Five actions fit for 55: streamlining energy savings calculations

This project has received funding from the Horizon 2020 programme under grant agreement
n°890147. The content of this presentation reflects only the author’s view. The European
Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains.
Introduction
Streamlining energy savings calculations: “5 actions fit for 55”
Nele Renders, VITO/EnergyVille

Who are we?
RESEARCH & POLICY
INSTITUTIONS
ENERGY AGENCIES
OR RELATED
CONNECTORS TO
MARKET & TECHNOLOGY
ACTORS
2020 2023
START
SEPTEMBER 1, 2020
END
AUGUST 31, 2023
COORDINATOR
12 PARTNERS
10 COUNTRIES

What do we aim for?
Building capacity among public authorities on Article 3 & Article 7
of the Energy Efficiency Directive:
streamSAVE builds capacity through the creation of an open dialogue that
focuses on streamlining calculation methodologies to estimate bottom-up
savings and cost effectiveness of technical energy savings actions. The
project targets priority actions i.e., new actions with high energy saving
potential and considered as a priority issue by national public authorities.
Address additional efforts in EU Member States in realizing energy
savings by 2030 under Article 3 & Article 7 of EED.

What do we aim for specifically?
Streamline methodologies to estimate energy savings of 10 priority actions to
answer the need for comparable progress reporting, while acknowledging
diverse Member States’ realities. GUIDANCE ON STANDARDIZED SAVING METHODOLOGIES
Peer-to-peer capacity building through dialogue and capacity support to
address Member States needs:
– Cooperative community of technology group experts, public authorities and other market
actors centered around each priority action.
– One-to-one technical assistance: providing evidence-based support on streamlined
savings calculation to the 10 partner Member States.
Sustainability and replicability of streamSAVE outcomes: lively community and
active streamSAVE platform beyond the life of the project

PRIORITY ACTIONS
HEAT
RECOVERY BACS/BEMS
REFRIGERATION
SYSTEMS
ELECTRIC
VEHICLES
LIGHTING
SYSTEMS
KNOWLEDGE
FACILITY
PEER-TO-PEER
DIALOGUES
CAPACITY SUPPORT
FACILITY
How do we realize these objectives?

Second round of Priority Actions
We welcome your feedback: link to
survey
Small-scale RES central space
heating (incl. hot water)
More efficient space cooling
Small and medium data centres
Measures alleviating (also)
energy poverty
Accelerated replacement of
inefficient electric motors
Providing feedback and
tailored advice - behavioral
changes households
Modal shift for freight
transport
We welcome your feedback: https://www.surveymonkey.de/r/streamSAVE_feedback

In short, what do we stand for?
Streamlining energy savings methodologies, incl. indicative values
and cost effectiveness
Technical priority actions: high energy savings potential and
considered as priority by national public authorities
Demand-driven: being close to and supporting stakeholders’ needs
within EU Member States
Creating lively community of experts on priority actions
Building bridges towards existing initiatives to valorize streamSAVE
outcomes.

Thank you
Get in touch for more information!
All project reports will be available for download
on the streamSAVE website www.streamsave.eu
Project coordinator - Nele Renders, VITO
Email the project at contact@streamsave.eu
Follow the project on LinkedIn @streamSAVEH2020
Follow the project on Twitter @stream_save

streamSAVE Webinar
`Five actions fit for 55: streamlining energy savings calculations´
Views from the EU Commission and the link with Fit-for-55
8 December 2021 Anne Weidenbach, Policy Officer,
Energy Efficiency Unit, DG ENER,
European Commission

Annex V(1) EED 2012/27/EU as amended by Directive 2018/2002
Calculation methods provided
“Obligated, participating or entrusted parties, or
implementing public authorities, may use the following
methods for calculating energy savings:
(a) deemed savings, by reference to the results of
previous independently monitored energy
improvements in similar installations (…)
(b) metered savings (…)
(c) scaled savings (…) This approach may be used
only where establishing robust measured data for a
specific installation is difficult or disproportionately
expensive (…)
(d) surveyed savings (…). This approach may be
used only for savings resulting from changes in
consumer behaviour. It shall not be used for savings
resulting from the installation of physical measures.”
Possibility to use standardised
calculation methods, applied with data
specific to each energy saving action
or project
Standardised energy savings for
standardised action types

Different methods for different purposes
Calculation
method
Deemed savings Scaled savings Metered savings
Cases where
it is
commonly
applied
• Large number of
similar actions (that
can be described in a
standardised way)
• Collecting specific data
for each action could
be difficult or
expensive (compared
to the energy savings
achieved)
• Intermediate number of
actions partly similar /
partly specific
• Collecting energy
consumption data could
be difficult or expensive,
but some specific data
can be collected at a
reasonable cost
• Large actions or projects, that
can be very specific
• Amount of energy savings high
enough (usually >10%) to be
distinguished from other
changes in metered energy
consumption
• (Sub-)metering of energy
consumption doable at a
reasonable cost or needed
anyway
This categorisation might evolve in future

Advantages and limitations of each method
Calculation
method
Deemed savings Scaled savings Metered savings
Advantages • Low monitoring cost
• Visibility to market actors
(values available beforehand;
catalogue of energy saving
actions), for example in
EEOS, voluntary
agreements, …
• Reasonable compromise
between reliability and M&V cost
• Address specific actions
• Useful for M&V of a policy
measure and for project
planning (investment certainty,
e.g. through energy audits)
• Provides results that reflect the
actual energy savings achieved
by each action or project
• Useful for M&V of a policy
measure and for project planning
(investment certainty, e.g.
through energy audits), especially
when (sub-)metering in place
anyway
Limitations • Requires actions that can be
described in a standardised
way
• Requires reliable and
detailed national data to
define the deemed savings
• Average values risk to not
reflect individual cases
• Possible gap between the
average values used to
define the deemed savings
and the average of reported
actions
• Might result in high
administrative costs in case of
large number of actions (or
require a dedicated IT system)
• Costly depending on the data to
be collected
• Requires experts, training or
guidelines to ensure reliable
calculations
• Requires sound verification of
calculations (but possibility in
some cases to use automated
checks)
• Costs might be disproportionate
for small actions / small amount
of energy savings
• Data needs go beyond energy
consumption (e.g. weather
conditions, production volumes)
• Expertise required to verify
energy savings and changes in
energy consumption for other
reasons
• More complex to verify
• Data confidentiality to be ensured

Documentation of deemed savings is key
Annex V(3)(c) EED 2021/27/EU as amended:
`energy savings that are achieved or are to be
achieved are determined in a transparent manner´
Annex V(5) EED 2021/27/EU as amended:
`Notification of methodology
(…) notification shall include details of:
(g) the calculation methodology, including how
additionality and materiality have been determined and
which methodologies and benchmarks are used for
deemed and scaled savings;´
See also point (4) in Annex III of the Governance Regulation
Documentation is key to comply with reporting
obligations and to allow for regular & sound
review and update of the deemed savings
methodology
Example of good practices:
Revise and update
catalogue of deemed savings regularly;
consult stakeholders to ensure legitimacy of
the deemed savings

Objectives of the EED revision
Reap unexploited energy
savings potential across the
economy
Reflect the increased energy
efficiency ambition from the
Climate Target Plan
Provide Member States
with measures compatible
with the increased ambition
towards 2030 climate
target 55%
Energy efficiency is a pre-condition for all decarbonisation scenarios of the Climate Target Plan

Main elements of the EED
Binding EU energy efficiency target & indicative national contributions
‘Energy Efficiency First’ Principle – making it an integral part of policy and
investment decisions
Strengthened energy savings obligation in end-use
Stronger exemplary role of public sector
Increased focus on alleviating energy poverty and consumer empowerment

Energy savings obligation
Article 8 draft EED recast
Increased energy
savings obligation in
end use as of 1 January
2024 and beyond
Retaining the flexibility
regarding the choice of
policy measures
Full flexibility regarding
the sectors to target
1.5% new annual
energy savings
(all Member
States)
Via EEOS or
alternative
measures

Energy savings obligation
Article 8 draft EED recast
Materiality
Calculation
methods
(Annex V(1)
Additionality
Key elements retained

Relevant amendment proposals regarding the
calculation of energy savings
Policy measures promoting
the installation of solar
thermal technologies
Exclusion of savings as a
result of policy measures
regarding the use of direct
fossil fuel combustion
technologies
Energy savings to be
achieved among
vulnerable customers,
people affected by
energy poverty and,
where applicable,
people living in social
housing
As from 1
January 2024

Thank you
Fit for 55 package: EU economy and society to meet climate ambitions (europa.eu)
Proposal_for_a_directive_on_energy_efficiency_recast.pdf (europa.eu)

This project has received funding from the Horizon 2020 programme under grant agreement
n°890147. The content of this presentation reflects only the author’s view. The European
Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains.
Guidance on standardized saving
methodologies & Training Module
Energy, CO2 savings and costs
Elisabeth Böck, Austrian Energy Agency

Intermediate version of the Guidance
Contents: General aspects of:
–Estimation of energy savings:
– Differences in savings calculation for Article 3 & Article 7 EED
– Definition of a baseline
– Approaches for cumulating energy savings under Article 7 EED
– Correction for behavioural effects
–Estimation of relevant costs connected to energy savings
actions
–Estimation of GHG savings

Intermediate version of the Guidance
Eight newly developed methodologies:
– Heat recovery for on-site use in industry - feedback of excess heat into a
process
– Heat recovery for on-site use in industry - use of excess heat for on-site
applications
– Heat recovery for feed-in to a district heating grid
– Building Automation and Control Systems in residential and non-residential
buildings
– Energy efficient compression refrigeration units
– Fuel Switching to Electric Vehicles
– Energy efficient road lighting systems – engineering approach
– Energy efficient road lighting systems – simplified approach

Methodology contents
For each methodology:
–Calculation of total final energy savings (Article 7 EED)
– including indicative calculation values based on statistical data
–Calculation of impact on energy consumption (Article 3 EED)
–Overview of costs related to the action:
– Investment costs
– Variable operational costs
– Fixed operational costs
– Revenues
–Calculation of greenhouse gas savings

Heat Recovery in Industry
Target
– Using excess heat to feed:
– back into the same process
– another on-site application
– into a district heating grid
Objectives & Benefits
– Preparing a guidance on how such savings achieved can be
accounted for under the EED
– Assist stakeholders in identifying what energy streams need
to be considered and how to normalize measured data
– Reduce fuel input and energy cost of industrial processes

BACS
Target
– Installation of Building Automation and Control Systems in
residential and non-residential buildings for:
– Heating
– Cooling
– Hot Water
– Lighting
– Ventilation
– More effective use of energy in these areas due to
automation
– Detection and diagnosis of inefficient operation
– Increased comfort and convenience for building
inhabitants/users

Industrial & Commercial Refrigeration
Target
– Replacement of old, electrically operated compression
refrigeration units (water- or air-chilled) with more efficient
equipment
– Based on Seasonal Performance Ratio (SEPR)
– Common uniform methodology to calculate the savings
achieved by such replacements
– Help identify the baseline to be considered when calculating
such savings

Electric Vehicles
Target
– Fuel switching between conventional and electric vehicles
– Savings ensured with higher conversion efficiency
– Fuel switching between fossil fuels and electricity, which is
increasingly generated based on renewable resources
– To develop a common uniform methodology to calculate the
savings with electric vehicles (fuel switching)
– Considering different types of vehicles (cars, vans, buses,
trucks) and different options of fuel (including hybrid
options)

Public Lighting
Target
– Road Lighting
– Offers two options:
– Simplified Approach for savings calculation, including
indicative values
– Engineering approach, using data from implemented projects
– Possibility to account for lighting control systems
– Offer different calculation approaches to be used depending
on data availability

streamSAVE Training Module
The Training Module is available on the streamSAVE platform since October 22nd, 2021.
It provides online calculation templates for the 8 developed bottom-up calculation
methodologies, including:
indicative calculation values
data on costs
estimations of GHG emission reduction
Register here:
https://streamsave.flexx.camp/signup-0818ml

Conor Molloy
MSc (energy), CMVP, CILT, CEM-I
Registered Energy Auditor
#10001 Ireland

Conor Molloy MSc (energy), CMVP, CILT, CEM-I
Helping business save energy & emissions since 2005
▪ Specialised in sustainable transport & logistics programmes
Expert on
▪ NSAI Expert Panel TC301 (50001 technical committee)
▪ Global Logistics Emissions Council (GLEC)
Relevant experience
▪ ISO50001 lead, mentor and trainer;
▪ Convener EU EN16247-4:2014 Transport Energy Audit standard
▪ Contributed to EU GPP Guidelines for transport 2015-20
▪ Al Gore Climate Reality leader since 2018
▪ President Ireland Chapter AEE Association of Energy Engineers

The challenge
❑ The case for having standardized
methods and indicative values for the
calculation of energy savings for
reporting against EED targets.
❑ Lets go back to 2015 . . .

NEDC Test vs
real world use
– ICCT 2015
09/12/2021
4

Sources for ICCT analysis – NEDC Gap

Real world solutions for electro mobility?
Independent measurement & verifications are rare
Supplier references are useful but not enough
How were the savings calculated, greenwash or IPMVP*
We need a shorthand / reference upon which to base investment decisions
*International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol (IPMVP)

An industry example; the GLEC* Framework
A global common language for units, factors
and calculations (soon to become ISO14083)
• Use GHG emissions as a metric for
sustainable freight transportation decisions
• Make or influence decisions around supply
chain optimization
• Manage the performance
• Evaluate the impact of measures
• Track progress towards your climate goals
• Inform on emissions reductions achieved
*Global Logistics Emissions Council - https://www.smartfreightcentre.org/en/how-to-implement-items/what-is-glec-framework/58/

Thank you!
🌍 www.aems.ie
☎️ +3531230 5018
📧 team@aems.ie
🐦 @conormolloy
Next AEE Transport
Energy Audit training
10-13th January 2022
0930-1230 hrs CET
• Uncertainty leads to investment hesitancy
• Climate action is urgent
• Investment decisions must be speeded up
• To accelerate adoption of electro- mobility in all its
many forms (2, 3 & 4 wheelers as well as cars,
vans, trucks & buses
• streamSAVE offers a common basis for
decisions with “Guidance on Standardized
calculation methodologies for savings (energy,
CO₂ and costs)”.

Experts
in energy,
transport &
emissions.
www.aems.ie

Elena Allegrini, Ph.D. ENEA - Department of Energy Efficiency (DUEE)
Webinar, 09/12/2021
Standardized calculation methods:
the Italian experience
with the tax relief mechanism

1. Alternative Measures (AM) in Italy
2. Annual Report on Energy Efficiency
3. Importance and added value of SM
2
Table of contents

«Bonus Casa»
«Ecobonus»
«Bonus Facciate»
«Superbonus»
Supporting schemes in
terms of tax relief for
energy efficiency actions
AM in Italy: fiscal incentives for building renovation
3
To improve energy efficiency in
Europe, Article 7 EED requires
Member States to achieve yearly
energy savings through an energy
efficiency obligation scheme (EEOS)
or alternative measures (AM).
Financing schemes and
instruments, and fiscal incentives

4
«Bonus Casa»
▪ Ordinary and extraordinary maintenance of buildings
▪ Building renovation
▪ Passive acoustic requirements
▪ Anti-seismic actions
▪ Asbestos remediation/abatement
▪ Use of RES and actions addressed to energy saving
«Ecobonus»
▪ Cladding
▪ Replacement of existing windows
▪ Shadowing systems
▪ Replacement of heating plants
▪ Biomass
▪ Building Automation
▪ Solar collectors
▪ Multiple dwellings
«Bonus Facciate»
▪ Only for buildings in the so called zones A and B or equivalent
▪ Only for building façades, which are visible from public streets
▪ Cladding
▪ Opaque enclosures painting
▪ Balcones
«Superbonus»
▪ Primary “leading” works: thermal insulation (cladding) of
more than 25% of the external building enclosure;
replacement of the existing heating equipment; seismic
structural actions.
▪ Secondary “linked” works: large variety of actions,
ranging from the installation of photovoltaic panels, to
double glazing, installation of electric car chargers.
Energy primary savings calculated by
Standardized Methods
engineers, architects according to
nationial regulations
engineers, architects according to
nationial regulations
Energy primary savings
calculated by engineers,
architects according to
nationial regulations or
(SM in specific cases)
For further
details

5
«Bonus Casa»
Energy saving according to table 3 AEEG
(Authority for Electricity and Gas)
Building Energy Requirement
Area = 82 mq
η_production (initial) = 0,80
η_production (final) = 0,945
Zone A B C D E F
Heating 14 14 23 42 66 92
Heating + DHW 40 40 48 67 92 117
Zone A B C D E F
Heating 163 163 267 488 768 1070
Heating + DHW 465 465 558 779 1070 1361
kWh/year
(BER) in terms of primary
energy
Primary energy
conversion factor
Considering the area
of the flat/building
Energy Saving (kWh/year)
BERPE x 1 −
𝑓𝐵𝐴𝐶 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡
𝑓𝐵𝐴𝐶 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒
Class for BA D C B A
Heating 1,09 1 0,88 0,81
DHW 1,11 1 0,9 0,8
𝑓𝐵𝐴𝐶𝑆
Building Automation

6
«Ecobonus»
Shading Systems External blinds
Energy primary savings calculated by engineers, architects according to
nationial regulations or Standardized Methods (SM in specific cases)

Annual Report on Energy Efficiency
7
Every year our Department (National
Agency for Energy Efficiency) publishes
the annual report, concerning the total
actions in terms of renovation projects
and the targets achieved in the
previous year, with a specific focus on
fiscal incentives for building renovation.
For example, the annual report 2021
concerns the goals and results in 2020.
For further information, please visit:
https://www.efficienzaenergetica.enea.it/pubblicazioni.html

8
Measure 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2014-20
EEOS 0,872 0,859 1,102 1,346 1,186 1,517 1,510 8,392
AM 1 0,004 0,009 0,016 0,043 0,098 0,182 0,269 0,621
AM 2 0,364 0,739 1,091 1,480 1,850 2,251 2,621 10,396
AM 3 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000
AM 4 0,000 0,000 0,300 0,300 0,440 0,510 0,580 1,830
AM 5 0,002 0,101 0,168 0,168 0,222 0,223 0,225 1,108
AM 6 0,000 0,015 0,084 0,084 0,088 0,094 0,104 0,411
AM 7 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,087 0,240 0,156 0,483
Total 1,242 1,722 2,403 3,421 3,971 5,017 5,465 23,241
Yearly energy saving (Mtoe/year) according to article 7 EED – cumulative data
Minimum Cumulative Energy
Saving according to article 7
for the years 2014-20:
25,5 Mtoe
44,7%
Considering the total
energy saving in the
period 2014-20
23,241 Mtoe
40,7%
of the target
according to article 7
for the years 2014-20:
25,5 Mtoe
91%

9
Measure 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total
Bonus Casa 0,271 0,281 0,257 0,277 0,270 0,293 0,247 1,896
Ecobonus 0,093 0,094 0,096 0,112 0,099 0,108 0,117 0,719
Bonus Facciate 0,003 0,003
Superbonus 0,003 0,003
Total 0,364 0,375 0,353 0,389 0,369 0,401 0,370 2,621
Yearly energy saving (Mtoe/year) from fiscal incentives in building renovation
Bonus Casa: 66,7%
Ecobonus: 31,6%
Bonus Facciate: 0,81%
Superbonus: 0,81%

Conclusion
10
The importance of Standardized
Methods in fiscal incentives for
building renovation
The added value of Standardized
Methods in fiscal incentives for
building renovation
❑ Role in the calculation of the energy
saving, especially for Bonus Casa (~
67% in 2020)
❑ Role in the evaluation of the targets
according to article 7 EED – AM
❑ Standardization
❑ Possibility to develop tools to easy
calculate the amount of energy
saving (calculated by the end users)

Thank you
for the attention
https://www.efficienzaenergetica.enea.it/detrazioni-fiscali.html

Five actions fit for 55: streamlining energy savings calculations

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to Five actions fit for 55: streamlining energy savings calculations

Similar to Five actions fit for 55: streamlining energy savings calculations (20)

More from Leonardo ENERGY

More from Leonardo ENERGY (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Five actions fit for 55: streamlining energy savings calculations