3. Asigurarea calitatii!
Variabilitatea (“zgomotul”) este mai
mare in spirometrie decit in majoritatea
altor teste de laborator clinic, datorita
inconsistentei eforturilor pacientilor.
Becklake MR. Am J Med 1986; 80: 1158-1164
4. Asigurarea calitatii!
In 1990, in SUA, numai 57% din
spirometre intruneau standardele ATS!
Nelson SB et al. Chest 1990; 97: 288-297
5. + alti factori perturbatori
Procedurile de testare?
Program permanent de asigurare a
calitatii?
Valori de referinta corespunzatoare?
Algoritmi corecti de interpretare a
rezultatelor?
6. …
National Asthma Education Program:
spirometria este esentiala pentru
diagnosticul si ingrijirea astmului
deoarece atit medicii, cit si pacientii au
o perceptie gresita asupra severitatii
astmului ceea ce duce la erori de
tratament.
NIH publication no.91-3042
7. …
Medicii nu pot identifica patternul
obstructiv sau restrictiv din istoric si
examenul fizic. Cind incearca sa o
faca gresesc in 61% din cazuri!
Russell NJ et al. Thorax 1986; 41: 360-363
12. Spirometry in old age - myths
‘Most old people can’t do a meaningful PEFR, FEV1 and
FVC’
FALSE
‘Almost all old people can do spirometry if encouraged’
FALSE
13. Spirometry in old age - facts
* >80% of 65-94 year olds can meet the ATS’94 criteria
* performance is related to cognitive scores, functional
scores and educational attainment
* not independently related to age, BMI, or GDS
* the proportion of incompetent patients rose with age, to
about 40% at age 85 or over
Pezzoli et al Age Ageing(2003);32:43-46
Bellia et al Am J Respir Crit Care Med(2000);161:1094-
99
14. Spirometry in old age - how?
* screen for cognitive impairment (? thresholds)
* High level of operator skill, patience, enthusiasm
* use the ATS’94 criteria for quality control
* if ATS’94 criteria not met, consider using PEFR, Slow VC
* if in doubt, try to do spirometry
15. ATS’94 criteria
* 3 curves acceptable, 2 of which reproducible
* acceptable curve has - no artefact, an acceptable start (back
extrap. Vol <5%), FVC time of 6s or more, final plateau 1s
* reproducible curves have - difference of 200ml or less in
FEV1 and FVC
16. Alternatives to spirometry
* respiratory impedance by forced oscillation
* whole body plethysmography
* helium dilution volumetry
* inspiratory ‘impedance’ (ratio of dP/dtmax to Vt/Ti)
* cross-sectional radiography
All these limited by complexity, cost, unavailability or lack of data
for elderly patients
18. Valoarea limita pentruValoarea limita pentru ACTACT – controlat sau nu ?– controlat sau nu ?
Pacientii cu scor ACTPacientii cu scor ACT ≤≤ 1919 sunt necontrolatisunt necontrolati
19. ACT asigura o valoare predictiva mai buna in evaluarea
controlului astmului comparativ cu VEMS ; cea mai buna
strategie este cea care le combina pe ambele
Contributia ACT si spirometriei inContributia ACT si spirometriei in
evaluarea controlului astmuluievaluarea controlului astmului
20. Monitorizare BPOC
Sintem obsedati de VEMS!
... Dar
Imbunatatirea simptomelor poate
apare fara modificarea VEMS si
schimbarea VEMS poate avea loc fara
repercursiuni clinice!
21. Monitorizare BPOC
Consecintele bolii includ simptomele,
pierderea in greutate, intoleranta la
effort, exacerbarile, calitatea vietii,
utilizarea resurselor sanitare si
decesul.
VEMS nu poate fi utilizat ca un marker
global si sint necesari alti markeri!
Jones PW. Eur Respir J 2006; 27: 822-832
22. Monitorizare BPOC
Spirometria nu este adecvata pentru a
descrie impactul BPOC sau a evalua
eficacitatea interventiilor terapeutice!
Jones PW. Eur Respir J 2006; 27: 822-832
23. Markeri biologici
Celule inflamatorii in expectoratie
Markeri solubili in expectoratie
Gaze expirate
Condensat aerian expirat
Markeri periferici sanguini
Nivelurile din sputa proteaze/antiproteaze
etc.
24. Markeri fiziologici
Testul de mers la 6 min
Functia muschilor sheletici
Rata si tipul exacerbarilor
Imagistica: CT, PET
etc.
28. “Spirometry helps confirm the
diagnosis and establishes the initial
severity of the disease, but you are
usually 95% of the way there with the
history”
Pownall M. Airways J 2003; 2: 191-2
29. “How are you?”
“What would you like to be able to
do”?
“How far can you walk?”
Pownall M. Airways J 2003; 2: 191-2