5. 2001 2007 2012
286 MILLION PPL 331 MILLION PPL 368 MILLION PPL
28%
55 MILLION HH
72% URBAN
RURAL
As per Census 2001 about 30% of
the population lived in urban areas
LATRINE
CASE 1: No Access
12.07 (17.87%) million urban HH do not have
access to latrines, hence defecate in open.
N U S P
6. CASE 2: Community Latrines
LATRINE
5.48 (8.13%) million urban HH use community latrines.
CASE 3: Shared Latrines
LATRINE LATRINE LATRINE
13.40 (19.49%) million urban HH use shared latrines.
N U S P
7. CASE 4: CASE 5:
12.47 million (18.5%) urban HH 26.83 million (39.8%) urban HH
do not have access to drainage. are connected to open drains.
CASE 6: SLUMS
17% - No Latrines 51% - No Latrines
66% - Septic Tanks 35% - Septic Tanks
30% - UG Sewerage 15% - UG Sewerage
N U S P
8. Causes
37% Health and
63% Environmental
Costs
Unsafely Disposed
Safely Disposed
Sewage Disposal
60 % of the GDP
Upto Rs. 500 crores
To cure children <14 yrs
from various diseases
N U S P
9. VISION:
All Indian cities and towns become totally sanitized, healthy and
livable and ensure and sustain good public health and environmental
outcomes for all their citizens with a special focus on hygienic and affordable
sanitation facilities for the urban poor and women.
N U S P
10. Lack of Awareness Fragmented Institutional
Roles and Responsibilities
Social & Occupational KEY ISSUES: Reaching the Unserved
Aspects of Sanitation and Poor
Lack of an Integrated Limited Technology
City-wide Approach Choices
N U S P
11. POLICY GOALS:
The overall goal of this policy is to transform Urban India into
community-driven, totally sanitized healthy and livable cities and towns.
N U S P
12. Strengthening National,
Generating Awareness State, City and Local
Institutions
SPECIFIC GOALS
Promoting Behavioral Promoting recycle and
change reuse of treated water
Community Planned Ensuring all human waste
and Managed Toilets is collected, conveyed,
treated and disposed
N U S P
13. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY
GOI
NATIONAL POLICY Guidelines
STATE
STATE POLICY Policy /Plan, Targets
ULB Action Plans , Short term
CITY SANITATION PLAN
Plans
N U S P
15. GOI SUPPORT
FUNDING SUBSIDY
GOI HUPA ILCS CENTRE 75%
FOR BY
STATE 15%
BENEFICIARY
10%
CONTRIBUTUION
OBJECTIVE
CONVERT
6 LAC DRY LATRINES TO FLUSH LATRINES BY 31ST MARCH 2010
25%
NEW TOILETS FOR EWS CONVERSION
75% NEW TOILETS
CENTRAL FUND ALLOCATIONS
N U S P
16. GOI SUPPORT for …
State Level Sanitation Plans within a Period of 2 yrs
City Sanitation Plans by Identified cities within a period of 2 yrs
Providing funds for preparation of DPR
Promote PPP
Providing Technical assistance for Capacity Building within the year 2009
Periodic ratings and recognition of best performer for National Award
Funding Projects from existing schemes
JNNURM – UIG component
UIDSSMT
Other special provision for North-Eastern States.
Funding States for developing & implementing Innovative Strategies
N U S P
18. Components
Coordination @ National Level
Capacity Awareness
Building generation
Components of
Financing National Urban Institutional
Sanitation Policy Roles
Monitoring Knowledge
& Development
Evaluation
N U S P
20. Components
Capacity building
and Training
With the help of specialist
Service Delivery in agencies, NGOs, Private Clear assignment
sector Organizations
Cities Of
With the help of NGOs & Institutional roles
CBOs
State will ensure
compliance of Components of Setting Standards
environment, health State Level @ State Level
and service delivery Sanitation Like: CPHEEO & BIS
standards Strategy
Monitoring & Planning & Financing
Evaluation @ State Reaching the @ State Level
Level unserved and poor
Basic sanitation should be
de-linked from issues of
land tenure
N U S P
22. Components
Monitoring and
Evaluation of 100%
Sanitation Status
City Reward Scheme Forming Sanitation
Capacity building Task Force and
and Training Mobilizing
stakeholders
Operation &
Components of Baseline data
Maintenance and
City Sanitation collection and
Service Delivery
Plan creating database
System
Awareness
Planning
generation and
and
Specifying Legal and launch of sanitation
Financing
Regulatory campaign
Institutional
Responsibilities
N U S P
24. Draft Framework for City Sanitation Plan
•Executive Head Municipal commissioner
•Head - Mayor
•ULB/PHED
•Eminent Persons
•Representatives of : People
Shops/Establishments
NGOs
Union of Sanitary Workers
Private Sector
Education & cultural Institutions
N U S P
26. REWARD SCHEMES
To For
City Reward Schemes Monetary Benefit Municipal Wards Upkeep &
Maintenance
Colonies or Residents’
Scroll of Honor Association
Infrastructure
Improvement
Recognition in Public Educational
Institutions
Environment Fairs
Market and Bazaar
Committees Health Camps
Railway Stations, Bus
Depots and Office
Bhavans
N U S P
27. REWARD SCHEMES
National Award Baseline and Conducting Surveys and Mobilizing all stakeholders and
Schemes Planning draw-up C S P
Implementation Implementing strategy of C S P
Achievement of
Whether attained the desired outcome?
Milestone
State Level State level awards may be constituted to keep a track
Verification of progress of the cities
National Cities’ MoUD will commission independent agencies to carry
Sanitation Rating out surveys of Class 1 cities and publishing the results
N U S Advisory Group Final Authority for deciding annual awards
Type of Award Recognition only, no monetary incentive. Sponsorship
for trainings, events, exchange and learning visits
N U S P
28.
29. REWARD SCHEMES
Special Honorary Awards For excelling in any 1 aspect
Awards for Exemplary For maximum overall performance compared to
Performance baseline situation
30. Thank You for Your Time and Attention ..!!
This presentation is prepared for Planning Division, MMRDA.
Prepared by Swetal D. Kanwalu