Maxillary and periorbital fractures

Maxillary
and
Periorbital
Fractures
Frederick Mars Untalan, MD
http://entbgh.blogspot.com/

Overview
• Classic tripod, orbital floor, LeFort fractures
better thought of as
orbitozygomaticomaxillary fractures
• Precise anatomic reduction is key
• Goal is functional
and cosmetic rehabilitation

Epidemiology
• Males : Females -- 4:1
• Predominantly in 20’s or 30’s
• Cause
– MVA > altercation > fall
• Site
– Nasal > Zygoma > other
• In altercations left zygoma fractured more often

Mechanisms
• Assault
• MVA
• Gunshot wounds
• Sports
• Falls
• Industrial accidents

Anatomy

Anatomy of
the Orbit
• Bones: Frontal,
Zygomatic, Ethmoid,
Lacrimal, Maxilla, Palatal,
Sphenoid

Anatomy of
the Orbit
• Four-sided pyramid
or cone

Anatomy of
the Orbit
• Maximum
vertical
dimension 1.5
cm behind rim
• Floor is concave
and then convex

Anatomy of
the Orbit
• Floor slopes
into medial
wall
• Optic nerve
superomedial
to true apex

Anatomy of Zygoma
• Four
superficial
and two
deep
articulations
• Intersection
of arcs
define malar
prominence

Anatomy of the Maxilla
• Paired
embryologically
• Functionally acts
with palatine
bone

Anatomy of the Maxilla

Vertical
Buttresses
• Resist
occlusal
load

Facial
Buttress
system
From :Stanley RB. Maxillary
and Periorbital Fractures. In
:Bailey BJ ed., Head and Neck
Surgery-Otolaryngology, third
edition, Philadelphia, Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins 2001, pg
777. http://entbgh.blogspot.com/

Horizontal
Buttresses

Facial
Buttress
system
From: Celin SE. Fractures of
the Upper Facial and
Midfacial Skeleton. In: Myers
EN ed., Operative
Otolaryngology Head and
Neck Surgery, Philadelphia,
WB Saunders Company
1997:1143-1192.

Fracture Patterns

Facial Buttress system
From: Celin SE. Fractures of the Upper Facial and Midfacial Skeleton. In: Myers EN ed., Operative
Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Philadelphia, WB Saunders Company 1997:1143-1192.

Facial
buttress
system
From: Rowe NL, Williams JL.
Maxillofacial Injuries. Edinburgh,
Churchill Livingstone,1985, pg
19.

LeFort fractures
• Rene LeFort 1901 in cadaver skulls
• Based on the most superior level
• Frequently different levels on either side
• LeFort I
• LeFort II
• LeFort III

From: Dolan KD, Jacoby CG, Smoker WR. Radiology of Facial Injury. New York, MacMillian
Publishing Company 1988, pg76.

Modified LeFort Classification
From: Marciani RD.
Management of Midface
Fractures: fifty years
later. J Oral Maxillofac
Surg 1993;51:962.

LeFort
Fractures
• Experimentally
determined weak
points
• Can be in
combinations
bilaterally
• Useful descriptor
• Results from
anterior forces

Le Fort I

Maxillary Fractures LeFort I
• Clinical findings:
– Facial edema
– Malocclusion of the
teeth
– Motion of the
maxilla while the
nasal bridge
remains stable

Le Fort II

Maxillary Fractures
LeFort II
– Marked facial edema
– Nasal flattening
– Traumatic telecanthus
– Epistaxis or CSF
rhinorrhea
– Movement of the
upper jaw and the
nose.

Le Fort III

Maxillary Fractures LeFort III
– Dish faced
deformity
– Epistaxis and CSF
rhinorrhea
– Motion of the
maxilla, nasal bones
and zygoma
– Severe airway
obstruction

Zygoma Fractures
• Results from lateral forceshttp://entbgh.blogspot.com/

Zygoma Tripod Fractures
Clinical Features
• Clinical features:
– Periorbital edema and
ecchymosis
– Hypesthesia of the
infraorbital nerve
– Palpation may reveal
step off
– Concomitant globe
injuries are common

Zygoma Fractures
• Impacted zygoma may mask orbital
floor defect

Orbital Blowout Fractures
Clinical Findings
• Periorbital tenderness,
swelling, ecchymosis.
• Enopthalmus or sunken
eyes.
• Impaired ocular
motility.
• Infraorbital anesthesia.
• Step off deformity

Orbital Blowout Injury

Orbital Blowout Injury
• Usually inferior
and/or medial wall
• Cone will become
more spherical
• Leads to
enophthalmos,
inferior
displacement
• Muscle entrapment
causes diplopia

Patient Evaluation

Physical Exam
• Can be very difficult in traumatized patient
• Don’t forget trauma ABC’s (ATLS)
• Look for occlusion, trismus, stability,
asymmetry, extraocular movements, V2
anesthesia, stepoffs, bowstring test,
lacerations and ecchymosis

Physical Exam
• Midface asymmetry
may indicate zygoma
fracture

Physical Exam
• Palpate for midface
instability

Forced Duction Testing

Physical Exam
• Often edema,
swelling, or patient’s
mental status make
physical exam
difficult
• CT is modality of
choice -- axial and
coronal

CT areas to evaluate
• Vertical buttresses
• Zygomatic arch
• Orbital walls
• Bony palate
• Mandibular condyles

Evaluation
• ABC’s
• History
• Palpation of entire facial skeleton
• Occlusion
• Ophthalmologic exam / consultation
• C-spine
• Imaging – CT

Imaging
• CT has surpassed plain film xray
• Allows precise diagnosis and surgical planning
• Axial and coronal cuts

From: Som PM, Curtin HD. Head and Neck Imaging;. Fourth Edition; St. Louis, Mosby 2003, pg 386.

From: Som PM, Curtin HD. Head and Neck Imaging;. Fourth Edition; St. Louis, Mosby 2003, pg 387.

From: Som PM, Curtin HD. Head and Neck Imaging;. Fourth Edition; St. Louis, Mosby 2003, pg 393.http://entbgh.blogspot.com/

Treatment

Surgical exposure
Bicoronal
Periocular/transconjunctival
Intraoral

Treatment
• Goal is functional and cosmetic restoration
• Treatment must be individualized
• Various factors can affect management
strategies
– Multi-trauma
– Concomitant mandible injury
– Only-seeing eye

Treatment of maxillary fractures
• Early repair
• Single-stage
• Extended access
approaches
• Rigid fixation
• Immediate bone grafting
• Re-suspension of soft
tissues

Maxillary fractures
• Steps of reconstruction-Rohrich and Shewmake
• Reestablish facial height and width
• IMF with ORIF of mandible
• Zygomatic arch reconstruction restores facial width
and projection
• Reconstruction continues from stable bone to
unstable and from lateral to medial

Internal fixation vs. traditional
methods
• Klotch et al 1987
• 43 patients
• 22 treated with ORIF using AO miniplates
• 21 treated with combination of
intermaxillary fixation, and/or
interosseous wiring, and/or primary bone
grafting

• Most severe injuries in
rigid internal fixation
group
• Shorter IMF, early return
to diet, lower percentage
of tracheotomy
• No plate infections

• Haug et al 1995
• 134 patients
treated by
maxillomandibula
r fixation or rigid
internal fixation
• Postoperative
problems in 60%
vs 64%

• Complication rates
similar
• Rigid fixation has
benefits:
– Airway protection
– Enhanced nutrition
– More rapid return to
pretraumatic
function

Order of
Repairs
• Work from stable
to unstable
• Use occlusion as
guide
• Generally stabilize
mandible, zygoma
and palate before
midface before
orbit and NOE

Zygoma
• Ideally done
between 5-7 days for
resolution of edema
• Pre- or intra-
operative steroids
can help with edema
• After 10 days
masseter begins to
shorten

Zygoma
• Minimally displaced, non comminuted can
be treated with reduction only
• Increasing amounts of displacement and
comminution may require plating of lateral
antrum, orbital rim, ZF suture, and even the
zygomatic arch
• One can wire the ZF suture first to assist
with reduction, then plate it after other
areas stabilized

Zygoma Algorithm

ORIF of Lateral
Antral Wall

Gillies Reduction

Post-Gillies Reduction

Coronal Approach

Coronal Approach
• Supraorbital
nerve may be
released for
more exposure

Hemicoronal
Approach

Lateral Brow Incision
• Avoid shaving brow hairs
• Goal is the ZF suture

Sublabial
Approach
• Leave mucosa
to sew to later
• Identify and
preserve V2

Midface
• “Rigid” fixation misnomer with small plates
and thin bones
• Semirigid fixation (wire) sometimes preferable
• Early function can be achieved with soft diet
only

Vertical Buttress Algorithm

Midface Disimpaction
• May be necessary to restore facial
dimensions before fixation

Palate
Fracture
• Wire can be
placed posteriorly
for stabilization
before triangular
reduction

ORIF of Midface

Orbital Floor
• Best done 7-10 days
• Other indications
– 1-2 sq.cm of floor disrupted
• Contraindications
– hyphema, retinal tear, globe perforation
– only seeing eye
– medically unstable

Orbital Floor
• Dotted line shows
anatomic goal of
restoration

Orbital Rim Access
• A -- subciliary
• B -- lower eyelid
• C -- infraorbital

Transconjunctival
Approach
• Conjunctiva is
being used to
protect globe

Orbital Floor
Bone Grafting
• Need to
support floor
full 4 cm

Synthetic
Mesh

Orbital
Metallic
Mesh

Orbital Roof
• Uncommon due to high levels of force needed
to fracture orbital roof
• Commonly with intracranial problems

Orbital Roof Repair
• Repair roof higher on frontal bar

Conclusion
• Goal is functional and cosmetic rehabilitation
• Precise anatomic restoration key
• Treatment tailored to each individual
• Knowledge of anatomy and techniques will
lead to superior results

Maxillary and periorbital fractures

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (6)

Similar to Maxillary and periorbital fractures

Similar to Maxillary and periorbital fractures (20)

More from Notre Dame De Chartres Hospital

More from Notre Dame De Chartres Hospital (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Maxillary and periorbital fractures