SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 73
Download to read offline
Prepared By:- ARPIT BANA
PQA,M.PHARM
M.S UNIVERSITY.
GUIDED BY: Dr. RAJASHREE MASHRU
Faculty of Pharmacy, M.S University.
 Bioburden is the population of viable
microorganism on a particular object,
formulation and/or finished product.
 It is the number of bacteria living on a surface
that has not been sterilized.
 Bioburden Testing, also known as microbial
limit testing, is performed on pharmaceutical
products and medical products for quality
control purposes.
 Bioburden is generally expressed as CFU/mL
(Colony Forming Units)
 The development of a microbial contamination control program
is critical to the effort to get a new facility qualified, and to
maintain the facility in a state of control once qualified.
 To determine the total number of viable microorganisms in or on
a medical device, container or component after completion of all
in-process steps before sterilization.
 To act as an early warning system for possible production
problems which could lead to inadequate sterilization or possible
product recall.
 To calculate the necessary dose for effective radiation
sterilization and to monitor product to ensure adequate dosing.
 To test the effectiveness of cleaning agent against bacteria.
 Act as an indicator of manufacturing condition. The purpose of
environmental monitoring is to correct problems before product
is placed at risk.
 The Legal basis for Bioburden testing lies in CFR 21
(Code of Federal Register 21) and ISO 11737 worldwide.
 21 C.F.R. 211.110 (a)(6) states that bioburden in-process
testing must be conducted pursuant to written
procedures during the manufacturing process of drug
products.
 Current good manufacturing practice (CGMP)
requirements as specified in 21 CFR Part 211.113, Control
of Microbiological Contamination, state that “Appropriate
written procedures, designed to prevent objectionable
microorganisms in drug products not required to be sterile,
shall be established and followed.”
 The United States Pharmacopeia (USP) outlines several
tests that can be done to quantitatively determine the
Bioburden of non-sterile drug products.
 It is important when conducting these tests to ensure that
the testing method does not either introduce bacteria into
the test sample or kill bacteria in the test sample.
Raw material: 1) warehouse
2) sampling equipment
3) sampling personal
4) sampling environment
Dispensing: 1) dispensing equipment
2) dispensing personal
3) dispensing equipment
Manufacturing:1) equipment
2) air system
3) no. of personnel
Packaging : 1) primary packaging
2) secondary packaging
1. Types of Non-viable contamination:
2. Types of Viable contamination:
Fibers Particles
Clothing Dead skin
Papers Dandruff
Hair Tobacco smoke
Cleaning equipment
Microorganism Insects & pest
bacteria Rodent
Fungi Cockroach
Viruses mice
 Water is a frequent source of endotoxins
and bioburden, which can carry Gram
negative bacteria. It is therefore
important to examine process water
usage.
 These arise from several mfg or
processing steps- for example from
extrusion, grinding, milling or cleaning
processes, etc.
1. Air-borne bioburden- organisms found
in critical environment.
2. Water-borne bioburden- due to use of
purified water as an ingredient or during
processing steps.
3. Surface-borne bioburden- organisms
present on surface of particular
equipments and devices.
4. Personnel bioburden- arising on
account of improper personnel hygiene,
clothing, cleanliness or sanitation.
1. Airborne particulate bioburden:
2. Surface bioburden:
CLASS OF
AREA
ACTION
LEVEL
ALERT LEVEL
I 1 CFU 1 CFU
II 10 CFU 5 CFU
III 25 CFU 15 CFU
CLASS OF AREA ACTION LEVEL ALERT LEVEL
I 1 CFU 1 CFU
II 10 CFU 5 CFU
III 25 CFU 15 CFU
3. Personnel Bioburden:
MATERIAL ACTION LEVEL ALERT LEVEL
Gloves ≥ 5 CFU/plate ≥ 2 CFU/plate
Gown ≥ total 30 CFU/ 3 plates ≥ total 20 CFU/3 plates
LEVEL ROOM :NOT IN
USE
ROOM:PRIO
R TO USE
ROOM: IN USE
I Once a week 3 days CL: once before start, once
during process, once after
finishing.
II Once a week 3 days SL: once during process &
once a week.
III Once every 2
weeks
3 days SL: once a day
OL: once every 2 weeks
CL: critical locations
SL: selected locations
OL: other locations
1. Sampling
2. Extraction methods
3. Enumeration procedures
4. Incubation
 General sampling strategies and
characteristics:
The method of obtaining samples for bioburden
influences the test results. Preferred method is
to obtain random samples.
ASCEPTIC: Be clean as possible. The method of
sampling itself should not contribute to
microbial contamination, else it gives faulty
results.
RANDOM: Random samples are taken from each
area of production room and not just from one
specific location.
REPRESENTATIVE: Units sampled for
testing should represent each phase of
production process.
REJECTED SAMPLES: rejected samples
may be used for laboratory testing if they
have been through the same process that
the normal units have undergone.
SIMULATED PRODUCT: Special units
used for sampling made exactly similar
to the original product via the same
processing. Such units are used due to
expensive nature of original product.
 Goal of sampling:
• It will help to determine whether
microorganism present at various places is
affecting the individual or preparation.
• Sampling is use to identify the location of
microbes, because they are collected from
different spaces.
• It will help in identification of microorganism.
Sr.no Various system Sample site
1. Environmental
air
Near open door and/or
filled container.
2. Room air Proximal to work area.
3. Water Point of use.
4. operator Finger impression
sampling
Air
sampling
Culturable Non-
Culturable
Water
sampling
Nichrome
wire loop
sampling
Surface
sampling
Tape lift
surface
sampling
Rodac plate
method
Cotton
swabbing
 This method mainly determine the quality of
parenteral processing environment,
 It provides the information about the type of
microbes present in air.
a) Culturable air sampling: Requires culture
medium for the growth of microbes.
 slit to agar sampler
 Anderson technique
 Surface air system
 The gelatin membrane system
 Sterilization microbial sampling
 Liquid impingers
ANDERSON
AIR SAMPLER
GELATIN-
MEMBRANE
CULTURE SYSTEM
LIQUID IMPINGER
AIR SAMPLER
b) Non Culturable air sampling:
 In this method, measured volume of
air is passed through sampling devices.
The collector of air has a sticky surface of
glass where microbes get stick and
trapped which are further analyzed.
 Hence no use of culture medium.
 The efficiency of air sampling technique
depends on :
 The design of sampler
 Sampling rate and volume of air taken
 The nature of collection medium
 Sampling time
 Nichrome wire loop method-
• In this method nichrome wire loop is used which
has rounded tip and by using this tip, sample is
collected and observed under microscope or put in
a specific growth medium.
• Generally, microbiologists use inoculating loops
to transfer microorganisms to growth media.
• Loop consists of a three inch long, 25 gauge
nichrome wire with a loop at one end and
mounted on an eight inch long aluminum handle.
• It is easy to sterilize and reuse because nichrome
wire resists deterioration with repeated
heat/cooling cycles.
It includes the sampling from the floors, walls, machinery,
equipment, rooms etc.
a. Rodac plate method
(RODAC- Replicate Organism Detection and Counting)
In this method, a 100mm diameter agar contact plate is used in
which agar is poured. Then this plate is pressed against a flat
surface, microbes will stick to the medium.
Instead of agar plate, nylon plates are also used.
b. Cotton swab method
It can be collected by cotton Q-tip applicator that has been moist
with growth media and than send to testing laboratory.
Disadvantage is the presence of cotton fibers on its surface.
c. Tape lift surface sampling
In this cotton adhesive tape is positioned on the surface and press
gently without rubbing, and then directly observed under
microscope.
RODAC
PLATES
TAPE-LIFT SURFACE
SAMPLING
COTTON SWAB
 After sample collection, it is required that the
sample is extracted from the sampler and
transferred to a suitable medium for further
growth of microbes and analysis.
 Methods:
1. Ultrasonicating
2. Vortex mixing
3. Blending
4. Shaking
5. Agar overlaying
After extracting the sample, growth of microbes on
suitable media to count them.
A. Membrane Filtration
B. Plate count methods
i. Pour-plate method
ii. Surface spread method
C. Serial dilution method
 Membrane filters used are 50 mm in
diameter, having a nominal pore size of
0.45 µm for retaining bacteria.
 Suitable incubating conditions are required for
growth of microbes.
 The bioburden validation is a test to determine
the efficacy of a method that is used to estimate
the bioburden on the product.
 With the results of bioburden validation a
correction factor is calculated which is used in
the estimation of the product’s bioburden.
45
 EN-ISO 11737-1 describes two general methods
for the BV:
1. Repetitive(Exhaustive) Recovery Method
2. Inoculation Method
46
 In this method the extraction procedure on a single
sample product is to be repeated until there is no
significant increase in the number of recovered
microorganims.
 The goal is to recover all viable microorganisms by
washing the sample product repeatedly.
 The counts in CFU that are recovered from the first
extraction are compared to the total counts
recovered from all the washes to calculate a
percent recovery when doing just one extraction.
47
 The percent recovery is used to calculate a
correction factor which is then applied to the
bioburden test numbers for the product.
 In this way routine bioburden tests require
only one extraction.
 The CFU recovered from one extraction are
then simply multiplied by the correction factor
to determine the total bioburden of a product.
48
 In this method a sterile product is inoculated
with a known amount of viable
microorganisms in order to create an artificial
bioburden.
 After inoculation, the product is allowed to dry
for a defined period of time.
 Once the inoculum has dried, the chosen
method for extracting the microorganisms from
the product is applied.
49
 A ratio of recovered titer to initial inoculum
count establishes the recovery efficiency and
correction factor for the product.
 Disadvantage of this method is that sterile
samples are required and viability of
microorganisms after drying process can not be
guaranteed.
50
 EN-ISO 11737-1 describes a number of methods that
can be combined in order to obtain the best result in
recovering the bioburden from the product.
 Elution methods for releasing of bioburden from the
product into a rinsing fluid:
1. Stomaching
2. Ultra Sonication
3. Shaking
4. Vortex Mixing
5. Flushing
6. Blending
7. Swabbing
51
 Non elution methods for estimation of
bioburden:
1. Contact Plating
2. Agar Overlaying
 For the transfer into culture medium different
methods like membrane filtration, pour
plating, spread plating or spiral plating can be
applied.
 Best method for a specified product is
determined by the BV.
52
 For estimation of bioburden, mainly two
medias are used:
1. Tryptone Soya Agar(TSA)- for aerobic m.o.
with incubation of 3-5 days at 32.5 ºC ± 2.5ºC.
2. Sabouraud Dextrose Agar(SDA)- for yeast and
mould with incubation of 5-7 days at 22.5ºC ±
2.5ºC.
53
 When the population of microorganism is
subjected to a sterilization process, all the cells do
not die at the same time.
 The no. of surviving cells decreases exponentially
with time of exposure until viable organism can no
longer be detected. So in order to find out the
efficiency of the sterilization process some
terminologies are employed i.e.
1) D value
2) Z value
3) F value
4) Inactivation factor
1)D VALUE
 The resistance of a given organism to any specified
killing process can be characterized by the D value.
 This is the time in minutes required to reduce the
no. of organisms by 90% i.e. upto10% of the original
count.
 Sterilization by heating in an autoclave or by
dry heat: the D value is expressed by time in
minutes at defined temperature. The
temperature is shown as subscript Ex. D₁₂₁,
D₁₇₀.
 Sterilization by exposure to ionizing
radiation: the D value is expressed by
absorbed dose.
 Sterilization by exposure to ethylene oxide:
the D value is expressed by time in minutes.
 The D value is mathematically shown by
following equation
D = U/log N₀−log Nu
Here, U = exposure time
N₀ = initial microbial population
Nu = microbial population after receiving U
time.
2) Z VALUE( THERMAL DESTRUCTION VALUE):
 Z value relates the heat resistance of a microorganism to
change in temperature.
 It is the total degrees of temperature change to produce a 10
fold reduction in D value or the temperature change required
for 1 log reduction in D-value.
 Z-value is obtained from the plot of log D value vs
temperature.
Z= T2-T1/ log D1-log D2
 Bacterial spores have Z value in range 10 to 15ºC while most
non- sporing organisms have Z value of 4 to 6ºC.
3) F VALUE
 It is the time in minutes required to kill an organism at
250ºF(121ºC)
 Thus if sterilization process said to have F value of 15min. It
implies that it has the same lethal effect on a given organism as
that of heating at 121ºC for 15min.
 F value is a measure of the lethality of total process of
sterilization.
F₀ = ∆t ∑ 10(T-To)/Z
Where, ∆t is time interval for measurement of product tempT
And To is the reference temperature
Z = 10⁰C F₀ = total lethality
4) INACTIVATION FACTOR
 It is the amount by which a given
combination of temperature ,radiation dose
rate etc and time of exposure will reduce
the no. of survivors of a given organism.
 It is calculated from known D value of
organism as follows
 Inactivation factor = 10(t/D)
Where, t is the treatment time
D is D-value at that same time.
 The lower the contamination rate and
higher the inactivation factor of a
sterilization process, less is the risk of
failure.
Here: B=No. of org. surviving after sterilization
A= Initial no. of micro-organisms
Ft = Equivalent exposure time
Dt=Log reduction microbial contamination(D-
value)
It is desirable that ‘B’ should be as low as
possible:-
1. By reducing Bioburden on bulk product (A)
2. Increasing the exposure time (Ft)
3. Employing micro-org. with a lower D-value at
specified temperature.
 A pharmaceutical product has bioburden of
378 CFU. For how much time should it be
sterilized with D-value(121°C) of 1.5 min/log
so as to assure SAL of 106 ?
60
61
Equations and Examples
62
 Product Contamination:
Batch bioburden= sample bioburden * (batch volume/
sample volume)
 Equipment Contamination:
1. Contact surface Bioburden= sample bioburden *
(contact area/ sample area)
2. Contact surface Bioburden=Rinse fluid * sample
bioburden (Batch volume/ rinse volume)
 Environmental Contamination:
1. Fraction contaminated= CFU * (area of opening of
container/ area of settle plate) * (time contamination
exposed/ time settle plate exposed)
2. Contamination rate= 1/ fraction contamination
63
64
Total
Contamination
Risk
Product
Contamination
Equipment
Contamination
Environmental
Contamination
 For airborne
bioburden at max of
12 inch upstream
from point of use.
 For surface bioburden
measured per 25 sq
cm.
 For personnel
bioburden exit test.
65
Level Action
Level
Alert
Level
I 1 CFU 1 CFU
II 10 CFU 5 CFU
III 25 CFU 15 CFU
Action
Level
Alert Level
Gloves 5
CFU/plate
2
CFU/plate
Gown 30 CFU/3
plates
20 CFU/ 3
plates
Airborne and Surface
Personnel
 A product xyz was tested for bioburden. Batch
size is 10,000 bottles. Find the contamination
per bottle.
66
Ingredient Quantity (g) Bioburden per g
(CFU)
Active ingredient 5000 10
Preservatives 500 10
Vehicle 87400 10
Excipients 100 500
67
Ingredient Quantity (g) Bioburden per g
(CFU)
Total Bioburden
(CFU)
Active
ingredient
5000 10 50,000
Preservatives 500 10 5000
Vehicle 87,400 10 8,74,000
Excipients 100 500 50,000
Grand Total 979,000
Contamination per bottle= 979,000/ 10,000≈ 98 CFU
 For, a container with neck area of 0.8 sq cm is
open during filling for
(a) 10 min
(b) 1 sec
and a 14 cm plate(area= 154 sq cm) is exposed
adjacent in 4 hrs, 2 microorganisms are found
to have deposited on the settle plate. Find the
contamination rate for both (a) and (b).
68
(a)
 Fraction contaminated
= 2* (0.8/ 154)* (10/4*60)
= 0.00043
 Contamination rate
= 1/ 0.00043
=2325.58
≈2326
(b)
 Fraction contaminated
= 2* (0.8/ 154)*
[(1/60)/(4*60)]
= 7.215 * 10-7
 Contamination rate
= 1/ 7.215 * 10-7
=1.38 * 108
≈ 1.4 * 108
69
 A 125 litre capacity blender has internal surface
area of 2356 sq cm. Surface bioburden was
found to be 33 CFU per 25 sq cm. Calculate the
contamination risk per 100 ml of product
mixed in the blender.
70
 Surface contamination
= 33 * ( 2356/ 25)
= 3109.92 CFU
 Contamination risk per 100 ml
= (100/ 125000) * 3109.92
=2.48
≈ 3 CFU
71
 Scott Sutton, PhD; “Bioburden Contamination Control: A Holistic Overview”;
American Pharmaceutical Review; Endotoxin Supplement; July/Aug 2015;
volume 18, issue 5.
 Microbiological Validation according to EN-ISO 11137-2:2012, Method VDmax
25
Initial Validation; Pharma Help Bag; Synergy Health.
 “Bioburden: Characterization, Method Validation and Determination”; Eurofins.
 “The Microbial Bioburden of USP 797 Compliance”; Simplifying Environmental
Quality and Control Practices for Pharmaceutical Compounding; PathCon
Laboratories; Fall 2009.
 Scott Sutton, PhD; “The Role of Bioburden in the Contamination-Control Plan”;
Equipment and Processing Report; Jan 19, 2011.
 Microbial Risk Assessment Guideline, Pathogenic Microorganisms with focus on
Food and Water; Prepared by the Interagency Microbiological Risk Assessment
Guideline Workgroup; USDA and FSIS; July 2012(001).
 S. P. Denyer, R. M. Baird; “Guide To Microbiological Control In
Pharmaceuticals”; Ellis Horwood Limited; England.
 “Glimpses of Pharma Profession: A compilation of presentations made at
different programs organized by IPA Vadodara Branch (2000-2001); The Indian
Pharmaceutical Association, Vadodara Branch.
72
Bioburden

More Related Content

What's hot

Bioburden method validation
Bioburden method validationBioburden method validation
Bioburden method validationEka Selvina
 
Biosafety level and biosafety cabinets
Biosafety level and biosafety cabinetsBiosafety level and biosafety cabinets
Biosafety level and biosafety cabinetsTechef In
 
Bacterial Endotoxin Test
Bacterial Endotoxin TestBacterial Endotoxin Test
Bacterial Endotoxin TestPharmaguideline
 
Pharmaceutical Microbiology: Current and Future Challenges
Pharmaceutical Microbiology: Current and Future Challenges Pharmaceutical Microbiology: Current and Future Challenges
Pharmaceutical Microbiology: Current and Future Challenges Tim Sandle, Ph.D.
 
Scope, roles and responsibilities of microbiologist in
Scope, roles and responsibilities of microbiologist inScope, roles and responsibilities of microbiologist in
Scope, roles and responsibilities of microbiologist inAuricle Nissim
 
Understanding How Bioburden and Sterilization Affect Medical Devices
Understanding How Bioburden and Sterilization Affect Medical DevicesUnderstanding How Bioburden and Sterilization Affect Medical Devices
Understanding How Bioburden and Sterilization Affect Medical DevicesPacific BioLabs
 
membrane filtration
membrane filtrationmembrane filtration
membrane filtrationAnkit Sharma
 
Environmental Monitoring of Clean Room
Environmental Monitoring of Clean RoomEnvironmental Monitoring of Clean Room
Environmental Monitoring of Clean RoomIqra Shafeeq
 
Microbial Limit Test- An Over view
Microbial Limit Test- An Over view Microbial Limit Test- An Over view
Microbial Limit Test- An Over view Srinath Sasidharan
 
Microbiological sampling of air
Microbiological sampling of airMicrobiological sampling of air
Microbiological sampling of airSahil Shakya
 

What's hot (20)

Bioburden method validation
Bioburden method validationBioburden method validation
Bioburden method validation
 
Biosafety level and biosafety cabinets
Biosafety level and biosafety cabinetsBiosafety level and biosafety cabinets
Biosafety level and biosafety cabinets
 
Microbial limit test
Microbial limit testMicrobial limit test
Microbial limit test
 
Bacterial Endotoxin Test
Bacterial Endotoxin TestBacterial Endotoxin Test
Bacterial Endotoxin Test
 
Pharmaceutical Microbiology: Current and Future Challenges
Pharmaceutical Microbiology: Current and Future Challenges Pharmaceutical Microbiology: Current and Future Challenges
Pharmaceutical Microbiology: Current and Future Challenges
 
WHO Good Practices for Microbiology Labs.
WHO Good Practices for Microbiology Labs.WHO Good Practices for Microbiology Labs.
WHO Good Practices for Microbiology Labs.
 
Scope, roles and responsibilities of microbiologist in
Scope, roles and responsibilities of microbiologist inScope, roles and responsibilities of microbiologist in
Scope, roles and responsibilities of microbiologist in
 
Sterility testing
Sterility testingSterility testing
Sterility testing
 
Understanding How Bioburden and Sterilization Affect Medical Devices
Understanding How Bioburden and Sterilization Affect Medical DevicesUnderstanding How Bioburden and Sterilization Affect Medical Devices
Understanding How Bioburden and Sterilization Affect Medical Devices
 
Bacterial Endotoxins test
Bacterial Endotoxins testBacterial Endotoxins test
Bacterial Endotoxins test
 
6. Sterility testing
6. Sterility testing6. Sterility testing
6. Sterility testing
 
Sterility test
Sterility testSterility test
Sterility test
 
membrane filtration
membrane filtrationmembrane filtration
membrane filtration
 
Sterility tests
Sterility testsSterility tests
Sterility tests
 
Sterility testing USP 71
Sterility testing USP 71Sterility testing USP 71
Sterility testing USP 71
 
Bio burden
Bio burdenBio burden
Bio burden
 
Depyrogenation by dry heat
Depyrogenation by dry heatDepyrogenation by dry heat
Depyrogenation by dry heat
 
Environmental Monitoring of Clean Room
Environmental Monitoring of Clean RoomEnvironmental Monitoring of Clean Room
Environmental Monitoring of Clean Room
 
Microbial Limit Test- An Over view
Microbial Limit Test- An Over view Microbial Limit Test- An Over view
Microbial Limit Test- An Over view
 
Microbiological sampling of air
Microbiological sampling of airMicrobiological sampling of air
Microbiological sampling of air
 

Viewers also liked

Analysis of herbal drugs by titrimetry
Analysis of herbal drugs by titrimetryAnalysis of herbal drugs by titrimetry
Analysis of herbal drugs by titrimetryvedshree raole
 
Flow injection analysis
Flow injection analysisFlow injection analysis
Flow injection analysisvedshree raole
 
Taller 2 ensayo descriptivo isamalia muñiz
Taller 2 ensayo descriptivo isamalia muñizTaller 2 ensayo descriptivo isamalia muñiz
Taller 2 ensayo descriptivo isamalia muñizIsamalia Muniz
 
Returning from Prison - Building Health, Purpose and Community
Returning from Prison - Building Health, Purpose and CommunityReturning from Prison - Building Health, Purpose and Community
Returning from Prison - Building Health, Purpose and CommunityMichael Changaris
 
자료형과 값
자료형과 값자료형과 값
자료형과 값. Ruvendix
 
Demons In The Closet - A look at Mental Health with Remote Wokers WordCamp St...
Demons In The Closet - A look at Mental Health with Remote Wokers WordCamp St...Demons In The Closet - A look at Mental Health with Remote Wokers WordCamp St...
Demons In The Closet - A look at Mental Health with Remote Wokers WordCamp St...Michele Butcher-Jones
 
Tata Tigor Diesel Specs
Tata Tigor Diesel SpecsTata Tigor Diesel Specs
Tata Tigor Diesel SpecsRushLane
 
Tata Tigor Petrol Specs
Tata Tigor Petrol SpecsTata Tigor Petrol Specs
Tata Tigor Petrol SpecsRushLane
 
Masters of SlideShare
Masters of SlideShareMasters of SlideShare
Masters of SlideShareKapost
 
10 Ways to Win at SlideShare SEO & Presentation Optimization
10 Ways to Win at SlideShare SEO & Presentation Optimization10 Ways to Win at SlideShare SEO & Presentation Optimization
10 Ways to Win at SlideShare SEO & Presentation OptimizationOneupweb
 
How To Get More From SlideShare - Super-Simple Tips For Content Marketing
How To Get More From SlideShare - Super-Simple Tips For Content MarketingHow To Get More From SlideShare - Super-Simple Tips For Content Marketing
How To Get More From SlideShare - Super-Simple Tips For Content MarketingContent Marketing Institute
 
What to Upload to SlideShare
What to Upload to SlideShareWhat to Upload to SlideShare
What to Upload to SlideShareSlideShare
 
Virscidian Poster Pittcon 2010
Virscidian Poster Pittcon 2010Virscidian Poster Pittcon 2010
Virscidian Poster Pittcon 2010Mark Bayliss
 
Using lc ms to quantify and identify natural toxins in food and environmental...
Using lc ms to quantify and identify natural toxins in food and environmental...Using lc ms to quantify and identify natural toxins in food and environmental...
Using lc ms to quantify and identify natural toxins in food and environmental...泰聖 葉
 
Zafar mirza presentation_
Zafar mirza presentation_Zafar mirza presentation_
Zafar mirza presentation_Pranaya Krishna
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Analysis of herbal drugs by titrimetry
Analysis of herbal drugs by titrimetryAnalysis of herbal drugs by titrimetry
Analysis of herbal drugs by titrimetry
 
Flow injection analysis
Flow injection analysisFlow injection analysis
Flow injection analysis
 
Chemiluminescence
ChemiluminescenceChemiluminescence
Chemiluminescence
 
Taller 2 ensayo descriptivo isamalia muñiz
Taller 2 ensayo descriptivo isamalia muñizTaller 2 ensayo descriptivo isamalia muñiz
Taller 2 ensayo descriptivo isamalia muñiz
 
Returning from Prison - Building Health, Purpose and Community
Returning from Prison - Building Health, Purpose and CommunityReturning from Prison - Building Health, Purpose and Community
Returning from Prison - Building Health, Purpose and Community
 
자료형과 값
자료형과 값자료형과 값
자료형과 값
 
Demons In The Closet - A look at Mental Health with Remote Wokers WordCamp St...
Demons In The Closet - A look at Mental Health with Remote Wokers WordCamp St...Demons In The Closet - A look at Mental Health with Remote Wokers WordCamp St...
Demons In The Closet - A look at Mental Health with Remote Wokers WordCamp St...
 
Tata Tigor Diesel Specs
Tata Tigor Diesel SpecsTata Tigor Diesel Specs
Tata Tigor Diesel Specs
 
Tata Tigor Petrol Specs
Tata Tigor Petrol SpecsTata Tigor Petrol Specs
Tata Tigor Petrol Specs
 
Masters of SlideShare
Masters of SlideShareMasters of SlideShare
Masters of SlideShare
 
10 Ways to Win at SlideShare SEO & Presentation Optimization
10 Ways to Win at SlideShare SEO & Presentation Optimization10 Ways to Win at SlideShare SEO & Presentation Optimization
10 Ways to Win at SlideShare SEO & Presentation Optimization
 
How To Get More From SlideShare - Super-Simple Tips For Content Marketing
How To Get More From SlideShare - Super-Simple Tips For Content MarketingHow To Get More From SlideShare - Super-Simple Tips For Content Marketing
How To Get More From SlideShare - Super-Simple Tips For Content Marketing
 
What to Upload to SlideShare
What to Upload to SlideShareWhat to Upload to SlideShare
What to Upload to SlideShare
 
Virscidian Poster Pittcon 2010
Virscidian Poster Pittcon 2010Virscidian Poster Pittcon 2010
Virscidian Poster Pittcon 2010
 
Archana B lc ppt
Archana B lc pptArchana B lc ppt
Archana B lc ppt
 
Microbiology Resume
Microbiology ResumeMicrobiology Resume
Microbiology Resume
 
Microbiologist
MicrobiologistMicrobiologist
Microbiologist
 
Using lc ms to quantify and identify natural toxins in food and environmental...
Using lc ms to quantify and identify natural toxins in food and environmental...Using lc ms to quantify and identify natural toxins in food and environmental...
Using lc ms to quantify and identify natural toxins in food and environmental...
 
Sarahme
SarahmeSarahme
Sarahme
 
Zafar mirza presentation_
Zafar mirza presentation_Zafar mirza presentation_
Zafar mirza presentation_
 

Similar to Bioburden

isolationofindustrialmicroorganisms-210610090245.pdf
isolationofindustrialmicroorganisms-210610090245.pdfisolationofindustrialmicroorganisms-210610090245.pdf
isolationofindustrialmicroorganisms-210610090245.pdfalizain9604
 
Isolation of industrial microorganisms
Isolation of industrial microorganismsIsolation of industrial microorganisms
Isolation of industrial microorganismsNithyaNandapal
 
Filter validation
Filter validationFilter validation
Filter validationVINOTH R
 
Types of processing.pptx
Types of processing.pptxTypes of processing.pptx
Types of processing.pptxPGMBslides
 
D7 Laundry Sanitizer and Disinfectant Test
D7 Laundry Sanitizer and Disinfectant Test D7 Laundry Sanitizer and Disinfectant Test
D7 Laundry Sanitizer and Disinfectant Test Casey Latto
 
Microbiological Environmental Monitoring in Pharmaceutical Facility
Microbiological Environmental Monitoring in Pharmaceutical FacilityMicrobiological Environmental Monitoring in Pharmaceutical Facility
Microbiological Environmental Monitoring in Pharmaceutical Facilitydelli_intralab
 
Microbiology Laboratory Qualifications and Microbial Testing Techniques
Microbiology Laboratory Qualifications and Microbial Testing TechniquesMicrobiology Laboratory Qualifications and Microbial Testing Techniques
Microbiology Laboratory Qualifications and Microbial Testing TechniquesKavitaBhatt14
 
Evaluation of parenterals products
Evaluation of parenterals productsEvaluation of parenterals products
Evaluation of parenterals productsD.R. Chandravanshi
 
Antibacterial finishes
Antibacterial finishesAntibacterial finishes
Antibacterial finishesShameem_Byadgi
 
Cleaning Validation Protocol for Cannabis Certificate Programs.docx
Cleaning Validation Protocol for Cannabis Certificate Programs.docxCleaning Validation Protocol for Cannabis Certificate Programs.docx
Cleaning Validation Protocol for Cannabis Certificate Programs.docxNACPT Pharma College
 
Measurement of microbial growth
Measurement of microbial growthMeasurement of microbial growth
Measurement of microbial growthKalavati Prajapati
 
Cleaning validation presentation
Cleaning validation presentationCleaning validation presentation
Cleaning validation presentationVishnu Satpute
 
Detection techniques for microorganisms in food of animal
Detection techniques for microorganisms in food of animalDetection techniques for microorganisms in food of animal
Detection techniques for microorganisms in food of animalMANJEET RATHOUR
 
class evaluation of disinfectant.pdf
class evaluation of disinfectant.pdfclass evaluation of disinfectant.pdf
class evaluation of disinfectant.pdfAjithPc3
 
Cleaning validation
Cleaning validation Cleaning validation
Cleaning validation Alekya Chinki
 
Ipqc tests for sterile formulations
Ipqc tests for sterile formulationsIpqc tests for sterile formulations
Ipqc tests for sterile formulationsPramod Ramane
 

Similar to Bioburden (20)

Unit 2 ppt new.pptx
Unit 2 ppt new.pptxUnit 2 ppt new.pptx
Unit 2 ppt new.pptx
 
isolationofindustrialmicroorganisms-210610090245.pdf
isolationofindustrialmicroorganisms-210610090245.pdfisolationofindustrialmicroorganisms-210610090245.pdf
isolationofindustrialmicroorganisms-210610090245.pdf
 
Isolation of industrial microorganisms
Isolation of industrial microorganismsIsolation of industrial microorganisms
Isolation of industrial microorganisms
 
Filter validation
Filter validationFilter validation
Filter validation
 
Types of processing.pptx
Types of processing.pptxTypes of processing.pptx
Types of processing.pptx
 
Method of microbial examination of food
Method of microbial examination of foodMethod of microbial examination of food
Method of microbial examination of food
 
D7 Laundry Sanitizer and Disinfectant Test
D7 Laundry Sanitizer and Disinfectant Test D7 Laundry Sanitizer and Disinfectant Test
D7 Laundry Sanitizer and Disinfectant Test
 
Microbiological Environmental Monitoring in Pharmaceutical Facility
Microbiological Environmental Monitoring in Pharmaceutical FacilityMicrobiological Environmental Monitoring in Pharmaceutical Facility
Microbiological Environmental Monitoring in Pharmaceutical Facility
 
Microbiology Laboratory Qualifications and Microbial Testing Techniques
Microbiology Laboratory Qualifications and Microbial Testing TechniquesMicrobiology Laboratory Qualifications and Microbial Testing Techniques
Microbiology Laboratory Qualifications and Microbial Testing Techniques
 
Evaluation of parenterals products
Evaluation of parenterals productsEvaluation of parenterals products
Evaluation of parenterals products
 
Antibacterial finishes
Antibacterial finishesAntibacterial finishes
Antibacterial finishes
 
Cleaning Validation Protocol for Cannabis Certificate Programs.docx
Cleaning Validation Protocol for Cannabis Certificate Programs.docxCleaning Validation Protocol for Cannabis Certificate Programs.docx
Cleaning Validation Protocol for Cannabis Certificate Programs.docx
 
Measurement of microbial growth
Measurement of microbial growthMeasurement of microbial growth
Measurement of microbial growth
 
1116 Added.pdf
1116 Added.pdf1116 Added.pdf
1116 Added.pdf
 
Cleaning validation presentation
Cleaning validation presentationCleaning validation presentation
Cleaning validation presentation
 
Detection techniques for microorganisms in food of animal
Detection techniques for microorganisms in food of animalDetection techniques for microorganisms in food of animal
Detection techniques for microorganisms in food of animal
 
class evaluation of disinfectant.pdf
class evaluation of disinfectant.pdfclass evaluation of disinfectant.pdf
class evaluation of disinfectant.pdf
 
Cleaning validation
Cleaning validation Cleaning validation
Cleaning validation
 
Ipqc tests for sterile formulations
Ipqc tests for sterile formulationsIpqc tests for sterile formulations
Ipqc tests for sterile formulations
 
Screening
ScreeningScreening
Screening
 

Recently uploaded

Science (Communication) and Wikipedia - Potentials and Pitfalls
Science (Communication) and Wikipedia - Potentials and PitfallsScience (Communication) and Wikipedia - Potentials and Pitfalls
Science (Communication) and Wikipedia - Potentials and PitfallsDobusch Leonhard
 
Observation of Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 2.5–4.5 M⊙ Compa...
Observation of Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 2.5–4.5 M⊙ Compa...Observation of Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 2.5–4.5 M⊙ Compa...
Observation of Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 2.5–4.5 M⊙ Compa...Sérgio Sacani
 
final waves properties grade 7 - third quarter
final waves properties grade 7 - third quarterfinal waves properties grade 7 - third quarter
final waves properties grade 7 - third quarterHanHyoKim
 
Environmental Acoustics- Speech interference level, acoustics calibrator.pptx
Environmental Acoustics- Speech interference level, acoustics calibrator.pptxEnvironmental Acoustics- Speech interference level, acoustics calibrator.pptx
Environmental Acoustics- Speech interference level, acoustics calibrator.pptxpriyankatabhane
 
complex analysis best book for solving questions.pdf
complex analysis best book for solving questions.pdfcomplex analysis best book for solving questions.pdf
complex analysis best book for solving questions.pdfSubhamKumar3239
 
DECOMPOSITION PATHWAYS of TM-alkyl complexes.pdf
DECOMPOSITION PATHWAYS of TM-alkyl complexes.pdfDECOMPOSITION PATHWAYS of TM-alkyl complexes.pdf
DECOMPOSITION PATHWAYS of TM-alkyl complexes.pdfDivyaK787011
 
KDIGO-2023-CKD-Guideline-Public-Review-Draft_5-July-2023.pdf
KDIGO-2023-CKD-Guideline-Public-Review-Draft_5-July-2023.pdfKDIGO-2023-CKD-Guideline-Public-Review-Draft_5-July-2023.pdf
KDIGO-2023-CKD-Guideline-Public-Review-Draft_5-July-2023.pdfGABYFIORELAMALPARTID1
 
Charateristics of the Angara-A5 spacecraft launched from the Vostochny Cosmod...
Charateristics of the Angara-A5 spacecraft launched from the Vostochny Cosmod...Charateristics of the Angara-A5 spacecraft launched from the Vostochny Cosmod...
Charateristics of the Angara-A5 spacecraft launched from the Vostochny Cosmod...Christina Parmionova
 
WEEK 4 PHYSICAL SCIENCE QUARTER 3 FOR G11
WEEK 4 PHYSICAL SCIENCE QUARTER 3 FOR G11WEEK 4 PHYSICAL SCIENCE QUARTER 3 FOR G11
WEEK 4 PHYSICAL SCIENCE QUARTER 3 FOR G11GelineAvendao
 
whole genome sequencing new and its types including shortgun and clone by clone
whole genome sequencing new  and its types including shortgun and clone by clonewhole genome sequencing new  and its types including shortgun and clone by clone
whole genome sequencing new and its types including shortgun and clone by clonechaudhary charan shingh university
 
CHROMATOGRAPHY PALLAVI RAWAT.pptx
CHROMATOGRAPHY  PALLAVI RAWAT.pptxCHROMATOGRAPHY  PALLAVI RAWAT.pptx
CHROMATOGRAPHY PALLAVI RAWAT.pptxpallavirawat456
 
Abnormal LFTs rate of deco and NAFLD.pptx
Abnormal LFTs rate of deco and NAFLD.pptxAbnormal LFTs rate of deco and NAFLD.pptx
Abnormal LFTs rate of deco and NAFLD.pptxzeus70441
 
Observational constraints on mergers creating magnetism in massive stars
Observational constraints on mergers creating magnetism in massive starsObservational constraints on mergers creating magnetism in massive stars
Observational constraints on mergers creating magnetism in massive starsSérgio Sacani
 
Oxo-Acids of Halogens and their Salts.pptx
Oxo-Acids of Halogens and their Salts.pptxOxo-Acids of Halogens and their Salts.pptx
Oxo-Acids of Halogens and their Salts.pptxfarhanvvdk
 
Environmental acoustics- noise criteria.pptx
Environmental acoustics- noise criteria.pptxEnvironmental acoustics- noise criteria.pptx
Environmental acoustics- noise criteria.pptxpriyankatabhane
 
Introduction of Human Body & Structure of cell.pptx
Introduction of Human Body & Structure of cell.pptxIntroduction of Human Body & Structure of cell.pptx
Introduction of Human Body & Structure of cell.pptxMedical College
 
6.1 Pests of Groundnut_Binomics_Identification_Dr.UPR
6.1 Pests of Groundnut_Binomics_Identification_Dr.UPR6.1 Pests of Groundnut_Binomics_Identification_Dr.UPR
6.1 Pests of Groundnut_Binomics_Identification_Dr.UPRPirithiRaju
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Science (Communication) and Wikipedia - Potentials and Pitfalls
Science (Communication) and Wikipedia - Potentials and PitfallsScience (Communication) and Wikipedia - Potentials and Pitfalls
Science (Communication) and Wikipedia - Potentials and Pitfalls
 
Observation of Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 2.5–4.5 M⊙ Compa...
Observation of Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 2.5–4.5 M⊙ Compa...Observation of Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 2.5–4.5 M⊙ Compa...
Observation of Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 2.5–4.5 M⊙ Compa...
 
Let’s Say Someone Did Drop the Bomb. Then What?
Let’s Say Someone Did Drop the Bomb. Then What?Let’s Say Someone Did Drop the Bomb. Then What?
Let’s Say Someone Did Drop the Bomb. Then What?
 
final waves properties grade 7 - third quarter
final waves properties grade 7 - third quarterfinal waves properties grade 7 - third quarter
final waves properties grade 7 - third quarter
 
Environmental Acoustics- Speech interference level, acoustics calibrator.pptx
Environmental Acoustics- Speech interference level, acoustics calibrator.pptxEnvironmental Acoustics- Speech interference level, acoustics calibrator.pptx
Environmental Acoustics- Speech interference level, acoustics calibrator.pptx
 
complex analysis best book for solving questions.pdf
complex analysis best book for solving questions.pdfcomplex analysis best book for solving questions.pdf
complex analysis best book for solving questions.pdf
 
DECOMPOSITION PATHWAYS of TM-alkyl complexes.pdf
DECOMPOSITION PATHWAYS of TM-alkyl complexes.pdfDECOMPOSITION PATHWAYS of TM-alkyl complexes.pdf
DECOMPOSITION PATHWAYS of TM-alkyl complexes.pdf
 
KDIGO-2023-CKD-Guideline-Public-Review-Draft_5-July-2023.pdf
KDIGO-2023-CKD-Guideline-Public-Review-Draft_5-July-2023.pdfKDIGO-2023-CKD-Guideline-Public-Review-Draft_5-July-2023.pdf
KDIGO-2023-CKD-Guideline-Public-Review-Draft_5-July-2023.pdf
 
Charateristics of the Angara-A5 spacecraft launched from the Vostochny Cosmod...
Charateristics of the Angara-A5 spacecraft launched from the Vostochny Cosmod...Charateristics of the Angara-A5 spacecraft launched from the Vostochny Cosmod...
Charateristics of the Angara-A5 spacecraft launched from the Vostochny Cosmod...
 
WEEK 4 PHYSICAL SCIENCE QUARTER 3 FOR G11
WEEK 4 PHYSICAL SCIENCE QUARTER 3 FOR G11WEEK 4 PHYSICAL SCIENCE QUARTER 3 FOR G11
WEEK 4 PHYSICAL SCIENCE QUARTER 3 FOR G11
 
PLASMODIUM. PPTX
PLASMODIUM. PPTXPLASMODIUM. PPTX
PLASMODIUM. PPTX
 
whole genome sequencing new and its types including shortgun and clone by clone
whole genome sequencing new  and its types including shortgun and clone by clonewhole genome sequencing new  and its types including shortgun and clone by clone
whole genome sequencing new and its types including shortgun and clone by clone
 
CHROMATOGRAPHY PALLAVI RAWAT.pptx
CHROMATOGRAPHY  PALLAVI RAWAT.pptxCHROMATOGRAPHY  PALLAVI RAWAT.pptx
CHROMATOGRAPHY PALLAVI RAWAT.pptx
 
Abnormal LFTs rate of deco and NAFLD.pptx
Abnormal LFTs rate of deco and NAFLD.pptxAbnormal LFTs rate of deco and NAFLD.pptx
Abnormal LFTs rate of deco and NAFLD.pptx
 
Observational constraints on mergers creating magnetism in massive stars
Observational constraints on mergers creating magnetism in massive starsObservational constraints on mergers creating magnetism in massive stars
Observational constraints on mergers creating magnetism in massive stars
 
Oxo-Acids of Halogens and their Salts.pptx
Oxo-Acids of Halogens and their Salts.pptxOxo-Acids of Halogens and their Salts.pptx
Oxo-Acids of Halogens and their Salts.pptx
 
AZOTOBACTER AS BIOFERILIZER.PPTX
AZOTOBACTER AS BIOFERILIZER.PPTXAZOTOBACTER AS BIOFERILIZER.PPTX
AZOTOBACTER AS BIOFERILIZER.PPTX
 
Environmental acoustics- noise criteria.pptx
Environmental acoustics- noise criteria.pptxEnvironmental acoustics- noise criteria.pptx
Environmental acoustics- noise criteria.pptx
 
Introduction of Human Body & Structure of cell.pptx
Introduction of Human Body & Structure of cell.pptxIntroduction of Human Body & Structure of cell.pptx
Introduction of Human Body & Structure of cell.pptx
 
6.1 Pests of Groundnut_Binomics_Identification_Dr.UPR
6.1 Pests of Groundnut_Binomics_Identification_Dr.UPR6.1 Pests of Groundnut_Binomics_Identification_Dr.UPR
6.1 Pests of Groundnut_Binomics_Identification_Dr.UPR
 

Bioburden

  • 1. Prepared By:- ARPIT BANA PQA,M.PHARM M.S UNIVERSITY. GUIDED BY: Dr. RAJASHREE MASHRU Faculty of Pharmacy, M.S University.
  • 2.  Bioburden is the population of viable microorganism on a particular object, formulation and/or finished product.  It is the number of bacteria living on a surface that has not been sterilized.  Bioburden Testing, also known as microbial limit testing, is performed on pharmaceutical products and medical products for quality control purposes.  Bioburden is generally expressed as CFU/mL (Colony Forming Units)
  • 3.  The development of a microbial contamination control program is critical to the effort to get a new facility qualified, and to maintain the facility in a state of control once qualified.  To determine the total number of viable microorganisms in or on a medical device, container or component after completion of all in-process steps before sterilization.  To act as an early warning system for possible production problems which could lead to inadequate sterilization or possible product recall.  To calculate the necessary dose for effective radiation sterilization and to monitor product to ensure adequate dosing.  To test the effectiveness of cleaning agent against bacteria.  Act as an indicator of manufacturing condition. The purpose of environmental monitoring is to correct problems before product is placed at risk.
  • 4.  The Legal basis for Bioburden testing lies in CFR 21 (Code of Federal Register 21) and ISO 11737 worldwide.  21 C.F.R. 211.110 (a)(6) states that bioburden in-process testing must be conducted pursuant to written procedures during the manufacturing process of drug products.  Current good manufacturing practice (CGMP) requirements as specified in 21 CFR Part 211.113, Control of Microbiological Contamination, state that “Appropriate written procedures, designed to prevent objectionable microorganisms in drug products not required to be sterile, shall be established and followed.”  The United States Pharmacopeia (USP) outlines several tests that can be done to quantitatively determine the Bioburden of non-sterile drug products.  It is important when conducting these tests to ensure that the testing method does not either introduce bacteria into the test sample or kill bacteria in the test sample.
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.
  • 16. Raw material: 1) warehouse 2) sampling equipment 3) sampling personal 4) sampling environment Dispensing: 1) dispensing equipment 2) dispensing personal 3) dispensing equipment Manufacturing:1) equipment 2) air system 3) no. of personnel Packaging : 1) primary packaging 2) secondary packaging
  • 17. 1. Types of Non-viable contamination: 2. Types of Viable contamination: Fibers Particles Clothing Dead skin Papers Dandruff Hair Tobacco smoke Cleaning equipment Microorganism Insects & pest bacteria Rodent Fungi Cockroach Viruses mice
  • 18.  Water is a frequent source of endotoxins and bioburden, which can carry Gram negative bacteria. It is therefore important to examine process water usage.  These arise from several mfg or processing steps- for example from extrusion, grinding, milling or cleaning processes, etc.
  • 19.
  • 20. 1. Air-borne bioburden- organisms found in critical environment. 2. Water-borne bioburden- due to use of purified water as an ingredient or during processing steps. 3. Surface-borne bioburden- organisms present on surface of particular equipments and devices. 4. Personnel bioburden- arising on account of improper personnel hygiene, clothing, cleanliness or sanitation.
  • 21. 1. Airborne particulate bioburden: 2. Surface bioburden: CLASS OF AREA ACTION LEVEL ALERT LEVEL I 1 CFU 1 CFU II 10 CFU 5 CFU III 25 CFU 15 CFU CLASS OF AREA ACTION LEVEL ALERT LEVEL I 1 CFU 1 CFU II 10 CFU 5 CFU III 25 CFU 15 CFU
  • 22. 3. Personnel Bioburden: MATERIAL ACTION LEVEL ALERT LEVEL Gloves ≥ 5 CFU/plate ≥ 2 CFU/plate Gown ≥ total 30 CFU/ 3 plates ≥ total 20 CFU/3 plates
  • 23. LEVEL ROOM :NOT IN USE ROOM:PRIO R TO USE ROOM: IN USE I Once a week 3 days CL: once before start, once during process, once after finishing. II Once a week 3 days SL: once during process & once a week. III Once every 2 weeks 3 days SL: once a day OL: once every 2 weeks CL: critical locations SL: selected locations OL: other locations
  • 24.
  • 25. 1. Sampling 2. Extraction methods 3. Enumeration procedures 4. Incubation
  • 26.  General sampling strategies and characteristics: The method of obtaining samples for bioburden influences the test results. Preferred method is to obtain random samples. ASCEPTIC: Be clean as possible. The method of sampling itself should not contribute to microbial contamination, else it gives faulty results. RANDOM: Random samples are taken from each area of production room and not just from one specific location.
  • 27. REPRESENTATIVE: Units sampled for testing should represent each phase of production process. REJECTED SAMPLES: rejected samples may be used for laboratory testing if they have been through the same process that the normal units have undergone. SIMULATED PRODUCT: Special units used for sampling made exactly similar to the original product via the same processing. Such units are used due to expensive nature of original product.
  • 28.  Goal of sampling: • It will help to determine whether microorganism present at various places is affecting the individual or preparation. • Sampling is use to identify the location of microbes, because they are collected from different spaces. • It will help in identification of microorganism. Sr.no Various system Sample site 1. Environmental air Near open door and/or filled container. 2. Room air Proximal to work area. 3. Water Point of use. 4. operator Finger impression
  • 30.  This method mainly determine the quality of parenteral processing environment,  It provides the information about the type of microbes present in air. a) Culturable air sampling: Requires culture medium for the growth of microbes.  slit to agar sampler  Anderson technique  Surface air system  The gelatin membrane system  Sterilization microbial sampling  Liquid impingers
  • 33. b) Non Culturable air sampling:  In this method, measured volume of air is passed through sampling devices. The collector of air has a sticky surface of glass where microbes get stick and trapped which are further analyzed.  Hence no use of culture medium.  The efficiency of air sampling technique depends on :  The design of sampler  Sampling rate and volume of air taken  The nature of collection medium  Sampling time
  • 34.  Nichrome wire loop method- • In this method nichrome wire loop is used which has rounded tip and by using this tip, sample is collected and observed under microscope or put in a specific growth medium. • Generally, microbiologists use inoculating loops to transfer microorganisms to growth media. • Loop consists of a three inch long, 25 gauge nichrome wire with a loop at one end and mounted on an eight inch long aluminum handle. • It is easy to sterilize and reuse because nichrome wire resists deterioration with repeated heat/cooling cycles.
  • 35.
  • 36. It includes the sampling from the floors, walls, machinery, equipment, rooms etc. a. Rodac plate method (RODAC- Replicate Organism Detection and Counting) In this method, a 100mm diameter agar contact plate is used in which agar is poured. Then this plate is pressed against a flat surface, microbes will stick to the medium. Instead of agar plate, nylon plates are also used. b. Cotton swab method It can be collected by cotton Q-tip applicator that has been moist with growth media and than send to testing laboratory. Disadvantage is the presence of cotton fibers on its surface. c. Tape lift surface sampling In this cotton adhesive tape is positioned on the surface and press gently without rubbing, and then directly observed under microscope.
  • 38.  After sample collection, it is required that the sample is extracted from the sampler and transferred to a suitable medium for further growth of microbes and analysis.  Methods: 1. Ultrasonicating 2. Vortex mixing 3. Blending 4. Shaking 5. Agar overlaying
  • 39. After extracting the sample, growth of microbes on suitable media to count them. A. Membrane Filtration B. Plate count methods i. Pour-plate method ii. Surface spread method C. Serial dilution method
  • 40.
  • 41.  Membrane filters used are 50 mm in diameter, having a nominal pore size of 0.45 µm for retaining bacteria.
  • 42.
  • 43.
  • 44.  Suitable incubating conditions are required for growth of microbes.
  • 45.  The bioburden validation is a test to determine the efficacy of a method that is used to estimate the bioburden on the product.  With the results of bioburden validation a correction factor is calculated which is used in the estimation of the product’s bioburden. 45
  • 46.  EN-ISO 11737-1 describes two general methods for the BV: 1. Repetitive(Exhaustive) Recovery Method 2. Inoculation Method 46
  • 47.  In this method the extraction procedure on a single sample product is to be repeated until there is no significant increase in the number of recovered microorganims.  The goal is to recover all viable microorganisms by washing the sample product repeatedly.  The counts in CFU that are recovered from the first extraction are compared to the total counts recovered from all the washes to calculate a percent recovery when doing just one extraction. 47
  • 48.  The percent recovery is used to calculate a correction factor which is then applied to the bioburden test numbers for the product.  In this way routine bioburden tests require only one extraction.  The CFU recovered from one extraction are then simply multiplied by the correction factor to determine the total bioburden of a product. 48
  • 49.  In this method a sterile product is inoculated with a known amount of viable microorganisms in order to create an artificial bioburden.  After inoculation, the product is allowed to dry for a defined period of time.  Once the inoculum has dried, the chosen method for extracting the microorganisms from the product is applied. 49
  • 50.  A ratio of recovered titer to initial inoculum count establishes the recovery efficiency and correction factor for the product.  Disadvantage of this method is that sterile samples are required and viability of microorganisms after drying process can not be guaranteed. 50
  • 51.  EN-ISO 11737-1 describes a number of methods that can be combined in order to obtain the best result in recovering the bioburden from the product.  Elution methods for releasing of bioburden from the product into a rinsing fluid: 1. Stomaching 2. Ultra Sonication 3. Shaking 4. Vortex Mixing 5. Flushing 6. Blending 7. Swabbing 51
  • 52.  Non elution methods for estimation of bioburden: 1. Contact Plating 2. Agar Overlaying  For the transfer into culture medium different methods like membrane filtration, pour plating, spread plating or spiral plating can be applied.  Best method for a specified product is determined by the BV. 52
  • 53.  For estimation of bioburden, mainly two medias are used: 1. Tryptone Soya Agar(TSA)- for aerobic m.o. with incubation of 3-5 days at 32.5 ºC ± 2.5ºC. 2. Sabouraud Dextrose Agar(SDA)- for yeast and mould with incubation of 5-7 days at 22.5ºC ± 2.5ºC. 53
  • 54.
  • 55.  When the population of microorganism is subjected to a sterilization process, all the cells do not die at the same time.  The no. of surviving cells decreases exponentially with time of exposure until viable organism can no longer be detected. So in order to find out the efficiency of the sterilization process some terminologies are employed i.e. 1) D value 2) Z value 3) F value 4) Inactivation factor 1)D VALUE  The resistance of a given organism to any specified killing process can be characterized by the D value.  This is the time in minutes required to reduce the no. of organisms by 90% i.e. upto10% of the original count.
  • 56.  Sterilization by heating in an autoclave or by dry heat: the D value is expressed by time in minutes at defined temperature. The temperature is shown as subscript Ex. D₁₂₁, D₁₇₀.  Sterilization by exposure to ionizing radiation: the D value is expressed by absorbed dose.  Sterilization by exposure to ethylene oxide: the D value is expressed by time in minutes.  The D value is mathematically shown by following equation D = U/log N₀−log Nu Here, U = exposure time N₀ = initial microbial population Nu = microbial population after receiving U time.
  • 57. 2) Z VALUE( THERMAL DESTRUCTION VALUE):  Z value relates the heat resistance of a microorganism to change in temperature.  It is the total degrees of temperature change to produce a 10 fold reduction in D value or the temperature change required for 1 log reduction in D-value.  Z-value is obtained from the plot of log D value vs temperature. Z= T2-T1/ log D1-log D2  Bacterial spores have Z value in range 10 to 15ºC while most non- sporing organisms have Z value of 4 to 6ºC. 3) F VALUE  It is the time in minutes required to kill an organism at 250ºF(121ºC)  Thus if sterilization process said to have F value of 15min. It implies that it has the same lethal effect on a given organism as that of heating at 121ºC for 15min.  F value is a measure of the lethality of total process of sterilization. F₀ = ∆t ∑ 10(T-To)/Z Where, ∆t is time interval for measurement of product tempT And To is the reference temperature Z = 10⁰C F₀ = total lethality
  • 58. 4) INACTIVATION FACTOR  It is the amount by which a given combination of temperature ,radiation dose rate etc and time of exposure will reduce the no. of survivors of a given organism.  It is calculated from known D value of organism as follows  Inactivation factor = 10(t/D) Where, t is the treatment time D is D-value at that same time.  The lower the contamination rate and higher the inactivation factor of a sterilization process, less is the risk of failure.
  • 59. Here: B=No. of org. surviving after sterilization A= Initial no. of micro-organisms Ft = Equivalent exposure time Dt=Log reduction microbial contamination(D- value) It is desirable that ‘B’ should be as low as possible:- 1. By reducing Bioburden on bulk product (A) 2. Increasing the exposure time (Ft) 3. Employing micro-org. with a lower D-value at specified temperature.
  • 60.  A pharmaceutical product has bioburden of 378 CFU. For how much time should it be sterilized with D-value(121°C) of 1.5 min/log so as to assure SAL of 106 ? 60
  • 61. 61
  • 63.  Product Contamination: Batch bioburden= sample bioburden * (batch volume/ sample volume)  Equipment Contamination: 1. Contact surface Bioburden= sample bioburden * (contact area/ sample area) 2. Contact surface Bioburden=Rinse fluid * sample bioburden (Batch volume/ rinse volume)  Environmental Contamination: 1. Fraction contaminated= CFU * (area of opening of container/ area of settle plate) * (time contamination exposed/ time settle plate exposed) 2. Contamination rate= 1/ fraction contamination 63
  • 65.  For airborne bioburden at max of 12 inch upstream from point of use.  For surface bioburden measured per 25 sq cm.  For personnel bioburden exit test. 65 Level Action Level Alert Level I 1 CFU 1 CFU II 10 CFU 5 CFU III 25 CFU 15 CFU Action Level Alert Level Gloves 5 CFU/plate 2 CFU/plate Gown 30 CFU/3 plates 20 CFU/ 3 plates Airborne and Surface Personnel
  • 66.  A product xyz was tested for bioburden. Batch size is 10,000 bottles. Find the contamination per bottle. 66 Ingredient Quantity (g) Bioburden per g (CFU) Active ingredient 5000 10 Preservatives 500 10 Vehicle 87400 10 Excipients 100 500
  • 67. 67 Ingredient Quantity (g) Bioburden per g (CFU) Total Bioburden (CFU) Active ingredient 5000 10 50,000 Preservatives 500 10 5000 Vehicle 87,400 10 8,74,000 Excipients 100 500 50,000 Grand Total 979,000 Contamination per bottle= 979,000/ 10,000≈ 98 CFU
  • 68.  For, a container with neck area of 0.8 sq cm is open during filling for (a) 10 min (b) 1 sec and a 14 cm plate(area= 154 sq cm) is exposed adjacent in 4 hrs, 2 microorganisms are found to have deposited on the settle plate. Find the contamination rate for both (a) and (b). 68
  • 69. (a)  Fraction contaminated = 2* (0.8/ 154)* (10/4*60) = 0.00043  Contamination rate = 1/ 0.00043 =2325.58 ≈2326 (b)  Fraction contaminated = 2* (0.8/ 154)* [(1/60)/(4*60)] = 7.215 * 10-7  Contamination rate = 1/ 7.215 * 10-7 =1.38 * 108 ≈ 1.4 * 108 69
  • 70.  A 125 litre capacity blender has internal surface area of 2356 sq cm. Surface bioburden was found to be 33 CFU per 25 sq cm. Calculate the contamination risk per 100 ml of product mixed in the blender. 70
  • 71.  Surface contamination = 33 * ( 2356/ 25) = 3109.92 CFU  Contamination risk per 100 ml = (100/ 125000) * 3109.92 =2.48 ≈ 3 CFU 71
  • 72.  Scott Sutton, PhD; “Bioburden Contamination Control: A Holistic Overview”; American Pharmaceutical Review; Endotoxin Supplement; July/Aug 2015; volume 18, issue 5.  Microbiological Validation according to EN-ISO 11137-2:2012, Method VDmax 25 Initial Validation; Pharma Help Bag; Synergy Health.  “Bioburden: Characterization, Method Validation and Determination”; Eurofins.  “The Microbial Bioburden of USP 797 Compliance”; Simplifying Environmental Quality and Control Practices for Pharmaceutical Compounding; PathCon Laboratories; Fall 2009.  Scott Sutton, PhD; “The Role of Bioburden in the Contamination-Control Plan”; Equipment and Processing Report; Jan 19, 2011.  Microbial Risk Assessment Guideline, Pathogenic Microorganisms with focus on Food and Water; Prepared by the Interagency Microbiological Risk Assessment Guideline Workgroup; USDA and FSIS; July 2012(001).  S. P. Denyer, R. M. Baird; “Guide To Microbiological Control In Pharmaceuticals”; Ellis Horwood Limited; England.  “Glimpses of Pharma Profession: A compilation of presentations made at different programs organized by IPA Vadodara Branch (2000-2001); The Indian Pharmaceutical Association, Vadodara Branch. 72