SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 68
ETHICS
  Rule 1.13 in Context
    Wendy Gerwick Couture
       Associate Professor
University of Idaho College of Law
     wgcouture@uidaho.edu
Rule 1.13 in Context
Rule 1.13 (b)-(e)
Rule 1.13 (a), (f) & (g)
                           Reporting Up the
  Entity As Client
                                Chain
Rule 1.13 (b)-(e)
   Rule 1.13 (a), (f) & (g)
                                 Reporting Up the
     Entity As Client
                                      Chain




Representing      Representing
  ONLY the          the Entity
   Entity             AND a
                   Constituent
Rule 1.13 (b)-(e)
   Rule 1.13 (a), (f) & (g)
                                 Reporting Up the
     Entity As Client
                                      Chain




Representing      Representing
  ONLY the          the Entity
   Entity             AND a
                   Constituent
Rule 1.13 (a), (f)   Representing   Treatment of Information
     & (g)             ONLY the         When Interacting
Entity As Client
                        Entity         With A Constituent
                                          “One-Way Door”
Rule 1.13 (a), (f)        Representing             Treatment of Information
      & (g)                  ONLY the                   When Interacting
 Entity As Client
                              Entity                   With A Constituent
                                                             “One-Way Door”



Information Learned From Constituent is Client’s Information
    • Attorney should share the information with the entity’s leadership, to the extent
      necessary to keep the client “reasonably informed about the status of the
      matter.” R. 1.4(a)(3).
    • The entity can decide whether to disclose that information to third parties. R.
      1.6(a).
Rule 1.13 (a), (f)        Representing             Treatment of Information
      & (g)                  ONLY the                   When Interacting
 Entity As Client
                              Entity                   With A Constituent
                                                             “One-Way Door”



Information Learned From Constituent is Client’s Information
    • Attorney should share the information with the entity’s leadership, to the extent
      necessary to keep the client “reasonably informed about the status of the
      matter.” R. 1.4(a)(3).
    • The entity can decide whether to disclose that information to third parties. R.
      1.6(a).


Attorney Can’t Share Client’s Information with Constituent Unless Authorized
    • Authorization can be either express or implied “in order to carry out the
      representation.” R. 1.6(a).
Rule 1.13 (a), (f)   Representing
                                    Warnings to Constituent When
     & (g)             ONLY the
Entity As Client                     Interacting With Constituent
                        Entity
Rule 1.13 (a), (f)      Representing
                                           Warnings to Constituent When
         & (g)                ONLY the
    Entity As Client                        Interacting With Constituent
                               Entity

Rule 1.13(f)      Upjohn Warning    Rule 4.3       Rule 4.3   Rest. (3d) Law
                                                               Governing
                                                              Lawyers § 14
Rule 1.13 (a), (f)      Representing
                                               Warnings to Constituent When
             & (g)                ONLY the
        Entity As Client                        Interacting With Constituent
                                   Entity

  Rule 1.13(f)        Upjohn Warning    Rule 4.3       Rule 4.3   Rest. (3d) Law
If know or                                                         Governing
reasonably should                                                 Lawyers § 14
know that the
organization’s
interests are
adverse to those of
constituent
Rule 1.13 (a), (f)              Representing
                                                                Warnings to Constituent When
             & (g)                        ONLY the
        Entity As Client                                         Interacting With Constituent
                                           Entity

  Rule 1.13(f)             Upjohn Warning              Rule 4.3         Rule 4.3   Rest. (3d) Law
If know or                                                                          Governing
reasonably should                                                                  Lawyers § 14
know that the
organization’s
interests are
adverse to those of
constituent




Identity of           Constituent   Discussions between
client                may wish to   constituent & lawyer
(lawyer’s not         obtain own    are protected by entity’s
disinterested;        lawyer        attorney-client
lawyer doesn’t                      privilege, subject to
represent                           waiver at entity’s sole
constituent)                        discretion
Rule 1.13 (a), (f)               Representing
                                                                 Warnings to Constituent When
             & (g)                         ONLY the
        Entity As Client                                          Interacting With Constituent
                                            Entity

  Rule 1.13(f)             Upjohn Warning               Rule 4.3         Rule 4.3   Rest. (3d) Law
If know or                To ensure that                                             Governing
reasonably should         communications                                            Lawyers § 14
know that the             between constituent &
organization’s            attorney are protected
interests are             by the entity’s
adverse to those of       attorney-client
constituent               privilege




Identity of           Constituent    Discussions between
client                may wish to    constituent & lawyer
(lawyer’s not         obtain own     are protected by entity’s
disinterested;        lawyer         attorney-client
lawyer doesn’t                       privilege, subject to
represent                            waiver at entity’s sole
constituent)                         discretion
Rule 1.13 (a), (f)               Representing
                                                                 Warnings to Constituent When
             & (g)                         ONLY the
        Entity As Client                                          Interacting With Constituent
                                            Entity

  Rule 1.13(f)             Upjohn Warning               Rule 4.3             Rule 4.3          Rest. (3d) Law
If know or                To ensure that                                                        Governing
reasonably should         communications                                                       Lawyers § 14
know that the             between constituent &
organization’s            attorney are protected
interests are             by the entity’s
adverse to those of       attorney-client
constituent               privilege




Identity of           Constituent    Discussions between         Interview is       Content of
client                may wish to    constituent & lawyer        being conducted    interview
(lawyer’s not         obtain own     are protected by entity’s   to gather facts    should be
disinterested;        lawyer         attorney-client             in order to        kept
lawyer doesn’t                       privilege, subject to       provide legal      confidential
represent                            waiver at entity’s sole     advice to entity
constituent)                         discretion
Rule 1.13 (a), (f)               Representing
                                                                  Warnings to Constituent When
             & (g)                         ONLY the
        Entity As Client                                           Interacting With Constituent
                                            Entity

  Rule 1.13(f)             Upjohn Warning               Rule 4.3              Rule 4.3          Rest. (3d) Law
If know or                To ensure that            If know or should                            Governing
reasonably should         communications            know that                                   Lawyers § 14
know that the             between constituent &     unrepresented
organization’s            attorney are protected    person
interests are             by the attorney-client    misunderstands
adverse to those of       privilege                 the lawyer’s role
constituent




Identity of           Constituent    Discussions between          Interview is       Content of
client                may wish to    constituent & lawyer         being conducted    interview
(lawyer’s not         obtain own     are protected by entity’s    to gather facts    should be
disinterested;        lawyer         attorney-client              in order to        kept
lawyer doesn’t                       privilege, subject to        provide legal      confidential
represent                            waiver at entity’s sole      advice to entity
constituent)                         discretion
Rule 1.13 (a), (f)               Representing
                                                                  Warnings to Constituent When
             & (g)                         ONLY the
        Entity As Client                                           Interacting With Constituent
                                            Entity

  Rule 1.13(f)             Upjohn Warning               Rule 4.3              Rule 4.3          Rest. (3d) Law
If know or                To ensure that            If know or should                            Governing
reasonably should         communications            know that                                   Lawyers § 14
know that the             between constituent &     unrepresented
organization’s            attorney are protected    person
interests are             by the attorney-client    misunderstands
adverse to those of       privilege                 the lawyer’s role
constituent




Identity of           Constituent    Discussions between          Interview is       Content of
client                may wish to    constituent & lawyer         being conducted    interview
(lawyer’s not         obtain own     are protected by entity’s    to gather facts    should be
disinterested;        lawyer         attorney-client              in order to        kept
lawyer doesn’t                       privilege, subject to        provide legal      confidential
represent                            waiver at entity’s sole      advice to entity
constituent)                         discretion
Rule 1.13 (a), (f)               Representing
                                                                  Warnings to Constituent When
             & (g)                         ONLY the
        Entity As Client                                           Interacting With Constituent
                                            Entity

  Rule 1.13(f)             Upjohn Warning               Rule 4.3              Rule 4.3             Rest. (3d) Law
If know or                To ensure that            If know or should    If know or reasonably      Governing
reasonably should         communications            know that            should know that          Lawyers § 14
know that the             between constituent &     unrepresented        unrepresented
organization’s            attorney are protected    person               person’s interests
interests are             by the attorney-client    misunderstands       have a reasonable
adverse to those of       privilege                 the lawyer’s role    possibility of being in
constituent                                                              conflict with entity’s
                                                                         interest




Identity of           Constituent    Discussions between          Interview is        Content of      No legal
client                may wish to    constituent & lawyer         being conducted     interview       advice, oth
(lawyer’s not         obtain own     are protected by entity’s    to gather facts     should be       er than
disinterested;        lawyer         attorney-client              in order to         kept            advice to
lawyer doesn’t                       privilege, subject to        provide legal       confidential    secure
represent                            waiver at entity’s sole      advice to entity                    counsel
constituent)                         discretion
Rule 1.13 (a), (f)               Representing
                                                                  Warnings to Constituent When
             & (g)                         ONLY the
        Entity As Client                                           Interacting With Constituent
                                            Entity

  Rule 1.13(f)             Upjohn Warning               Rule 4.3              Rule 4.3             Rest. (3d) Law
If know or                To ensure that            If know or should    If know or reasonably      Governing
reasonably should         communications            know that            should know that          Lawyers § 14
know that the             between constituent &     unrepresented        unrepresented
organization’s            attorney are protected    person               person’s interests
interests are             by the attorney-client    misunderstands       have a reasonable
adverse to those of       privilege                 the lawyer’s role    possibility of being in
constituent                                                              conflict with entity’s
                                                                         interest




Identity of           Constituent    Discussions between          Interview is        Content of      No legal
client                may wish to    constituent & lawyer         being conducted     interview       advice, oth
(lawyer’s not         obtain own     are protected by entity’s    to gather facts     should be       er than
disinterested;        lawyer         attorney-client              in order to         kept            advice to
lawyer doesn’t                       privilege, subject to        provide legal       confidential    secure
represent                            waiver at entity’s sole      advice to entity                    counsel
constituent)                         discretion
Rule 1.13 (a), (f)               Representing
                                                                  Warnings to Constituent When
             & (g)                         ONLY the
        Entity As Client                                           Interacting With Constituent
                                            Entity

  Rule 1.13(f)             Upjohn Warning               Rule 4.3              Rule 4.3             Rest. (3d) Law
If know or                To ensure that            If know or should    If know or reasonably      Governing
reasonably should         communications            know that            should know that          Lawyers § 14
know that the             between constituent &     unrepresented        unrepresented
                                                                                                   To prevent
organization’s            attorney are protected    person               person’s interests
                                                                                                   creation of an
interests are             by the attorney-client    misunderstands       have a reasonable
                                                                                                   implied attorney-
adverse to those of       privilege                 the lawyer’s role    possibility of being in
                                                                                                   client relationship
constituent                                                              conflict with entity’s
                                                                         interest




Identity of           Constituent    Discussions between          Interview is        Content of        No legal
client                may wish to    constituent & lawyer         being conducted     interview         advice, oth
(lawyer’s not         obtain own     are protected by entity’s    to gather facts     should be         er than
disinterested;        lawyer         attorney-client              in order to         kept              advice to
lawyer doesn’t                       privilege, subject to        provide legal       confidential      secure
represent                            waiver at entity’s sole      advice to entity                      counsel
constituent)                         discretion
Rule 1.13 (a), (f)               Representing
                                                                  Warnings to Constituent When
             & (g)                         ONLY the
        Entity As Client                                           Interacting With Constituent
                                            Entity

  Rule 1.13(f)             Upjohn Warning               Rule 4.3              Rule 4.3             Rest. (3d) Law
If know or                To ensure that            If know or should    If know or reasonably      Governing
reasonably should         communications            know that            should know that          Lawyers § 14
know that the             between constituent &     unrepresented        unrepresented
                                                                                                   To prevent
organization’s            attorney are protected    person               person’s interests
                                                                                                   creation of an
interests are             by the attorney-client    misunderstands       have a reasonable
                                                                                                   implied attorney-
adverse to those of       privilege                 the lawyer’s role    possibility of being in
                                                                                                   client relationship
constituent                                                              conflict with entity’s
                                                                         interest




Identity of           Constituent    Discussions between          Interview is        Content of        No legal
client                may wish to    constituent & lawyer         being conducted     interview         advice, oth
(lawyer’s not         obtain own     are protected by entity’s    to gather facts     should be         er than
disinterested;        lawyer         attorney-client              in order to         kept              advice to
lawyer doesn’t                       privilege, subject to        provide legal       confidential      secure
represent                            waiver at entity’s sole      advice to entity                      counsel
constituent)                         discretion
Rule 1.13 (b)-(e)
   Rule 1.13 (a), (f) & (g)
                                 Reporting Up the
     Entity As Client
                                      Chain




Representing      Representing
  ONLY the          the Entity
   Entity             AND a
                   Constituent
Rule 1.13 (a), (f)
                     Representing
                       the Entity   CONFLICT Analysis
     & (g)
Entity As Client         AND a
                      Constituent
Rule 1.13 (a), (f)
                           Representing
                             the Entity   CONFLICTS Analysis
        & (g)
   Entity As Client            AND a
                            Constituent



R. 1.7 - Is there a current
conflict?
- Two are directly adverse
- Significant risk that
   representation of one will
   be materially limited by
   responsibilities to other
Rule 1.13 (a), (f)
                           Representing
                             the Entity   CONFLICT Analysis
        & (g)
   Entity As Client            AND a
                            Constituent



R. 1.7 - Is there a current
conflict?
- Two are directly adverse
- Significant risk that
   representation of one will
   be materially limited by
   responsibilities to other


If lawyer reasonably believes
can nonetheless represent
both competently &
diligently, OK if each client
gives informed
consent, confirmed in writing.
Rule 1.13 (a), (f)
                           Representing
                             the Entity             CONFLICT Analysis
        & (g)
   Entity As Client            AND a
                            Constituent

                                          R. 1.7 - Is there a potential
                                          future conflict?
R. 1.7 - Is there a current
conflict?
- Two are directly adverse
- Significant risk that
   representation of one will
   be materially limited by
   responsibilities to other


If lawyer reasonably believes
can nonetheless represent
both competently &
diligently, OK if each client
gives informed
consent, confirmed in writing.
Rule 1.13 (a), (f)
                           Representing
                             the Entity             CONFLICT Analysis
        & (g)
   Entity As Client            AND a
                            Constituent

                                          R. 1.7 - Is there a potential
                                          future conflict?
R. 1.7 - Is there a current
conflict?
- Two are directly adverse                         Yes, there is.
- Significant risk that
   representation of one will
   be materially limited by
   responsibilities to other


If lawyer reasonably believes
can nonetheless represent
both competently &
diligently, OK if each client
gives informed
consent, confirmed in writing.
Rule 1.13 (a), (f)
                           Representing
                             the Entity                CONFLICT Analysis
        & (g)
   Entity As Client            AND a
                            Constituent

                                             R. 1.7 - Is there a potential
                                             future conflict?
R. 1.7 - Is there a current
conflict?
- Two are directly adverse                             Yes, there is.
- Significant risk that
   representation of one will
   be materially limited by      R. 1.7 cmt. 22 –
   responsibilities to other     Prospective waiver
                                 of conflict may be
                                 effective
If lawyer reasonably believes    - Depends on the
can nonetheless represent        extent to which the
both competently &               client reasonably
diligently, OK if each client    understands the
gives informed                   material risks that
consent, confirmed in writing.   the waiver entails
Rule 1.13 (a), (f)
                           Representing
                             the Entity                CONFLICT Analysis
        & (g)
   Entity As Client            AND a
                            Constituent

                                             R. 1.7 - Is there a potential
                                             future conflict?
R. 1.7 - Is there a current
conflict?
- Two are directly adverse                             Yes, there is.
- Significant risk that
   representation of one will
   be materially limited by      R. 1.7 cmt. 22 –        R. 1.7 cmt. 29; R. 1.9 – If
   responsibilities to other     Prospective waiver      common representation
                                 of conflict may be      fails, ordinarily must withdraw
                                 effective               from representation of
If lawyer reasonably believes    - Depends on the        all, absent informed consent of
can nonetheless represent        extent to which the     both
both competently &               client reasonably
diligently, OK if each client    understands the
gives informed                   material risks that
consent, confirmed in writing.   the waiver entails
Rule 1.13 (a), (f)
                           Representing
                             the Entity                CONFLICT Analysis
        & (g)
   Entity As Client            AND a
                            Constituent

                                             R. 1.7 - Is there a potential
                                             future conflict?
R. 1.7 - Is there a current
conflict?
- Two are directly adverse                             Yes, there is.
- Significant risk that
   representation of one will
   be materially limited by      R. 1.7 cmt. 22 –        R. 1.7 cmt. 29; R. 1.9 – If
   responsibilities to other     Prospective waiver      common representation
                                 of conflict may be      fails, ordinarily must withdraw
                                 effective               from representation of
If lawyer reasonably believes    - Depends on the        all, absent informed consent of
can nonetheless represent        extent to which the     both
both competently &               client reasonably
diligently, OK if each client    understands the         BUT, constituent might be
gives informed                   material risks that     able to give this consent
consent, confirmed in writing.   the waiver entails      prospectively
Rule 1.13 (a), (f) & (g)
                                   Entity As Client

      Representing                                    Representing
        ONLY the                                        the Entity
         Entity                                           AND a
                                                       Constituent
                 Application in Context of Entity Formation
Some authority that can represent ONLY yet-to-be-formed entity, if

     • Clarify at initial meeting that representing entity only
     • Specify in engagement agreement that:
                     -represent entity only, not constituents
                     - organizers agree to ratify on behalf of entity upon formation
                     - information communicated by constituents will be communicated
                     with entity’s other decision-makers
     • Abide by Rule 4.3 re: dealing with unrepresented constituents

State Bar of Ariz. Ethics Op. 02-06; see also Jesse v. Danforth, 869 P.2d 1203 (Wis. 1992).
Rule 1.13 (b)-(e)
   Rule 1.13 (a), (f) & (g)
                                   Reporting Up the
     Entity As Client
                                        Chain

                                   Initial Reporting Duty

                                 Duty to Continue Reporting
Representing                            Up the Chain
                  Representing
  ONLY the          the Entity
   Entity             AND a        Option to Report Out
                   Constituent
Rule 1.13 (b)-(e)
   Rule 1.13 (a), (f) & (g)
                                   Reporting Up the
     Entity As Client
                                        Chain

                                   Initial Reporting Duty

                                 Duty to Continue Reporting
Representing                            Up the Chain
                  Representing
  ONLY the          the Entity
   Entity             AND a        Option to Report Out
                   Constituent
Initial Reporting Duty
 Rule 1.13




  SEC Rule
 17 C.F.R. §
205.1 et seq.
Initial Reporting Duty
        Rule 1.13

IF lawyer for organization knows that:
 constituent is engaged in action, intends to act, or refuses to
  act
 in a matter related to representation
 that is a violation of legal obligation to the organization OR a
  violation of law that reasonably might be imputed to the
  organization
 that is likely to result in substantial injury to the organization

        SEC Rule
       17 C.F.R. §
      205.1 et seq.
Initial Reporting Duty       THEN shall proceed as is
        Rule 1.13
                                                                       reasonably necessary in
IF lawyer for organization knows that:                                 the best interest of the
 constituent is engaged in action, intends to act, or refuses to      organization
  act
 in a matter related to representation
 that is a violation of legal obligation to the organization OR a
  violation of law that reasonably might be imputed to the
  organization
 that is likely to result in substantial injury to the organization

        SEC Rule
       17 C.F.R. §
      205.1 et seq.
Initial Reporting Duty            THEN shall proceed as is
        Rule 1.13
                                                                            reasonably necessary in
IF lawyer for organization knows that:                                      the best interest of the
 constituent is engaged in action, intends to act, or refuses to           organization
  act
 in a matter related to representation
 that is a violation of legal obligation to the organization OR a     UNLESS lawyer reasonably believes
  violation of law that reasonably might be imputed to the             that isn’t necessary in the best
  organization                                                         interest of the organization to do
 that is likely to result in substantial injury to the organization   so, lawyer shall refer the matter to
                                                                       higher authority in the organization
        SEC Rule
       17 C.F.R. §
      205.1 et seq.
Initial Reporting Duty            THEN shall proceed as is
        Rule 1.13
                                                                            reasonably necessary in
IF lawyer for organization knows that:                                      the best interest of the
 constituent is engaged in action, intends to act, or refuses to           organization
  act
 in a matter related to representation
 that is a violation of legal obligation to the organization OR a     UNLESS lawyer reasonably believes
  violation of law that reasonably might be imputed to the             that isn’t necessary in the best
  organization                                                         interest of the organization to do
 that is likely to result in substantial injury to the organization   so, lawyer shall refer the matter to
                                                                       higher authority in the organization
        SEC Rule
       17 C.F.R. §
      205.1 et seq.
IF an attorney,
appearing and practicing before the SEC,
becomes aware of evidence of:
 a material violation
 by the issuer or by any officer, director, employee, or
    agent of the issuer
Initial Reporting Duty            THEN shall proceed as is
        Rule 1.13
                                                                            reasonably necessary in
IF lawyer for organization knows that:                                      the best interest of the
 constituent is engaged in action, intends to act, or refuses to           organization
  act
 in a matter related to representation
 that is a violation of legal obligation to the organization OR a     UNLESS lawyer reasonably believes
  violation of law that reasonably might be imputed to the             that isn’t necessary in the best
  organization                                                         interest of the organization to do
 that is likely to result in substantial injury to the organization   so, lawyer shall refer the matter to
                                                                       higher authority in the organization
        SEC Rule
       17 C.F.R. §
      205.1 et seq.
IF an attorney,                                                              THEN shall report such
appearing and practicing before the SEC,                                     evidence to:
becomes aware of evidence of:                                                - the issuer’s chief legal
 a material violation                                                          officer, OR
 by the issuer or by any officer, director, employee, or                    - the issuer’s chief legal
    agent of the issuer                                                         officer and the
                                                                                CEO, OR
                                                                             - the issuer’s “qualified
                                                                                legal compliance
                                                                                committee,” if formed
Initial Reporting Duty            THEN shall proceed as is
        Rule 1.13
                                                                            reasonably necessary in
IF lawyer for organization knows that:                                      the best interest of the
 constituent is engaged in action, intends to act, or refuses to           organization
  act
 in a matter related to representation
 that is a violation of legal obligation to the organization OR a     UNLESS lawyer reasonably believes
  violation of law that reasonably might be imputed to the             that isn’t necessary in the best
  organization                                                         interest of the organization to do
 that is likely to result in substantial injury to the organization   so, lawyer shall refer the matter to
                                                                       higher authority in the organization
        SEC Rule
       17 C.F.R. §
      205.1 et seq.
IF an attorney,                                                              THEN shall report such
appearing and practicing before the SEC,                                     evidence to:
becomes aware of evidence of:                                                - the issuer’s chief legal
 a material violation                                                          officer, OR
 by the issuer or by any officer, director, employee, or                    - the issuer’s chief legal
    agent of the issuer                                                         officer and the
                                                                                CEO, OR
                                                                             - the issuer’s “qualified
                                                                                legal compliance
Similarities – up-the-chain; shall                                              committee,” if formed
Initial Reporting Duty            THEN shall proceed as is
        Rule 1.13
                                                                            reasonably necessary in
IF lawyer for organization knows that:                                      the best interest of the
 constituent is engaged in action, intends to act, or refuses to           organization
  act
 in a matter related to representation
 that is a violation of legal obligation to the organization OR a     UNLESS lawyer reasonably believes
  violation of law that reasonably might be imputed to the             that isn’t necessary in the best
  organization                                                         interest of the organization to do
 that is likely to result in substantial injury to the organization   so, lawyer shall refer the matter to
                                includes providing advice              higher authority in the organization
        SEC Rule                on securities laws re: any
       17 C.F.R. §              document to be
      205.1 et seq.             submitted to SEC
IF an attorney,                                                              THEN shall report such
appearing and practicing before the SEC,                                     evidence to:
becomes aware of evidence of:                                                - the issuer’s chief legal
 a material violation                                                          officer, OR
 by the issuer OR by any officer, director, employee, or                    - the issuer’s chief legal
    agent of the issuer                                                         officer and the
                                                                                CEO, OR
                                                                             - the issuer’s “qualified
                                                                                legal compliance
                                                                                committee,” if formed
Initial Reporting Duty            THEN shall proceed as is
        Rule 1.13
                                                                            reasonably necessary in
IF lawyer for organization knows that:                                      the best interest of the
 constituent is engaged in action, intends to act, or refuses to           organization
  act
 in a matter related to representation
 that is a violation of legal obligation to the organization OR a     UNLESS lawyer reasonably believes
  violation of law that reasonably might be imputed to the             that isn’t necessary in the best
  organization                                                         interest of the organization to do
 that is likely to result in substantial injury to the organization   so, lawyer shall refer the matter to
                                                                       higher authority in the organization
        SEC Rule
       17 C.F.R. §
      205.1 et seq.
IF an attorney,                                                              THEN shall report such
appearing and practicing before the SEC,                                     evidence to:
becomes aware of evidence of:                                                - the issuer’s chief legal
 a material violation                                                          officer, OR
 by the issuer OR by any officer, director, employee, or                    - the issuer’s chief legal
    agent of the issuer                                                         officer and the
                                                                                CEO, OR
   means a reporting issuer                                                  - the issuer’s “qualified
                                                                                legal compliance
                                                                                committee,” if formed
Initial Reporting Duty of
                                            denotes actual knowledge
                                                                              THEN shall proceed as is
        Rule 1.13                           the fact in question, which may
                                            be inferred from circumstances    reasonably necessary in
IF lawyer for organization knows that:                                        the best interest of the
 constituent is engaged in action, intends to act, or refuses to             organization
  act
 in a matter related to representation
 that is a violation of legal obligation to the organization OR a      UNLESS lawyer reasonably believes
  violation of law that reasonably might be imputed to the              that isn’t necessary in the best
  organization                                                          interest of the organization to do
 that is likely to result in substantial injury to the organization    so, lawyer shall refer the matter to
                                                                        higher authority in the organization
        SEC Rule
       17 C.F.R. §
      205.1 et seq.
IF an attorney,                                                               THEN shall report such
appearing and practicing before the SEC,                                      evidence to:
becomes aware of evidence of:                                                 - the issuer’s chief legal
 a material violation                                                           officer, OR
 by the issuer OR by any officer, director, employee, or                     - the issuer’s chief legal
    agent of the issuer                                                          officer and the CEO,
                 means credible evidence, based upon which it                    OR
                 would be unreasonable, under the                             - the issuer’s “qualified
                 circumstances, for a prudent & competent                        legal compliance
                 attorney not to conclude that a violation has                   committee,” if formed
                 occurred, is ongoing, or is about to occur
Initial Reporting Duty            THEN shall proceed as is
        Rule 1.13
                                                                            reasonably necessary in
IF lawyer for organization knows that:                                      the best interest of the
 constituent is engaged in action, intends to act, or refuses to           organization
  act
 in a matter related to representation
 that is a violation of legal obligation to the organization OR a     UNLESS lawyer reasonably believes
  violation of law that reasonably might be imputed to the             that isn’t necessary in the best
  organization                                                         interest of the organization to do
 that is likely to result in substantial injury to the organization   so, lawyer shall refer the matter to
                                                                       higher authority in the organization
        SEC Rule
       17 C.F.R. §
      205.1 et seq.
IF an attorney,                                                              THEN shall report such
appearing and practicing before the SEC,                                     evidence to:
becomes aware of evidence of:                                                - the issuer’s chief legal
 a material violation                                                          officer, OR
 by the issuer OR by any officer, director, employee, or                    - the issuer’s chief legal
    agent of the issuer                                                         officer and the
                                                                                CEO, OR
                 means a material violation of a federal or state
                 securities law, a material breach of fiduciary duty
                                                                             - the issuer’s “qualified
                 arising under federal or state law, or a similar               legal compliance
                 material violation of any federal or state law                 committee,” if formed
Initial Reporting Duty            THEN shall proceed as is
        Rule 1.13
                                                                            reasonably necessary in
IF lawyer for organization knows that:                                      the best interest of the
 constituent is engaged in action, intends to act, or refuses to           organization
  act
 in a matter related to representation
 that is a violation of legal obligation to the organization OR a     UNLESS lawyer reasonably believes
  violation of law that reasonably might be imputed to the
                                   allows lawyer more flexibility      that isn’t necessary in the best
  organization                     under some                          interest of the organization to do so,
 that is likely to result in substantial injury to the organization
                                   circumstances, such as a            lawyer shall refer the matter to
                                   constituent’s innocent              higher authority in the organization
        SEC Rule                   misunderstanding of the
       17 C.F.R. §                 law, which the lawyer can
     205.1 et seq.                 correct by advising constituent

IF an attorney,                                                              THEN shall report such
appearing and practicing before the SEC,                                     evidence to:
becomes aware of evidence of:                                                - the issuer’s chief legal
 a material violation                                                          officer, OR
 by the issuer OR by any officer, director, employee, or                    - the issuer’s chief legal
    agent of the issuer                                                         officer and the
                                                                                CEO, OR
                                                                             - the issuer’s “qualified
                                                                                legal compliance
                                                                                committee,” if formed
Initial Reporting Duty


              SEC Rule
              17 C.F.R.
Rule 1.13      § 205.1
                et seq.
Rule 1.13 (b)-(e)
   Rule 1.13 (a), (f) & (g)
                                   Reporting Up the
     Entity As Client
                                        Chain

                                   Initial Reporting Duty

                                 Duty to Continue Reporting
Representing                            Up the Chain
                  Representing
  ONLY the          the Entity
   Entity             AND a        Option to Report Out
                   Constituent
Duty to Continue Reporting Up the Chain
 Rule 1.13




  SEC Rule
 17 C.F.R. §
205.1 et seq.
Duty to Continue Reporting Up the Chain
       Rule 1.13
Unless the lawyer reasonably believes that it is not necessary
in the best interest of the organization to do so, the lawyer
shall refer the matter to higher authority in the
organization, including, if warranted by the circumstances, to
the highest authority that can act on behalf of the
organization as determined by applicable law.

       SEC Rule
      17 C.F.R. §
     205.1 et seq.
Duty to Continue Reporting Up the Chain
       Rule 1.13
Unless the lawyer reasonably believes that it is not necessary
in the best interest of the organization to do so, the lawyer    “ordinarily will be the board of
shall refer the matter to higher authority in the                directors or similar governing body”
organization, including, if warranted by the circumstances, to
the highest authority that can act on behalf of the
organization as determined by applicable law.

       SEC Rule
      17 C.F.R. §
     205.1 et seq.
Duty to Continue Reporting Up the Chain
       Rule 1.13
Unless the lawyer reasonably believes that it is not necessary
in the best interest of the organization to do so, the lawyer    “ordinarily will be the board of
shall refer the matter to higher authority in the                directors or similar governing body”
organization, including, if warranted by the circumstances, to
the highest authority that can act on behalf of the
organization as determined by applicable law.

       SEC Rule
      17 C.F.R. §
     205.1 et seq.
Unless an attorney who has made a report
reasonably believes that the chief legal officer
or the CEO of the issuer has provided an
appropriate response within a reasonable
time, the attorney shall report the evidence of
a material violation to:
Duty to Continue Reporting Up the Chain
       Rule 1.13
Unless the lawyer reasonably believes that it is not necessary
in the best interest of the organization to do so, the lawyer        “ordinarily will be the board of
shall refer the matter to higher authority in the                    directors or similar governing body”
organization, including, if warranted by the circumstances, to
the highest authority that can act on behalf of the
organization as determined by applicable law.

       SEC Rule
      17 C.F.R. §
     205.1 et seq.
Unless an attorney who has made a report                         •   audit committee of board of
reasonably believes that the chief legal officer                     directors; OR
or the CEO of the issuer has provided an                         •   another committee consisting
appropriate response within a reasonable                             solely of independent directors;
time, the attorney shall report the evidence of                      OR
a material violation to:                                         •   board of directors (if no
                                                                     committee consisting solely of
                                                                     independent directors)
Duty to Continue Reporting Up the Chain
       Rule 1.13
Unless the lawyer reasonably believes that it is not necessary
in the best interest of the organization to do so, the lawyer                 “ordinarily will be the board of
shall refer the matter to higher authority in the                             directors or similar governing body”
organization, including, if warranted by the circumstances, to
the highest authority that can act on behalf of the
organization as determined by applicable law.

       SEC Rule
      17 C.F.R. §
     205.1 et seq.
Unless an attorney who has made a report                                  •   audit committee of board of
reasonably believes that the chief legal officer                              directors; OR
or the CEO of the issuer has provided an                                  •   another committee consisting
appropriate response within a reasonable                                      solely of independent directors;
time, the attorney shall report the evidence of                               OR
a material violation to:                                                  •   board of directors (if no
                                                                              committee consisting solely of
 means that the attorney reasonably believes:
                                                                              independent directors)
 • no material violation occurred, is ongoing, or is about to occur; OR
 • the issuer has adopted appropriate remedial measures; OR
 • the issuer has retained counsel to review the reported evidence
    AND (i) substantially implemented counsel’s remedial
    recommendations, or (ii) been advised that counsel may assert
    colorable defense
Duty to Continue Reporting Up the Chain



                      SEC Rule
                      17 C.F.R.
         Rule 1.13     § 205.1
                        et seq.
Rule 1.13 (b)-(e)
   Rule 1.13 (a), (f) & (g)
                                   Reporting Up the
     Entity As Client
                                        Chain

                                   Initial Reporting Duty

                                 Duty to Continue Reporting
Representing                            Up the Chain
                  Representing
  ONLY the          the Entity
   Entity             AND a        Option to Report Out
                   Constituent
Option to Report Out
       Lawyer may reveal information to extent lawyer reasonably believes necessary:
  Rule             Rule               Rule            17 C.F.R. §        17 C.F.R. §
1.6(b)(2)        1.6(b)(3)           1.13(c)           205.3(d)           205.3(d)
                                                        (2)(i)             (2)(iii)
Option to Report Out
       Lawyer may reveal information to extent lawyer reasonably believes necessary:
  Rule             Rule                Rule             17 C.F.R. §      17 C.F.R. §
1.6(b)(2)        1.6(b)(3)            1.13(c)            205.3(d)         205.3(d)
                                  to prevent             (2)(i)           (2)(iii)
                                   substantial injury
                                   to the
                                   organization

                                  after lawyer
                                   reported
                                   constituent’s
                                   action or
                                   intention to act;

                                  highest authority
                                   that can act on
                                   behalf of
                                   organization
                                   failed to address
                                   in timely &
                                   appropriate
                                   manner;

                                  action or
                                   inaction is a
                                   clear violation of
                                   law
Option to Report Out
             Lawyer may reveal information to extent lawyer reasonably believes necessary:
      Rule                 Rule                     Rule             17 C.F.R. §   17 C.F.R. §
    1.6(b)(2)            1.6(b)(3)                 1.13(c)            205.3(d)      205.3(d)
 to prevent           to                     to prevent             (2)(i)        (2)(iii)
  client from           prevent, mitigat        substantial injury
  committing a          e or rectify            to the
  crime or fraud        substantial             organization
                        injury to the
 that is               financial              after lawyer
  reasonably            interests or            reported
  certain to result     property of             constituent’s
  in substantial        another                 action or
  injury to the                                 intention to act;
  financial            that is
  interests or          reasonably             highest authority
  property of           certain to result       that can act on
  another               or has resulted         behalf of
                        from the client's       organization
 in furtherance        commission of a         failed to address
  of which the          crime or fraud          in timely &
  client has used                               appropriate
  or is using the      in furtherance of       manner;
  lawyer's              which the client
  services              has used the           action or
                        lawyer's services       inaction is a
                                                clear violation of
                                                law
Option to Report Out
             Lawyer may reveal information to extent lawyer reasonably believes necessary:
      Rule                 Rule                     Rule               17 C.F.R. §             17 C.F.R. §
    1.6(b)(2)            1.6(b)(3)                 1.13(c)              205.3(d)                205.3(d)
 to prevent           to                     to prevent               (2)(i)                  (2)(iii)
  client from           prevent, mitigat        substantial injury
                                                                      to prevent issuer     to rectify the
  committing a          e or rectify            to the
                                                                       from committing        consequences of a
  crime or fraud        substantial             organization
                                                                       a material             material violation
                        injury to the
                                                                       violation              by the issuer
 that is               financial              after lawyer
  reasonably            interests or            reported
                                                                      that is likely to     that has caused, or
  certain to result     property of             constituent’s
                                                                       cause                  may
  in substantial        another                 action or
                                                                       substantial            cause, substantial
  injury to the                                 intention to act;
                                                                       injury to the          injury to the
  financial            that is
                                                                       financial interest     financial interest
  interests or          reasonably             highest authority                             or property of the
  property of           certain to result                              or property of
                                                that can act on                               issuer or investors
  another               or has resulted                                the issuer or
                                                behalf of
                        from the client's                              investors
                                                organization                                 in furtherance of
 in furtherance        commission of a         failed to address
  of which the          crime or fraud                                may reveal to          which the
                                                in timely &                                   attorney’s services
  client has used                                                      SEC only
                                                appropriate                                   were used
  or is using the      in furtherance of       manner;
  lawyer's              which the client
                                                                                             may reveal to SEC
  services              has used the           action or                                     only
                        lawyer's services       inaction is a
                                                clear violation of
                                                law
Option to Report Out
             Lawyer may reveal information to extent lawyer reasonably believes necessary:
      Rule                 Rule                     Rule               17 C.F.R. §             17 C.F.R. §
    1.6(b)(2)            1.6(b)(3)                 1.13(c)              205.3(d)                205.3(d)
 to prevent           to                     to prevent               (2)(i)                  (2)(iii)
  client from           prevent, mitigat        substantial injury
                                                                      to prevent issuer     to rectify the
  committing a          e or rectify            to the
                                                                       from committing        consequences of a
  crime or fraud        substantial             organization
                                                                       a material             material violation
                        injury to the
                                                                       violation              by the issuer
 that is               financial              after lawyer
  reasonably            interests or            reported
                                                                      that is likely to     that has caused, or
  certain to result     property of             constituent’s
                                                                       cause                  may
  in substantial        another                 action or
                                                                       substantial            cause, substantial
  injury to the                                 intention to act;
                                                                       injury to the          injury to the
  financial            that is
                                                                       financial interest     financial interest
  interests or          reasonably             highest authority                             or property of the
  property of           certain to result                              or property of
                                                that can act on                               issuer or investors
  another               or has resulted                                the issuer or
                                                behalf of
                        from the client's                              investors
                                                organization fails                           in furtherance of
 in furtherance        commission of a         to address in
  of which the          crime or fraud                                may reveal to          which the
                                                timely &                                      attorney’s services
  client has used                                                      SEC only
                                                appropriate                                   were used
  or is using the      in furtherance of       manner;
  lawyer's              which the client
                                                                                             may reveal to SEC
  services              has used the           action or                                     only
                        lawyer's services       inaction is a
                                                clear violation of
                                                law
Option to Report Out
             Lawyer may reveal information to extent lawyer reasonably believes necessary:
      Rule                 Rule                     Rule               17 C.F.R. §             17 C.F.R. §
    1.6(b)(2)            1.6(b)(3)                 1.13(c)              205.3(d)                205.3(d)
 to prevent           to                     to prevent               (2)(i)                  (2)(iii)
  client from           prevent, mitigat        substantial injury
                                                                      to prevent issuer     to rectify the
  committing a          e or rectify            to the
                                                                       from committing        consequences of a
  crime or fraud        substantial             organization
                                                                       a material             material violation
                        injury to the
                                                                       violation              by the issuer
 that is               financial              after lawyer
  reasonably            interests or            reported
                                                                      that is likely to     that has caused, or
  certain to result     property of             constituent’s
                                                                       cause                  may
  in substantial        another                 action or
                                                                       substantial            cause, substantial
  injury to the                                 intention to act;
                                                                       injury to the          injury to the
  financial            that is
                                                                       financial interest     financial interest
  interests or          reasonably             highest authority                             or property of the
  property of           certain to result                              or property of
                                                that can act on                               issuer or investors
  another               or has resulted                                the issuer or
                                                behalf of
                        from the client's                              investors
                                                organization fails                           in furtherance of
 in furtherance        commission of a         to address in
  of which the          crime or fraud                                may reveal to          which the
                                                timely &                                      attorney’s services
  client has used                                                      SEC only
                                                appropriate                                   were used
  or is using the      in furtherance of       manner;
  lawyer's              which the client
                                                                                             may reveal to SEC
  services              has used the           action or                                     only
                        lawyer's services       inaction is a
                                                clear violation of
                                                law
Option to Report Out
             Lawyer may reveal information to extent lawyer reasonably believes necessary:
      Rule                 Rule                     Rule               17 C.F.R. §             17 C.F.R. §
    1.6(b)(2)            1.6(b)(3)                 1.13(c)              205.3(d)                205.3(d)
 to prevent           to                     to prevent               (2)(i)                  (2)(iii)
  client from           prevent, mitigat        substantial injury
                                                                      to prevent issuer     to rectify the
  committing a          e or rectify            to the
                                                                       from committing        consequences of a
  crime or fraud        substantial             organization
                                                                       a material             material violation
                        injury to the
                                                                       violation              by the issuer
 that is               financial              after lawyer
  reasonably            interests or            reported
                                                                      that is likely to     that has caused, or
  certain to result     property of             constituent’s
                                                                       cause                  may
  in substantial        another                 action or
                                                                       substantial            cause, substantial
  injury to the                                 intention to act;
                                                                       injury to the          injury to the
  financial            that is
                                                                       financial interest     financial interest
  interests or          reasonably             highest authority                             or property of the
  property of           certain to result                              or property of
                                                that can act on                               issuer or investors
  another               or has resulted                                the issuer or
                                                behalf of
                        from the client's                              investors
                                                organization fails                           in furtherance of
 in furtherance        commission of a         to address in
  of which the          crime or fraud                                may reveal to          which the
                                                timely &                                      attorney’s services
  client has used                                                      SEC only
                                                appropriate                                   were used
  or is using the      in furtherance of       manner;
  lawyer's              which the client
                                                                                             may reveal to SEC
  services              has used the           action or                                     only
                        lawyer's services       inaction is a
                                                clear violation of
                                                law
Option to Report Out
             Lawyer may reveal information to extent lawyer reasonably believes necessary:
      Rule                 Rule                     Rule               17 C.F.R. §             17 C.F.R. §
    1.6(b)(2)            1.6(b)(3)                 1.13(c)              205.3(d)                205.3(d)
 to prevent           to                     to prevent               (2)(i)                  (2)(iii)
  client from           prevent, mitigat        substantial injury
                                                                      to prevent issuer     to rectify the
  committing a          e or rectify            to the
                                                                       from committing        consequences of a
  crime or fraud        substantial             organization
                                                                       a material             material violation
                        injury to the
                                                                       violation              by the issuer
 that is               financial              after lawyer
  reasonably            interests or            reported
                                                                      that is likely to     that has caused, or
  certain to result     property of             constituent’s
                                                                       cause                  may
  in substantial        another                 action or
                                                                       substantial            cause, substantial
  injury to the                                 intention to act;
                                                                       injury to the          injury to the
  financial            that is
                                                                       financial interest     financial interest
  interests or          reasonably             highest authority                             or property of the
  property of           certain to result                              or property of
                                                that can act on                               issuer or investors
  another               or has resulted                                the issuer or
                                                behalf of
                        from the client's                              investors
                                                organization fails                           in furtherance of
 in furtherance        commission of a         to address in
  of which the          crime or fraud                                may reveal to          which the
                                                timely &                                      attorney’s services
  client has used                                                      SEC only
                                                appropriate                                   were used
  or is using the      in furtherance of       manner;
  lawyer's              which the client
                                                                                             may reveal to SEC
  services              has used the           action or                                     only
                        lawyer's services       inaction is a
                                                clear violation of
                                                law
Option to Report Out
             Lawyer may reveal information to extent lawyer reasonably believes necessary:
      Rule                 Rule                     Rule               17 C.F.R. §             17 C.F.R. §
    1.6(b)(2)            1.6(b)(3)                 1.13(c)              205.3(d)                205.3(d)
 to prevent           to                     to prevent               (2)(i)                  (2)(iii)
  client from           prevent, mitigat        substantial injury
                                                                      to prevent issuer     to rectify the
  committing a          e or rectify            to the
                                                                       from committing        consequences of a
  crime or fraud        substantial             organization
                                                                       a material             material violation
                        injury to the
                                                                       violation              by the issuer
 that is               financial              after lawyer
  reasonably            interests or            reported
                                                                      that is likely to     that has caused, or
  certain to result     property of             constituent’s
                                                                       cause                  may
  in substantial        another                 action or
                                                                       substantial            cause, substantial
  injury to the                                 intention to act;
                                                                       injury to the          injury to the
  financial            that is
                                                                       financial interest     financial interest
  interests or          reasonably             highest authority                             or property of the
  property of           certain to result                              or property of
                                                that can act on                               issuer or investors
  another               or has resulted                                the issuer or
                                                behalf of
                        from the client's                              investors
                                                organization fails                           in furtherance of
 in furtherance        commission of a         to address in
  of which the          crime or fraud                                may reveal to          which the
                                                timely &                                      attorney’s services
  client has used                                                      SEC only
                                                appropriate                                   were used
  or is using the      in furtherance of       manner;
  lawyer's              which the client
                                                                                             may reveal to SEC
  services              has used the           action or                                     only
                        lawyer's services       inaction is a
                                                clear violation of
                                                law
Option to Report Out
             Lawyer may reveal information to extent lawyer reasonably believes necessary:
      Rule                 Rule                     Rule               17 C.F.R. §             17 C.F.R. §
    1.6(b)(2)            1.6(b)(3)                 1.13(c)              205.3(d)                205.3(d)
 to prevent           to                     to prevent               (2)(i)                  (2)(iii)
  client from           prevent, mitigat        substantial injury
                                                                      to prevent issuer     to rectify the
  committing a          e or rectify            to the
                                                                       from committing        consequences of a
  crime or fraud        substantial             organization
                                                                       a material             material violation
                        injury to the
                                                                       violation              by the issuer
 that is               financial              after lawyer
  reasonably            interests or            reported
                                                                      that is likely to     that has caused, or
  certain to result     property of             constituent’s
                                                                       cause                  may
  in substantial        another                 action or
                                                                       substantial            cause, substantial
  injury to the                                 intention to act;
                                                                       injury to the          injury to the
  financial            that is
                                                                       financial interest     financial interest
  interests or          reasonably             highest authority                             or property of the
  property of           certain to result                              or property of
                                                that can act on                               issuer or investors
  another               or has resulted                                the issuer or
                                                behalf of
                        from the client's                              investors
                                                organization fails                           in furtherance of
 in furtherance        commission of a         to address in
  of which the          crime or fraud                                may reveal to          which the
                                                timely &                                      attorney’s services
  client has used                                                      SEC only
                                                appropriate                                   were used
  or is using the      in furtherance of       manner;
  lawyer's              which the client
                                                                                             may reveal to SEC
  services              has used the           action or                                     only
                        lawyer's services       inaction is a
                                                clear violation of
                                                law
Option to Report Out




           Rule
         1.13(c)
Rule 1.13 (b)-(e)
   Rule 1.13 (a), (f) & (g)
                                   Reporting Up the
     Entity As Client
                                        Chain

                                   Initial Reporting Duty

                                 Duty to Continue Reporting
Representing                            Up the Chain
                  Representing
  ONLY the          the Entity
   Entity             AND a        Option to Report Out
                   Constituent
Rule 1.13 in Context
Rule 1.13 in Context

         Thank you!
    Wendy Gerwick Couture
       Associate Professor
University of Idaho College of Law
     wgcouture@uidaho.edu

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

English speaking countries
English speaking countriesEnglish speaking countries
English speaking countrieskillaruns
 
Ksenia Telunts Evaluation question 1
Ksenia Telunts Evaluation question 1 Ksenia Telunts Evaluation question 1
Ksenia Telunts Evaluation question 1 carolinebirksatwork
 
Evaluation Question Four
Evaluation Question FourEvaluation Question Four
Evaluation Question FourJoel Berkowitz
 
Joseph & All Things Semitic ITALIAN
Joseph & All Things Semitic ITALIANJoseph & All Things Semitic ITALIAN
Joseph & All Things Semitic ITALIANdearl1
 
ใบงานที่ 7 เรื่อง โครงงานประเภท
ใบงานที่ 7 เรื่อง โครงงานประเภทใบงานที่ 7 เรื่อง โครงงานประเภท
ใบงานที่ 7 เรื่อง โครงงานประเภทJustice MengKing
 
Llapis de colors 2
Llapis de colors 2Llapis de colors 2
Llapis de colors 2aula20_2012
 
Конкурсный урок
Конкурсный урокКонкурсный урок
Конкурсный урокkillaruns
 

Viewers also liked (8)

Curriculum Vitae
Curriculum VitaeCurriculum Vitae
Curriculum Vitae
 
English speaking countries
English speaking countriesEnglish speaking countries
English speaking countries
 
Ksenia Telunts Evaluation question 1
Ksenia Telunts Evaluation question 1 Ksenia Telunts Evaluation question 1
Ksenia Telunts Evaluation question 1
 
Evaluation Question Four
Evaluation Question FourEvaluation Question Four
Evaluation Question Four
 
Joseph & All Things Semitic ITALIAN
Joseph & All Things Semitic ITALIANJoseph & All Things Semitic ITALIAN
Joseph & All Things Semitic ITALIAN
 
ใบงานที่ 7 เรื่อง โครงงานประเภท
ใบงานที่ 7 เรื่อง โครงงานประเภทใบงานที่ 7 เรื่อง โครงงานประเภท
ใบงานที่ 7 เรื่อง โครงงานประเภท
 
Llapis de colors 2
Llapis de colors 2Llapis de colors 2
Llapis de colors 2
 
Конкурсный урок
Конкурсный урокКонкурсный урок
Конкурсный урок
 

More from Wendy Couture

Business & Corporate Caselaw Review (2023)
Business & Corporate Caselaw Review (2023)Business & Corporate Caselaw Review (2023)
Business & Corporate Caselaw Review (2023)Wendy Couture
 
Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (2022)
Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (2022)Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (2022)
Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (2022)Wendy Couture
 
Top 10 Issues in De-SPAC Securities Litigation
Top 10 Issues in De-SPAC Securities LitigationTop 10 Issues in De-SPAC Securities Litigation
Top 10 Issues in De-SPAC Securities LitigationWendy Couture
 
Corporate Law Case Review (2021)
Corporate Law Case Review (2021)Corporate Law Case Review (2021)
Corporate Law Case Review (2021)Wendy Couture
 
Top 10 Cases in Business Law (Idaho)
Top 10 Cases in Business Law (Idaho)Top 10 Cases in Business Law (Idaho)
Top 10 Cases in Business Law (Idaho)Wendy Couture
 
"Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year" (2019)
"Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year" (2019)"Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year" (2019)
"Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year" (2019)Wendy Couture
 
Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (May 11, 2018)
Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (May 11, 2018)Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (May 11, 2018)
Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (May 11, 2018)Wendy Couture
 
Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (2017)
Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (2017)Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (2017)
Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (2017)Wendy Couture
 
Idaho Supreme Court - Spring Case Review - Business Cases (2017)
Idaho Supreme Court - Spring Case Review - Business Cases (2017)Idaho Supreme Court - Spring Case Review - Business Cases (2017)
Idaho Supreme Court - Spring Case Review - Business Cases (2017)Wendy Couture
 
Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (2016)
Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (2016)Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (2016)
Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (2016)Wendy Couture
 
The Impact of the PSLRA on Post-Discovery Amendment of Pleadings
The Impact of the PSLRA on Post-Discovery Amendment of PleadingsThe Impact of the PSLRA on Post-Discovery Amendment of Pleadings
The Impact of the PSLRA on Post-Discovery Amendment of PleadingsWendy Couture
 
Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (2015)
Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (2015)Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (2015)
Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (2015)Wendy Couture
 
The Mysteries of Class Action Tolling and the Impacts on Opt-Out Litigation
The Mysteries of Class Action Tolling and the Impacts on Opt-Out LitigationThe Mysteries of Class Action Tolling and the Impacts on Opt-Out Litigation
The Mysteries of Class Action Tolling and the Impacts on Opt-Out LitigationWendy Couture
 
The Future of Securities Litigation Post-Halliburton
The Future of Securities Litigation Post-HalliburtonThe Future of Securities Litigation Post-Halliburton
The Future of Securities Litigation Post-HalliburtonWendy Couture
 
Crowdfunding (in Idaho) 101
Crowdfunding (in Idaho) 101Crowdfunding (in Idaho) 101
Crowdfunding (in Idaho) 101Wendy Couture
 
Top 10 Business Cases From the Past Year (2014)
Top 10 Business Cases From the Past Year (2014)Top 10 Business Cases From the Past Year (2014)
Top 10 Business Cases From the Past Year (2014)Wendy Couture
 
Using Shareholder Proposals to Fill Regulatory Gaps
Using Shareholder Proposals to Fill Regulatory GapsUsing Shareholder Proposals to Fill Regulatory Gaps
Using Shareholder Proposals to Fill Regulatory GapsWendy Couture
 
The Collision Between the First Amendment and Securities Fraud
The Collision Between the First Amendment and Securities FraudThe Collision Between the First Amendment and Securities Fraud
The Collision Between the First Amendment and Securities FraudWendy Couture
 
Top 10 Business Law Cases From the Past Year (2013)
Top 10 Business Law Cases From the Past Year (2013)Top 10 Business Law Cases From the Past Year (2013)
Top 10 Business Law Cases From the Past Year (2013)Wendy Couture
 
The Duty to Report Up the Chain
The Duty to Report Up the ChainThe Duty to Report Up the Chain
The Duty to Report Up the ChainWendy Couture
 

More from Wendy Couture (20)

Business & Corporate Caselaw Review (2023)
Business & Corporate Caselaw Review (2023)Business & Corporate Caselaw Review (2023)
Business & Corporate Caselaw Review (2023)
 
Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (2022)
Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (2022)Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (2022)
Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (2022)
 
Top 10 Issues in De-SPAC Securities Litigation
Top 10 Issues in De-SPAC Securities LitigationTop 10 Issues in De-SPAC Securities Litigation
Top 10 Issues in De-SPAC Securities Litigation
 
Corporate Law Case Review (2021)
Corporate Law Case Review (2021)Corporate Law Case Review (2021)
Corporate Law Case Review (2021)
 
Top 10 Cases in Business Law (Idaho)
Top 10 Cases in Business Law (Idaho)Top 10 Cases in Business Law (Idaho)
Top 10 Cases in Business Law (Idaho)
 
"Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year" (2019)
"Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year" (2019)"Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year" (2019)
"Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year" (2019)
 
Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (May 11, 2018)
Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (May 11, 2018)Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (May 11, 2018)
Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (May 11, 2018)
 
Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (2017)
Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (2017)Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (2017)
Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (2017)
 
Idaho Supreme Court - Spring Case Review - Business Cases (2017)
Idaho Supreme Court - Spring Case Review - Business Cases (2017)Idaho Supreme Court - Spring Case Review - Business Cases (2017)
Idaho Supreme Court - Spring Case Review - Business Cases (2017)
 
Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (2016)
Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (2016)Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (2016)
Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (2016)
 
The Impact of the PSLRA on Post-Discovery Amendment of Pleadings
The Impact of the PSLRA on Post-Discovery Amendment of PleadingsThe Impact of the PSLRA on Post-Discovery Amendment of Pleadings
The Impact of the PSLRA on Post-Discovery Amendment of Pleadings
 
Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (2015)
Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (2015)Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (2015)
Top 10 Business Law Cases of the Year (2015)
 
The Mysteries of Class Action Tolling and the Impacts on Opt-Out Litigation
The Mysteries of Class Action Tolling and the Impacts on Opt-Out LitigationThe Mysteries of Class Action Tolling and the Impacts on Opt-Out Litigation
The Mysteries of Class Action Tolling and the Impacts on Opt-Out Litigation
 
The Future of Securities Litigation Post-Halliburton
The Future of Securities Litigation Post-HalliburtonThe Future of Securities Litigation Post-Halliburton
The Future of Securities Litigation Post-Halliburton
 
Crowdfunding (in Idaho) 101
Crowdfunding (in Idaho) 101Crowdfunding (in Idaho) 101
Crowdfunding (in Idaho) 101
 
Top 10 Business Cases From the Past Year (2014)
Top 10 Business Cases From the Past Year (2014)Top 10 Business Cases From the Past Year (2014)
Top 10 Business Cases From the Past Year (2014)
 
Using Shareholder Proposals to Fill Regulatory Gaps
Using Shareholder Proposals to Fill Regulatory GapsUsing Shareholder Proposals to Fill Regulatory Gaps
Using Shareholder Proposals to Fill Regulatory Gaps
 
The Collision Between the First Amendment and Securities Fraud
The Collision Between the First Amendment and Securities FraudThe Collision Between the First Amendment and Securities Fraud
The Collision Between the First Amendment and Securities Fraud
 
Top 10 Business Law Cases From the Past Year (2013)
Top 10 Business Law Cases From the Past Year (2013)Top 10 Business Law Cases From the Past Year (2013)
Top 10 Business Law Cases From the Past Year (2013)
 
The Duty to Report Up the Chain
The Duty to Report Up the ChainThe Duty to Report Up the Chain
The Duty to Report Up the Chain
 

Rule 1.13 Ethics Document

  • 1. ETHICS Rule 1.13 in Context Wendy Gerwick Couture Associate Professor University of Idaho College of Law wgcouture@uidaho.edu
  • 2. Rule 1.13 in Context
  • 3. Rule 1.13 (b)-(e) Rule 1.13 (a), (f) & (g) Reporting Up the Entity As Client Chain
  • 4. Rule 1.13 (b)-(e) Rule 1.13 (a), (f) & (g) Reporting Up the Entity As Client Chain Representing Representing ONLY the the Entity Entity AND a Constituent
  • 5. Rule 1.13 (b)-(e) Rule 1.13 (a), (f) & (g) Reporting Up the Entity As Client Chain Representing Representing ONLY the the Entity Entity AND a Constituent
  • 6. Rule 1.13 (a), (f) Representing Treatment of Information & (g) ONLY the When Interacting Entity As Client Entity With A Constituent “One-Way Door”
  • 7. Rule 1.13 (a), (f) Representing Treatment of Information & (g) ONLY the When Interacting Entity As Client Entity With A Constituent “One-Way Door” Information Learned From Constituent is Client’s Information • Attorney should share the information with the entity’s leadership, to the extent necessary to keep the client “reasonably informed about the status of the matter.” R. 1.4(a)(3). • The entity can decide whether to disclose that information to third parties. R. 1.6(a).
  • 8. Rule 1.13 (a), (f) Representing Treatment of Information & (g) ONLY the When Interacting Entity As Client Entity With A Constituent “One-Way Door” Information Learned From Constituent is Client’s Information • Attorney should share the information with the entity’s leadership, to the extent necessary to keep the client “reasonably informed about the status of the matter.” R. 1.4(a)(3). • The entity can decide whether to disclose that information to third parties. R. 1.6(a). Attorney Can’t Share Client’s Information with Constituent Unless Authorized • Authorization can be either express or implied “in order to carry out the representation.” R. 1.6(a).
  • 9. Rule 1.13 (a), (f) Representing Warnings to Constituent When & (g) ONLY the Entity As Client Interacting With Constituent Entity
  • 10. Rule 1.13 (a), (f) Representing Warnings to Constituent When & (g) ONLY the Entity As Client Interacting With Constituent Entity Rule 1.13(f) Upjohn Warning Rule 4.3 Rule 4.3 Rest. (3d) Law Governing Lawyers § 14
  • 11. Rule 1.13 (a), (f) Representing Warnings to Constituent When & (g) ONLY the Entity As Client Interacting With Constituent Entity Rule 1.13(f) Upjohn Warning Rule 4.3 Rule 4.3 Rest. (3d) Law If know or Governing reasonably should Lawyers § 14 know that the organization’s interests are adverse to those of constituent
  • 12. Rule 1.13 (a), (f) Representing Warnings to Constituent When & (g) ONLY the Entity As Client Interacting With Constituent Entity Rule 1.13(f) Upjohn Warning Rule 4.3 Rule 4.3 Rest. (3d) Law If know or Governing reasonably should Lawyers § 14 know that the organization’s interests are adverse to those of constituent Identity of Constituent Discussions between client may wish to constituent & lawyer (lawyer’s not obtain own are protected by entity’s disinterested; lawyer attorney-client lawyer doesn’t privilege, subject to represent waiver at entity’s sole constituent) discretion
  • 13. Rule 1.13 (a), (f) Representing Warnings to Constituent When & (g) ONLY the Entity As Client Interacting With Constituent Entity Rule 1.13(f) Upjohn Warning Rule 4.3 Rule 4.3 Rest. (3d) Law If know or To ensure that Governing reasonably should communications Lawyers § 14 know that the between constituent & organization’s attorney are protected interests are by the entity’s adverse to those of attorney-client constituent privilege Identity of Constituent Discussions between client may wish to constituent & lawyer (lawyer’s not obtain own are protected by entity’s disinterested; lawyer attorney-client lawyer doesn’t privilege, subject to represent waiver at entity’s sole constituent) discretion
  • 14. Rule 1.13 (a), (f) Representing Warnings to Constituent When & (g) ONLY the Entity As Client Interacting With Constituent Entity Rule 1.13(f) Upjohn Warning Rule 4.3 Rule 4.3 Rest. (3d) Law If know or To ensure that Governing reasonably should communications Lawyers § 14 know that the between constituent & organization’s attorney are protected interests are by the entity’s adverse to those of attorney-client constituent privilege Identity of Constituent Discussions between Interview is Content of client may wish to constituent & lawyer being conducted interview (lawyer’s not obtain own are protected by entity’s to gather facts should be disinterested; lawyer attorney-client in order to kept lawyer doesn’t privilege, subject to provide legal confidential represent waiver at entity’s sole advice to entity constituent) discretion
  • 15. Rule 1.13 (a), (f) Representing Warnings to Constituent When & (g) ONLY the Entity As Client Interacting With Constituent Entity Rule 1.13(f) Upjohn Warning Rule 4.3 Rule 4.3 Rest. (3d) Law If know or To ensure that If know or should Governing reasonably should communications know that Lawyers § 14 know that the between constituent & unrepresented organization’s attorney are protected person interests are by the attorney-client misunderstands adverse to those of privilege the lawyer’s role constituent Identity of Constituent Discussions between Interview is Content of client may wish to constituent & lawyer being conducted interview (lawyer’s not obtain own are protected by entity’s to gather facts should be disinterested; lawyer attorney-client in order to kept lawyer doesn’t privilege, subject to provide legal confidential represent waiver at entity’s sole advice to entity constituent) discretion
  • 16. Rule 1.13 (a), (f) Representing Warnings to Constituent When & (g) ONLY the Entity As Client Interacting With Constituent Entity Rule 1.13(f) Upjohn Warning Rule 4.3 Rule 4.3 Rest. (3d) Law If know or To ensure that If know or should Governing reasonably should communications know that Lawyers § 14 know that the between constituent & unrepresented organization’s attorney are protected person interests are by the attorney-client misunderstands adverse to those of privilege the lawyer’s role constituent Identity of Constituent Discussions between Interview is Content of client may wish to constituent & lawyer being conducted interview (lawyer’s not obtain own are protected by entity’s to gather facts should be disinterested; lawyer attorney-client in order to kept lawyer doesn’t privilege, subject to provide legal confidential represent waiver at entity’s sole advice to entity constituent) discretion
  • 17. Rule 1.13 (a), (f) Representing Warnings to Constituent When & (g) ONLY the Entity As Client Interacting With Constituent Entity Rule 1.13(f) Upjohn Warning Rule 4.3 Rule 4.3 Rest. (3d) Law If know or To ensure that If know or should If know or reasonably Governing reasonably should communications know that should know that Lawyers § 14 know that the between constituent & unrepresented unrepresented organization’s attorney are protected person person’s interests interests are by the attorney-client misunderstands have a reasonable adverse to those of privilege the lawyer’s role possibility of being in constituent conflict with entity’s interest Identity of Constituent Discussions between Interview is Content of No legal client may wish to constituent & lawyer being conducted interview advice, oth (lawyer’s not obtain own are protected by entity’s to gather facts should be er than disinterested; lawyer attorney-client in order to kept advice to lawyer doesn’t privilege, subject to provide legal confidential secure represent waiver at entity’s sole advice to entity counsel constituent) discretion
  • 18. Rule 1.13 (a), (f) Representing Warnings to Constituent When & (g) ONLY the Entity As Client Interacting With Constituent Entity Rule 1.13(f) Upjohn Warning Rule 4.3 Rule 4.3 Rest. (3d) Law If know or To ensure that If know or should If know or reasonably Governing reasonably should communications know that should know that Lawyers § 14 know that the between constituent & unrepresented unrepresented organization’s attorney are protected person person’s interests interests are by the attorney-client misunderstands have a reasonable adverse to those of privilege the lawyer’s role possibility of being in constituent conflict with entity’s interest Identity of Constituent Discussions between Interview is Content of No legal client may wish to constituent & lawyer being conducted interview advice, oth (lawyer’s not obtain own are protected by entity’s to gather facts should be er than disinterested; lawyer attorney-client in order to kept advice to lawyer doesn’t privilege, subject to provide legal confidential secure represent waiver at entity’s sole advice to entity counsel constituent) discretion
  • 19. Rule 1.13 (a), (f) Representing Warnings to Constituent When & (g) ONLY the Entity As Client Interacting With Constituent Entity Rule 1.13(f) Upjohn Warning Rule 4.3 Rule 4.3 Rest. (3d) Law If know or To ensure that If know or should If know or reasonably Governing reasonably should communications know that should know that Lawyers § 14 know that the between constituent & unrepresented unrepresented To prevent organization’s attorney are protected person person’s interests creation of an interests are by the attorney-client misunderstands have a reasonable implied attorney- adverse to those of privilege the lawyer’s role possibility of being in client relationship constituent conflict with entity’s interest Identity of Constituent Discussions between Interview is Content of No legal client may wish to constituent & lawyer being conducted interview advice, oth (lawyer’s not obtain own are protected by entity’s to gather facts should be er than disinterested; lawyer attorney-client in order to kept advice to lawyer doesn’t privilege, subject to provide legal confidential secure represent waiver at entity’s sole advice to entity counsel constituent) discretion
  • 20. Rule 1.13 (a), (f) Representing Warnings to Constituent When & (g) ONLY the Entity As Client Interacting With Constituent Entity Rule 1.13(f) Upjohn Warning Rule 4.3 Rule 4.3 Rest. (3d) Law If know or To ensure that If know or should If know or reasonably Governing reasonably should communications know that should know that Lawyers § 14 know that the between constituent & unrepresented unrepresented To prevent organization’s attorney are protected person person’s interests creation of an interests are by the attorney-client misunderstands have a reasonable implied attorney- adverse to those of privilege the lawyer’s role possibility of being in client relationship constituent conflict with entity’s interest Identity of Constituent Discussions between Interview is Content of No legal client may wish to constituent & lawyer being conducted interview advice, oth (lawyer’s not obtain own are protected by entity’s to gather facts should be er than disinterested; lawyer attorney-client in order to kept advice to lawyer doesn’t privilege, subject to provide legal confidential secure represent waiver at entity’s sole advice to entity counsel constituent) discretion
  • 21. Rule 1.13 (b)-(e) Rule 1.13 (a), (f) & (g) Reporting Up the Entity As Client Chain Representing Representing ONLY the the Entity Entity AND a Constituent
  • 22. Rule 1.13 (a), (f) Representing the Entity CONFLICT Analysis & (g) Entity As Client AND a Constituent
  • 23. Rule 1.13 (a), (f) Representing the Entity CONFLICTS Analysis & (g) Entity As Client AND a Constituent R. 1.7 - Is there a current conflict? - Two are directly adverse - Significant risk that representation of one will be materially limited by responsibilities to other
  • 24. Rule 1.13 (a), (f) Representing the Entity CONFLICT Analysis & (g) Entity As Client AND a Constituent R. 1.7 - Is there a current conflict? - Two are directly adverse - Significant risk that representation of one will be materially limited by responsibilities to other If lawyer reasonably believes can nonetheless represent both competently & diligently, OK if each client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing.
  • 25. Rule 1.13 (a), (f) Representing the Entity CONFLICT Analysis & (g) Entity As Client AND a Constituent R. 1.7 - Is there a potential future conflict? R. 1.7 - Is there a current conflict? - Two are directly adverse - Significant risk that representation of one will be materially limited by responsibilities to other If lawyer reasonably believes can nonetheless represent both competently & diligently, OK if each client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing.
  • 26. Rule 1.13 (a), (f) Representing the Entity CONFLICT Analysis & (g) Entity As Client AND a Constituent R. 1.7 - Is there a potential future conflict? R. 1.7 - Is there a current conflict? - Two are directly adverse Yes, there is. - Significant risk that representation of one will be materially limited by responsibilities to other If lawyer reasonably believes can nonetheless represent both competently & diligently, OK if each client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing.
  • 27. Rule 1.13 (a), (f) Representing the Entity CONFLICT Analysis & (g) Entity As Client AND a Constituent R. 1.7 - Is there a potential future conflict? R. 1.7 - Is there a current conflict? - Two are directly adverse Yes, there is. - Significant risk that representation of one will be materially limited by R. 1.7 cmt. 22 – responsibilities to other Prospective waiver of conflict may be effective If lawyer reasonably believes - Depends on the can nonetheless represent extent to which the both competently & client reasonably diligently, OK if each client understands the gives informed material risks that consent, confirmed in writing. the waiver entails
  • 28. Rule 1.13 (a), (f) Representing the Entity CONFLICT Analysis & (g) Entity As Client AND a Constituent R. 1.7 - Is there a potential future conflict? R. 1.7 - Is there a current conflict? - Two are directly adverse Yes, there is. - Significant risk that representation of one will be materially limited by R. 1.7 cmt. 22 – R. 1.7 cmt. 29; R. 1.9 – If responsibilities to other Prospective waiver common representation of conflict may be fails, ordinarily must withdraw effective from representation of If lawyer reasonably believes - Depends on the all, absent informed consent of can nonetheless represent extent to which the both both competently & client reasonably diligently, OK if each client understands the gives informed material risks that consent, confirmed in writing. the waiver entails
  • 29. Rule 1.13 (a), (f) Representing the Entity CONFLICT Analysis & (g) Entity As Client AND a Constituent R. 1.7 - Is there a potential future conflict? R. 1.7 - Is there a current conflict? - Two are directly adverse Yes, there is. - Significant risk that representation of one will be materially limited by R. 1.7 cmt. 22 – R. 1.7 cmt. 29; R. 1.9 – If responsibilities to other Prospective waiver common representation of conflict may be fails, ordinarily must withdraw effective from representation of If lawyer reasonably believes - Depends on the all, absent informed consent of can nonetheless represent extent to which the both both competently & client reasonably diligently, OK if each client understands the BUT, constituent might be gives informed material risks that able to give this consent consent, confirmed in writing. the waiver entails prospectively
  • 30. Rule 1.13 (a), (f) & (g) Entity As Client Representing Representing ONLY the the Entity Entity AND a Constituent Application in Context of Entity Formation Some authority that can represent ONLY yet-to-be-formed entity, if • Clarify at initial meeting that representing entity only • Specify in engagement agreement that: -represent entity only, not constituents - organizers agree to ratify on behalf of entity upon formation - information communicated by constituents will be communicated with entity’s other decision-makers • Abide by Rule 4.3 re: dealing with unrepresented constituents State Bar of Ariz. Ethics Op. 02-06; see also Jesse v. Danforth, 869 P.2d 1203 (Wis. 1992).
  • 31. Rule 1.13 (b)-(e) Rule 1.13 (a), (f) & (g) Reporting Up the Entity As Client Chain Initial Reporting Duty Duty to Continue Reporting Representing Up the Chain Representing ONLY the the Entity Entity AND a Option to Report Out Constituent
  • 32. Rule 1.13 (b)-(e) Rule 1.13 (a), (f) & (g) Reporting Up the Entity As Client Chain Initial Reporting Duty Duty to Continue Reporting Representing Up the Chain Representing ONLY the the Entity Entity AND a Option to Report Out Constituent
  • 33. Initial Reporting Duty Rule 1.13 SEC Rule 17 C.F.R. § 205.1 et seq.
  • 34. Initial Reporting Duty Rule 1.13 IF lawyer for organization knows that:  constituent is engaged in action, intends to act, or refuses to act  in a matter related to representation  that is a violation of legal obligation to the organization OR a violation of law that reasonably might be imputed to the organization  that is likely to result in substantial injury to the organization SEC Rule 17 C.F.R. § 205.1 et seq.
  • 35. Initial Reporting Duty THEN shall proceed as is Rule 1.13 reasonably necessary in IF lawyer for organization knows that: the best interest of the  constituent is engaged in action, intends to act, or refuses to organization act  in a matter related to representation  that is a violation of legal obligation to the organization OR a violation of law that reasonably might be imputed to the organization  that is likely to result in substantial injury to the organization SEC Rule 17 C.F.R. § 205.1 et seq.
  • 36. Initial Reporting Duty THEN shall proceed as is Rule 1.13 reasonably necessary in IF lawyer for organization knows that: the best interest of the  constituent is engaged in action, intends to act, or refuses to organization act  in a matter related to representation  that is a violation of legal obligation to the organization OR a UNLESS lawyer reasonably believes violation of law that reasonably might be imputed to the that isn’t necessary in the best organization interest of the organization to do  that is likely to result in substantial injury to the organization so, lawyer shall refer the matter to higher authority in the organization SEC Rule 17 C.F.R. § 205.1 et seq.
  • 37. Initial Reporting Duty THEN shall proceed as is Rule 1.13 reasonably necessary in IF lawyer for organization knows that: the best interest of the  constituent is engaged in action, intends to act, or refuses to organization act  in a matter related to representation  that is a violation of legal obligation to the organization OR a UNLESS lawyer reasonably believes violation of law that reasonably might be imputed to the that isn’t necessary in the best organization interest of the organization to do  that is likely to result in substantial injury to the organization so, lawyer shall refer the matter to higher authority in the organization SEC Rule 17 C.F.R. § 205.1 et seq. IF an attorney, appearing and practicing before the SEC, becomes aware of evidence of:  a material violation  by the issuer or by any officer, director, employee, or agent of the issuer
  • 38. Initial Reporting Duty THEN shall proceed as is Rule 1.13 reasonably necessary in IF lawyer for organization knows that: the best interest of the  constituent is engaged in action, intends to act, or refuses to organization act  in a matter related to representation  that is a violation of legal obligation to the organization OR a UNLESS lawyer reasonably believes violation of law that reasonably might be imputed to the that isn’t necessary in the best organization interest of the organization to do  that is likely to result in substantial injury to the organization so, lawyer shall refer the matter to higher authority in the organization SEC Rule 17 C.F.R. § 205.1 et seq. IF an attorney, THEN shall report such appearing and practicing before the SEC, evidence to: becomes aware of evidence of: - the issuer’s chief legal  a material violation officer, OR  by the issuer or by any officer, director, employee, or - the issuer’s chief legal agent of the issuer officer and the CEO, OR - the issuer’s “qualified legal compliance committee,” if formed
  • 39. Initial Reporting Duty THEN shall proceed as is Rule 1.13 reasonably necessary in IF lawyer for organization knows that: the best interest of the  constituent is engaged in action, intends to act, or refuses to organization act  in a matter related to representation  that is a violation of legal obligation to the organization OR a UNLESS lawyer reasonably believes violation of law that reasonably might be imputed to the that isn’t necessary in the best organization interest of the organization to do  that is likely to result in substantial injury to the organization so, lawyer shall refer the matter to higher authority in the organization SEC Rule 17 C.F.R. § 205.1 et seq. IF an attorney, THEN shall report such appearing and practicing before the SEC, evidence to: becomes aware of evidence of: - the issuer’s chief legal  a material violation officer, OR  by the issuer or by any officer, director, employee, or - the issuer’s chief legal agent of the issuer officer and the CEO, OR - the issuer’s “qualified legal compliance Similarities – up-the-chain; shall committee,” if formed
  • 40. Initial Reporting Duty THEN shall proceed as is Rule 1.13 reasonably necessary in IF lawyer for organization knows that: the best interest of the  constituent is engaged in action, intends to act, or refuses to organization act  in a matter related to representation  that is a violation of legal obligation to the organization OR a UNLESS lawyer reasonably believes violation of law that reasonably might be imputed to the that isn’t necessary in the best organization interest of the organization to do  that is likely to result in substantial injury to the organization so, lawyer shall refer the matter to includes providing advice higher authority in the organization SEC Rule on securities laws re: any 17 C.F.R. § document to be 205.1 et seq. submitted to SEC IF an attorney, THEN shall report such appearing and practicing before the SEC, evidence to: becomes aware of evidence of: - the issuer’s chief legal  a material violation officer, OR  by the issuer OR by any officer, director, employee, or - the issuer’s chief legal agent of the issuer officer and the CEO, OR - the issuer’s “qualified legal compliance committee,” if formed
  • 41. Initial Reporting Duty THEN shall proceed as is Rule 1.13 reasonably necessary in IF lawyer for organization knows that: the best interest of the  constituent is engaged in action, intends to act, or refuses to organization act  in a matter related to representation  that is a violation of legal obligation to the organization OR a UNLESS lawyer reasonably believes violation of law that reasonably might be imputed to the that isn’t necessary in the best organization interest of the organization to do  that is likely to result in substantial injury to the organization so, lawyer shall refer the matter to higher authority in the organization SEC Rule 17 C.F.R. § 205.1 et seq. IF an attorney, THEN shall report such appearing and practicing before the SEC, evidence to: becomes aware of evidence of: - the issuer’s chief legal  a material violation officer, OR  by the issuer OR by any officer, director, employee, or - the issuer’s chief legal agent of the issuer officer and the CEO, OR means a reporting issuer - the issuer’s “qualified legal compliance committee,” if formed
  • 42. Initial Reporting Duty of denotes actual knowledge THEN shall proceed as is Rule 1.13 the fact in question, which may be inferred from circumstances reasonably necessary in IF lawyer for organization knows that: the best interest of the  constituent is engaged in action, intends to act, or refuses to organization act  in a matter related to representation  that is a violation of legal obligation to the organization OR a UNLESS lawyer reasonably believes violation of law that reasonably might be imputed to the that isn’t necessary in the best organization interest of the organization to do  that is likely to result in substantial injury to the organization so, lawyer shall refer the matter to higher authority in the organization SEC Rule 17 C.F.R. § 205.1 et seq. IF an attorney, THEN shall report such appearing and practicing before the SEC, evidence to: becomes aware of evidence of: - the issuer’s chief legal  a material violation officer, OR  by the issuer OR by any officer, director, employee, or - the issuer’s chief legal agent of the issuer officer and the CEO, means credible evidence, based upon which it OR would be unreasonable, under the - the issuer’s “qualified circumstances, for a prudent & competent legal compliance attorney not to conclude that a violation has committee,” if formed occurred, is ongoing, or is about to occur
  • 43. Initial Reporting Duty THEN shall proceed as is Rule 1.13 reasonably necessary in IF lawyer for organization knows that: the best interest of the  constituent is engaged in action, intends to act, or refuses to organization act  in a matter related to representation  that is a violation of legal obligation to the organization OR a UNLESS lawyer reasonably believes violation of law that reasonably might be imputed to the that isn’t necessary in the best organization interest of the organization to do  that is likely to result in substantial injury to the organization so, lawyer shall refer the matter to higher authority in the organization SEC Rule 17 C.F.R. § 205.1 et seq. IF an attorney, THEN shall report such appearing and practicing before the SEC, evidence to: becomes aware of evidence of: - the issuer’s chief legal  a material violation officer, OR  by the issuer OR by any officer, director, employee, or - the issuer’s chief legal agent of the issuer officer and the CEO, OR means a material violation of a federal or state securities law, a material breach of fiduciary duty - the issuer’s “qualified arising under federal or state law, or a similar legal compliance material violation of any federal or state law committee,” if formed
  • 44. Initial Reporting Duty THEN shall proceed as is Rule 1.13 reasonably necessary in IF lawyer for organization knows that: the best interest of the  constituent is engaged in action, intends to act, or refuses to organization act  in a matter related to representation  that is a violation of legal obligation to the organization OR a UNLESS lawyer reasonably believes violation of law that reasonably might be imputed to the allows lawyer more flexibility that isn’t necessary in the best organization under some interest of the organization to do so,  that is likely to result in substantial injury to the organization circumstances, such as a lawyer shall refer the matter to constituent’s innocent higher authority in the organization SEC Rule misunderstanding of the 17 C.F.R. § law, which the lawyer can 205.1 et seq. correct by advising constituent IF an attorney, THEN shall report such appearing and practicing before the SEC, evidence to: becomes aware of evidence of: - the issuer’s chief legal  a material violation officer, OR  by the issuer OR by any officer, director, employee, or - the issuer’s chief legal agent of the issuer officer and the CEO, OR - the issuer’s “qualified legal compliance committee,” if formed
  • 45. Initial Reporting Duty SEC Rule 17 C.F.R. Rule 1.13 § 205.1 et seq.
  • 46. Rule 1.13 (b)-(e) Rule 1.13 (a), (f) & (g) Reporting Up the Entity As Client Chain Initial Reporting Duty Duty to Continue Reporting Representing Up the Chain Representing ONLY the the Entity Entity AND a Option to Report Out Constituent
  • 47. Duty to Continue Reporting Up the Chain Rule 1.13 SEC Rule 17 C.F.R. § 205.1 et seq.
  • 48. Duty to Continue Reporting Up the Chain Rule 1.13 Unless the lawyer reasonably believes that it is not necessary in the best interest of the organization to do so, the lawyer shall refer the matter to higher authority in the organization, including, if warranted by the circumstances, to the highest authority that can act on behalf of the organization as determined by applicable law. SEC Rule 17 C.F.R. § 205.1 et seq.
  • 49. Duty to Continue Reporting Up the Chain Rule 1.13 Unless the lawyer reasonably believes that it is not necessary in the best interest of the organization to do so, the lawyer “ordinarily will be the board of shall refer the matter to higher authority in the directors or similar governing body” organization, including, if warranted by the circumstances, to the highest authority that can act on behalf of the organization as determined by applicable law. SEC Rule 17 C.F.R. § 205.1 et seq.
  • 50. Duty to Continue Reporting Up the Chain Rule 1.13 Unless the lawyer reasonably believes that it is not necessary in the best interest of the organization to do so, the lawyer “ordinarily will be the board of shall refer the matter to higher authority in the directors or similar governing body” organization, including, if warranted by the circumstances, to the highest authority that can act on behalf of the organization as determined by applicable law. SEC Rule 17 C.F.R. § 205.1 et seq. Unless an attorney who has made a report reasonably believes that the chief legal officer or the CEO of the issuer has provided an appropriate response within a reasonable time, the attorney shall report the evidence of a material violation to:
  • 51. Duty to Continue Reporting Up the Chain Rule 1.13 Unless the lawyer reasonably believes that it is not necessary in the best interest of the organization to do so, the lawyer “ordinarily will be the board of shall refer the matter to higher authority in the directors or similar governing body” organization, including, if warranted by the circumstances, to the highest authority that can act on behalf of the organization as determined by applicable law. SEC Rule 17 C.F.R. § 205.1 et seq. Unless an attorney who has made a report • audit committee of board of reasonably believes that the chief legal officer directors; OR or the CEO of the issuer has provided an • another committee consisting appropriate response within a reasonable solely of independent directors; time, the attorney shall report the evidence of OR a material violation to: • board of directors (if no committee consisting solely of independent directors)
  • 52. Duty to Continue Reporting Up the Chain Rule 1.13 Unless the lawyer reasonably believes that it is not necessary in the best interest of the organization to do so, the lawyer “ordinarily will be the board of shall refer the matter to higher authority in the directors or similar governing body” organization, including, if warranted by the circumstances, to the highest authority that can act on behalf of the organization as determined by applicable law. SEC Rule 17 C.F.R. § 205.1 et seq. Unless an attorney who has made a report • audit committee of board of reasonably believes that the chief legal officer directors; OR or the CEO of the issuer has provided an • another committee consisting appropriate response within a reasonable solely of independent directors; time, the attorney shall report the evidence of OR a material violation to: • board of directors (if no committee consisting solely of means that the attorney reasonably believes: independent directors) • no material violation occurred, is ongoing, or is about to occur; OR • the issuer has adopted appropriate remedial measures; OR • the issuer has retained counsel to review the reported evidence AND (i) substantially implemented counsel’s remedial recommendations, or (ii) been advised that counsel may assert colorable defense
  • 53. Duty to Continue Reporting Up the Chain SEC Rule 17 C.F.R. Rule 1.13 § 205.1 et seq.
  • 54. Rule 1.13 (b)-(e) Rule 1.13 (a), (f) & (g) Reporting Up the Entity As Client Chain Initial Reporting Duty Duty to Continue Reporting Representing Up the Chain Representing ONLY the the Entity Entity AND a Option to Report Out Constituent
  • 55. Option to Report Out Lawyer may reveal information to extent lawyer reasonably believes necessary: Rule Rule Rule 17 C.F.R. § 17 C.F.R. § 1.6(b)(2) 1.6(b)(3) 1.13(c) 205.3(d) 205.3(d) (2)(i) (2)(iii)
  • 56. Option to Report Out Lawyer may reveal information to extent lawyer reasonably believes necessary: Rule Rule Rule 17 C.F.R. § 17 C.F.R. § 1.6(b)(2) 1.6(b)(3) 1.13(c) 205.3(d) 205.3(d)  to prevent (2)(i) (2)(iii) substantial injury to the organization  after lawyer reported constituent’s action or intention to act;  highest authority that can act on behalf of organization failed to address in timely & appropriate manner;  action or inaction is a clear violation of law
  • 57. Option to Report Out Lawyer may reveal information to extent lawyer reasonably believes necessary: Rule Rule Rule 17 C.F.R. § 17 C.F.R. § 1.6(b)(2) 1.6(b)(3) 1.13(c) 205.3(d) 205.3(d)  to prevent  to  to prevent (2)(i) (2)(iii) client from prevent, mitigat substantial injury committing a e or rectify to the crime or fraud substantial organization injury to the  that is financial  after lawyer reasonably interests or reported certain to result property of constituent’s in substantial another action or injury to the intention to act; financial  that is interests or reasonably  highest authority property of certain to result that can act on another or has resulted behalf of from the client's organization  in furtherance commission of a failed to address of which the crime or fraud in timely & client has used appropriate or is using the  in furtherance of manner; lawyer's which the client services has used the  action or lawyer's services inaction is a clear violation of law
  • 58. Option to Report Out Lawyer may reveal information to extent lawyer reasonably believes necessary: Rule Rule Rule 17 C.F.R. § 17 C.F.R. § 1.6(b)(2) 1.6(b)(3) 1.13(c) 205.3(d) 205.3(d)  to prevent  to  to prevent (2)(i) (2)(iii) client from prevent, mitigat substantial injury  to prevent issuer  to rectify the committing a e or rectify to the from committing consequences of a crime or fraud substantial organization a material material violation injury to the violation by the issuer  that is financial  after lawyer reasonably interests or reported  that is likely to  that has caused, or certain to result property of constituent’s cause may in substantial another action or substantial cause, substantial injury to the intention to act; injury to the injury to the financial  that is financial interest financial interest interests or reasonably  highest authority or property of the property of certain to result or property of that can act on issuer or investors another or has resulted the issuer or behalf of from the client's investors organization  in furtherance of  in furtherance commission of a failed to address of which the crime or fraud  may reveal to which the in timely & attorney’s services client has used SEC only appropriate were used or is using the  in furtherance of manner; lawyer's which the client  may reveal to SEC services has used the  action or only lawyer's services inaction is a clear violation of law
  • 59. Option to Report Out Lawyer may reveal information to extent lawyer reasonably believes necessary: Rule Rule Rule 17 C.F.R. § 17 C.F.R. § 1.6(b)(2) 1.6(b)(3) 1.13(c) 205.3(d) 205.3(d)  to prevent  to  to prevent (2)(i) (2)(iii) client from prevent, mitigat substantial injury  to prevent issuer  to rectify the committing a e or rectify to the from committing consequences of a crime or fraud substantial organization a material material violation injury to the violation by the issuer  that is financial  after lawyer reasonably interests or reported  that is likely to  that has caused, or certain to result property of constituent’s cause may in substantial another action or substantial cause, substantial injury to the intention to act; injury to the injury to the financial  that is financial interest financial interest interests or reasonably  highest authority or property of the property of certain to result or property of that can act on issuer or investors another or has resulted the issuer or behalf of from the client's investors organization fails  in furtherance of  in furtherance commission of a to address in of which the crime or fraud  may reveal to which the timely & attorney’s services client has used SEC only appropriate were used or is using the  in furtherance of manner; lawyer's which the client  may reveal to SEC services has used the  action or only lawyer's services inaction is a clear violation of law
  • 60. Option to Report Out Lawyer may reveal information to extent lawyer reasonably believes necessary: Rule Rule Rule 17 C.F.R. § 17 C.F.R. § 1.6(b)(2) 1.6(b)(3) 1.13(c) 205.3(d) 205.3(d)  to prevent  to  to prevent (2)(i) (2)(iii) client from prevent, mitigat substantial injury  to prevent issuer  to rectify the committing a e or rectify to the from committing consequences of a crime or fraud substantial organization a material material violation injury to the violation by the issuer  that is financial  after lawyer reasonably interests or reported  that is likely to  that has caused, or certain to result property of constituent’s cause may in substantial another action or substantial cause, substantial injury to the intention to act; injury to the injury to the financial  that is financial interest financial interest interests or reasonably  highest authority or property of the property of certain to result or property of that can act on issuer or investors another or has resulted the issuer or behalf of from the client's investors organization fails  in furtherance of  in furtherance commission of a to address in of which the crime or fraud  may reveal to which the timely & attorney’s services client has used SEC only appropriate were used or is using the  in furtherance of manner; lawyer's which the client  may reveal to SEC services has used the  action or only lawyer's services inaction is a clear violation of law
  • 61. Option to Report Out Lawyer may reveal information to extent lawyer reasonably believes necessary: Rule Rule Rule 17 C.F.R. § 17 C.F.R. § 1.6(b)(2) 1.6(b)(3) 1.13(c) 205.3(d) 205.3(d)  to prevent  to  to prevent (2)(i) (2)(iii) client from prevent, mitigat substantial injury  to prevent issuer  to rectify the committing a e or rectify to the from committing consequences of a crime or fraud substantial organization a material material violation injury to the violation by the issuer  that is financial  after lawyer reasonably interests or reported  that is likely to  that has caused, or certain to result property of constituent’s cause may in substantial another action or substantial cause, substantial injury to the intention to act; injury to the injury to the financial  that is financial interest financial interest interests or reasonably  highest authority or property of the property of certain to result or property of that can act on issuer or investors another or has resulted the issuer or behalf of from the client's investors organization fails  in furtherance of  in furtherance commission of a to address in of which the crime or fraud  may reveal to which the timely & attorney’s services client has used SEC only appropriate were used or is using the  in furtherance of manner; lawyer's which the client  may reveal to SEC services has used the  action or only lawyer's services inaction is a clear violation of law
  • 62. Option to Report Out Lawyer may reveal information to extent lawyer reasonably believes necessary: Rule Rule Rule 17 C.F.R. § 17 C.F.R. § 1.6(b)(2) 1.6(b)(3) 1.13(c) 205.3(d) 205.3(d)  to prevent  to  to prevent (2)(i) (2)(iii) client from prevent, mitigat substantial injury  to prevent issuer  to rectify the committing a e or rectify to the from committing consequences of a crime or fraud substantial organization a material material violation injury to the violation by the issuer  that is financial  after lawyer reasonably interests or reported  that is likely to  that has caused, or certain to result property of constituent’s cause may in substantial another action or substantial cause, substantial injury to the intention to act; injury to the injury to the financial  that is financial interest financial interest interests or reasonably  highest authority or property of the property of certain to result or property of that can act on issuer or investors another or has resulted the issuer or behalf of from the client's investors organization fails  in furtherance of  in furtherance commission of a to address in of which the crime or fraud  may reveal to which the timely & attorney’s services client has used SEC only appropriate were used or is using the  in furtherance of manner; lawyer's which the client  may reveal to SEC services has used the  action or only lawyer's services inaction is a clear violation of law
  • 63. Option to Report Out Lawyer may reveal information to extent lawyer reasonably believes necessary: Rule Rule Rule 17 C.F.R. § 17 C.F.R. § 1.6(b)(2) 1.6(b)(3) 1.13(c) 205.3(d) 205.3(d)  to prevent  to  to prevent (2)(i) (2)(iii) client from prevent, mitigat substantial injury  to prevent issuer  to rectify the committing a e or rectify to the from committing consequences of a crime or fraud substantial organization a material material violation injury to the violation by the issuer  that is financial  after lawyer reasonably interests or reported  that is likely to  that has caused, or certain to result property of constituent’s cause may in substantial another action or substantial cause, substantial injury to the intention to act; injury to the injury to the financial  that is financial interest financial interest interests or reasonably  highest authority or property of the property of certain to result or property of that can act on issuer or investors another or has resulted the issuer or behalf of from the client's investors organization fails  in furtherance of  in furtherance commission of a to address in of which the crime or fraud  may reveal to which the timely & attorney’s services client has used SEC only appropriate were used or is using the  in furtherance of manner; lawyer's which the client  may reveal to SEC services has used the  action or only lawyer's services inaction is a clear violation of law
  • 64. Option to Report Out Lawyer may reveal information to extent lawyer reasonably believes necessary: Rule Rule Rule 17 C.F.R. § 17 C.F.R. § 1.6(b)(2) 1.6(b)(3) 1.13(c) 205.3(d) 205.3(d)  to prevent  to  to prevent (2)(i) (2)(iii) client from prevent, mitigat substantial injury  to prevent issuer  to rectify the committing a e or rectify to the from committing consequences of a crime or fraud substantial organization a material material violation injury to the violation by the issuer  that is financial  after lawyer reasonably interests or reported  that is likely to  that has caused, or certain to result property of constituent’s cause may in substantial another action or substantial cause, substantial injury to the intention to act; injury to the injury to the financial  that is financial interest financial interest interests or reasonably  highest authority or property of the property of certain to result or property of that can act on issuer or investors another or has resulted the issuer or behalf of from the client's investors organization fails  in furtherance of  in furtherance commission of a to address in of which the crime or fraud  may reveal to which the timely & attorney’s services client has used SEC only appropriate were used or is using the  in furtherance of manner; lawyer's which the client  may reveal to SEC services has used the  action or only lawyer's services inaction is a clear violation of law
  • 65. Option to Report Out Rule 1.13(c)
  • 66. Rule 1.13 (b)-(e) Rule 1.13 (a), (f) & (g) Reporting Up the Entity As Client Chain Initial Reporting Duty Duty to Continue Reporting Representing Up the Chain Representing ONLY the the Entity Entity AND a Option to Report Out Constituent
  • 67. Rule 1.13 in Context
  • 68. Rule 1.13 in Context Thank you! Wendy Gerwick Couture Associate Professor University of Idaho College of Law wgcouture@uidaho.edu