This document discusses the adaptability of the Global Game Jam by examining its implementation in Japan. It describes how the Global Game Jam spread game prototyping culture and participatory design approaches in Japan. It also outlines strategies for designing effective regional game jams, as illustrated by the Fukushima Game Jam, which brought together developers to create games addressing issues in areas affected by the 2011 earthquake and tsunami. The Global Game Jam is concluded to inspire new collaborative game jams worldwide while requiring adaptation to different cultural contexts.

1. . . . . . .
.
......
Adaptability of the Global Game Jam
A Case Study in Japan
Shinji R. Yamane
IGDA Japan / Aoyama Gakuin Univ.
FDG2013, GGJ Workshop
S. Yamane (IGDA.jp) Adaptability of GGJ 2013 1 / 26

2. . . . . . .
Contents
...1 Introduction
...2 GGJ: Deign Theory and Strategy
...3 Case Study in Japan
...4 Future of Game Jam approach
...5 Rise of Mega–region Game Jam
...6 After the Jam
...7 Summary
S. Yamane (IGDA.jp) Adaptability of GGJ 2013 2 / 26

3. . . . . . .
Introduction
Phaistos Disk: The oldest movable type
S. Yamane (IGDA.jp) Adaptability of GGJ 2013 3 / 26

4. . . . . . .
Introduction
Innovation and Social condition
Gutenberg Revolution
Innovation requires the culturall condition
The Global Game Jam require any social condition?
What is the Global Game Jam?
Take a look at the recognition and design of GGJ.
S. Yamane (IGDA.jp) Adaptability of GGJ 2013 4 / 26

5. . . . . . .
GGJ: Deign Theory and Strategy
Recognizing what is /isn’t Game Jam
“jam session” by game developers
short–period team development
death march myth: each roles has own cycle
not a contest, not for a win
everybody is welcome
not beginners but professionals also can learn
download freely, public/peer review, version–up
Understanding characteristic is not so easy.
S. Yamane (IGDA.jp) Adaptability of GGJ 2013 5 / 26

6. . . . . . .
GGJ: Deign Theory and Strategy
Why can we recognize Game Jam?
Game Jam
New Product
Development
Aesthetics &
Technology
Product-Value
Focused
Rapid
Experience
Prototyping
Participatory
Design
Multidisciplinarity
Concurrent
Development
Lightweight
Construction
Game Jam elements outlined by Musil(2010)
S. Yamane (IGDA.jp) Adaptability of GGJ 2013 6 / 26

7. . . . . . .
GGJ: Deign Theory and Strategy
What we experienced in Global Game Jam
Game Jam
jammer
?
!
Local organizers and jammers are not familier for some
elements.
S. Yamane (IGDA.jp) Adaptability of GGJ 2013 7 / 26

8. . . . . . .
GGJ: Deign Theory and Strategy
GGJ organizers’ challenge
Game Jam
jammerjam
designer
design
Local organizer can emphasize some unfamilier
elements to jammers.
Designing jam sites by achievements and challenges.
S. Yamane (IGDA.jp) Adaptability of GGJ 2013 8 / 26

9. . . . . . .
Case Study in Japan
IGDA Japan and Global Game Jam
IGDA Japan promoting GGJ by:
Following GGJ since January 2010
translating GGJ keynote videos,
supporting GGJ organizers in Japanese,
promoting GGJ to the academia in Japanese or
English,
providing live talk streaming, open play party, etc.
S. Yamane (IGDA.jp) Adaptability of GGJ 2013 9 / 26

10. . . . . . .
Case Study in Japan
Encounter to game jams in Japan
S. Yamane (IGDA.jp) Adaptability of GGJ 2013 10 / 26

11. . . . . . .
Case Study in Japan
Encounter to game jams in Japan
Before the Global Game Jam, nobody knows about
Indie Game Jam, Nordic Game Jam.
Indies and Universities joined experimentally
Translating keynotes with backgrounds was helpful
for reflection.
IGDA Newsletter (Game education issue, August
2010) was useful.
GGJ2010 report
Game Prototyping Curriculum
IGDA Curriculum Framework
S. Yamane (IGDA.jp) Adaptability of GGJ 2013 11 / 26

12. . . . . . .
Case Study in Japan
What Succeeded and Failed
Major success in GGJ2011 in Japan
University–Industry collaboration
grass–rooted game community
public awareness and discussions via USTREAM and
Twitter
“Featured Game for Global Game Jam” in IGDA
Newsletter
Missing elements in GGJ2011 in Japan
Participatory Design?
working in diverse teams
switching roles or polyvalency
rapid prototyping with reflections
S. Yamane (IGDA.jp) Adaptability of GGJ 2013 12 / 26

13. . . . . . .
Case Study in Japan
Game development in the social context
In Final Fantasy XIII postmortem (2010):
not only game engine, but game development
method in crisis
until they made an playable demo, the development
team had lacked a shared vision
the demo was for a game show, not included in the
original development plan
The game prototyping process was featured in Japanese
major game industry — at the almost same period when
Global Game Jam started.
S. Yamane (IGDA.jp) Adaptability of GGJ 2013 13 / 26

14. . . . . . .
Case Study in Japan
Local design of GGJ in Japan
To emphasizing the missing elements by design:
rapid prototyping: Alpha, beta, complete
presentation on–air schedule sharing
participatory design: public review, inviting citizens
encourage opportunity for failure
GGJ site organizers can design game jam with the local
achievements or local awards.
S. Yamane (IGDA.jp) Adaptability of GGJ 2013 14 / 26

15. . . . . . .
Future of Game Jam approach
Future of Game Jam approach
Inspired by Global Game Jam, other game jams will be
held everywhere.
Global Game Jam globally distributed event for general
purpose
Mega–region game jam Localized Global Game Jam or
nation–wide event with social purpose
Local game jam in–house, stand–alone event for a local
purpose
The success of GGJ leads to many other game jams with
new actors.
(In Japan, there are the game jams in every month. )
S. Yamane (IGDA.jp) Adaptability of GGJ 2013 15 / 26

16. . . . . . .
Rise of Mega–region Game Jam
Rise of Mega–region Game Jam
Apps for Healthy Kids game jam (2010)
Fukushima Game Jam (2011–)
NASA International Space Apps Challenge (2012–)
Game Accessibility Challenge (2012–)
GGJ mainly held at the universities with broadband
Mega–region game jam can expand the
collaboration not only schools but broader citizens,
with a low cost.
S. Yamane (IGDA.jp) Adaptability of GGJ 2013 16 / 26

17. . . . . . .
Rise of Mega–region Game Jam
Fukushima Game Jam
East Japan earthquake desease occured March 11,
2011.
IGDA Japan started Fukushima Game Jam in
August 2011.
Fukushima Game Jam 2012 in 1 minute
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5apdF6Ri7RE
Interactive Map in English:
http://spectrum.ieee.org/static/
mapping-fukushimas-impact-on-japan
Minamisoma city in Fukushima is located at the
edge of low–level radiation zone.
S. Yamane (IGDA.jp) Adaptability of GGJ 2013 17 / 26

18. . . . . . .
Rise of Mega–region Game Jam
Design strategy 1: Process
Alpha, beta, public play test, and final release are
scheduled in 30 hours
Tokyo team also experienced the bus trip with a local
guide to the edge of the evacuation zone just before
starting design.
S. Yamane (IGDA.jp) Adaptability of GGJ 2013 18 / 26

19. . . . . . .
Rise of Mega–region Game Jam
Design strategy2: Participatory Design
Public play–test and kids workshop
Focusing the users’ needs sometimes changed the game
design.
S. Yamane (IGDA.jp) Adaptability of GGJ 2013 19 / 26

20. . . . . . .
Rise of Mega–region Game Jam
Design strategy 3: Listening to users
Some observation from Minamisoma bus trip and
live–streaming program during the game jam:
No IT industry: agriculture and services for nuclear
power station
No university
Public awareness concerning
S. Yamane (IGDA.jp) Adaptability of GGJ 2013 20 / 26

21. . . . . . .
Rise of Mega–region Game Jam
Design strategy 4: Team
Each team has 5–7 person
Jammers should registration with their profile
Professional/semi-professional lead developer for
each team
Beginner/student for each team
Separate developers from a same organization
Sometimes too many programmers and less manual
writers
S. Yamane (IGDA.jp) Adaptability of GGJ 2013 21 / 26

22. . . . . . .
Rise of Mega–region Game Jam
Design strategy 5: satellites
More than 100 developers took part in Fukushima Game
Jam 2011:
Main site: 44 (25 from Tokyo, 19 from Tohoku
region)
Tokyo: about 40 (2 sites including part-time
attendee)
Fukuoka: about 30
Sapporo: 7
SHIPS (Sympathy, Interest, Participation, Share)
expanded overseas in FGJ 2012.
S. Yamane (IGDA.jp) Adaptability of GGJ 2013 22 / 26

23. . . . . . .
Rise of Mega–region Game Jam
Design strategy 6: achievements
Announce themes and achievements:
Collaboration with local kids
Include the specialties from Tohoku area
Five minutes limit
. . .
Creative recovery and place–making after 3.11
earthquake, tsunami, and atomic meltdown
S. Yamane (IGDA.jp) Adaptability of GGJ 2013 23 / 26

24. . . . . . .
After the Jam
FGJ and Lessons from Global Game Jam
According to IGDA Newsletter, the lesson from GGJ
includes below:
...1 Rapid prototyping experience
...2 Opportunity for failure
...3 Working in diverse teams
...4 (Professional) Tools assessment and selection
...5 Research and user studies
...6 Promotion
these characteristics were also observed in FGJ (expect
for avoiding failure).
S. Yamane (IGDA.jp) Adaptability of GGJ 2013 24 / 26

25. . . . . . .
Summary
Conclusion
Recognizing Global Game Jam from depends on the
cultural condition.
For adaptability, Global Game Jam site organizers
can emphasize the design elements of game jam.
Global Game Jam can bring the prototyping culture
or participatory design worldwide. (In Japan, those
all movements appear in the very short time!)
Inspired by Global Game Jam, the mega–region
game jams are rising in different scales.
more collaboration among new actors!
S. Yamane (IGDA.jp) Adaptability of GGJ 2013 25 / 26

26. . . . . . .
Summary
See you in our next game jam.
...1 Fukushima Game Jam 2014, next August 3rd to 4th.
...2 http://fgj.igda.jp/?cat=3 (tag: English)
...3 local satelite site registration is wellcome.
S. Yamane (IGDA.jp) Adaptability of GGJ 2013 26 / 26