tend to be poor at forming 272 N/m2, respectively; which corresponds to tensile strength values strong inter-particulate bonds [39]. of approximately 0.026 × 106 N/m2 and 0.7 × 106 N/m2, respectively. It There were significant differences in dynamic hardness between is interesting that after conventional wet granulation, the metformin the two granulation processes for APAP, the model drug known to formulation displayed roughly a 27-fold increase in the tensile undergo brittle fracture. The results showed that the powder before strength of the compacts. This significant increase in tensile strength conventional wet granulation had the highest H value of all the with the addition of water from the conventional wet granulation samples tested, indicating the brittle character of APAP. However, the process indicates that metformin has viscoelastic properties. Based on dynamic hardness was reduced by N50% after conventional wet the data thus far, the conventional wet granulation process offers the granulation and further still after foam granulation (Table 3). most benefit for metformin in terms of improvement in mechanical Furthermore, it was only for APAP that an improvement in tensile properties. strength was observed when comparing after granulation samples A brittle material will resist permanent deformation and hence, from the conventional wet and foam granulation processes to before show a smaller indentation from the sphere, with a resultant smaller granulation samples. Tensile strength value of 1.0 N/m2 for APAP foam chordal radius. Also, less of the impact energy will be absorbed by a granulation was the highest of all the granulations. These results brittle material and that will result in a higher rebound velocity. This is indicate that for a brittle drug such as APAP, the foam process is more in contrast to a compact composed of a ductile material. Such a plastic appropriate to improve the mechanical properties of the drug. This compact is relatively softer and will deform around the sphere, may be attributed to the higher surface area of solution in the form of absorbing its impact energy and leaving a much larger dent, therefore tiny bubbles of foam that enabled a more uniform distribution of the displaying a larger chordal radius. plastic binder to cover the drug granules, thus modifying their Different properties were observed for aspirin, a known ductile mechanical properties more effectively. material. For the conventional wet granulation process three samples were evaluated; before granulation (without any added water), after 3.4. Hiestand tableting indices granulation dried for 6 h, as well as the granules over-dried for 12 h. The conventional wet granulation sample that was over-dried for 12 h The BIw and BFI values can be used to further elucidate which behaved very differently. The extra drying time caused the granule granulation process is best suited to improve the intrinsic mechanical surface area to collapse. Therefore, as the water evaporated from properties of the drug. These two indices have an inverse relationship; within the pores of the particles, the particles became denser, harder therefore, a higher BIw and/or a lower BFI are indicative of plastic and more brittle. This is clearly seen in the doubling of the dynamic deformation behavior. BIw and BFI values of the formulations are listed hardness value (H). in Table 3. Furthermore, interesting relationships were observed when In comparing the conventional wet and foam granulations for examining the chordal radius and rebound velocity data for the metformin, the conventional wet granulation (after) sample yielded different aspirin granulations. While the chordal radii and rebound the highest BIw as well as the lowest overall BFI value of 0.001. On the velocities were similar in both the 6 and 12 h granulations, the chordal other hand, the powder blend before conventional wet granulation radius for the aspirin foam granulation was approximately 30% higher showed the highest overall BFI value of 0.81. The addition of water in
  • 9. S.L. Cantor et al. / Powder Technology 195 (2009) 15–24 23 the conventional wet granulation process dramatically improved the was determined. While there do not appear to be major differences in BFI value of metformin by 800-fold and showed markedly improved surface area and pore size for the different granulation batches, there plasticity as compared with the powder blend before granulation. were discernible differences in their mechanical properties. The foam These results were also an improvement over the foam granulation process appeared to significantly enhance the plasticity of a granula- process. This supports the data discussed previously that conventional tion containing a brittle drug such as APAP. However, foam granula- wet granulation is the best process for this drug (Table 3). BIw tion with a ductile drug like aspirin produced a material with mixed measures the survival success of true contact areas formed at deformation behavior based on the high BIw and BFI values. This is in maximum compressive stress; viscoelastic materials such as metfor- contrast to the conventional wet granulated aspirin that showed an min will produce compacts with higher tensile strengths due to inverse relationship between high BIw and low BFI values. enhanced intra-particulate bonding in the presence of higher Foam granulation did not enhance the plasticity for viscoelastic moisture levels. BFI indicates the ability of a material to relieve stress materials like metformin and the conventional wet granulation by plastic deformation in accordance with the Griffith crack propaga- process was observed to confer the greatest advantage for metformin. tion theory. If the BFI is less than 0.2 there will typically be no capping The increase in plasticity for foam granulated formulations may be or lamination. However, if the BFI is N0.2 in conjunction with poor BIw due to the improved surface coverage of HPC on the drug particles as values, there is a greater probability of capping or lamination [4,11]. compared to the conventional wet granulation process. In conclusion, Among the aspirin granulations, the lowest BIw value of 0.0035 the selection of the most appropriate granulation process (conven- was observed for the over-dried, low surface area (0.05 m2/g) tional wet or foam) to improve a drug product's manufacturability can conventional wet granulation sample, indicating relative brittle be guided by knowledge of the intrinsic mechanical properties of the behavior. This effect has been previously reported for conventionally drug. wet granulated microcrystalline cellulose where the authors found that dense, less porous granules would be less prone to fragmentation Acknowledgements or plastic deformation during compression [8]. A comparison of BIw and BFI values before and after conventional wet granulation (6 h The authors would like to acknowledge BMS for providing the drying) indicated that the aspirin formulation improved in plasticity opportunity and summer internship funding to S. Cantor to conduct after conventional wet granulation. Foam granulated aspirin exhibited this work and also to the BMS foam granulation team members the highest BIw value of 0.0089 of all the granulations. However, the especially F. Nikfar; C. Keary and P.J. Sheskey (Dow Chemical) for their BFI value of 0.5 observed for foam granulated aspirin was high given technical input and assistance. that aspirin is known to be ductile. Therefore, the deformation behavior of the aspirin foam granulation can be considered as References anomalous or mixed, showing both plastic and brittle characteristics. Phenacetin, a drug known to exhibit a brittle deformation behavior, [1] C. Keary, P.J. Sheskey, Preliminary report on the discovery of a new pharmaceutical was reported to demonstrate very similar results to the aspirin foam granulation process using foamed aqueous binders, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 30 (2004) 831–845. granulation with 0.0088 and 0.43 for BIw and BFI values, respectively [2] R. Rowe, P.J. Sheskey, P.J. Weller (Eds.), Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients, [11]. High BIw and BFI values also suggest a mixed deformation 4th ed., Pharmaceutical Press, Grayslake, IL, 2003. mechanism for phenacetin. However, Hiestand classified phenacetin [3] P. Sheskey, C. Keary, D. Clark, K. Balwinski, Scale-up trials of foam granulation technology — High shear, Pharm. Technol. 31 (2007) 94–108. as a “normal” material that compresses in a viscoelastic manner [31] [4] M. Aulton, A.M. Dyer, K.A. Khan, The strength and compaction of millispheres, whereas APAP, a brittle drug, would be classified as a “special case” Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 20 (1994) 3069–3104. material. Special case materials exhibit extremely poor tableting [5] Y. Habib, L.L. Augsburger, R.F. Shangraw, Production of inert cushioning beads: effect of excipients on the physicomechanical properties of freeze-dried beads characteristics because their particles are very hard and bonding containing microcrystalline cellulose produced by extrusion–spheronization, Int. J. between them is very weak. Additionally, special case particles do not Pharm. 233 (2002) 67–83. deform plastically under compressive load to form bonding surfaces. [6] E.N. Hiestand, Mechanical properties of compacts and particles that control tableting success, J. Pharm. Sci. 86 (1997) 985–990. Instead, particles easily rearrange by sliding past each other. This [7] C. Gustafsson, H. Lennholm, T. Iversen, C. Nystrom, Evaluation of surface and bulk occurrence leads to greatly diminished inter-particulate bonding and characteristics of cellulose powders in relation to compaction behavior and tablet low tensile strength of compacts [23,31]. properties, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 29 (2003) 1095–1107. [8] S. Badawy, D.B. Gray, M.A. Hussain, A study of the effect of wet granulation on In comparing BIw and BFI values of APAP before and after microcrystalline cellulose particle structure and performance, Pharm. Res. 23 conventional wet granulation a three-fold increase in the BIw and a (2006) 634–640. three-fold decrease in the BFI value was observed after granulation. [9] K. van der voort Maarschalk, H. Vromans, W. Groenedijk, G.K. Bolhuis, C.F. Lerk, This suggested some beneficial effect of the conventional wet Effect of water on deformation and bonding of pregelatinized starch compacts, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 44 (1997) 253–260. granulation process in improving the plasticity of this brittle drug. [10] L. Yang, G. Venkatesh, R. Fassihi, Characterization of compressibility and However, the foam process further resulted a two-fold increase in the compactibility of polyethylene oxide polymers for modified release application BIw coupled with a decrease in BFI of granulated APAP over the by compaction simulator, J. Pharm. Sci. 85 (1996) 1085–1090. [11] E.N. Hiestand, Mechanical behavior of solids, in: J.G. Stowell (Ed.), Mechanics and conventional wet granulation process, indicating that this is the best Physical Properties for Powders and Compacts, SCSI, Inc., West Lafayette, IN, 2002, process to improve the mechanical properties of this drug. These pp. 21–48. results can be attributed to the fact that the foamed binder has an [12] J.E. Rees, K.D. Tsardaka, Some effects of moisture on the viscoelastic behavior of modified starch during powder compaction, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 40 (1994) enhanced surface area compared with water alone. Therefore, HPC, 193–197. being a surface-active binder with ductile characteristics, can more [13] A.A. Griffith, The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids, Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. homogeneously coat the APAP granules containing this brittle drug. Lond A221 (1920) 163–198. [14] W.T. Morehead, Viscoelastic behavior of pharmaceutical materials during Thus, by improving the intrinsic APAP granule plasticity the mechan- compaction, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 18 (1992) 659–675. ical properties of the compacts were also improved. [15] S. Pedersen, H.G. Kristensen, Change in crystal density of acetylsalicylic acid during compaction, S.T.P, Pharm. Sci. 4 (1994) 201–206. [16] E. Joiris, P.D. Martino, C. Berneron, A.M. Guyot-Hermann, J.-C. Guyot, Compression 4. Conclusions behavior of orthorhombic paracetamol, Pharm. Res. 15 (1998) 1122–1130. [17] B. Obiora, E. Shotten, Effects of waxes, hydrolyzed gelatin and moisture on the The physico-mechanical properties of high drug load granulations compression characteristics of paracetamol and phenacetin, J. Pharm. Pharmacol. manufactured using conventional wet granulation or foam granula- 28 (1976) 629–632. [18] N. Patel, N.R. Poola, A. Babar, F.M. Plakogiannis, Fluidized-bed agglomeration of tion techniques were studied. Thus, influence of binder delivery acetaminophen: direct compression of tablets and physiologic availability, Drug techniques on granulation mechanical properties of the 3 model drugs Dev. Ind. Pharm. 15 (1989) 1175–1198.
  • 10. 24 S.L. Cantor et al. / Powder Technology 195 (2009) 15–24 [19] C. Imbert, P. Tchoreloff, B. Leclerc, G. Couarrazw, Indices of tableting performance [31] E.N. Hiestand, Rationale for and the measurement of tableting indices, in: G. and application of percolation theory to powder compaction, Eur. J. Pharm. Alderborn, C. Nystrom (Eds.), Pharmaceutical Powder Compaction Technology, Biopharm. 44 (1997) 273–282. Marcel Dekker, New York, 1996, pp. 219–244. [20] T. Beyer, G.M. Day, S.L. Price, The prediction, morphology, and mechanical [32] D. Wurster, S. Likitlersuang, Y. Chen, The influence of magnesium stearate on the properties of the polymorphs of paracetamol, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123 (2001) Hiestand tableting indices and other related mechanical properties of maltodex- 5086–5094. trins, Pharm. Dev. Technol. 10 (2005) 461–466. [21] S. Malamataris, J.E. Rees, Viscoelastic properties of some pharmaceutical powders [33] N. Davar, R. Shah, D.G. Pope, L.L. Augsburger, A critical comparison of Hiestand's compared using creep compliance, extended Heckel analysis and tablet strength tableting indices and traditional measures of compactibility to predict tableting measurements, Int. J. Pharm. 92 (1993) 123–135. behavior, Pharm. Res. 12 (1995) S168. [22] K.M. Picker, The 3D model: Explaining densification and deformation mechanisms [34] K. Ax, H. Feise, R. Sochon, M. Hounslow, A. Salman, Influence of liquid binder by using 3D parameter plots, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 30 (2004) 413–425. dispersion on agglomeration in an intensive mixer, Powder Technol. 179 (2008) [23] M. Mullarney, B.C. Hancock, Improving the prediction of exceptionally poor 190–194. tableting performance: an investigation into Hiestand's “Special Case.”, J. Pharm. [35] S. Badawy, M.M. Menning, M.A. Gorko, D.L. Gilbert, Effect of process parameters on Sci. 93 (2004) 2017–2021. compressibility of granulation manufactured in a high shear mixer, Int. J. Pharm. [24] V. Busignies, B. Leclerc, P. Porion, P. Evesque, P. Tchoreloff, Compaction behaviour 198 (2000) 51–56. and new predictive approach to the compressibility of binary mixtures of [36] M. Wikberg, G. Alderborn, Compression characteristics of granulated materials. IV. pharmaceutical excipients, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 64 (2006) 66–74. The effect of granule porosity on the fragmentation propensity and compactibility [25] F. Kiekens, R. Zelko, I. Antal, J.P. Remon, Evaluation of substrate–binder interaction of some granulations, Int. J. Pharm. 69 (1991) 239–253. in a model granule system, Int. J. Pharm. 169 (1998) 175–182. [37] P. Narayan, B.C. Hancock, The relationship between the particle properties, [26] R. Williams, J.W. McGinity, The use of tableting indices to study the compaction mechanical behavior, and surface roughness of some pharmaceutical excipient properties of powders, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 14 (1988) 1823–1844. compacts, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 355 (2003) 24–36. [27] P. Reist, Aerosol Science and Technology, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1993, [38] V. Busignies, P. Tchoreloff, B. Leclerc, M. Besnard, G. Couarraze, Compaction of pp. 13–30. crystallographic forms of pharmaceutical granular lactoses. I. Compressibility, Eur. [28] A. Fan, S. Pallerla, G. Carlson, D. Ladipo, J. Dukich, R. Capella, S. Leung, Effect of J. Pharm. Biopharm. 58 (2004) 569–576. particle size distribution and flow property of powder blend on tablet weight [39] E. Horisawa, K. Danjo, H. Sunada, Influence of granulating method on physical and variation, Amer. Pharm. Rev. 8 (2005) 73–78. mechanical properties, compression behavior, and compactibility of lactose and [29] P. Webb and C. Orr, 1997, Analytical Methods in Fine Particle Technology. microcrystalline cellulose granules, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 26 (2000) 583–593. Micromeritics Instrument Corp., Norcross, GA.: pp. 80, 157. [30] E.N. Hiestand, J.E. Wells, C.B. Peot, J.F. Ochs, Physical processes of tableting, J. Pharm. Sci. 66 (1977) 510–519.