Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 3 STEPS Using Odoo 17
Transformer Design
1. Brandon Walther Jason Weaver
Nate Putnam Dennis Wang
The University of Texas at Austin
Prof Kristin Wood
SUTD-MIT International Design Centre (IDC)
Dan Jensen
United States Air Force Academy
2. Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
A Transformer is a system that exhibits a state change in order to
facilitate new functionality or enhance existing functionality
A State is a specific physical configuration in which a system
performs a function
3. Multiple mission capability on a single platform
Certain transforming devices may
perform functions between states
that are not possible in single-state
products
Benefits may be achieved in
weight-sensitive applications
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
4. To develop a Transformational Design Theory
& Method to facilitate the design of
transforming products
Motivation
Develop transforming Micro Aerial Vehicle (MAVs)
thus expanding their mission profile and increasing
flexibility to rapidly changing missions
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
Coordinate with USAFA cadets to advance
design curriculum
5. Inductive Approach
(Bottom to Top)
Observe and Study
Nature; Patents; Products
Search, gather and identify elements
and key features of transformation
Extract and categorize
transformation heuristics
Transformation principles
and theory
Hypothesize definitions,
transformers, scenarios, etc.
Identify needs and
possible solutions
Extract and categorize
transformation heuristics
Deductive Approach
(Top to Bottom)
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
6. Inductive Approach:
We’ve studied over 2,400 patents for laws of
transformation
1,000s of products and 100s of natural analogies
were also studied for laws of transformation
3 Transformation Principles
20 Transformation Facilitators
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
7. Transformation Principle
A Transformation Principle is a generalized directive
to bring about a certain type of mechanical
transformation
Transformation Principles describe the basic
mechanics of the act of transformation
Transformation Facilitator
Transformation Facilitators aid in the design for
transformation but their implementation does not
create transformation singly
Transformation Facilitators describe critical details
of the transformation
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
8. Expand/Collapse
Change physical dimensions of an object to bring about an
increase/decrease in occupied volume primarily along an axis,
in a plane or in three dimensions
This portable sports
chair expands and
collapses for a
sitting mode and a
storage/ portable
mode
The puffer fish
expands to ward off
and escape
predators
The bag in this patent
expands from a towel to
a tote bag
1. Product 2. Natural Analogy 3. Patent
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
9. Common Core Structure
Compose devices with a core structure that remains the same,
while the periphery reconfigures to alter the function of the
device
JSF – CTOL and STOVL A Changing Cane
System
Reproductive Termite
CTOL
STOVL
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
10. Store /
Fly
Whole plane in
container
Wings in
fuselage
1 wing inside
another
Wings in
container
Fuselage =
container
Expose
Cover
Enclosure
Nesting
Wrap /Fold
Wings wrap plane
Wings form
container
Fitted
container
Wrapper for plane
Fuse
Divide
Plane =
Tools
Interchange
Wings
Disassemble plane
Wing/ fuselage
compose other devices
Wing or body
compose other
part
MAV in 2
halves
Body
Armor
Function Sharing
Modularity
Composite
Nesting
Disassemble and
store separately
Part of plane fits inside
anther part
Wrap/
Fold
Nest
Roll wing
around fuselage
Roll up
wing
Disassemble
Telescoping
Wing inside
other
Wings inside
fuselage
Inflate
Form Container
Container forms from other
items
Slap bracelet
Shape
Memory
Alloy
Furcate
“Bird
wing”
Expand
Collapse
Enclosure
Capability
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
11. Roll up
wing
Store / Fly
Wrap/
Fold
Roll wing around
fuselage Slap bracelet
Furcate
Expand/Col
lapse
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
Design problem
Transformation
Principle
Transformation
Facilitator
Concepts
12. T-Cards are a form of deployment of tool to aid
concept generating for transformational designs
Each card contains a “Principle” or a “Facilitator” – its
definition and illustrative examples
Principle Card Facilitator Card
How to use these
cards
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
13. Each card is color coded – PRINCIPLE and FACILITATOR
The coding groups certain facilitators under the 3 specific
principles
Expand/Collapse, Expose/Cover and Fuse/Divide
For Example:
Inflate facilitates the
Expand/Collapse
type transformation
Inflate on the other
hand doesn’t
facilitate the
Fuse/Divide type
transformation
x
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
15. Driven by asynchronism
Commonality between states
Activity
Flow
Applicable at different phases of design
We have identified 3 ways to indicate when
to pursue transformation
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
16. The system needs to be packaged for
portability, deployment, and/or protection
Applied at initial stage in design – customer needs
analysis
Commonality in activity
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
17. The system performs multiple, related overall
functions asynchronously
Applied at black box level of abstraction
Commonality in activity
Functional relationship
Hierarchical relationship
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
18. The system performs multiple, unrelated
processes asynchronously, and the individual
states share common material and/or energy
Applied at function structure level of abstraction
Flow commonality
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
20. Motivation
TFIs tell us when to pursue transformation as
designers
What lacks is a scientific way to correlate
customer needs to Transformation Indicators
Methods in engineering design map customer
needs to functional descriptions
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional
Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional
Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
21. Basics
Considers “what” (function) the product must do,
not “how” (form) it is to be achieved
Leads to component-independent expression
Organizes the design process and allows for
problem decomposition and abstraction
Describe what the system must do as a system of
functions
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional
Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional
Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
23. Import EEEE Store EEEE EE Actuate EE
EE
Regulate
EE
EE Convert
EE to
MRE MRE
Convert
MRE to
Pneum E
Pnu E
Convert
Pneum E
to MTE
MTE
Acoustic, Thermal
Air
Air
Air
Xmit
EE
EE
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional
Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional
Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended Architecture
26. Focus on shifting the following functions
STOP + DISTRIBUTE
GUIDE
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function
Shifting
Blended Architecture
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function
Shifting
Blended Architecture
27. Opportunity for transformation stems
from:
Common flow (energy, material) between
states
Redundant functionality across states
Geometrical relationship
Form follows function
Indication for transformation is functional
Implementation is form-based
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function
Shifting
Blended Architecture
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function
Shifting
Blended Architecture
28. Utilizes functional analysis
2 Product architectures
Grouped
Common flow heuristics
Identify independent flow groups
from function structure
System of systems
Immense function sharing
Unclear sub-system boundaries
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended
Architecture
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended
Architecture
29. Out of 30 products functionally modeled,
half exhibited a grouped product
architecture
Half of products examined were blended
Most exhibit packaging TFI (portable)
High ratio of functions/components
Physical elements “blend” at interfaces
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended
Architecture
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended
Architecture
30. Blended Wing Body (BWB)
Traditional aircraft
(uncoupled)
Blended Wing Body
(coupled)
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended
Architecture
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended
Architecture
31. Develop a strategy to design
transformers with blended architecture
Fewer existing design methods
Interfaces have complex interactions
Efficient, performance-based design
Strong relationship to physical components
How to implement form into a design
strategy and method
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended
Architecture
Transformation
Transformation
Indicators
Functional Analysis
Function Shifting
Blended
Architecture
32. Empirical Study to Find Relationships
Experimental Transformer Design
Method
33. We have discussed
Principles
Facilitators
Functions
How are they related?
Is there any underlying organization?
How can they be implemented in design?
Research Goal
Transformer Repository
Principles & Facilitators
Applications to Design
Design Experiment
Summary
Research Goal
Transformer Repository
Principles & Facilitators
Applications to Design
Design Experiment
Summary
34. Research Goal
Transformer Repository
Principles & Facilitators
Applications to Design
Design Experiment
Summary
Research Goal
Transformer Repository
Principles & Facilitators
Applications to Design
Design Experiment
Summary
To identify specific patterns and relationships
among principles and facilitators
Motivation:
Develop a unifying theory of transformation
behavior and design
Guide the designer to favorable combinations
“Bend the rules” to find innovative new
transformation solutions
35. Research Goal
Transformer Repository
Principles & Facilitators
Applications to Design
Design Experiment
Summary
Research Goal
Transformer Repository
Principles & Facilitators
Applications to Design
Design Experiment
Summary
How?
Use an Inductive Approach
Hypothesize definitions,
transformers, scenarios,
etc.
Identify needs and
possible solutions
Extract and categorize
transformation heuristics
Deductive Approach
(Top to Bottom)
Inductive Approach
(Bottom to Top)
Observe and Study
Nature; Patents; Products
Search, gather and identify elements
and key features of transformation
Extract and categorize
transformation heuristics
Transformation principles
and theory
36. Research Goal
Transformer
Repository
Principles & Facilitators
Applications to Design
Design Experiment
Summary
Research Goal
Transformer
Repository
Principles & Facilitators
Applications to Design
Design Experiment
Summary
Compiles transformation characteristics of a
large sample set of products
Why?
Previous work identified principles and
facilitators using patent search
Initial study covered 35 products
Transformer repository examines much larger
sample size, including original examples
37. Research Goal
Transformer
Repository
Principles & Facilitators
Applications to Design
Design Experiment
Summary
Research Goal
Transformer
Repository
Principles & Facilitators
Applications to Design
Design Experiment
Summary
Sources of transformers
Patent search
Industrial Design websites and literature
Observation
Organization of repository
190 transforming products
Lists principles, facilitators, sources, types of
states
39. Research Goal
Transformer Repository
Principles &
Facilitators
Applications to Design
Design Experiment
Summary
Research Goal
Transformer Repository
Principles &
Facilitators
Applications to Design
Design Experiment
Summary
Facilitator-Facilitator Matrix
Identifies links among principles, facilitators
Method of creating matrix:
Transformer
P & F
P & F
X =
P & F
P & F
Transformer
44. Research Goal
Transformer Repository
Principles &
Facilitators
Applications to Design
Design Experiment
Summary
Research Goal
Transformer Repository
Principles &
Facilitators
Applications to Design
Design Experiment
Summary
45. Research Goal
Transformer Repository
Principles & Facilitators
Applications to
Design
Design Experiment
Summary
Research Goal
Transformer Repository
Principles & Facilitators
Applications to
Design
Design Experiment
Summary
Concept Generation
“More is better”
Seeing combinations of principles, facilitators, and
functions spurs the imagination
Mind-mapping
Design-by-Analogy
Transformation principles
and theory
Inductive Approach
(Bottom to Top)
Observe and Study
Nature; Patents; Products
Search, gather and identify elements
and key features of transformation
Extract and categorize
transformation heuristics
Hypothesize definitions,
transformers, scenarios, etc.
Identify needs and
possible solutions
Extract and categorize
transformation heuristics
Deductive Approach
(Top to Bottom)
Application - How can we use these
relationships to design better transformers?
Design Methodology
Use the Deductive Approach (Scientific Method)
46. Research Goal
Transformer Repository
Principles & Facilitators
Applications to
Design
Design Experiment
Summary
Research Goal
Transformer Repository
Principles & Facilitators
Applications to
Design
Design Experiment
Summary
Design-by-Analogy
Search for new analogies across domains
Example: Automatic towel folder
Synonym for “Fold” is “Douse”
douse a sail
Led to a new concept
using similar process
47. Research Goal
Transformer Repository
Principles & Facilitators
Applications to
Design
Design Experiment
Summary
Research Goal
Transformer Repository
Principles & Facilitators
Applications to
Design
Design Experiment
Summary
word
hypernym
troponyms
sister terms sister terms
48. rotate
screw wheel twirlspin, whirl,
reel, gyrate
birlcrank
cartwheel whirligig
move
turn
revolvecircumvolve caracole
pirouette
spiral,
corkscrew
turn out splay flip over swing
around
twist
curl, wave, kink crick
pivot,
swivel
quiver,
pulsate
bendflick writhe
pronate
seesaw divergetumbleflap make
way
49. Test Case: Transforming Screwdriver
Research Goal
Transformer Repository
Principles & Facilitators
Applications to Design
Design Experiment
Summary
Research Goal
Transformer Repository
Principles & Facilitators
Applications to Design
Design Experiment
Summary
Investigate use of WordTrees with
Principles/Facilitators
+ =
50. Research Goal
Transformer Repository
Principles & Facilitators
Applications to Design
Design Experiment
Summary
Research Goal
Transformer Repository
Principles & Facilitators
Applications to Design
Design Experiment
Summary
Many solutions available on the market
Mature, well-populated design space
How many can we find?
51. Research Goal
Transformer Repository
Principles & Facilitators
Applications to Design
Design Experiment
Summary
Research Goal
Transformer Repository
Principles & Facilitators
Applications to Design
Design Experiment
Summary
Stage 1:
Identify “key product descriptors”
Create WordTrees for descriptors
Create WordTrees for the 3 principles
Mind-map, using WordTrees as mental cues
52. Research Goal
Transformer Repository
Principles & Facilitators
Applications to Design
Design Experiment
Summary
Research Goal
Transformer Repository
Principles & Facilitators
Applications to Design
Design Experiment
Summary
53. Research Goal
Transformer Repository
Principles & Facilitators
Applications to Design
Design Experiment
Summary
Research Goal
Transformer Repository
Principles & Facilitators
Applications to Design
Design Experiment
Summary
Stage 2:
Reference newly discovered relationships to identify
important facilitators
Create WordTrees for facilitators
Investigate unknown or intriguing terms
Mind-map, using WordTrees and external research
as mental cues
54. Research Goal
Transformer Repository
Principles & Facilitators
Applications to Design
Design Experiment
Summary
Research Goal
Transformer Repository
Principles & Facilitators
Applications to Design
Design Experiment
Summary
flick
move
turn
bend
rotate
move
bend
flip
turn
flip
flick
55. Research Goal
Transformer Repository
Principles & Facilitators
Applications to Design
Design Experiment
Summary
Research Goal
Transformer Repository
Principles & Facilitators
Applications to Design
Design Experiment
Summary
About 60 concepts total
Additional 23% from second stage
56. Research Goal
Transformer Repository
Principles & Facilitators
Applications to Design
Design Experiment
Summary
Research Goal
Transformer Repository
Principles & Facilitators
Applications to Design
Design Experiment
Summary
Additional Concepts
57. Research Goal
Transformer Repository
Principles & Facilitators
Applications to Design
Design Experiment
Summary
Research Goal
Transformer Repository
Principles & Facilitators
Applications to Design
Design Experiment
Summary
Future Validation of Method
Run design problem with several groups of
engineering students
Familiar and unfamiliar with transformers
Test variations against control group
Determine which portions of the process are most
beneficial
58. Research Goal
Transformer Repository
Principles & Facilitators
Applications to Design
Design Experiment
Summary
Research Goal
Transformer Repository
Principles & Facilitators
Applications to Design
Design Experiment
Summary
Matrix analysis New IdeasWordTrees
Extract relationships Investigate analogies
To sum up . . .
60. Project
Introduction
Solution Procedure
Analysis
Task Clarification
Problem Reformulation
and Hypothesis
Concept Generation
and Experiment
Project
Introduction
Solution Procedure
Analysis
Task Clarification
Problem Reformulation
and Hypothesis
Concept Generation
and Experiment
MAVs expend energy as they fly
A finite amount of energy can be stored
on the craft and is typically imported prior
to mission
There are two ways to increase available
energy:
Increase energy storage capacity
Import energy during the mission
61. Project Introduction
Solution
Procedure
Analysis
Task Clarification
Problem Reformulation
and Hypothesis
Concept Generation
and Experiment
Project Introduction
Solution
Procedure
Analysis
Task Clarification
Problem Reformulation
and Hypothesis
Concept Generation
and Experiment
Concept
Generation
Energy
Component
Database
Energy System
Modeling
Core-Function
Modeling Strategy
6-3-5
WordTree
Mind-Mapping
Task
Clarification
Analysis
WordTree
Creation
Prototyping /
Experimentation
MAV Reconfigurable Platform
PROBLEM REFORMULATION
AND
HYPOTHESIS
Functional Modeling
Customer Needs
Analysis
Concept
Development
CAD Modeling Math Modeling of
MAV Flight
Concept
Generation
Experiment
Preliminary Concept
Generation
Literature Review
Working
Prototype
Design Research
Findings
Preliminary
Solution Ideas
Technology
Forecasting
Scientific Method Path
Design Method Path
Concept Variants
Tabletop POCs
Design Review
Problem
Generalization
Problem
Reformulation
Energy Morph Matrix
Two paths to two results
Design method results in working prototype
Scientific method furthers study of design
62. Project Introduction
Solution Procedure
Energy System
Analysis
Task Clarification
Problem Reformulation
and Hypothesis
Concept Generation
and Experiment
Project Introduction
Solution Procedure
Energy System
Analysis
Task Clarification
Problem Reformulation
and Hypothesis
Concept Generation
and Experiment
Initial goal was to understand energy systems from a
functional standpoint
Started with a functional basis1
—a list of 42 functions
and 14 energy types
Analyzed ~30 function structures to identify a handful
of core functions found in energy systems
Result is 5 core functions and 6 energy types
63. CONVERT
IMPORT EEXPORT E
STORE
TRANSMIT
Light Microwaves
Radio
Air
Compression
Heat
Air
Compression
Light Heat
Propulsion/Drag
Sound Sound
Wind
Radio
Communications
MAV in Flight
Fuel in AirExhaust
64. STORAGE MEDIA TRANSMISSION CHANNELS CONVERTERS from to
Rotational Kinetic Electromagnetic Radiation Photovoltaic Panel
Translational Kinetic -Light Rectenna Array
Spring Potential -Microwaves Photosynthetic Organism
Rotational Kinetic Mechanical Coupling Piezoelectric Generator
Translational Kinetic Solid Momentum/Force Electric Motor Generator
Compressed Fluid Potential Fluid Momentum/Force Turbine
Battery Conduction Air Engine
Ultracapacitor Induction LASER
Liquid Phase Moving Chemicals Microwave Emitter
-Fossil Fuel Convection Resistor
-Alcohol Conduction Electric Motor
Gas Phase Radiation Electrolysis
-Propane Piezoelectric Actuator
-Hydrogen Fuel Cell
Solid Phase Piston Engine
-Hydrogen Metal Hydride Jet Engine
-Other Powder Fuel Chemical Muscle
Hot, Insulated Mass Various Living Bacteria
Exothermic Reaction (general)
Endothermic Reaction (general)
Thermoelectric Generator
Shape-Memory Alloy
Stirling Engine
Energy Morph Matrix
65. Project Introduction
Solution Procedure
Energy System
Analysis
Task
Clarification
Problem
Reformulation
and Hypothesis
Concept Generation
and Experiment
Project Introduction
Solution Procedure
Energy System
Analysis
Task
Clarification
Problem
Reformulation
and Hypothesis
Concept Generation
and Experiment
Key Customer Needs
Maximize:
Range
Loiter capability
Automation
Stealth
Minimize:
Interruption of surveillance
Sensitivity to weather/light conditions
66. Project Introduction
Solution Procedure
Energy System
Analysis
Task
Clarification
Problem
Reformulation
and Hypothesis
Concept Generation
and Experiment
Project Introduction
Solution Procedure
Energy System
Analysis
Task
Clarification
Problem
Reformulation
and Hypothesis
Concept Generation
and Experiment
Literature Review/Prior Work
Boeing, AFRL, 2007
AAR control algorithm for UAVs
NASA, others
solar-powered HALE aircraft
CRC (Canada, 1980’s)
SHARP UAV powered by microwaves
SPAWAR Systems Center, 2006
VTOL UAV refueling by UGV ground station
67. Project Introduction
Solution Procedure
Energy System
Analysis
Task Clarification
Problem
Reformulation
and Hypothesis
Concept Generation
and Experiment
Project Introduction
Solution Procedure
Energy System
Analysis
Task Clarification
Problem
Reformulation
and Hypothesis
Concept Generation
and Experiment
Aerial Refueling versus Mid-mission Re-energizing
Goals of
Restatement/Generalization/Reformulation:
Break fixation on obvious solutions
Inspire analogical thinking by restating the
problem in a general way
Expand the relevant design space
68. Project Introduction
Solution Procedure
Energy System
Analysis
Task Clarification
Problem
Reformulation
and Hypothesis
Concept Generation
and Experiment
Project Introduction
Solution Procedure
Energy System
Analysis
Task Clarification
Problem
Reformulation
and Hypothesis
Concept Generation
and Experiment
Question:
How do we incorporate problem reformulation
and analogical thinking into the design process?
Answer:
Use WordTrees
69. Project Introduction
Solution Procedure
Energy System
Analysis
Task Clarification
Problem
Reformulation
and Hypothesis
Concept Generation
and Experiment
Project Introduction
Solution Procedure
Energy System
Analysis
Task Clarification
Problem
Reformulation
and Hypothesis
Concept Generation
and Experiment
We have two useful sources of information:
Energy Morph Matrix
WordTrees
HYPOTHESIS:
By presenting this information during concept
generation, more concepts will be generated.
70. Concept Generation Experiment – Setup
Control Group
• only saw problem statement
• mind map
• 6-3-5
Energy Morph Matrix Group
• saw problem statement
• saw morph matrix
• performed thought exercise
• mind map
• 6-3-5
WordTree Group
• saw problem statement
• created WordTrees
• saw one provided
• mind map
• 6-3-5
Project Introduction
Solution Procedure
Energy System
Analysis
Task Clarification
Problem
Reformulation
and Hypothesis
Concept
Generation
and Experiment
Project Introduction
Solution Procedure
Energy System
Analysis
Task Clarification
Problem
Reformulation
and Hypothesis
Concept
Generation
and Experiment
71. You are here
Surveillance Area
Design a system to maintain fuel capability without returning to launch point
Minimize human input that a soldier has to do to
operate the system
Goal is continuous operation, with minimum time
spent refueling
Might need to be used in day or night
Should be reasonably stealthy
Maximize the range over which the
system can operate
Maximize the time surveillance can be
maintained
Problem Statement Given to All Groups
72. STORAGE MEDIA TRANSMISSION CHANNELS CONVERTERS from to
Rotational Kinetic Electromagnetic Radiation Photovoltaic Panel
Translational Kinetic -Light Rectenna Array
Spring Potential -Microwaves Photosynthetic Organism
Rotational Kinetic Mechanical Coupling Piezoelectric Generator
Translational Kinetic Solid Momentum/Force Electric Motor Generator
Compressed Fluid Potential Fluid Momentum/Force Turbine
Battery Conduction Air Engine
Ultracapacitor Induction LASER
Liquid Phase Moving Chemicals Microwave Emitter
-Fossil Fuel Convection Resistor
-Alcohol Conduction Electric Motor
Gas Phase Radiation Electrolysis
-Propane Piezoelectric Actuator
-Hydrogen Fuel Cell
Solid Phase Piston Engine
-Hydrogen Metal Hydride Jet Engine
-Other Powder Fuel Chemical Muscle
Hot, Insulated Mass Various Living Bacteria
Exothermic Reaction (general)
Endothermic Reaction (general)
Thermoelectric Generator
Shape-Memory Alloy
Stirling Engine
Energy Morph Matrix Provided
74. WordTree and Morph Matrix groups had 50% more concepts than control group
75. Use camouflage
on these
Add capability to assist
in relaunch
Could be dropped on
separate mission
or otherwise brought to site
Various types of energy
storage possible
76. Design of The Black Mamba
Battery Swapping Prototype
77. Project
Introduction
Use of Flexibility
Principles
Design Details
Modification for Battery
Swapping System
Live Demo
Project
Introduction
Use of Flexibility
Principles
Design Details
Modification for Battery
Swapping System
Live Demo
Goal is to design a flying platform to
test various MAV concept systems
This platform will facilitate rapid
embodiment of current and future
MAV system concepts developed at UT
First use of test platform is an Aerial
Refueling System
78. Project Introduction
Use of
Flexibility
Principles
Design Details
Modification for Battery
Swapping System
Live Demo
Project Introduction
Use of
Flexibility
Principles
Design Details
Modification for Battery
Swapping System
Live Demo
Principles used:
Modularity
• Using separate modules to carry out
functions that are not closely related
Interface Decoupling
• Creating detachable modules
Spatial
• Providing free interfaces and expansive,
unobstructed surfaces for new interfaces
79. 4 Distinct Modules:
Tail
Wing
Fuselage
Motor Mount
81. Project Introduction
Use of Flexibility
Principles
Design Details
Modification for
Battery Swapping
System
Live Demo
Project Introduction
Use of Flexibility
Principles
Design Details
Modification for
Battery Swapping
System
Live Demo
Magnets
Spring-loaded
Electrical contacts
Al Battery
Electrodes
82. - RC car drives battery into MAV, where magnets line up and connect
Ladies and gentlemen, let’s get ready to RUMBLE…..
Most of you are probably familiar with the ’80s animated series of the Transformers, along with the film that came out last summer. Our research, however, focuses on utilitarian Transformers, such as the ones pictured here. Before we get started, allow me to define a couple terms that will be used throughout our presentation:
Transformers are a beneficial product domain in that:
They have multiple mission capability on a single platform (such as the amphibious troop carrier)
Some transformers can perform functions between states (like the Shift bike that helps a child merge to a bicycle from a tricycle)
Transformers show great potential for weight-sensitive products
…So, as design researchers, it our ultimate goal to develop a theory and methodology for transformational design. Our motivation for such is to develop transforming MAVs and subsequently expand their mission capability. We also exchange ideas with USAFA cadets to further our design theory and methodology.
Our research path is twofold. Our inductive approach begins with observation of products, patents, and nature; extract information, and then put this info into principles and theory. We also use deductive reasoning (essentially the scientific method), where we start with a hypothesis, and work our way through experimentation to prove/disprove our initial thoughts on theory.
As I get into the meat of our theory, our inductive approach includes studying over 2,400 patents, 1,000s of products, and 100s of biological examples of transformation. This work has lead to the development of our foundational theory, which comes in the form of 3 Transformation Principles and 20 Transformation Facilitators for the mechanical domain.
A Transformation Principle tells us how the transformation happens. The Transformation Facilitators are a more detailed description of the transformation. Transformation Facilitators show ways to assist transformation, but do not initiate transformation individually.
Here is 1 of 3 Transformation Principles: Expand/Collapse, defined at the top of the slide. Some example objects from which we developed this Principle are the expanding/collapsing sports chair (in the product domain), the puffer fish that expands to ward off predators, and the patent of a towel that expands into a tote bag.
This slide discusses 1 of our Transformation Facilitators, which is Common Core Structure. This facilitator basically states that as some products transform between states, the core of the device stays the same. Again, this part of theory was developed from numerous existing products, natural analogies, and patents.
Shifting from theory to design applications, we have developed a couple of tools around the theory to put into practice to aid in the concept generation of transforming devices. The first one I will mention is a modified Mind Map. The overall design problem is labeled in a center node. From this origin, one would write in nodes representing the 3 Transformation Principles. Branching off the Principles Nodes, are the Transformation Facilitators, and subsequently separate concept variants.
Here is an expanded snapshot of the overall mind map shown previously, with a solution that was taken into concept sketch phase of design. Using the expand/collapse principle, wrap/fold and furcate facilitators, an idea came about to inlay a bi-stable metallic strip within a wing that would allow it to wrap for storage.
Another concept generation tool we’ve developed are T-Cards. Each card has a Principle (yellow background) or a Facilitator (blue background).
The T-Cards are also color coded and have geometrical cues that indicate how certain Facilitators go with certain Principles, while the facilitator does not work with other Transformation Principles.
For the gust-resistance wing problem, the T-Cards were used to develop a wing with spoilers to spoil the unwanted lift and remain in stable flight, and also a ported wing which bleeds off the unwanted lift produced by a gust.
The next part of the Transformation theory we have developed is the Transformational Indicators. These indicators tell us when we should pursue transformation as design engineers. Transformation is mainly pursued when one does not need to use separate systems simultaneously. There is usually a commonality between the states of a transformer, which I will elaborate on later, and these indicators are applicable at different phases of the design.
The first indicator is the packaging TFI. What this means is that when the customer has stated that the system needs to be portable for storage and/or protection, transformation may be an effective means to satisfy this need.
The second indicator describes when 2 separate systems are have a commonality in activity. For example, the bike lock/tire pump we presented last year is useful for a taking a general bike ride – allowing for the bike to be locked and the tires to be inflated when necessary.
The final indicator states that transformation may be pursued when two systems that do not have a relationship in activity but have the same energy and/or material flowing through them. The sprinkler/sprayer that we demonstrated last year shows this indicator. While a lawn sprinkler and a hose nozzle both have water and hydraulic energy passing through them, their activities are not related.
Now that I’ve explained the TFIs…what we need is a way to examine CNs. Functional analysis is a way to scientifically correlate CNs to know when and how to pursue transformation.
Put concisely, functional analysis is an examination of the what the product must to – not how it does it. It’s a published design method that describes what the device must do as a system of functions.
Here is a short example of a function structure. Basically, the diagram describes how the flow of mechanical energy is first imported, then stored, then finally exported – all from a functional perspective. Here are some forms of products that accomplish this function chain.
Functional analysis is a known science. This slide simply demonstrates that we can develop a model of a complex device (such as an R.C. airplane) and break down into a simpler problem of functions. Here is a function chain that demonstrates how electrical energy is ultimately converted to thrust and lift.
At this time, I’d like to demo a transformer that I functionally modeled. This product converts from a flashlight (which directs the light) to a lantern (which disperses the light for 360 deg area lumination)
This slide shows the function structures of the lantern on top and the flashlight on bottom. What I want you to take away from this is that the two diagrams are very similar. What functionally separates the two states apart is what the light does before leaving the system boundary. For the lantern, the light is stopped and distributed – for the flashlight, the light is guided or directed.
What allows this transformation to occur is the ability to shift between the above functions. What we are answering is that could we have predicted a possible transformer by simply examining both function structures. The path of light needs to shift, but the rest of the system is the same.
We are discovering from the functional analysis of transformation that the opportunity of transformation results from the same energy and/or material between states and a significant similarity in overall functionality. One important thing to mention, though, is that form is critical for the final embodiment of the transformation.
We are currently applying the findings from functional analysis toward the development of a design methodology. The next realm of design that I am currently pursuing is the product architecture of transformers. There are two architectures:
Grouped products have separable functional groupings. We presented a design methodology for this product domain last year, showcased by our sprinkler/sprayer.
The other architecture, system of systems, have a great deal of function sharing and hazy system boundaries.
We functionally examined 30 random transforming products. Half of these were grouped, while the other half were of the blended or systems-of-systems architecture.
Here is an example product of a blended product, the Boeing Blended Wing Body aircraft. The body shares the primary functions of lift, storage, and control. A traditional aircraft, on the other hand, has a one-to-one mapping of functions to components.
I am currently working on further analysis and development of a methodology for the design of transformers with an emphasis on the system of systems product architecture. My results and first run on the method will be included in my thesis, to be finished this summer.
Now, I would like to give the floor to Jason who will discuss further analysis of function and how they tie to principles and facilitators.
Now we’ll take a closer look at the principles and facilitators Brandon described. In particular, we’ll focus on an empirical study of transformers and a feasibility study for a new design methodology.
To review, transformation principles describe the general form of a transformation process, like Expand/Collapse. Facilitators are supporting characteristics that aid the process, like folding and nesting. Functions are the elemental descriptions of what a product does. We see here just a sample of the great variety of transformers. Each one uses many principles and facilitators, all interacting to create transformation. Analyzing and designing these systems would be much easier if we understood these relationships.
These relationships can be studied using an inductive research approach. In an inductive approach, we observe the world around us, extract data from the observations, and then derive supporting theories.
We conducted an empirical study looking at a large range of real-life transformers. This information was compiled into a transformer repository for reference.
The information in the transformer repository could then be analyzed to isolate trends in the data. One method that we have used previously with success is vector space analysis. Basically, the repository can be seen as one big matrix. Multiplying different elements of the matrix together results in a square matrix where each principle or facilitator is linked to every other one in the matrix.
Design heuristics - If you have a certain principle/facilitator in mind, automatically know what other ones to look at
Mature design space. Hypothesis that if this is a useful method, should be able to independently come up with many examples already in use, plus some new ones
Here is where we tie back to facilitator matrix look at combinations