1. Getting It Right
How disinformation drives the immigration
debate and what you can do to fix it
Tucson Outlooks Conference
Todd Landfried
Arizona Employers for Immigration Reform
1
2. “It's not what you don't know that
gets you into trouble. It's what you
know for sure that just ain't so.”
Mark Twain
2
4. How’d We Get Here?
Partisanship, ideology and fear are driving this issue
3
5. How’d We Get Here?
Partisanship, ideology and fear are driving this issue
Myths, distortions and outright lies are more common than fact
3
6. How’d We Get Here?
Partisanship, ideology and fear are driving this issue
Myths, distortions and outright lies are more common than fact
Rhetoric makes scapegoats of employers, workers and the federal
government, causing them to respond with fear and inaction
3
7. How’d We Get Here?
Partisanship, ideology and fear are driving this issue
Myths, distortions and outright lies are more common than fact
Rhetoric makes scapegoats of employers, workers and the federal
government, causing them to respond with fear and inaction
Polarizes people on moral, ethnic and economic grounds
3
8. How’d We Get Here?
Partisanship, ideology and fear are driving this issue
Myths, distortions and outright lies are more common than fact
Rhetoric makes scapegoats of employers, workers and the federal
government, causing them to respond with fear and inaction
Polarizes people on moral, ethnic and economic grounds
A potent “third-rail” issue where real solutions aren’t an option
3
10. Emotion Trumps Reason
Groups with clear biases, outrageous claims and questionable
research are cited as experts -- without challenge
FAIR → CIS → NumbersUSA
4
11. Emotion Trumps Reason
Groups with clear biases, outrageous claims and questionable
research are cited as experts -- without challenge
FAIR → CIS → NumbersUSA
Solid academic research ignored because of alleged or
manufactured “bias”
4
12. Emotion Trumps Reason
Groups with clear biases, outrageous claims and questionable
research are cited as experts -- without challenge
FAIR → CIS → NumbersUSA
Solid academic research ignored because of alleged or
manufactured “bias”
“On-the-ground” expertise and data are ignored
4
13. Emotion Trumps Reason
Groups with clear biases, outrageous claims and questionable
research are cited as experts -- without challenge
FAIR → CIS → NumbersUSA
Solid academic research ignored because of alleged or
manufactured “bias”
“On-the-ground” expertise and data are ignored
Media, business, community leaders fail to hold proponents
accountable - it is nothing short of a lack of courage
4
15. Why No Accountability?
They believe what they’re told, e.g., “Don’t question authority”
They’re not aware they’re being lied to:
Why? No access to alternative information or solutions to prove otherwise
Intimidated into silence or complacency
No intellectual curiosity: “where ignorance is bliss, ‘tis folly to be wise”
Don’t want to know the truth
5
16. “A salient characteristic of the
current debate on U.S.
immigration policy is the high
ratio of hot air to data.”
Dr. Douglas Massey
Co-director, Mexican Migration Project
Princeton University
mmp.opr.princeton.edu
6
42. Source: AZ Fact Check, Immigration list checked 1/18/11. N = 57 14
43. 9 out of 10
Source: AZ Fact Check, Immigration list checked 1/18/11. N = 57 14
44. o n
r of 10
W g
9 out
Source: AZ Fact Check, Immigration list checked 1/18/11. N = 57 14
45. Birthright Fallacy
U.S. Citizen
Citizen Child
Source: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service
15
46. Birthright Fallacy
U.S. Citizen
Spouse 3 years
Minor Child 7 years
Sibling 22 years
Citizen Child
Parents
Siblings
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60
Years
Source: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service
15
47. Birthright Fallacy
U.S. Citizen
Spouse 3 years
Minor Child 7 years
Sibling 22 years
Citizen Child
Parents Ineligible
Siblings Ineligible
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60
Years
Source: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service
15
48. Birthright Fallacy
U.S. Citizen
Spouse 3 years
Minor Child 7 years
Sibling 22 years
Citizen Child
Parents Ineligible Penalty
Siblings Ineligible Penalty
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60
Years
Source: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service
15
49. Birthright Fallacy
U.S. Citizen
Spouse 3 years
Minor Child 7 years
Sibling 22 years
Citizen Child
Parents Ineligible Penalty Wait
Siblings Ineligible Penalty Wait
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60
Years
Source: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service
15
50. Birthright Fallacy
U.S. Citizen
Spouse 3 years
Minor Child 7 years
Sibling 22 years
Citizen Child
Parents Ineligible Penalty Wait 38 years
Siblings Ineligible Penalty Wait
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60
Years
Source: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service
15
51. Birthright Fallacy
U.S. Citizen
Spouse 3 years
Minor Child 7 years
Sibling 22 years
Citizen Child
Parents Ineligible Penalty Wait 38 years
Siblings Ineligible Penalty Wait 53 years
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60
Years
Source: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service
15
60. Economics of Population Loss
Immigrant Pop. Gross State Tax Revenue
Income Loss Job Loss
Decline Product Loss Loss
15% $8.3B $5.3B 99,000 $636M
30% $14.4B $9.4B 172,000 $1.27B
50% $20B $15.7B 291,000 $2.11B
100% $48.8B $29.5B 581,000 $4.22B
Source: "A Rising Tide or a Shrinking Pie," M. Fitz and R. Hinojosa, Immigration Policy Council, March, 2011.
22
61. Crime Fallacies
Unauthorized Claim Reality Difference
% in Federal Prison 35% 17.5% +200%
% in AZ Prisons* 33% 13.2% +240%
Violent Crime
18.6% 15.2% +122%
Drop 3X US Avg.
Hate Crime
Not a problem +68% +6,800%
Increase ‘07-’10
Identity Theft 100% 0.9% -99.1%
* Includes green card and undocumented prisoners
23
84. “The greatest threat to democracy
is having a public that thinks it is
fully informed, but really isn’t very
well informed at all.”
Linda Foley
34
85. Been There, Done That
Restrictive immigration laws are not new to our country
Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, The Gentleman’s Agreement of 1907, The
Immigration Act of 1924, and Bracero Program of 1942
In the last several years, restrictive laws have gained favor again
All started with one sponsor at the city, county and state level
All relied upon the same bad data we’ve just discussed
So what were their results?
35
87. Sound Good?
✓Shrinking workforce
✓Significant population loss
✓Significantly fewer consumers
✓Business layoffs & closures
✓Broad tax base decline
✓Foreclosures up, values down
✓Damage to business climate
✓Loss of investment interest
36
89. Impacts In Other Jurisdictions
Prince William County, VA (2007) - $14.9M to train & enforce
county officers, not county jurisdictional officers; foreclosure rate
3X regional rate; business closures up 45%
Farmer’s Branch, TX (2007) - $5M in lawsuit costs, increased
vacancy rates, lower property values, businesses closed
Hazelton, PA (2007) - $5M in lawsuit costs, increased foreclosure
and vacancy rates, lower property values, businesses closed
37
90. Impacts In Other Jurisdictions
Source: A Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Analysis of the Impact of the Oklahoma Taxpayer and Citizen Protection Act of 2007
38
91. Impacts In Other Jurisdictions
Oklahoma Taxpayer & Citizen Protection Act (2007) - Oklahoma
Bankers Association study found the loss of 90,000 unauthorized
workers/families resulted in net Gross State Product loss of $1.9B
Urban Institute found negligible impact on savings on public services
from departure of the undocumented because by law they’re ineligible
for those benefits in the first place
Source: A Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Analysis of the Impact of the Oklahoma Taxpayer and Citizen Protection Act of 2007
38
92. State of Arizona
Source: Public Policy Institute of California. www.ppic.org/content/pubs/report/R_311MLR.pdf 39
93. State of Arizona
Impacts of Legal Arizona Workers Act (2007)
Has resulted in the hiring of fewer undocumented workers
Has reduced undocumented population by 92,000 unrelated to the
recession
BUT - a dramatic shift to cash-based, self-employment, thus
weakening the tax base
Reduced size of the labor pool in construction, retail, restaurant,
hospitality and agriculture businesses
Source: Public Policy Institute of California. www.ppic.org/content/pubs/report/R_311MLR.pdf 39
95. State of Arizona
Impacts of SB 1070 (2010)
$5M+ to train law enforcement
$186M in near-term convention and related tourism losses
$14.4B loss in Arizona GSP with departure of 30% undocumented
workers and families; $48.4B if they all leave
172,000 related job losses
$40.7M loss in state tax revenues
40
98. Georgia: Following AZ’s Lead
Ignoring history and evidence of policy failures, GA bill was signed
on May 12, 2011
Georgia felt the impact within days
Farmers lost field workers during prime spring harvest season and the
state’s Farm Bureau projected immediate losses at $330M
Gov. Deal called for impact study 14 days AFTER the law was passed
“Pilot” probationer employment program for agriculture failed miserably:
needed 11,000 and 14 showed up and two remained a week later
42
103. Alabama: Following AZ’s Lead
Alabama’s law signed on June 9, 2011
Alabama felt the impact within days
Construction industry stalled as workers leave, slowing down
rebuilding process following spring tornado storms
Many businesses will lay off workers or close because they have no
expectation that “American” workers will do the work
Long-term growers of crops that are hand-picked are switching to
crops that can be mechanized
44
104. Quiz
Doing the same thing over and over and
expecting a different result is the definition of...
45
105. Quiz
Doing the same thing over and over and
expecting a different result is the definition of...
INSANITY
45
106. Quiz
Doing the same thing over and over and
expecting a different result is the definition of...
INSANITY
45
107. This Doesn’t Work
Non-federal immigration laws have not worked anywhere
No study exists that shows positive impacts of any state-level
immigration law
All studies show negative economic and social consequences
Successful Russell Pearce recall shows sensible immigration
reform can be a winning campaign issue
Federal reform is impossible without state and local pressure
46
108. Taking Charge of Change
Other solutions exist that can address the immigration problem
Ellis Island Centers on the border
Maricopa C.A. Bill Montgomery’s S.A.N.E. Immigration plan
No need to grant amnesty
Focus on addressing labor and security issues at the same time
Solving the labor issue makes security more feasible more quickly
47
109. Taking Charge of Change
Stop believing everything you hear - 9 times out of 10 it’s wrong
Stop remaining silent - demand changes to bad laws
Business, faith, legal, and community leaders must speak out
together
Start demanding state and federal candidates talk about their
solutions and demand specific timelines for action
Get involved in business coalitions like AZEIR, Real Arizona, etc.
48
110. Getting Involved Works!
The approach of speaking out, building coalitions, education,
proactive media use and legislative interaction works:
Utah - - along with the Utah Compact (another coalition effort),
defeated HB 70 and spawned creation of innovative guest worker
programs in 2011 and retries in 2012
Kansas - defeated Kris Kobach’s copycats in 2011 & 2012
Texas - defeated copycat bills in regular and special legislative session
Arizona - defeated five SB1070 follow-on bills in 2011
49
111. Take-aways
Bad data + fear + anger = bad policy and bad laws
Misinformation, distortions, half-truths, lies and fear are driving the
debate and are justifying extreme and exaggerated actions
Arizona’s approach has been tried before and failed everywhere
Stop being complacent and get involved
Demand better solutions - our economic future depends on it
50
An estimated 14,748 persons were murdered nationwide in 2010. If the undocumented committed 9,000 of them, that means they committed 61% of the crime. Yeah, sure.\n\nThis was a 4.2 percent decrease from the 2009 estimate, a 14.8 percent decrease from the 2006 figure, and an 8.0 percent decrease from the 2001 estimate. \n
An estimated 14,748 persons were murdered nationwide in 2010. If the undocumented committed 9,000 of them, that means they committed 61% of the crime. Yeah, sure.\n\nThis was a 4.2 percent decrease from the 2009 estimate, a 14.8 percent decrease from the 2006 figure, and an 8.0 percent decrease from the 2001 estimate. \n
An estimated 14,748 persons were murdered nationwide in 2010. If the undocumented committed 9,000 of them, that means they committed 61% of the crime. Yeah, sure.\n\nThis was a 4.2 percent decrease from the 2009 estimate, a 14.8 percent decrease from the 2006 figure, and an 8.0 percent decrease from the 2001 estimate. \n
An estimated 14,748 persons were murdered nationwide in 2010. If the undocumented committed 9,000 of them, that means they committed 61% of the crime. Yeah, sure.\n\nThis was a 4.2 percent decrease from the 2009 estimate, a 14.8 percent decrease from the 2006 figure, and an 8.0 percent decrease from the 2001 estimate. \n
An estimated 14,748 persons were murdered nationwide in 2010. If the undocumented committed 9,000 of them, that means they committed 61% of the crime. Yeah, sure.\n\nThis was a 4.2 percent decrease from the 2009 estimate, a 14.8 percent decrease from the 2006 figure, and an 8.0 percent decrease from the 2001 estimate. \n
An estimated 14,748 persons were murdered nationwide in 2010. If the undocumented committed 9,000 of them, that means they committed 61% of the crime. Yeah, sure.\n\nThis was a 4.2 percent decrease from the 2009 estimate, a 14.8 percent decrease from the 2006 figure, and an 8.0 percent decrease from the 2001 estimate. \n
An estimated 14,748 persons were murdered nationwide in 2010. If the undocumented committed 9,000 of them, that means they committed 61% of the crime. Yeah, sure.\n\nThis was a 4.2 percent decrease from the 2009 estimate, a 14.8 percent decrease from the 2006 figure, and an 8.0 percent decrease from the 2001 estimate. \n
An estimated 14,748 persons were murdered nationwide in 2010. If the undocumented committed 9,000 of them, that means they committed 61% of the crime. Yeah, sure.\n\nThis was a 4.2 percent decrease from the 2009 estimate, a 14.8 percent decrease from the 2006 figure, and an 8.0 percent decrease from the 2001 estimate. \n
An estimated 14,748 persons were murdered nationwide in 2010. If the undocumented committed 9,000 of them, that means they committed 61% of the crime. Yeah, sure.\n\nThis was a 4.2 percent decrease from the 2009 estimate, a 14.8 percent decrease from the 2006 figure, and an 8.0 percent decrease from the 2001 estimate. \n
An estimated 14,748 persons were murdered nationwide in 2010. If the undocumented committed 9,000 of them, that means they committed 61% of the crime. Yeah, sure.\n\nThis was a 4.2 percent decrease from the 2009 estimate, a 14.8 percent decrease from the 2006 figure, and an 8.0 percent decrease from the 2001 estimate. \n
An estimated 14,748 persons were murdered nationwide in 2010. If the undocumented committed 9,000 of them, that means they committed 61% of the crime. Yeah, sure.\n\nThis was a 4.2 percent decrease from the 2009 estimate, a 14.8 percent decrease from the 2006 figure, and an 8.0 percent decrease from the 2001 estimate. \n
An estimated 14,748 persons were murdered nationwide in 2010. If the undocumented committed 9,000 of them, that means they committed 61% of the crime. Yeah, sure.\n\nThis was a 4.2 percent decrease from the 2009 estimate, a 14.8 percent decrease from the 2006 figure, and an 8.0 percent decrease from the 2001 estimate. \n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
EXAMPLE #1: The Birthright Fallacy\n\n1. Bringing in a Spouse, of a US citizen: This is the fastest possible way to become a U.S. citizen - 3 years\n2. Bringing in minor child or parent: This process depends on whether the child is a minor or not, single or married. Minor children can file for green cards immediately, but cannot apply for citizenship status for an additional five years.\n3. Single or adult children and siblings can apply immediately, but the wait times depend on the country of origin and annual limits set by Congress. Typically, the wait is 11-22 years.\n\nNo U.S. citizen can "sponsor" someone to become a U.S. Citizen until they reach the age of 21. The suggestion that U.S. children of undocumented parents can somehow speed up their parent's entry into the country legally is without merit. The shortest amount of time it would take would be 38 years, but likely never. For siblings, it's even worse, taking up to 53 years.\n
EXAMPLE #1: The Birthright Fallacy\n\n1. Bringing in a Spouse, of a US citizen: This is the fastest possible way to become a U.S. citizen - 3 years\n2. Bringing in minor child or parent: This process depends on whether the child is a minor or not, single or married. Minor children can file for green cards immediately, but cannot apply for citizenship status for an additional five years.\n3. Single or adult children and siblings can apply immediately, but the wait times depend on the country of origin and annual limits set by Congress. Typically, the wait is 11-22 years.\n\nNo U.S. citizen can "sponsor" someone to become a U.S. Citizen until they reach the age of 21. The suggestion that U.S. children of undocumented parents can somehow speed up their parent's entry into the country legally is without merit. The shortest amount of time it would take would be 38 years, but likely never. For siblings, it's even worse, taking up to 53 years.\n
EXAMPLE #1: The Birthright Fallacy\n\n1. Bringing in a Spouse, of a US citizen: This is the fastest possible way to become a U.S. citizen - 3 years\n2. Bringing in minor child or parent: This process depends on whether the child is a minor or not, single or married. Minor children can file for green cards immediately, but cannot apply for citizenship status for an additional five years.\n3. Single or adult children and siblings can apply immediately, but the wait times depend on the country of origin and annual limits set by Congress. Typically, the wait is 11-22 years.\n\nNo U.S. citizen can "sponsor" someone to become a U.S. Citizen until they reach the age of 21. The suggestion that U.S. children of undocumented parents can somehow speed up their parent's entry into the country legally is without merit. The shortest amount of time it would take would be 38 years, but likely never. For siblings, it's even worse, taking up to 53 years.\n
EXAMPLE #1: The Birthright Fallacy\n\n1. Bringing in a Spouse, of a US citizen: This is the fastest possible way to become a U.S. citizen - 3 years\n2. Bringing in minor child or parent: This process depends on whether the child is a minor or not, single or married. Minor children can file for green cards immediately, but cannot apply for citizenship status for an additional five years.\n3. Single or adult children and siblings can apply immediately, but the wait times depend on the country of origin and annual limits set by Congress. Typically, the wait is 11-22 years.\n\nNo U.S. citizen can "sponsor" someone to become a U.S. Citizen until they reach the age of 21. The suggestion that U.S. children of undocumented parents can somehow speed up their parent's entry into the country legally is without merit. The shortest amount of time it would take would be 38 years, but likely never. For siblings, it's even worse, taking up to 53 years.\n
EXAMPLE #1: The Birthright Fallacy\n\n1. Bringing in a Spouse, of a US citizen: This is the fastest possible way to become a U.S. citizen - 3 years\n2. Bringing in minor child or parent: This process depends on whether the child is a minor or not, single or married. Minor children can file for green cards immediately, but cannot apply for citizenship status for an additional five years.\n3. Single or adult children and siblings can apply immediately, but the wait times depend on the country of origin and annual limits set by Congress. Typically, the wait is 11-22 years.\n\nNo U.S. citizen can "sponsor" someone to become a U.S. Citizen until they reach the age of 21. The suggestion that U.S. children of undocumented parents can somehow speed up their parent's entry into the country legally is without merit. The shortest amount of time it would take would be 38 years, but likely never. For siblings, it's even worse, taking up to 53 years.\n
EXAMPLE #1: The Birthright Fallacy\n\n1. Bringing in a Spouse, of a US citizen: This is the fastest possible way to become a U.S. citizen - 3 years\n2. Bringing in minor child or parent: This process depends on whether the child is a minor or not, single or married. Minor children can file for green cards immediately, but cannot apply for citizenship status for an additional five years.\n3. Single or adult children and siblings can apply immediately, but the wait times depend on the country of origin and annual limits set by Congress. Typically, the wait is 11-22 years.\n\nNo U.S. citizen can "sponsor" someone to become a U.S. Citizen until they reach the age of 21. The suggestion that U.S. children of undocumented parents can somehow speed up their parent's entry into the country legally is without merit. The shortest amount of time it would take would be 38 years, but likely never. For siblings, it's even worse, taking up to 53 years.\n
EXAMPLE #1: The Birthright Fallacy\n\n1. Bringing in a Spouse, of a US citizen: This is the fastest possible way to become a U.S. citizen - 3 years\n2. Bringing in minor child or parent: This process depends on whether the child is a minor or not, single or married. Minor children can file for green cards immediately, but cannot apply for citizenship status for an additional five years.\n3. Single or adult children and siblings can apply immediately, but the wait times depend on the country of origin and annual limits set by Congress. Typically, the wait is 11-22 years.\n\nNo U.S. citizen can "sponsor" someone to become a U.S. Citizen until they reach the age of 21. The suggestion that U.S. children of undocumented parents can somehow speed up their parent's entry into the country legally is without merit. The shortest amount of time it would take would be 38 years, but likely never. For siblings, it's even worse, taking up to 53 years.\n
EXAMPLE #1: The Birthright Fallacy\n\n1. Bringing in a Spouse, of a US citizen: This is the fastest possible way to become a U.S. citizen - 3 years\n2. Bringing in minor child or parent: This process depends on whether the child is a minor or not, single or married. Minor children can file for green cards immediately, but cannot apply for citizenship status for an additional five years.\n3. Single or adult children and siblings can apply immediately, but the wait times depend on the country of origin and annual limits set by Congress. Typically, the wait is 11-22 years.\n\nNo U.S. citizen can "sponsor" someone to become a U.S. Citizen until they reach the age of 21. The suggestion that U.S. children of undocumented parents can somehow speed up their parent's entry into the country legally is without merit. The shortest amount of time it would take would be 38 years, but likely never. For siblings, it's even worse, taking up to 53 years.\n
EXAMPLE #1: The Birthright Fallacy\n\n1. Bringing in a Spouse, of a US citizen: This is the fastest possible way to become a U.S. citizen - 3 years\n2. Bringing in minor child or parent: This process depends on whether the child is a minor or not, single or married. Minor children can file for green cards immediately, but cannot apply for citizenship status for an additional five years.\n3. Single or adult children and siblings can apply immediately, but the wait times depend on the country of origin and annual limits set by Congress. Typically, the wait is 11-22 years.\n\nNo U.S. citizen can "sponsor" someone to become a U.S. Citizen until they reach the age of 21. The suggestion that U.S. children of undocumented parents can somehow speed up their parent's entry into the country legally is without merit. The shortest amount of time it would take would be 38 years, but likely never. For siblings, it's even worse, taking up to 53 years.\n
EXAMPLE #1: The Birthright Fallacy\n\n1. Bringing in a Spouse, of a US citizen: This is the fastest possible way to become a U.S. citizen - 3 years\n2. Bringing in minor child or parent: This process depends on whether the child is a minor or not, single or married. Minor children can file for green cards immediately, but cannot apply for citizenship status for an additional five years.\n3. Single or adult children and siblings can apply immediately, but the wait times depend on the country of origin and annual limits set by Congress. Typically, the wait is 11-22 years.\n\nNo U.S. citizen can "sponsor" someone to become a U.S. Citizen until they reach the age of 21. The suggestion that U.S. children of undocumented parents can somehow speed up their parent's entry into the country legally is without merit. The shortest amount of time it would take would be 38 years, but likely never. For siblings, it's even worse, taking up to 53 years.\n
EXAMPLE #1: The Birthright Fallacy\n\n1. Bringing in a Spouse, of a US citizen: This is the fastest possible way to become a U.S. citizen - 3 years\n2. Bringing in minor child or parent: This process depends on whether the child is a minor or not, single or married. Minor children can file for green cards immediately, but cannot apply for citizenship status for an additional five years.\n3. Single or adult children and siblings can apply immediately, but the wait times depend on the country of origin and annual limits set by Congress. Typically, the wait is 11-22 years.\n\nNo U.S. citizen can "sponsor" someone to become a U.S. Citizen until they reach the age of 21. The suggestion that U.S. children of undocumented parents can somehow speed up their parent's entry into the country legally is without merit. The shortest amount of time it would take would be 38 years, but likely never. For siblings, it's even worse, taking up to 53 years.\n
EXAMPLE #1: The Birthright Fallacy\n\n1. Bringing in a Spouse, of a US citizen: This is the fastest possible way to become a U.S. citizen - 3 years\n2. Bringing in minor child or parent: This process depends on whether the child is a minor or not, single or married. Minor children can file for green cards immediately, but cannot apply for citizenship status for an additional five years.\n3. Single or adult children and siblings can apply immediately, but the wait times depend on the country of origin and annual limits set by Congress. Typically, the wait is 11-22 years.\n\nNo U.S. citizen can "sponsor" someone to become a U.S. Citizen until they reach the age of 21. The suggestion that U.S. children of undocumented parents can somehow speed up their parent's entry into the country legally is without merit. The shortest amount of time it would take would be 38 years, but likely never. For siblings, it's even worse, taking up to 53 years.\n
EXAMPLE #1: The Birthright Fallacy\n\n1. Bringing in a Spouse, of a US citizen: This is the fastest possible way to become a U.S. citizen - 3 years\n2. Bringing in minor child or parent: This process depends on whether the child is a minor or not, single or married. Minor children can file for green cards immediately, but cannot apply for citizenship status for an additional five years.\n3. Single or adult children and siblings can apply immediately, but the wait times depend on the country of origin and annual limits set by Congress. Typically, the wait is 11-22 years.\n\nNo U.S. citizen can "sponsor" someone to become a U.S. Citizen until they reach the age of 21. The suggestion that U.S. children of undocumented parents can somehow speed up their parent's entry into the country legally is without merit. The shortest amount of time it would take would be 38 years, but likely never. For siblings, it's even worse, taking up to 53 years.\n
EXAMPLE #1: The Birthright Fallacy\n\n1. Bringing in a Spouse, of a US citizen: This is the fastest possible way to become a U.S. citizen - 3 years\n2. Bringing in minor child or parent: This process depends on whether the child is a minor or not, single or married. Minor children can file for green cards immediately, but cannot apply for citizenship status for an additional five years.\n3. Single or adult children and siblings can apply immediately, but the wait times depend on the country of origin and annual limits set by Congress. Typically, the wait is 11-22 years.\n\nNo U.S. citizen can "sponsor" someone to become a U.S. Citizen until they reach the age of 21. The suggestion that U.S. children of undocumented parents can somehow speed up their parent's entry into the country legally is without merit. The shortest amount of time it would take would be 38 years, but likely never. For siblings, it's even worse, taking up to 53 years.\n
EXAMPLE #1: The Birthright Fallacy\n\n1. Bringing in a Spouse, of a US citizen: This is the fastest possible way to become a U.S. citizen - 3 years\n2. Bringing in minor child or parent: This process depends on whether the child is a minor or not, single or married. Minor children can file for green cards immediately, but cannot apply for citizenship status for an additional five years.\n3. Single or adult children and siblings can apply immediately, but the wait times depend on the country of origin and annual limits set by Congress. Typically, the wait is 11-22 years.\n\nNo U.S. citizen can "sponsor" someone to become a U.S. Citizen until they reach the age of 21. The suggestion that U.S. children of undocumented parents can somehow speed up their parent's entry into the country legally is without merit. The shortest amount of time it would take would be 38 years, but likely never. For siblings, it's even worse, taking up to 53 years.\n
EXAMPLE #1: The Birthright Fallacy\n\n1. Bringing in a Spouse, of a US citizen: This is the fastest possible way to become a U.S. citizen - 3 years\n2. Bringing in minor child or parent: This process depends on whether the child is a minor or not, single or married. Minor children can file for green cards immediately, but cannot apply for citizenship status for an additional five years.\n3. Single or adult children and siblings can apply immediately, but the wait times depend on the country of origin and annual limits set by Congress. Typically, the wait is 11-22 years.\n\nNo U.S. citizen can "sponsor" someone to become a U.S. Citizen until they reach the age of 21. The suggestion that U.S. children of undocumented parents can somehow speed up their parent's entry into the country legally is without merit. The shortest amount of time it would take would be 38 years, but likely never. For siblings, it's even worse, taking up to 53 years.\n
Example #5 - Jobs fallacy\n\nThese next two slides tell an amazing tale. We’re told to believe that wherever there are immigrant workers, there is high unemployment. These maps shows that simply isn’t the case. \n
http://www.dol.ks.gov/LMIS/newsrel/pr1013/map.html\n\nThe other question this begs is what happens to those jobs in the processing plants if ill-conceived immigration laws are passed? What the business owners are telling the legislature and their trade associations, is they will close the plants and move them to where they can get the labor, most likely Mexico. So what impact with THAT decision have on the Kansas economy?\n
\n
\n
Farm wages in agriculture are higher than the state minimum wage and often include piece-work rates that can add significantly to workers wages.\n
Farm wages in agriculture are higher than the state minimum wage and often include piece-work rates that can add significantly to workers wages.\n
Farm wages in agriculture are higher than the state minimum wage and often include piece-work rates that can add significantly to workers wages.\n
EXAMPLE #4: How exaggerating data distorts public perceptions of the problem.\n\nThis table highlights some of the more egregious falsehoods told on a daily basis about immigrants in Arizona. The data for Texas is similar, but all highlight the problems of rhetoric of "hot air."\n\nPrison population data: http://www.azcorrections.gov/adc/reports/Zoya_ethnic.aspx\nEducation costs data: Estimates based on larger estimate of http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/statistics/publications/ois_ill_pe_2010.pdf or http://www.migrationinformation.org/DataHub/charts/MPIDataHub-Children-in-immigrant-families.xls (12.2% or 61,507 undocumented population <=17 yrs x $6,170 = $379,498,190)\nHealth care costs data: Illegal Immigration: Perceptions and Realities, ASU Morrison Inst.\nTax Payments data: &#x201C;A Rising Tide or a Shrinking Pie,&#x201D; CAP, http://www.immigrationpolicy.org/special-reports/rising-tide-or-shrinking-pie \n\n\n
SB1070 has had a brutal impact on Arizona&#x2019;s economy already, but what would happen if all aspects of SB1070 were passed into law? \n\nSuffice it to say, the economic and jobs damage would be enormous. If SB1070 is fully implemented, the impacts on Arizona&#x2019;s economy would be worse than during the last recession by doubling the numbers of lost jobs (275,000 to 581,000) and reducing Gross State Product by $48.8B and tax revenues by $4.2B. \n\nThere has to be a better way and there are better ways. What&#x2019;s important is that you hear about them.\n\nSource: http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2011/03/rising_tide.html \n
EXAMPLE #4 continued: How exaggerating data distorts public perceptions of the problem.\n\nCrime statistics claims don&#x2019;t match up with reality.\n\nFederal Prison data: http://www.bop.gov/news/quick.jsp#2 \nAZ Prison data: http://www.azcorrections.gov/adc/reports/Zoya_ethnic.aspx\nViolent crime data: http://www.azdps.gov/About/Reports/Crime_In_Arizona/\nHate crime data: http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/ucr#hate\nID Theft data: http://www.adc.state.az.us/BudgetHearings2012.pdf\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
The number of immigration-related bills introduced in 2011\n
The number of immigration-related bills passed in 2011\n
The success rate of immigration-related bills passed in 2011\n
The percentage of immigration-related bills failed in 2011.\n
The percentage of immigration-related bills failed in 2011.\n
The number of Arizona-style SB1070 copycat bills introduced in 2011\n
The number of Arizona-style SB1070 copycat bills passed in 2011\n
The percentage of Arizona-style SB1070 copycat bills passed in 2011\n
The percentage of Arizona-style SB1070 copycat bills failing in 2011\n
The percentage of Arizona-style SB1070 copycat bills failing in 2011\n
The greatest threat to Democracy is having a public that thinks it is fully informed, but really isn&#x2019;t very well informed at all. Too often in this digital age, we jump right to the debate without having the facts. We need good, quality journalism so we the citizens of the United States, who live in a very complex world are able to say &#x201C;These are the facts. I know what the facts are and I&#x2019;m going to make my decision as an informed citizen.&#x201D;\n\nThree things you need to know about this presentation\nParty and ideology have nothing to do with this presentation. It&#x2019;s only intent is to present facts. \nIt&#x2019;s purpose is to challenge false beliefs and preconceived notions.\nThe information presented herein are based on verifiable public data obtained from recognized sources with sources listed at the bottom of each slide.\n