SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 18
Download to read offline
Final Project
                                                                    Fall- 2011



        Shan & National Masalah
           Brand Comparison




This report indicates the Applications of Statistics & Inferences
tools in Business World; for this purpose we have chosen the        MBA (Evening)
data of two famous Brands Shan & National Foods. This report
gives an idea how to utilize these Statistics & Inferences          PAF-KIET City Campus
functions in our real life.
                                                                    December 02, 2011
Final Project of Statistical Analysis for Fall-2011

Application of Statistics & Inferences Tools

               Course Facilitator: Sir Rizwan Farooqui



        Statistics & Inferences (55488)

           CID # 55488                   Group Name: Charlie


                     Group Participants:
                     Toufeeq Ahmed (55302)
                     Sadia Iftikhar (55502)
                     Abdul Waseem (55475)
                     Nazakat Ali (55447)
                     Javed Mehmood (55286)


                      December 02, 2011
ACKNOWLEDGMENT


We are profoundly grateful to Almighty Allah for enabling us to accomplish this Project!

We are sincerely thankful to our supervisor Sir Rizwan Farooqui (Course Facilitator:
Statistics & Inferences) for extending best possible support and cooperation for giving us the
idea for making such report on practical basis. He got a strong command on the subject and
the topics he covered, during entire semester, would help us a lot while implementing this
knowledge in our practical life.

We are also thankful to all those who helped us in filling out the questionnaires and provided
us meaningful information for completion of this project.

With the guidance of our supervisor we really enjoyed working on this project as it was a
great learning process with a team’s effort!
SHAN & N ATIION AL MASAL AH MIIX COMPARIISON
SHAN & N AT ON AL MASAL AH M X COMPAR SON

Problem Statement
This research is based on the five tested and validated constituents of brand equity. The current
issue contains the brand image/equity and marketing mix of Recipe Masalah Mix.




Objective of Research
      To identify the market leader in Recipe Masalah Mix and its benefits
      To examine the most successful Recipe Masalah
      To compare the Brand image, Brand loyalty and brand usage of Shan & National
      To investigate the customer loyalty and satisfaction with brand




Target Population
      Females of age 18 to 54 years.




Sampling Technique
      “Random Sampling" technique was used in this project.




Sample Size
The sample size for this study is 80 and all of them belong to different areas of Karachi and they
included only those people who use Recipe Masalah Mix.



Hypothesis
      Shan is the market leader in recipe Masalah Mix industry with strong brand image and
       brand usage.
      Biryani Recipe Masalah has more usage rate than other recipe Masalah.




Interviewing Methodology
     Close ended Questionnaire.
Brand Tracking Survey
                                Brand Awareness
1) When do you hear the word “Recipe Mix Masalah” which brands can you easily recalls?

                       Recall
 S. No.    Brand        Frequency       Percentage
    1     Shan             37             46.3%
    2     National         10             12.5%
    3     Both             33             41.3%
            Total          80




Comments:
46.3% customers can recall Shan more easily as compare to National 12.5%, but 41.3% customers
can recall Shan and National both.

2) Which of the following promotional campaigns of our product are you aware of?

                        Awareness
 S. No.       Media         Frequency         Percentage
    1     TV Ads               64               80.0%
    2     Newspapers            6                7.5%
    3     Others               10               12.5%
               Total           80




Comments:
TV advertisement is more effective and powerful tool of communication with 80% as compare to
newspaper 7.5% and other communication tools include point of Sale, Discounts etc is 12.5%.
Brand Usage
3) Which Brand of Recipe Mix Masalah do you use most?

                       Brand Usage
 S. No.     Brand         Frequency          Percentage
    1        Shan             55               68.8%
    2       National          23               28.8%
    3        Both             2                 2.5%
             Total            80




Comments:
68.8% people are user of Shan and 28.8% of National, only 2.5% uses both.

4) Your average usage per month?

                       Average Usage
 S. No.       Month         Frequency           Percentage
    1           0-2             25                31.3%
    2           3-5             30                37.5%
    3        6 or more          25                31.3%
               Total            80




Comments:
37.5% customers are medium user of packet Masalah, 31% are light user and 31% are heavy user of
packet masalah.
5) How often do you use?

                        Consumption
 S. No.      Time Period     Frequency          Percentage
    1      5 Days                25               31.3%
    2      Weekly                30               37.5%
    3      Bi-Weekly             13               16.3%
    4      Monthly               12               15.0%
                Total            80




Comments:
31.3% people use a Packet Masalah within 5 days, 37.5% weekly, 16.3% bi-weekly and 15% monthly.

6) Which Product you use most?


                         Product Category
  S. No.       Product            Frequency      Percentage
     1      Biryani                   41           51.2%
     2      Qorma                     14           17.1%
     3      Nihari                    10           12.2%
     4      Karahi                     9           11.4%
     5      Other                      7            8.1%
                Total                 80




Comments:
Biryani Masalah is number one with the usage rate 51.2%, Qorma on 2nd with 17.1%, Nihari on 3rd
with 12.2%, Karahi on 4th with 11.4%, and usage of other Masalah is 8.1%.
7) How long have your been using?
                        Usage History
 S. No.        Year           Frequency           Percentage
    1          1 to 2              6                 7.5%
    2          3 to 4              8                10.0%
    3        More than 4           66               82.5%
               Total               80




Comments:
82.5% customer is regular user of packet masalah using since more than 4 years and 10% since three
to four years whereas 7.5% are new user using since 1 to 2 years.
Brand Judgment
8) What is your loyalty with your Brand?
                               Loyalty
 S. No.               Option             Frequency Percentage
    1     I would recommend to others.      57       71.3%
    2     I would re-purchase in future.    18       22.5%
    3     I would switch to other brand.     5        6.3%
                      Total                 80




Comments:
71.3% customer has strong loyalty with their brand and they would recommend packet masalah to
other and 22.5% customers has medium loyalty and they would re-purchase it in future, and only
6.3% has none loyalty and would switch to other brand.




9) Do you use the same brand for all Recipes or different?
                      Recipes of Brand
  S. No.      Option        Frequency          Percentage
     1     Same                 60                75.0%
     2     Different            20                25.0%
               Total            80




Comments:
75% customers prefer same brand for all recipe and shows strong loyalty and satisfaction, whereas
25% customers used different brand for different recipe.
10) How is your experience with your brand?

                       Level of Satisfaction
 S. No.           Rank             Frequency         Percentage
    1     Highly Satisfied              23             28.8%
    2     Satisfied                     53             66.3%
    3     Dissatisfied                  4               5.0%
                  Total                 80




Comments:
28.8% customers are highly satisfied with their brand and 66.3% are medium satisfied with the brand
they use, and only 5% are dissatisfied with their brand.


11) Under what circumstances, would you switch to competitors?

                                Purchase Intent
 S. No.                     Rank                     Frequency Percentage
    1      Others are offering low prices.               9       11.3%
    2      Other is offering better Taste/ Aroma        71       88.8%
                            Total                        80




Comments:
88.8% are quality conscious and would switch to competitor only if they are offering better taste and
aroma because they see the taste and aroma best benefit of packet masalah, whereas only 11.3% of
the customers are price conscious and will switch their brand if competitor offers law prices.
Brand Performance
12) What is the most important aspect of Brand?

                               Features
 S. No.          Freature            Frequency         Percentage
    1     Price                          12              15.0%
    2     Taste & Aroma                  52              65.0%
    3     Availability                   10              12.5%
    4     Packaging                       6               7.5%
                    Total                80




Comments:
65% Customers prefer Taste & Aroma an important aspect / benefit of their brand, whereas other
prefers Price, Availability and Packaging which is accumulated 35%.

13) What packaging is more appealing?

                            Packaging
 S. No.      Packaging          Frequency         Percentage
    1     25 gm                     31              38.8%
    2     50 gm                     30              37.5%
    3     Double Pack               19              23.8%
                Total               80




Comments:
38.8% customers said that 25gm packaging is more appealing, for 37.5% customer 5gm packaging is
more appealing, and 23.8% suggests that double pack is more appealing.
14) How much times it takes to cook with Packet masalah?

                          Time Saving
 S. No.     Time Saving        Frequency          Percentage
    1     Less time                47               58.8%
    2     More time                 3                3.8%
    3     No Effect                30               37.5%
                Total              80




Comments:
58.8% customer suggests that packet masalah is less time consuming, 37.5% suggest that there is no
effect on time to cook with packet Masalah for cooking, and only 3.8% suggested that more time
consumed for cooking by packet masalah.
Brand Image
15) Which Brand of Recipe Mix Masalah do you consider as the market leader and most
consumed brand?

                     Successful Brand
 S. No.     Brand         Frequency          Percentage
    1     Shan                 58              72.5%
    2     National             17              21.3%
    3     Both                  5               6.3%
             Total             80




Comments:
72.5% customers consider Shan as a market leader for Masalah brand and 21.3% customers
consider National, whereas 6.3% customers consider both Shan and National as market leader.
Biographical Data
16) Age in years:

 S. No.                Year         Frequency   Percentage
    1                 Upto 24           18        22.5%
    2                 25 - 34           48        60.0%
    3                 35 - 44           10        12.5%
    4                 45 - 54           4          5.0%
                       Total            80




17) Marital Status:

  S. No.             Status         Frequency    Percentage
     1     Single                       31         38.8%
     2     Married                      42         52.5%
     3     Prefer not to tell           7           8.8%
                      Total             80
18) Education Level:

  S. No.              Education       Frequency Percentage
     1       Matric                       5        6.3%
     2       Intermediate                12       15.0%
     3       Graduate                    43       53.8%
     4       Post graduate               20       25.0%
                         Total           80




19) Gross Monthly Household Income:

 S. No.                Income         Frequency Percentage
    1      Rs. 25,000 or less             9       11.3%
    2      Rs. 25,000 – 50,000           27       33.8%
    3      Rs. 50,000 – 75,000           31       38.8%
    4      Rs. 75,000 – 100,000          11       13.8%
    5      Above Rs. 100,000              2        2.5%
                         Total           80
20) Residence:

   S. No.             Location        Frequency Percentage
      1      DHA/Clifton                  8       10.0%
      2      PECHS/Society                3        3.8%
      3      Gulshan/Johar               12       15.0%
      4      FB Area                      9       11.3%
      5      Nazimabad & North Area      20       25.0%
      6      Old City                     2        2.5%
      7      Orangi /Korangi/Malir       26       32.5%
                        Total            80
Statistical Analysis



Question                           SHAN         NATIONAL          BOTH            TOTAL
              Description
  No.                         Freq.     %      Freq.   %      Freq.     %      Freq.    %
  1        Brand Awareness      37    46.30%    10   12.50%    33    41.30%      80    100%
  3          Brand Usage        55    68.80%    23   28.80%     2     2.50%      80    100%
  15         Brand Image        58    72.50%    17   21.30%     5     6.30%      80    100%
               TOTAL           150              50             40               240



                Mean                50.00            16.67            13.33
                 S.D                11.36             6.51            17.10
           Sample Variance         129.00            42.33            292.33
           Co. of Variance         22.7%             39.0%            128.2%
               Range                21.00            13.00            31.00
                Max                 58.00            23.00            33.00
                Min                 37.00            10.00             2.00
               Count               150.00            50.00            40.00
References/Sources
   Statistics for Business and Economics, 6th Edition, Paul Newbold, William L Carlson and Betty
    Thorne.
   Elementary Statistics 5th Edition, Allan G. Bluman.
   Shan Foods website: http://www.shanfoods.com.
    National Foods website: http://www.nfoods.com.
   Internet Search Engine www.google.com.
   PAF-KIET site www.pafkiet.edu.pk.
   Microsoft Excel Tools.




                                The End
                                 ------

More Related Content

What's hot

Lecture 7 Hypothesis Testing Two Sample
Lecture 7 Hypothesis Testing Two SampleLecture 7 Hypothesis Testing Two Sample
Lecture 7 Hypothesis Testing Two Sample
Ahmadullah
 
09 ch ken black solution
09 ch ken black solution09 ch ken black solution
09 ch ken black solution
Krunal Shah
 
Statistics student sample project (1)
Statistics student sample project (1)Statistics student sample project (1)
Statistics student sample project (1)
Jef Faciol
 
02 ch ken black solution
02 ch ken black solution02 ch ken black solution
02 ch ken black solution
Krunal Shah
 
Inferential statistics
Inferential statisticsInferential statistics
Inferential statistics
Maria Theresa
 

What's hot (20)

Antecedants of Job satisfaction
Antecedants of Job satisfactionAntecedants of Job satisfaction
Antecedants of Job satisfaction
 
Lecture 7 Hypothesis Testing Two Sample
Lecture 7 Hypothesis Testing Two SampleLecture 7 Hypothesis Testing Two Sample
Lecture 7 Hypothesis Testing Two Sample
 
Estimating a Population Standard Deviation or Variance
Estimating a Population Standard Deviation or VarianceEstimating a Population Standard Deviation or Variance
Estimating a Population Standard Deviation or Variance
 
Regression
RegressionRegression
Regression
 
Chapter 11
Chapter 11 Chapter 11
Chapter 11
 
Sampling, Statistics and Sample Size
Sampling, Statistics and Sample SizeSampling, Statistics and Sample Size
Sampling, Statistics and Sample Size
 
09 ch ken black solution
09 ch ken black solution09 ch ken black solution
09 ch ken black solution
 
Statistics student sample project (1)
Statistics student sample project (1)Statistics student sample project (1)
Statistics student sample project (1)
 
Sample size by formula
Sample size by formulaSample size by formula
Sample size by formula
 
A Study on Level of employee Job satisfaction in Bharathi Associates
A Study on Level of employee Job satisfaction in Bharathi AssociatesA Study on Level of employee Job satisfaction in Bharathi Associates
A Study on Level of employee Job satisfaction in Bharathi Associates
 
02 ch ken black solution
02 ch ken black solution02 ch ken black solution
02 ch ken black solution
 
Two Proportions
Two Proportions  Two Proportions
Two Proportions
 
normal distribution
normal distributionnormal distribution
normal distribution
 
Null hypothesis for multiple linear regression
Null hypothesis for multiple linear regressionNull hypothesis for multiple linear regression
Null hypothesis for multiple linear regression
 
Regression
RegressionRegression
Regression
 
Central tedancy & correlation project - 1
Central tedancy & correlation project - 1Central tedancy & correlation project - 1
Central tedancy & correlation project - 1
 
Factor Analysis with an Example
Factor Analysis with an ExampleFactor Analysis with an Example
Factor Analysis with an Example
 
Employee Engagement
Employee EngagementEmployee Engagement
Employee Engagement
 
Null hypothesis for a one-way anova
Null hypothesis for a one-way anovaNull hypothesis for a one-way anova
Null hypothesis for a one-way anova
 
Inferential statistics
Inferential statisticsInferential statistics
Inferential statistics
 

Similar to Statistical Project

Charge ahead but not so fast
Charge ahead but not so fastCharge ahead but not so fast
Charge ahead but not so fast
NancyZCates
 
Catherine Eddy: How have businesses and consumers in SE Asia reacted to the c...
Catherine Eddy: How have businesses and consumers in SE Asia reacted to the c...Catherine Eddy: How have businesses and consumers in SE Asia reacted to the c...
Catherine Eddy: How have businesses and consumers in SE Asia reacted to the c...
Marketing Week
 
Measuring cx roi with social media deck 787-f
Measuring cx roi with social media   deck 787-fMeasuring cx roi with social media   deck 787-f
Measuring cx roi with social media deck 787-f
Gideon Ale
 
2012 member benchmark study results
2012 member benchmark study results2012 member benchmark study results
2012 member benchmark study results
Sustainable Brands
 
2012 member benchmark study results
2012 member benchmark study results2012 member benchmark study results
2012 member benchmark study results
Sustainable Brands
 
Edelman goodpurpose 2012 Malaysian Report
Edelman goodpurpose 2012 Malaysian ReportEdelman goodpurpose 2012 Malaysian Report
Edelman goodpurpose 2012 Malaysian Report
hinyoong
 

Similar to Statistical Project (20)

Report about Dish Washing Liquid in Vietnam 2015
Report about Dish Washing Liquid in Vietnam 2015Report about Dish Washing Liquid in Vietnam 2015
Report about Dish Washing Liquid in Vietnam 2015
 
Report about Floor Cleaner Products in Vietnam Market 2015
Report about Floor Cleaner Products in Vietnam Market 2015Report about Floor Cleaner Products in Vietnam Market 2015
Report about Floor Cleaner Products in Vietnam Market 2015
 
marketing mix of pidilite
marketing mix of pidilitemarketing mix of pidilite
marketing mix of pidilite
 
Charge ahead but not so fast
Charge ahead but not so fastCharge ahead but not so fast
Charge ahead but not so fast
 
APSA 2012 members insight survey - results final
APSA 2012 members insight survey - results finalAPSA 2012 members insight survey - results final
APSA 2012 members insight survey - results final
 
Consumer Behavior - Cosmetic - Herbal V/S Synthetic
Consumer Behavior - Cosmetic - Herbal V/S SyntheticConsumer Behavior - Cosmetic - Herbal V/S Synthetic
Consumer Behavior - Cosmetic - Herbal V/S Synthetic
 
Catherine Eddy: How have businesses and consumers in SE Asia reacted to the c...
Catherine Eddy: How have businesses and consumers in SE Asia reacted to the c...Catherine Eddy: How have businesses and consumers in SE Asia reacted to the c...
Catherine Eddy: How have businesses and consumers in SE Asia reacted to the c...
 
1 B Catherine Eddy
1 B Catherine Eddy1 B Catherine Eddy
1 B Catherine Eddy
 
Words of Wisdom
Words of WisdomWords of Wisdom
Words of Wisdom
 
Measuring cx roi with social media deck 787-f
Measuring cx roi with social media   deck 787-fMeasuring cx roi with social media   deck 787-f
Measuring cx roi with social media deck 787-f
 
Measuring Customer-Experience ROI with social media
Measuring Customer-Experience ROI with social mediaMeasuring Customer-Experience ROI with social media
Measuring Customer-Experience ROI with social media
 
2012 member benchmark study results
2012 member benchmark study results2012 member benchmark study results
2012 member benchmark study results
 
2012 member benchmark study results
2012 member benchmark study results2012 member benchmark study results
2012 member benchmark study results
 
Energy drinks usage in Vietnam
Energy drinks usage in VietnamEnergy drinks usage in Vietnam
Energy drinks usage in Vietnam
 
Report about Fabric Conditioner Products in Vietnam 2015
Report about Fabric Conditioner Products in Vietnam 2015Report about Fabric Conditioner Products in Vietnam 2015
Report about Fabric Conditioner Products in Vietnam 2015
 
Edelman goodpurpose 2012 Malaysian Report
Edelman goodpurpose 2012 Malaysian ReportEdelman goodpurpose 2012 Malaysian Report
Edelman goodpurpose 2012 Malaysian Report
 
Convention southstudy2011
Convention southstudy2011Convention southstudy2011
Convention southstudy2011
 
Cooking oil usage in Indonesia
Cooking oil usage in IndonesiaCooking oil usage in Indonesia
Cooking oil usage in Indonesia
 
Consumer Behaviour
Consumer BehaviourConsumer Behaviour
Consumer Behaviour
 
The 2017 Community Value and Metrics Report
The 2017 Community Value and Metrics ReportThe 2017 Community Value and Metrics Report
The 2017 Community Value and Metrics Report
 

More from Toufeeq Ahmed ♕ (8)

FM Project
FM ProjectFM Project
FM Project
 
FM Project
FM ProjectFM Project
FM Project
 
Brand Comparison
Brand ComparisonBrand Comparison
Brand Comparison
 
Amadeus Pakistan
Amadeus PakistanAmadeus Pakistan
Amadeus Pakistan
 
Day Dream Holidays
Day Dream HolidaysDay Dream Holidays
Day Dream Holidays
 
Marketing Plan
Marketing PlanMarketing Plan
Marketing Plan
 
Engro Foods Ratio Analysis
Engro Foods   Ratio AnalysisEngro Foods   Ratio Analysis
Engro Foods Ratio Analysis
 
Maths Project
Maths ProjectMaths Project
Maths Project
 

Statistical Project

  • 1. Final Project Fall- 2011 Shan & National Masalah Brand Comparison This report indicates the Applications of Statistics & Inferences tools in Business World; for this purpose we have chosen the MBA (Evening) data of two famous Brands Shan & National Foods. This report gives an idea how to utilize these Statistics & Inferences PAF-KIET City Campus functions in our real life. December 02, 2011
  • 2. Final Project of Statistical Analysis for Fall-2011 Application of Statistics & Inferences Tools Course Facilitator: Sir Rizwan Farooqui Statistics & Inferences (55488) CID # 55488 Group Name: Charlie Group Participants:  Toufeeq Ahmed (55302)  Sadia Iftikhar (55502)  Abdul Waseem (55475)  Nazakat Ali (55447)  Javed Mehmood (55286) December 02, 2011
  • 3. ACKNOWLEDGMENT We are profoundly grateful to Almighty Allah for enabling us to accomplish this Project! We are sincerely thankful to our supervisor Sir Rizwan Farooqui (Course Facilitator: Statistics & Inferences) for extending best possible support and cooperation for giving us the idea for making such report on practical basis. He got a strong command on the subject and the topics he covered, during entire semester, would help us a lot while implementing this knowledge in our practical life. We are also thankful to all those who helped us in filling out the questionnaires and provided us meaningful information for completion of this project. With the guidance of our supervisor we really enjoyed working on this project as it was a great learning process with a team’s effort!
  • 4. SHAN & N ATIION AL MASAL AH MIIX COMPARIISON SHAN & N AT ON AL MASAL AH M X COMPAR SON Problem Statement This research is based on the five tested and validated constituents of brand equity. The current issue contains the brand image/equity and marketing mix of Recipe Masalah Mix. Objective of Research  To identify the market leader in Recipe Masalah Mix and its benefits  To examine the most successful Recipe Masalah  To compare the Brand image, Brand loyalty and brand usage of Shan & National  To investigate the customer loyalty and satisfaction with brand Target Population  Females of age 18 to 54 years. Sampling Technique  “Random Sampling" technique was used in this project. Sample Size The sample size for this study is 80 and all of them belong to different areas of Karachi and they included only those people who use Recipe Masalah Mix. Hypothesis  Shan is the market leader in recipe Masalah Mix industry with strong brand image and brand usage.  Biryani Recipe Masalah has more usage rate than other recipe Masalah. Interviewing Methodology  Close ended Questionnaire.
  • 5. Brand Tracking Survey Brand Awareness 1) When do you hear the word “Recipe Mix Masalah” which brands can you easily recalls? Recall S. No. Brand Frequency Percentage 1 Shan 37 46.3% 2 National 10 12.5% 3 Both 33 41.3% Total 80 Comments: 46.3% customers can recall Shan more easily as compare to National 12.5%, but 41.3% customers can recall Shan and National both. 2) Which of the following promotional campaigns of our product are you aware of? Awareness S. No. Media Frequency Percentage 1 TV Ads 64 80.0% 2 Newspapers 6 7.5% 3 Others 10 12.5% Total 80 Comments: TV advertisement is more effective and powerful tool of communication with 80% as compare to newspaper 7.5% and other communication tools include point of Sale, Discounts etc is 12.5%.
  • 6. Brand Usage 3) Which Brand of Recipe Mix Masalah do you use most? Brand Usage S. No. Brand Frequency Percentage 1 Shan 55 68.8% 2 National 23 28.8% 3 Both 2 2.5% Total 80 Comments: 68.8% people are user of Shan and 28.8% of National, only 2.5% uses both. 4) Your average usage per month? Average Usage S. No. Month Frequency Percentage 1 0-2 25 31.3% 2 3-5 30 37.5% 3 6 or more 25 31.3% Total 80 Comments: 37.5% customers are medium user of packet Masalah, 31% are light user and 31% are heavy user of packet masalah.
  • 7. 5) How often do you use? Consumption S. No. Time Period Frequency Percentage 1 5 Days 25 31.3% 2 Weekly 30 37.5% 3 Bi-Weekly 13 16.3% 4 Monthly 12 15.0% Total 80 Comments: 31.3% people use a Packet Masalah within 5 days, 37.5% weekly, 16.3% bi-weekly and 15% monthly. 6) Which Product you use most? Product Category S. No. Product Frequency Percentage 1 Biryani 41 51.2% 2 Qorma 14 17.1% 3 Nihari 10 12.2% 4 Karahi 9 11.4% 5 Other 7 8.1% Total 80 Comments: Biryani Masalah is number one with the usage rate 51.2%, Qorma on 2nd with 17.1%, Nihari on 3rd with 12.2%, Karahi on 4th with 11.4%, and usage of other Masalah is 8.1%.
  • 8. 7) How long have your been using? Usage History S. No. Year Frequency Percentage 1 1 to 2 6 7.5% 2 3 to 4 8 10.0% 3 More than 4 66 82.5% Total 80 Comments: 82.5% customer is regular user of packet masalah using since more than 4 years and 10% since three to four years whereas 7.5% are new user using since 1 to 2 years.
  • 9. Brand Judgment 8) What is your loyalty with your Brand? Loyalty S. No. Option Frequency Percentage 1 I would recommend to others. 57 71.3% 2 I would re-purchase in future. 18 22.5% 3 I would switch to other brand. 5 6.3% Total 80 Comments: 71.3% customer has strong loyalty with their brand and they would recommend packet masalah to other and 22.5% customers has medium loyalty and they would re-purchase it in future, and only 6.3% has none loyalty and would switch to other brand. 9) Do you use the same brand for all Recipes or different? Recipes of Brand S. No. Option Frequency Percentage 1 Same 60 75.0% 2 Different 20 25.0% Total 80 Comments: 75% customers prefer same brand for all recipe and shows strong loyalty and satisfaction, whereas 25% customers used different brand for different recipe.
  • 10. 10) How is your experience with your brand? Level of Satisfaction S. No. Rank Frequency Percentage 1 Highly Satisfied 23 28.8% 2 Satisfied 53 66.3% 3 Dissatisfied 4 5.0% Total 80 Comments: 28.8% customers are highly satisfied with their brand and 66.3% are medium satisfied with the brand they use, and only 5% are dissatisfied with their brand. 11) Under what circumstances, would you switch to competitors? Purchase Intent S. No. Rank Frequency Percentage 1 Others are offering low prices. 9 11.3% 2 Other is offering better Taste/ Aroma 71 88.8% Total 80 Comments: 88.8% are quality conscious and would switch to competitor only if they are offering better taste and aroma because they see the taste and aroma best benefit of packet masalah, whereas only 11.3% of the customers are price conscious and will switch their brand if competitor offers law prices.
  • 11. Brand Performance 12) What is the most important aspect of Brand? Features S. No. Freature Frequency Percentage 1 Price 12 15.0% 2 Taste & Aroma 52 65.0% 3 Availability 10 12.5% 4 Packaging 6 7.5% Total 80 Comments: 65% Customers prefer Taste & Aroma an important aspect / benefit of their brand, whereas other prefers Price, Availability and Packaging which is accumulated 35%. 13) What packaging is more appealing? Packaging S. No. Packaging Frequency Percentage 1 25 gm 31 38.8% 2 50 gm 30 37.5% 3 Double Pack 19 23.8% Total 80 Comments: 38.8% customers said that 25gm packaging is more appealing, for 37.5% customer 5gm packaging is more appealing, and 23.8% suggests that double pack is more appealing.
  • 12. 14) How much times it takes to cook with Packet masalah? Time Saving S. No. Time Saving Frequency Percentage 1 Less time 47 58.8% 2 More time 3 3.8% 3 No Effect 30 37.5% Total 80 Comments: 58.8% customer suggests that packet masalah is less time consuming, 37.5% suggest that there is no effect on time to cook with packet Masalah for cooking, and only 3.8% suggested that more time consumed for cooking by packet masalah.
  • 13. Brand Image 15) Which Brand of Recipe Mix Masalah do you consider as the market leader and most consumed brand? Successful Brand S. No. Brand Frequency Percentage 1 Shan 58 72.5% 2 National 17 21.3% 3 Both 5 6.3% Total 80 Comments: 72.5% customers consider Shan as a market leader for Masalah brand and 21.3% customers consider National, whereas 6.3% customers consider both Shan and National as market leader.
  • 14. Biographical Data 16) Age in years: S. No. Year Frequency Percentage 1 Upto 24 18 22.5% 2 25 - 34 48 60.0% 3 35 - 44 10 12.5% 4 45 - 54 4 5.0% Total 80 17) Marital Status: S. No. Status Frequency Percentage 1 Single 31 38.8% 2 Married 42 52.5% 3 Prefer not to tell 7 8.8% Total 80
  • 15. 18) Education Level: S. No. Education Frequency Percentage 1 Matric 5 6.3% 2 Intermediate 12 15.0% 3 Graduate 43 53.8% 4 Post graduate 20 25.0% Total 80 19) Gross Monthly Household Income: S. No. Income Frequency Percentage 1 Rs. 25,000 or less 9 11.3% 2 Rs. 25,000 – 50,000 27 33.8% 3 Rs. 50,000 – 75,000 31 38.8% 4 Rs. 75,000 – 100,000 11 13.8% 5 Above Rs. 100,000 2 2.5% Total 80
  • 16. 20) Residence: S. No. Location Frequency Percentage 1 DHA/Clifton 8 10.0% 2 PECHS/Society 3 3.8% 3 Gulshan/Johar 12 15.0% 4 FB Area 9 11.3% 5 Nazimabad & North Area 20 25.0% 6 Old City 2 2.5% 7 Orangi /Korangi/Malir 26 32.5% Total 80
  • 17. Statistical Analysis Question SHAN NATIONAL BOTH TOTAL Description No. Freq. % Freq. % Freq. % Freq. % 1 Brand Awareness 37 46.30% 10 12.50% 33 41.30% 80 100% 3 Brand Usage 55 68.80% 23 28.80% 2 2.50% 80 100% 15 Brand Image 58 72.50% 17 21.30% 5 6.30% 80 100% TOTAL 150 50 40 240 Mean 50.00 16.67 13.33 S.D 11.36 6.51 17.10 Sample Variance 129.00 42.33 292.33 Co. of Variance 22.7% 39.0% 128.2% Range 21.00 13.00 31.00 Max 58.00 23.00 33.00 Min 37.00 10.00 2.00 Count 150.00 50.00 40.00
  • 18. References/Sources  Statistics for Business and Economics, 6th Edition, Paul Newbold, William L Carlson and Betty Thorne.  Elementary Statistics 5th Edition, Allan G. Bluman.  Shan Foods website: http://www.shanfoods.com.  National Foods website: http://www.nfoods.com.  Internet Search Engine www.google.com.  PAF-KIET site www.pafkiet.edu.pk.  Microsoft Excel Tools. The End ------