This presentation looks at customer and product profitability analysis, activity-based costing and the RapidBusinessModeling solution for corporate performance improvement.
2. Questions
ā¢ Which customers are the most proļ¬table?
ā¢ Which customers are we losing money with?
ā¢ Which products are the most/least proļ¬table?
ā¢ How much potential proļ¬ts are we giving up?
ā¢ How will pricing impact our proļ¬tability?
2
10. CTS = f ( customer )
ā¢ āCost to Serveā depends on
customer characteristics and
behavior.
4
11. CTS = f ( customer )
High Low
Products ordered custom standard
ā¢ āCost to Serveā depends on
customer characteristics and Order Quantities small large
behavior. Order Arrivals unpredictable predictable
Packaging customized standard
Delivery customized standard
Delivery Location far near
Del. Requirements changes no changes
Pre-Sales Support high low
Post-Sales Support high low
Payments slow on-time
4
12. CTS = f ( customer )
High Low
Products ordered custom standard
ā¢ āCost to Serveā depends on
customer characteristics and Order Quantities small large
behavior. Order Arrivals unpredictable predictable
Packaging customized standard
ā¢ Cost to Serve can be measured Delivery customized standard
through the activities consumed
Delivery Location far near
by the above factors.
Del. Requirements changes no changes
Pre-Sales Support high low
Post-Sales Support high low
Payments slow on-time
4
13. CTS = f ( customer )
High Low
Products ordered custom standard
ā¢ āCost to Serveā depends on
customer characteristics and Order Quantities small large
behavior. Order Arrivals unpredictable predictable
Packaging customized standard
ā¢ Cost to Serve can be measured Delivery customized standard
through the activities consumed
Delivery Location far near
by the above factors.
Del. Requirements changes no changes
ā¢ Customer Proļ¬tability Analysis Pre-Sales Support high low
uses āActivity-Based Costsā to Post-Sales Support high low
establish the Cost to Serve.
Payments slow on-time
4
15. Traditional Costing
consumed Outputs
Resources in Processes (products or services)
Organizational View
5
16. Traditional Costing
consumed to Outputs
Resources in Processes produce (products or services)
Organizational View
5
17. Traditional Costing
Accounting View
Costs Cost Objects
(direct or indirect)
consumed to Outputs
Resources in Processes produce (products or services)
Organizational View
5
18. Traditional Costing
Accounting View
Costs Cost Objects
(direct or indirect)
calculated
by
consumed to Outputs
Resources in Processes produce (products or services)
Organizational View
5
19. Traditional Costing
Accounting View
Costs Cost Objects
(direct or indirect)
calculated represent
by
consumed to Outputs
Resources in Processes produce (products or services)
Organizational View
5
20. Traditional Costing
Accounting View
direct cost
assigned to
Costs Cost Objects
(direct or indirect)
calculated represent
by
consumed to Outputs
Resources in Processes produce (products or services)
Organizational View
5
21. Traditional Costing
Accounting View
direct cost
assigned to
indirect cost
Costs Cost Objects
(direct or indirect) arbitrarily assigned to
calculated represent
by
consumed to Outputs
Resources in Processes produce (products or services)
Organizational View
5
22. Activity Based Costing
Accounting View
direct cost
assigned to
Costs Cost Objects
(direct or indirect)
calculated represent
by
consumed consumed Outputs
Resources by Processes
Activities by (products or services)
Organizational View
6
23. Activity Based Costing
Accounting View
direct cost
assigned to
Costs Cost Objects
(direct or indirect)
calculated represent
by
consumed consumed Outputs
Resources by Activities by (products or services)
Organizational View
6
24. Activity Based Costing
Accounting View
direct cost
assigned to
Costs Cost Objects
(direct or indirect)
Activity Cost
calculated represent
Pools
by
gathered
in
consumed consumed Outputs
Resources by Activities by (products or services)
Organizational View
6
25. Activity Based Costing
Accounting View
direct cost
assigned to
Costs Cost Drivers Cost Objects
(direct or indirect)
grouped
by
Activity Cost
calculated represent
Pools
by
gathered
in
consumed consumed Outputs
Resources by Activities by (products or services)
Organizational View
6
26. Activity Based Costing
Accounting View
direct cost
assigned to
assigned assign
Costs Cost Drivers Cost Objects
(direct or indirect) by to
grouped
by
Activity Cost
calculated represent
Pools
by
gathered
in
consumed consumed Outputs
Resources by Activities by (products or services)
Organizational View
6
32. Whale Curve Analysis
small
proļ¬t
big
customers / products
best 20% yield 130% of result - āproļ¬t-makersā
middle 60% yield small result - ābreak-evenā
8
33. Whale Curve Analysis
small
proļ¬t loss
big
customers / products
best 20% yield 130% of result - āproļ¬t-makersā
middle 60% yield small result - ābreak-evenā
worst 20% diminish result - āproļ¬t-takersā
8
36. Potential Analysis
proļ¬t
customers / products
best 20% yield 80% of higher result -> lift curve
middle 70% yield solid result -> ļ¬atten to right
9
37. Potential Analysis
potential
proļ¬t
customers / products
best 20% yield 80% of higher result -> lift curve
middle 70% yield solid result -> ļ¬atten to right
worst 10% cost only minor proļ¬t -> avoid slope
9
38. t
4-Box Action Plan
Target
Strategy
Non-Target
Proļ¬table Loss-making
Proļ¬t
10
39. t
4-Box Action Plan
Target
Retain
Strategy
Non-Target
Proļ¬table Loss-making
Proļ¬t
10
40. t
4-Box Action Plan
Target
Retain Transform
Strategy
Non-Target
Proļ¬table Loss-making
Proļ¬t
10
41. t
4-Box Action Plan
Target
Retain Transform
Strategy
Monitor
Non-Target
Proļ¬table Loss-making
Proļ¬t
10
42. t
4-Box Action Plan
Target
Retain Transform
Strategy
Monitor Replace
Non-Target
Proļ¬table Loss-making
Proļ¬t
10
43. t
CTS Segmentation
Low CTS
CTS (50%)
High CTS
green blue red
Whale Curve Regime
11
44. t
CTS Segmentation
Low CTS
Retain Increase Transform
CTS (50%)
Monitor Reduce Replace
High CTS
green blue red
Whale Curve Regime
11
45. t
CTS Segmentation
Low CTS
Retain Increase Transform
CTS (50%)
Monitor Reduce Replace
High CTS
green blue red
Whale Curve Regime
11
48. Approach - Summary
ā¢ Reļ¬ect ācost to serveā via activities to outputs (ABC)
ā¢ Determine customer proļ¬tability āwhale curveā (CPA)
12
49. Approach - Summary
ā¢ Reļ¬ect ācost to serveā via activities to outputs (ABC)
ā¢ Determine customer proļ¬tability āwhale curveā (CPA)
ā¢ Identify potential by customer segment (curve-change)
12
50. Approach - Summary
ā¢ Reļ¬ect ācost to serveā via activities to outputs (ABC)
ā¢ Determine customer proļ¬tability āwhale curveā (CPA)
ā¢ Identify potential by customer segment (curve-change)
ā¢ Use RapidBusinessModeling tool to model and analyze
12
51. Approach - Summary
ā¢ Reļ¬ect ācost to serveā via activities to outputs (ABC)
ā¢ Determine customer proļ¬tability āwhale curveā (CPA)
ā¢ Identify potential by customer segment (curve-change)
ā¢ Use RapidBusinessModeling tool to model and analyze
ā¢ Decide actions by customer segment (4-Box, 6-Pack)
12
60. Expense 1 Expense 2 Expense 3
?
Product I Product II
ok
Customer a Customer b Customer c Customer d
14
61. Expense 1 Expense 2 Expense 3
Product I Product II
ok
Customer a Customer b Customer c Customer d
14
62. Expense 1 Expense 2 Expense 3
Activity A Activity B Activity C
Product I Product II
ok
Customer a Customer b Customer c Customer d
14
63. Expense 1 Expense 2 Expense 3
ok
Activity A Activity B Activity C
Product I Product II
ok
Customer a Customer b Customer c Customer d
14
64. Expense 1 Expense 2 Expense 3
ok
Activity A Activity B Activity C
Product I Product II
ok
Customer a Customer b Customer c Customer d
14
65. Expense 1 Expense 2 Expense 3
ok
Activity A Activity B Activity C
Product I Product II
ok
Customer a Customer b Customer c Customer d
14
66. Expense 1 Expense 2 Expense 3
ok
Activity A Activity B Activity C
ok
Product I Product II
ok
Customer a Customer b Customer c Customer d
14
67. Expense 1 Expense 2 Expense 3
Cost
ok
Activity A Activity B Activity C
ok
Product I Product II
ok
Customer a Customer b Customer c Customer d
15
68. Expense 1 Expense 2 Expense 3
Cost
ok
Activity A Activity B Activity C
ok
Revenue
Product I Product II
ok
Customer a Customer b Customer c Customer d
15
69. Expense 1 Expense 2 Expense 3
Cost
ok
Activity A Activity B Activity C
Proļ¬t
ok
Revenue
Product I Product II
ok
Customer a Customer b Customer c Customer d
15
70. Expense 1 Expense 2 Expense 3
ok
Activity A Activity B Activity C
ok
Product I Product II
ok
Customer a Customer b Customer c Customer d
16
71. Expense 1 Expense 2 Expense 3
ok
Activity A Activity B Activity C
ok
Product I Product II
ok
Customer a Customer b Customer c Customer d
16
72. Expense 1 Expense 2 Expense 3
ok
Activity A Activity B Activity C
ok
Product I Product II
ok
Customer a Customer b Customer c Customer d
16
73. Expense 1 Expense 2 Expense 3
ok
Activity A Activity B Activity C
ok
Product I Product II
ok
Customer a Customer b Customer c Customer d
16
74. Expense 1 Expense 2 Expense 3
ok
Activity A Activity B Activity C
ok
Product I Product II
ok
Customer a Customer b Customer c Customer d
16
75. Expense 1 Expense 2 Expense 3
ok
Activity A Activity B Activity C
ok
Product I Product II
ok
Customer a Customer b Customer c Customer d
16
76. Expense 1 Expense 2 Expense 3
ok
Activity A Activity B Activity C
ok
Product I Product II
ok
Customer a Customer b Customer c Customer d
16
77. Expense 1 Expense 2 Expense 3
Cost
ok
Activity A Activity B Activity C
Proļ¬t
ok
Revenue
Product I Product II
ok
Customer a Customer b Customer c Customer d
17
78. Expense 1 Expense 2 Expense 3
Cost
Cost
ok
Activity A Activity B Activity C
Proļ¬t
ok
Revenue
Product I Product II
ok
Customer a Customer b Customer c Customer d
17
79. Expense 1 Expense 2 Expense 3
Cost
Cost
ok
Activity A Activity B Activity C
Proļ¬t
ok
Revenue
Product I Product II
ok
Customer a Customer b Customer c Customer d
17
80. Expense 1 Expense 2 Expense 3
Cost
Cost
ok
Activity A Activity B Activity C
Proļ¬t
ok
Revenue
Product I Product II
ok
Customer a Customer b Customer c Customer d
17
87. Typical Engagement
ā¢ Overview of Approach
ā¢ Gathering of Data
ā¢ Creation of Model
ā¢ Running the Numbers
ā¢ Visual Analysis of Results
19
88. RapidBusinessModeling ā Improving Profitability
Hans-Gerlach Woudboer
Owner and Founder of RapidBusinessModeling
10 years experience as proļ¬tability consultant
27 years ExxonMobil
Master degree Aachen University of Technology
Dr. Thomas Laussermair
President of Visualign Consulting
20 years experience in software engineering, business analysis
Siemens, Microsoft, Citrix Systems
Ph.D. Technical University Munich
RapidBusinessModeling.de Visualign.net
Hans-Gerlach Woudboer Thomas Laussermair
+49 160 530 1809 20 +1 954 802 7577 1
Editor's Notes
From my slides:\nDo You Know Your Customers True Profitability?\nDoes your company have any unprofitable customers?\nHow much money do you leave on the table with your customers?\nWhat profit does each of your customer add or destroy to your companies profit?\nHow much profit do you make or lose with activities and services performed for your customers?\nWe can help you to answer all of those questions\nConservatively we improve your bottom-line by 3- 6% of revenue\n \nwe can simulate your business allowing you to make your decisions based on facts and not guesses. For strategic for tactical but most importantly for the day to day operational decisions. Your people will decide like you were always in their ear!\nshow you how to start harvesting rapidly on making your day to day order transaction always profitable. Many small changes which accumulate to a huge mountain of success.\n \nA first glance approach for $2k\n    Based on your data available or of the top\n    early assessment of Potentials of CustomerProfitabilityImprovement\n    Report on where to focus on\n \nA more in depth approach for $10k\n    Based on your data available\nand interviews\n    more detailed Potentials of CustomerProfitabilityImprovement\n    detailed Report on where to focus ...\n \nUltimate Customer Profitability Improvement Solution\nfor good to repeat by your organisation semi -automatically\n \n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
ABC’s basic premises: Cost objects consume activities, which consume resources, which drives costs.\n\nABC intends to calculate “real cost” of cost objects (activities, processes, products, services).\n\nCost drivers are used to group costs into activity cost pools.\n\nABC Pro’s:\n+ offers a way to analyze cost and identify activities which add value\n+ can improve organization performance by increasing cost visibility\n+ can be used as a management tool for better allocation of resources\n+ offers a competitive cost advantage\n\nABC Con’s:\n- implementation is expensive and difficult (without proper tools and solutions)\n\n
ABC’s basic premises: Cost objects consume activities, which consume resources, which drives costs.\n\nABC intends to calculate “real cost” of cost objects (activities, processes, products, services).\n\nCost drivers are used to group costs into activity cost pools.\n\nABC Pro’s:\n+ offers a way to analyze cost and identify activities which add value\n+ can improve organization performance by increasing cost visibility\n+ can be used as a management tool for better allocation of resources\n+ offers a competitive cost advantage\n\nABC Con’s:\n- implementation is expensive and difficult (without proper tools and solutions)\n\n
ABC’s basic premises: Cost objects consume activities, which consume resources, which drives costs.\n\nABC intends to calculate “real cost” of cost objects (activities, processes, products, services).\n\nCost drivers are used to group costs into activity cost pools.\n\nABC Pro’s:\n+ offers a way to analyze cost and identify activities which add value\n+ can improve organization performance by increasing cost visibility\n+ can be used as a management tool for better allocation of resources\n+ offers a competitive cost advantage\n\nABC Con’s:\n- implementation is expensive and difficult (without proper tools and solutions)\n\n
ABC’s basic premises: Cost objects consume activities, which consume resources, which drives costs.\n\nABC intends to calculate “real cost” of cost objects (activities, processes, products, services).\n\nCost drivers are used to group costs into activity cost pools.\n\nABC Pro’s:\n+ offers a way to analyze cost and identify activities which add value\n+ can improve organization performance by increasing cost visibility\n+ can be used as a management tool for better allocation of resources\n+ offers a competitive cost advantage\n\nABC Con’s:\n- implementation is expensive and difficult (without proper tools and solutions)\n\n
ABC’s basic premises: Cost objects consume activities, which consume resources, which drives costs.\n\nABC intends to calculate “real cost” of cost objects (activities, processes, products, services).\n\nCost drivers are used to group costs into activity cost pools.\n\nABC Pro’s:\n+ offers a way to analyze cost and identify activities which add value\n+ can improve organization performance by increasing cost visibility\n+ can be used as a management tool for better allocation of resources\n+ offers a competitive cost advantage\n\nABC Con’s:\n- implementation is expensive and difficult (without proper tools and solutions)\n\n
ABC’s basic premises: Cost objects consume activities, which consume resources, which drives costs.\n\nABC intends to calculate “real cost” of cost objects (activities, processes, products, services).\n\nCost drivers are used to group costs into activity cost pools.\n\nABC Pro’s:\n+ offers a way to analyze cost and identify activities which add value\n+ can improve organization performance by increasing cost visibility\n+ can be used as a management tool for better allocation of resources\n+ offers a competitive cost advantage\n\nABC Con’s:\n- implementation is expensive and difficult (without proper tools and solutions)\n\n
ABC’s basic premises: Cost objects consume activities, which consume resources, which drives costs.\n\nABC intends to calculate “real cost” of cost objects (activities, processes, products, services).\n\nCost drivers are used to group costs into activity cost pools.\n\nABC Pro’s:\n+ offers a way to analyze cost and identify activities which add value\n+ can improve organization performance by increasing cost visibility\n+ can be used as a management tool for better allocation of resources\n+ offers a competitive cost advantage\n\nABC Con’s:\n- implementation is expensive and difficult (without proper tools and solutions)\n\n